Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 373, pp. 1503-1514, June 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: response of grafted plants to soil drying

N. Michele Holbrook1, V.R. Shashidhar2, Richard A. James3 and Rana Munns3,4

1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
2 Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore 560 065, India
3 CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

Received 8 May 2001; Accepted 22 February 2002


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
The hypothesis that ABA produced by roots in drying soil is responsible for stomatal closure was tested with grafted plants constructed from the ABA-deficient tomato mutants, sitiens and flacca and their near-isogenic wild-type parent. Three types of experiments were conducted. In the first type, reciprocal grafts were made between the wild type and sitiens or flacca. Stomatal conductance accorded with the genotype of the shoot, not the root. Stomates closed in all of the grafted plants in response to soil drying, regardless of the root genotype, i.e. regardless of the ability of the roots to produce ABA. In the second type of experiment, wild-type shoots were grafted onto a split-root system consisting of one wild-type root grafted to one mutant (flacca or sitiens) root. Water was withheld from one root system, while the other was watered well so that the shoots did not experience any decline in water potential or loss of turgor. Stomates closed to a similar extent when water was withheld from the mutant roots or the wild-type roots. In the third type of experiment, grafted plants with wild-type shoots and either wild-type or sitiens roots were established in pots that could be placed inside a pressure chamber, and the pressure increased as the soil dried so that the shoots remained fully turgid throughout. Stomates closed as the soil dried, regardless of whether the roots were wild type or sitiens. These experiments demonstrate that stomatal closure in response to soil drying can occur in the absence of leaf water deficit, and does not require ABA production by roots. A chemical signal from roots leading to a change in apoplastic ABA levels in leaves may be responsible for the stomatal closure.

Key words: Abscisic acid, drought, flacca, root signals, sitiens.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Experiments in which leaf water status was maintained in plants as the soil dried, either by balancing pressure techniques (Gollan et al., 1986Go; Schurr et al., 1992Go) or by roots split between wet and dry soil (Gowing et al., 1990Go; Khalil and Grace, 1993Go; Stoll et al., 2000Go), demonstrate that stomates can close independently of the water status of the leaves. This suggests that there is a chemical signal produced by the roots that controls stomatal conductance. There is evidence that this signal is ABA; stomatal closure is often associated with an increase of ABA in xylem sap, prior to a detectable increase in leaf ABA (reviewed in Davies and Zhang, 1991Go), and significant stomatal closure can be induced in detached leaves by feeding synthetic ABA at concentrations similar to that occurring in the transpiration stream (Tardieu et al., 1996Go; Correia and Pereira, 1994Go). This suggests that root-produced ABA might regulate stomatal behaviour under stress. However, a number of findings are inconsistent with this hypothesis. First, there is no absolute relationship between ABA and conductance even within a given species. The relationship can vary with the time of day (Tardieu et al., 1996Go), the degree of stress (Correia and Pereira, 1995Go) or with the individual plant (Schurr et al., 1992Go). Possible explanations of this variable relationship include an interaction with leaf water status (Tardieu et al., 1996Go), or, in the absence of changes in leaf water status, changes in ion transport that might give rise to changes in xylem sap pH (Gollan et al., 1992Go; Wilkinson and Davies, 1997Go; Wilkinson et al., 1998Go). Second, ABA arriving in the xylem is rapidly metabolized by leaves; ABA fed through the xylem of detached leaves had a half-life less than 1 h (Gowing et al., 1993Go), although in intact leaves the half-life was a little longer (Jia and Zhang, 1997Go). Trejo et al. showed that the mesophyll tissue rapidly metabolized ABA fed through the xylem, so it is possible that the fine control of stomatal conductance is exerted by leaf metabolic activity rather than by the ABA arriving in the xylem (Trejo et al., 1993Go). Third, the ABA appearing in the xylem may not have been produced by the roots; it may have been synthesized in the leaves, translocated in the phloem to the roots, and recirculated in the xylem (reviewed by Munns and Cramer, 1996Go). Fourth, experiments in which normal shoots have been grafted onto either normal roots or ABA-deficient roots have found little or no effect of the root genotype on stomatal behaviour (Fambrini et al., 1995Go; Jones et al., 1987Go). Thus, the role of ABA in the xylem versus that made in the leaf in controlling stomatal conductance is not clear.

