Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le, V. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le, V. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Le, V. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 364, pp. 2089-2095, November 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

An improved procedure for production of white spruce (Picea glauca) transgenic plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Van Quy Le, Julie Belles-Isles, Mathieu Dusabenyagasani and Francine M. Tremblay1

Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon Charles-Eugène Marchand, Université LAVAL, Québec, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4

Received 7 June 2001; Accepted 2 July 2001


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
An efficient and reproducible procedure for the transformation of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) embryogenic tissues was developed using A. tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer. Rapidly dividing white spruce embryogenic tissues were co-cultivated with disarmed A. tumefaciens strains containing additional copies of the virulence regions from plasmid PToK47. The plasmid pBi121, containing the neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene providing kanamycin resistance as a selectable marker and the ß-glucuronidase (uidA) reporter gene, was used as binary vector. The highest frequency of transformation (15 transformed tissues g-1 FW of treated embryogenic tissue) was obtained with 5-d-old tissues grown in liquid medium and co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for 2 d in the same medium but containing 50 µM acetosyringone. Recovery of kanamycin-resistant tissues was improved when tissues were first grown for 10 d on a timentin-containing medium (400 mg l-1), to prevent bacterial overgrowth, before application of the selection pressure. After 6 weeks on kanamycin-selection medium, resistant tissues were obtained and showed stable uidA expression. The presence of the transgenes was demonstrated by PCR analysis and their integration into the genome was confirmed by Southern hybridization. Transgenic plants were regenerated from transformed tissues within 4 months after co-culture.

Key words: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, embryogenic tissue, transformation procedure, transgenic plants, uidA expression, white spruce.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The development of tissue culture and transformation systems for tree species including conifers has advanced significantly in the past decade. Stable transformation was reported in Picea abies by the bombardment of somatic embryos (Robertson et al., 1992Go). Using the same technique, transgenic plants of Picea glauca have been regenerated (Ellis et al., 1993Go; Bommineni et al., 1993Go) and similar results have been reported for Picea mariana and Larix laricina (Charest et al., 1996Go; Klimaszewska et al., 1997Go). However, this direct procedure of transformation generally resulted in multiple copies of genes being integrated into the host genome, in fragmentation and gene rearrangements, in high frequency of sterile plants (Finnegan and McElroy, 1994Go; Flavell, 1994Go) and sometimes in a non-Mendelian inheritance of transgene(s) (Scheid et al., 1991Go; Peng et al., 1995Go). Furthermore, the transformation frequency was very low for coniferous species.

Genetic transformation using Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the most efficient procedure for introducing DNA into the genome of many monocotyledonous plants (reviewed by Smith and Hood, 1995Go). This system has been effective because only one or a few copies of the transfer DNA (T-DNA) are integrated into the host genome. The transgenic plants are generally fertile and the foreign genes are often transmitted to progeny in a Mendelian manner (Rhodora and Thomas, 1996Go). Recently, several publications have shown that transformation of previously recalcitrant species of monocotyledons (rice, corn and maize) can be accomplished through the use of disarmed A. tumefaciens strains to which additional copies of certain virulence genes were added (Liu et al., 1992Go; Gelvin and Liu, 1994Go; Hiei et al., 1994Go; Hansen et al., 1994Go; Li et al., 1996Go; Ishida et al., 1996Go; Rhodora and Thomas, 1996Go). Using this strategy, stable transformants were reported in a few species of conifers (Levée et al., 1997Go, 1999Go; Wenck et al., 1999Go). However, genetic transformation of conifers is still far from routine and remains a slow and tedious process. The difficulty in transforming conifers is probably due to factors such as the type and physiological status of explants, the vector system, the Agrobacterium strains and the selection scheme for transformants. Using embryogenic tissue initiated from mature zygotic embryos and a supervirulent strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a rapid and efficient protocol of transformation, regeneration and screening for embryogenic lines of white spruce is described.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasmid and embryogenic tissue preparation
The binary vector pBi121 used in the co-cultivation experiments has been described in detail elsewhere (Jefferson et al., 1987Go). The neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene, providing resistance to kanamycin, and the ß-glucuronidase (uidA) gene were used, respectively, as selectable marker and reporter genes. The binary vector pBi121 was introduced into the agropine strain EHA105 (Hood et al., 1993Go), the octopine strain LBA4404 (Hoekema et al., 1983Go) and the nopaline strain GV3101 (Koncz and Schell, 1986Go), all disarmed Agrobacterium strains containing an additional 15.8 kb fragment carrying extra copies of the virB, virC and virG regions from the supervirulent plasmid PToK47 (Jin et al., 1987Go).

Embryogenic tissues were initiated from mature zygotic embryos of white spruce (Picea glauca Moench. Voss) as described previously (Tremblay, 1990Go). The embryogenic suspension cultures were grown in 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml of liquid maintenance HLM-1 medium (Tremblay, 1990Go). They were subcultured every week at a ratio 1:5 (v/v) under low light intensity (5 µmol m-2 s-1) with a 16 h photoperiod at 23±2 °C on a rotary shaker at 100 rpm.

Prior to transformation experiments, different antibiotics were compared for their ability to control Agrobacterium growth, but also for their neutral reaction with white spruce embryogenic tissues during maintenance and maturation. For the maintenance experiment, 200 mg FW of embryogenic tissues grown as suspension culture were spread over a nylon membrane placed in Petri dishes onto solid HLM-1 medium (0.8% Bacto Agar) supplemented with either cefotaxime, carbenicillin (each tested at 100, 250, and 500 mg l-1), or timentin (100, 200, and 400 mg l-1) for 2 weeks, at which time FW was determined for each treatment. For the maturation experiment, embryogenic tissues were prepared as in the previous experiment and placed for 5 weeks onto maturation media containing 250 mg l-1 of either cefotaxime, carbenicillin or timentin. Experiments were performed with five replicates, one Petri dish per replicate.

Transformation procedure
For transformation experiments, 1 g of rapidly dividing embryogenic tissues (5 d after subculture) was transferred to sterile 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml of liquid HLM-1 medium. The A. tumefaciens strain was cultured overnight at 28 °C in liquid LB medium (Sambrook et al., 1989Go) containing 50 mg l-1 kanamycin and 100 mg l-1 carbenicillin with vigorous agitation (180 rpm) to an optimal density (OD600=1). Bacterial cells were pelleted at 5000 g for 15 min and resuspended in liquid maintenance medium. Approximately 109 bacteria were added to the 50 ml embryogenic suspension culture, which was left in the laminar flow hood for 1 h before being returned to the shaker.

After 2 d of co-cultivation, the suspension culture was allowed to settle in 50 ml sterile tubes, and the supernatant discarded. The embryogenic tissues were washed three times in fresh HLM-1 medium containing 400 mg l-1 timentin (ticarcillin/clavulanic acid 3:0.1, v:v). Approximately 5 ml of this suspension, corresponding to 200 mg of cells, were dispersed onto a nylon membrane using a Buchner funnel to remove liquid medium. The membranes carrying the cells were placed in Petri dishes on solid HLM-1 medium with timentin for incubation under low light at room temperature for 10 d. After this time, portions of embryogenic tissues (30–50 mg) were transferred onto a selection medium consisting of HLM-1 supplemented with 400 mg l-1 timentin and 25 mg l-1 kanamycin. After 3 weeks, surviving tissues were transferred to fresh selection medium. At the end of this round of selection, growing tissues were screened for uidA expression as described below. Portions of tissues (80 mg) with positive uidA expression were placed onto a maturation medium (Isabel et al., 1993Go) supplemented with 25 mg l-1 kanamycin and 200 mg l-1 timentin. After 5 weeks, mature somatic embryos were separated from the tissues and transferred onto a germination medium (Khlifi and Tremblay, 1995Go) containing either 0, 10, 25 or 50 mg l-1 kanamycin. Germination was performed under light (75 µmol m-2 s-1) with a 16 h photoperiod, at 23±2 °C. After 5 weeks germination, the number of embryos showing no sign of growth (dead) or developing a root or showing a GUS positive coloration was recorded.