In order to test the hypothesis that root-produced ABA controls stomatal conductance in drying soil, plants with ABA-deficient roots and wild-type shoots were constructed. If ABA produced by roots is required for root-to-shoot signalling, then the response to drying soil should depend upon the root genotype. The ABA-deficient tomato mutants sitiens and flacca were used. Previous work had shown that roots of sitiens plants do not synthesize increased amounts of ABA under stress (Cornish and Zeevaart, 1988Go; Dunlap and Binzel, 1996Go), and that sitiens does not export significant amounts of ABA in the xylem even in dry soil (R Munns and VR Shashidhar, unpublished data). Three types of experiments were conducted. The first type examined patterns of water use and stomatal conductance in reciprocal grafts of both sitiens and flacca. The second type of experiment examined patterns of water use when only part of the root system was dried. These ‘split-root’ experiments used plants formed from 3-way grafts such that the shoot had a wild-type phenotype, while the root system had both a wild-type and an ABA-deficient part. The split-root design allowed the effect of root genotype on patterns of water use in response to soil drying to be examined without the possibility of dehydration-induced ABA synthesis in leaves. The third type of experiment examined changes in stomatal conductance in response to soil drying of plants whose xylem pressures were held constant using root pressurization. Reciprocal grafts formed from wild-type shoots and sitiens or wild-type roots were established in pots that could fit within a Scholander-type pressure chamber. The chambers were pressurized as the soil dried to maintain the xylem sap at atmospheric pressure and hence also the shoot water status at its maximum.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Plant material and growth conditions
Seeds of the ABA-deficient mutants flacca and sitiens and their near-isogenic parental line, Rheinlands Ruhm, were obtained from the Tomato Genetic Resources Centre, University of California, Davis. Seeds were germinated on wet filter paper and grown without the addition of ABA. Experiments involving the mutant sitiens used a sandy loam (bulk density of 1.28 g cm-3; maximum water capacity of about 0.25 g cm-3) as the rooting medium. Experiments involving the mutant flacca were conducted using an organic-based potting medium (bulk density of 0.54 g cm-3; maximum water capacity of about 0.4 g cm-3). The plants were grown and experimental measurements carried out in growth chambers providing 30/20 °C day/night temperature, 60% daytime relative humidity, light intensity of 650 µmol m-2 s-1 and a 12 h photoperiod.

Reciprocal graft experiments
The effect of the root genotype (ABA-deficient versus wild type) on patterns of water use and stomatal conductance in response to drying soil was investigated using reciprocal grafts. Grafts were made by cutting the scion and stock plants diagonally, removing the leaves, securing the union with parafilm, and growing under a mist until new leaf growth was observed (approximately 2–3 weeks). At this stage there was no indication of reversion of the sit/wt (scion/stock) to the shoot morphology of the wild type, which occurs with time (Cornish and Zeevaart, 1988Go). In the experiments using the mutant sitiens, five individuals of all four graft combinations, wt/sit, wt/wt, sit/wt, and sit/sit were grown in 600 cm3 pots. There was no difference in leaf area between wt/wt, wt/sit, and sit/wt plants (average of 378 cm2), however, sit/sit plants had somewhat less total leaf area (average of 302 cm2). In the experiments using the mutant flacca, six individuals each of wt/flc and wt/wt were grown in 5.0 l pots. There was no difference in mean leaf area/plant between the two graft constructs (average of 2926 cm2). Both soil volume and leaf area per plant were smaller in the sitiens experiments than in the flacca experiments, however, the relationship between leaf area (cm2) and soil volume (cm3) was similar (0.55 cm-1 flacca versus 0.60 cm-1 sitiens). The plants were watered regularly throughout their development. At the onset of the experiment, the pots were covered with plastic to prevent evaporation from the soil and watering ceased.