ß-glucuronidase histochemical assay
Histochemical GUS assays were conducted essentially as described earlier (Jefferson, 1987Go). Briefly, kanamycin-resistant tissues or putative transgenic seedlings were incubated overnight at 37 °C in a X-Gluc solution composed of 0.1% (w/v) 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-ß-glucuronic acid, 100 µM sodium phosphate (pH 7), 0.5 µM potassium ferrocyanide, 0.5 µM potassium ferricyanide, and 10 µM ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA). Plant cells and tissues were scored as GUS-positive if any deep indigo blue colour was present.

Genomic DNA extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification, and Southern blot analysis
Genonmic DNA was extracted from transformed and untransformed (control) tissues by using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) when used for PCR amplification (small-scale preparation) and a DNeasy plant Maxi-Kit (Qiagen) when used for Southern blot analysis (large-scale preparation) according to manufacturer's instructions.

PCR amplification of the uidA and nptII genes was performed with the following specific primers: 5'-GTTACGTCCTGTAGAAACCCCAACCCGTG-3' and 5'-AAAGTCCCGCTAGTGCCTTGTCCAGTTGC-3' for the uidA gene, 5'-ACTGAAGCGGGAAGGGACTGGCTGCTATT-3' and 5'-GATACCGTAAAGCACGAGGAAGCGGTCAG-3' for the nptII gene. Standard PCR was carried out in 15 µl containing 100–200 ng DNA, 15 pmol of each primer, 200 µM dNTP, 1xPCR buffer, and 1 unit taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer, Mannheim). PCR was performed in a programmable thermocycler (Perkin Elmer Cetus) with the following conditions: 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 34 cycles (denaturation for 1 min at 94 °C, annealing for 1 min at 55 °C and extension for 2 min at 72 °C) and ended with 10 min at 72 °C. Samples were then stored at 4 °C. Amplified DNA was detected by ultraviolet light after electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose/ethidium bromide gels using 0.5xTRIS-borate (TBE) as running buffer.

For Southern blot analysis, isolated DNA (100 µg) was cleaved overnight at 37 °C with 300 units of HindIII and EcoRI before separation by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel (Sambrook et al., 1989Go). Digested DNA was denatured, neutralized and then transferred overnight onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer, Mannheim) in 4xSSC (Sambrook et al., 1989Go). DNA was bound to the membrane using a UV Stralinker (Fotodyne Inc.) and then probed with the 3 kb fragment containing the uidA coding sequence, which was obtained by digestion of pBi121 with HindIII and EcoRI. The probe was labelled with 32P-dCTP using T7 Quick Prime kit (Pharmacia). Hybridization was performed overnight at 65 °C followed by washes in 2xSSC and 1xSSC+1% SDS for 30 min each. The membrane was then exposed to X-ray film at -80 °C with two intensifying screens for 3–4 d.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Choice of selective agent and antibiotic against bacterial overgrowth
The tolerance of embryogenic tissue to kanamycin in the maintenance medium is presented in Fig. 1Go. A 10-fold increase in fresh weight was recorded after 1 week for embryogenic tissue on non-selective medium (0 mg l-1). Since no tolerance was recorded for the tissues growing on 25 mg l-1 kanamycin, this concentration was chosen for the selection medium.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Kanamycin toxicity curves for white spruce embryogenic tissue. Growth rate was measured on five replicated samples of 10 pieces of embryogenic tissue after 8 d on HLM-l medium containing 0, 5, 10, 20, and 25 mg l-1 kanamycin. Data are means±SD, n=5.

 
To select for the antibiotic most effective at preventing bacterial overgrowth while having a minimal effect on white spruce, embryogenic tissues were cultured on HLM-1 medium containing different concentrations of timentin, cefotaxime and carbenicillin. Addition of 100–500 mg l-1 cefotaxmie or carbenicillin or of 100–400 mg l-1 timentin did not significantly affect tissue growth compared to the control without antibiotic. However, timentin at 400 mg l-1 provided a better protection against bacterial overgrowth than cefotaxime and carbenicillin even at higher concentration. When 250 mg l-1 of each antibiotic was added to the maturation medium, mature embryo production as well as the germination rate of the embryos did not significantly differ from the controls without antibiotic.

Improvement of transformation procedure
The sensitivity of different genotypes (G-165, G-192, G-205, G-305, G-362) of white spruce to different A. tumefaciens strains (LB4404, EHA105, GV3101) was investigated. Among the different strains of Agrobacterium tested, only strain EHA105 successfully produced transformed tissues. Additionally, positive results were only observed with line G-205, which was then used in subsequent experiments.

Different parameters affecting the efficiency of the transformation procedure (solid and liquid co-cultivation, duration of co-cultivation, physiological age of tissue, and timing of application of selective agent) were tested. The optimal results were obtained with 5-d-old tissues grown in liquid culture and subsequently co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for 2 d in a maintenance medium containing 50 µM acetosyringone. The highest yield of kanamycin-resistant tissues was observed when selection was applied just 10 d after co-cultivation.

Transformed cells and transformed immature embryos were observed within 10 d of culture on the maintenance medium containing 400 mg l-1 timentin (Fig. 2AGo, BGo). Kanamycin at 25 mg l-1 was sufficient as the selective agent for putatively transformed tissues which were outgrowing on the selection medium within 6 weeks, while untransformed tissues died (Fig. 2CGo). The kanamycin-resistant tissues were screened for uidA expression. They showed numerous portions of tissue expressing GUS (Fig. 2DGo). GUS-like staining was never observed in untransformed embryogenic tissue.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Transformation and regeneration of transformed white spruce plants after inoculation with disarmed A. tumefaciens strains. (A) Histochemical staining for GUS activity in a transformed cell (bar=50 µm). (B) Histochemical staining for GUS activity in an immature transformed embryo (bar=50 µm). (C) Kanamycin-resistant tissue (left) obtained after transformation with EHA 105 containing additional copies of virulence genes compared to control tissue (right) (bar=2 mm). (D) Histochemical staining showing GUS activity in kanamycin resistant tissue of white spruce (bar=2 mm). (E) Cotyledonary embryos produced after 5 weeks on a maturation medium containing 50 mg l-1 kanamycin and expressing GUS activity (bar=2 mm). (F) Histochemical staining for GUS activity in immature (left) and cotyledonary (right) transformed embryos of white spruce (bar=0.5 mm). (G) From left to right, GUS activity in root, hypocotyl and cotyledons from a transformed seedling (bar=4 mm). (H) Untransformed (left) and transformed (right) white spruce seedlings after germination on a medium containing 50 mg l-1 kanamycin (bar=1 cm). (I) Transformed plantlets of white spruce 3 months after acclimatization to greenhouse conditions (bar=2 cm).

 
Kanamycin-resistant embryogenic tissues produced high numbers of cotyledonary embryos after 5 weeks on a maturation medium without kanamycin with at least 50% of them expressing GUS (Fig. 2EGo). GUS activity was detected histochemically in both globular and cotyledonary transformed embryos of white spruce (Fig. 2FGo). Mature somatic embryos were transferred onto germination medium supplemented with kanamycin to select resistant (putatively transformed) plantlets. GUS-histochemical assays demonstrated the presence of deep indigo blue colour in all parts of the plantlets (root, hypocotyl, cotyledon and needles) (Fig. 2GGo, HGo). After greenhouse acclimatization, transformed plantlets showed normal growth and phenotype (Fig. 2IGo).

Screening of stable transformants through germination of somatic embryos on kanamycin
The effect of kanamycin addition into the germination medium on the recovery of somatic plantlets is shown in Table 1Go. Most untransformed and transformed cotyledonary embryos developed into seedlings on a germination medium without kanamycin. However, germination on a medium containing 50 mg l-1 kanamycin resulted in 57% mortality for the untransformed somatic embryos with only 6% of them being able to develop a radicle. The opposite result was obtained for the putatively transformed embryos, with 63% of them able to develop a root, all of them expressing uidA (Table 1Go). Figure 2HGo shows the difference between an untransformed seedling and a transformed seedling on the germination medium supplemented with 50 mg l-1 kanamycin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Recovery of transformed and untransformed seedlings of white spruce after 5 weeks on a germination medium containing different concentrations of kanamycin

 

Screening of stable transformants through molecular analysis
PCR analysis was used to detect the presence of T-DNA in the kanamycin-resistant and GUS-positive tissues. Genomic DNA from independently transformed and untransformed (control) tissues was subjected to PCR. Figure 3Go shows that the samples from transformed tissues gave the predicted DNA fragment bands of 0.5 kb for nptII gene (lanes 3 and 4) and 0.8 kb for uidA gene (lanes 5, 6), whereas no amplification was detected in the sample from untransformed tissue (lane 2). Southern analysis with the 32P-labelled uidA probe showed a hybridization signal in the three transformed tissues analysed (lanes 3, 4, 5) (Fig. 4Go). No hybridization signal was observed with DNA of the untransformed (control) tissue (lane 2).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. PCR analysis of transformed embryogenic tissues of white spruce. DNAs were amplified with specific primers to the uidA and nptII genes. Lane M: HindIII digested plasmid DNA marker; lane 1: 0.5 kb amplified DNA fragment of nptII gene from plasmid pBi121; lane 2: untransformed (control) tissue; lanes 3–6: tissues from independent transformation events; lane 7: 0.8 kb amplified DNA fragment of uidA gene from plasmid pBi121.

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Southern blot analysis of three putatively transformed and one untransformed tissue sample. Genomic DNA was digested with HindIII and EcoRI. The 32P-labelled 800 bp PCR fragment generated from uidA coding sequence was used as the probe. Lane 1: DNA from plasmid pBi121 digested with HindIII and EcoRI which yields a fragment of 3 kb; lane 2: Genomic DNA from untransformed tissue; lanes 3–5: Genomic DNA from independently transformed tissues.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This paper presents a high transformation frequency of white spruce embryogenic tissue using a disarmed A. tumefaciens strain. Indeed, the frequency of 15 transformants g-1 FW of embryogenic tissues co-cultivated with Agrobacterium is high in comparison with the frequency of 1 transformant 10 g-1 FW of bombarded embryogenic tissues obtained by direct gene transfer (Ellis et al., 1993Go; Bommineni et al., 1993Go; Charest et al., 1996Go). The frequency obtained in the present study is also higher than those obtained in similar experiments on hybrid larch (1–2 transformants g-1 FW) (Levée et al., 1997Go) and white pine (4 transformants g-1 FW) (Levée et al., 1999Go).

Among the parameters evaluated in this study, Agrobacterium strains, plant genotype and physiological state of embryogenic tissue were the most important factors for the success of transformation. With the three Agrobacterium strains tested, no transformed tissue was obtained if additional copies of the virB, virC and virG genes from plasmid pToK47 were not added. When additional copies of these virulence genes were added to the strains, transformed tissues were only obtained with the agropine strain (EHA 105) while no transformation was obtained with octopine (LBA4404) or nopaline (GV3101) strains. As shown for other species such as lettuce (Curtis et al., 1994Go), rice (Hiei et al., 1994Go; Rhodora and Thomas, 1996Go), and maize (Ishida et al., 1996Go), the use of a supervirulent strain of A. tumefaciens is essential to facilitate gene insertion into white spruce embryogenic tissue. The requirement for supervirulent plasmid pToK47 containing the virB, virC and virG regions suggests that virulence induction may be a limiting factor for spruce transformation. Using this system, it was possible to show transient expression of the uidA gene in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), but no stable transformants were produced (Drake et al., 1997Go). Transient expression of the uidA gene has also been observed in both loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) and transformed embryogenic tissues were obtained from Norway spruce (Wenck et al., 1999Go).

As reported for other species (Sangwan et al., 1992Go; Bergmann and Stomp, 1992Go), the physiological status of the tissue was also considered to be an important factor for successful transformation of white spruce. The results of these studies showed that rapidly dividing embryogenic suspension culture, obtained 5 d after a 7 d subculture, provides suitable material to get a high frequency of transformation. Additionally, co-cultivation in liquid medium and addition of 50 µM acetosyringone were essential for successful transformation. Acetosyringone is one of the low molecular weight phenolic compounds naturally released by wounded plant cells and acts as an inducer of the virulence genes. For white spruce, the use of acetosyringone probably increases T-DNA transfer, as reported in a wide range of plant species (Stachel et al., 1985Go; Godwin et al., 1992Go). It was also shown that timentin, when used at a high concentration (400 mg l-1), provided better protection against bacterial overgrowth than cefotaxime and carbenicillin. By using timentin instead of cefotaxime or carbenicillin, the costs associated with antibiotic utilization are reduced. Finally, a two-step procedure for screening transformants, that is a first selection of transformed tissues and a second selection during the germination of putatively transformed embryos on a kanamycin-containing medium (25 and 50 mg l-1, respectively), improved the rapidity and efficiency of the transformation procedure allowing recovery of transgenic plants growing in soil 3–4 months after co-culture. Additionally, the kanamycin concentration used for the selection of transformed embryogenic tissues of white spruce is low in comparison with those used for other woody plants (Le et al., 1996Go; Franche et al., 1997Go; Levée et al., 1997Go).

In conclusion, a simple and efficient transformation procedure has been developed for embryogenic tissue of white spruce using disarmed Agrobacterium strain EHA105 containing copies of virB, virC and virG genes from the supervirulent plasmid pToK47. The procedure described here was successfully applied to produce 1200 transgenic white spruce plants containing insecticidal genes from Bacillus thuringiensis from 15 independent transformation events. This procedure will therefore facilitate white spruce improvement via genetic engineering and as well as facilitate physiological studies through the use of genetic manipulation.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by project 0890–142S (Ministère des Ressources Naturelles du Québec). We wish to thank Dr R Sederoff (Forest Biotechnology Group, North Carolina, State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA) for providing A. tumefaciens strain EHA-105 (PToK47), and Drs L Bernier, D Iraqi, E Garin, A El Meskaoui, and C Bomal for critical reading of the manuscript.


    Notes
 
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +14186567493. E-mail: francine.tremblay{at}sbf.ulaval.ca Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bergmann BA, Stomp AM. 1992. Effect of host plant genotype and growth rate on Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gall formation in Pinus radiata. Phytopathology 82, 1457–1462.

Bommineni VR, Chibbar RN, Datla RSS, Tsang EWT. 1993. Transformation of white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryos by microprojectible bombardment. Plant Cell Reports 13, 17–23.

Charest PJ, Devantier Y, Lachance D. 1996. Stable genetic transformation of Picea mariana (black spruce) via microprojectible bombardment. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant 32, 91–99.

Curtis IS, Power JB, Blackhall NW, DeLaat AMM, Davey MR. 1994. Genotype-independent transformation of lettuce using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Experimental Botany 45, 1441–1448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Drake PMW, John A, Power JB, Davey MR. 1997. Expression of the GUS A gene in embryogenic cell lines of Sitka spruce following Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 151–155.

Ellis DD, McCabe DE, McInnis S, Ramachandras R, Russell DR, Wallace KM, Martinell BJ, Roberts DR, Raffa KF, McCoun BT. 1993. Stable transformation of Picea glauca by particle acceleration. Bio/Technology 11, 84–89.

Finnegan J, McElroy D. 1994. Transgene inactivation: plants fight back. Bio/Technology 12, 883–888.

Flavell RB. 1994. Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 3490–3496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Franche C, Diouf D, Le VQ, Bogusz D, N'Diaye A, Gherbi H, Gobé C, Duhoux E. 1997. Genetic transformation of the actinorhizal tree Allocasuarina verticillata by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The Plant Journal 11, 879–904.

Gelvin SB, Liu CN. 1994. Genetic manipulation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains to improve transformation of recalcitrant species. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA, eds. Plant molecular biology manual, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–13.

Godwin ID, Ford-Lloyd BV, Newbury HJ. 1992. In vitro approaches to extending the host-range of Agrobacterium for plant transformation. Australian Journal of Botany 40, 751–763.

Hansen G, Das A, Chilton MD. 1994. Constitutive expression of the virulence genes improves the efficiency of plant transformation by Agrobacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 7603–7607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hiei Y, Ohta S, Toshihiro K, Komari T. 1994. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. The Plant Journal 6, 271–282.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA. 1983. A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir and T-region of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid. Nature 303, 179–180.

Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A. 1993. New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Research 2, 208–218.

Isabel N, Tremblay L, Michaud M, Tremblay FM, Bousquet J. 1993. RAPDs as an aid to certify the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill) B.S.P. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 81–87.

Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T. 1996. High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature Biotechnology 14, 745–750.[Web of Science][Medline]

Jefferson RA. 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Molecular Biology Reports 5, 387–405.

Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW. 1987. GUS fusions: ß-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO Journal 6, 3901–3907.[Web of Science][Medline]

Jin S, Komari T, Gordon MP, Nester EW. 1987. Genes responsible for the supervirulence phenotype of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A 281. Journal of Bacteriology 169, 4417–4425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Khlifi S, Tremblay FM. 1995. Maturation of black spruce somatic embryos. Part I. Effect of L-glutamine on the number and germinability of somatic embryos. Plant, Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 41, 23–32.

Klimaszewska K, Devantier Y, Lachance D, Lelu MA, Charest PJ. 1997. Larix laricina (tamarack) somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 27, 538–550.

Koncz C, Schell J. 1986. The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Molecular and General Genetics 204, 383–396.

Le VQ, Bogusz D, Gerbi H, Lapartient A, Duhoux E, Franch C. 1996. Agrobacterium tumefaciens gene transfer to Casuarina glauca, a tropical nitrogen-fixing tree. Plant Science 118, 57–69.

Levée V, Lelu MA, Jouanin L, Cornu D, Pilate G. 1997. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of hybrid larch (Larix kaempferi L. decidua) and transgenic plant regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 16, 680–685.

Levée V, Garin E, Klimaszewska K, Seguin A. 1999. Stable genetic transformation of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) after cocultivation of embryogenic tissues with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Molecular Breeding 5, 429–440.

Li HQ, Sautter C, Potrykus I, Pounti-Kaerlas J. 1996. Genetic transformation of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Nature Biotechnology 14, 736–740.[Web of Science][Medline]

Liu CN, Li XQ, Gelvin SB. 1992. Multiple copies of virG enhance the transient transformation of celery, carrot and rice tissues by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Molecular Biology 20, 1071–1087.[Web of Science][Medline]

Peng J, Wen F, Lister R, Hodges TK. 1995. Inheritance of GUS A and neogenes in transgenic rice. Plant Molecular Biology 27, 91–104.[Web of Science][Medline]

Rhodora RA, Thomas KH. 1996. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Japonica and India rice varieties. Planta 199, 612–617.

Robertson D, Weissinger AK, Ackley R, Glover S, Sederoff RR. 1992. Genetic transformation of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) using somatic embryo explants by microprojectile bombardment. Plant Molecular Biology 19, 925–935.[Web of Science][Medline]

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, Vol. 2. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Sangwan RS, Bourgeois Y, Brown S, Vasseur G, Sangwan NB. 1992. Characterization of competent cells and early events of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 188, 439–456.

Scheid OM, Paszkowski J, Potrykus I. 1991. Reversible inactivation of transgene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular and General Genetics 228, 104–112.

Smith RH, Hood EE. 1995. Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation of monocotyledons. Crop Science 35, 301–309.

Stachel SE, Messens E, Montagu MV, Zambryski P. 1985. Identification of the molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 318, 624–629.

Tremblay FM. 1990. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from embryos isolated from stored seeds of Picea glauca. Canadian Journal of Botany 68, 236–242.

Wenck AR, Quinn M, Whetten RW, Pullman C, Sederoff R. 1999. High-efficiency Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Plant Molecular Biology 39, 407–416.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Tang, R. J. Newton, and D. A. Weidner
Genetic transformation and gene silencing mediated by multiple copies of a transgene in eastern white pine
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2007; 58(3): 545 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Tang and Y. Tian
Transgenic loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plants expressing a modified {delta}-endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis with enhanced resistance to Dendrolimus punctatus Walker and Crypyothelea formosicola Staud
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2003; 54(383): 835 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le, V. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le, V. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Le, V. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?