In the sitiens experiment, plants were allowed to dry the soil at their own rate (i.e. no water was added to the pots during the period of soil drying). The time to visible wilting varied between graft types, but was approximately 3 d for plants with a wild-type scion and 2 d for plants with a sitiens scion. Plants were weighed at hourly intervals between 11.00 h and 17.00 h, and the transpiration rate calculated. Stomatal conductance was measured at 1 h intervals during the same period using a porometer (AP4, Delta-T Devices, Burwell UK). The experiment was terminated when the plants wilted, at which point the plants were harvested and total leaf area and soil dry weight determined. Soil water content was calculated assuming a constant plant weight over the course of the experiment (3 d). Leaves were sampled for ABA content from three individuals of each graft type at the beginning and the end of the experiment (method described below). Leaflets for ABA measurement were taken from the same leaf in which stomatal conductance was measured.

In the flacca experiment, each plant was weighed at the beginning and end of the light period, allowing an average water loss rate for the light and dark periods to be calculated. Differences in the rate of soil drying between plants were minimized by adding water to the pots such that the maximum rate of water loss did not exceed 0.05 kg d-1. At this rate, approximately 7 d were needed before the plants began to wilt. Measurements of water loss, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential were made until the plants began to wilt, at which point the plants were harvested. Stomatal conductance was measured on five leaves per plant between midday and 14.00 h. using a porometer (Li-1600, Li-Cor, Lincoln USA). Measured leaves were selected from at least three different branches per plant and only the youngest fully expanded leaves were used. Leaf water potential was determined using thermocouple psychrometers (JRD Merrill Specialty Equipment Co., Model 84–13C). Leaf discs (0.4 cm diameter) were rapidly sealed into the psychrometer chambers in a temperature-controlled box (30 °C), and measurements made with a Wescor HR33T dew point microvoltmeter.

Split-root experiments
A split-root experiment was used to examine the role of root-produced ABA on patterns of water use in response to partial drying of the root system. Split-root plants were constructed from a three-way graft joining together material from three separate plants. A V-shaped cut was made at the base of a wild-type shoot and simultaneously grafted to the root system of two other plants, growing in separate pots, from which the shoots had been excised (Fig. 1Go). The success rate for these grafts was quite low and large numbers of plants could not be generated. Six sitiens split-root plants were generated, with wild-type shoots and both wild-type and sitiens root systems, growing in different pots. Two flacca split-root plants were similar to this, i.e. had wild-type shoots and both wild-type and flacca root systems, and in another two the root systems were the same (either wild type or flacca). In all cases the pots were tall cylinders (5x40 cm).



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.  Grafted plants with split root systems. A wild-type shoot was grafted to the root system of a wild-type plant and a sitiens plant. The rods are part of the TDR apparatus for measuring soil water content.

 
Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) was used to determine the soil water content of each pot (Fig. 1Go). Wave-guides, consisting of three stainless steel rods, were inserted at a spacing of 2.5 cm. Measurements using a Tektronix 1502c time-domain reflectometer were taken three times each day, and the relationship between TDR reading and volumetric soil water content determined empirically by growing tomato plants in pots identical to one used for the split-root plants.

The basic experiment consisted of monitoring rates of whole plant water use and leaf water status as one pot dried while the other was watered. In the sitiens experiment, the three treatments (wild-type side dried, sitiens side dried, or neither side dried) were applied sequentially to each plant. The order in which each plant experienced these treatments was varied. Each plant (i.e. pair of pots) was weighed three times per day, and TDR measurements taken for each pot. The amount of water needed to bring the plant to its initial weight was calculated, and the appropriate pot was watered with this amount. Stomatal conductance was measured between midday and 14.00 h on five leaves per plant using a porometer (Delta-T). Leaf relative water content was determined by rapidly weighing excised leaflets (three per plant), re-weighing them after allowing them to hydrate fully by floating them for 3 h on deionized water, and then drying the leaves to a constant weight at 65 °C.

In the flacca experiment, water was withheld from one side of the root system of each plant for a period of 7 d. The plants were then freely watered for several days, following which water was withheld from the other side of the root system. Stomatal conductance was measured at midday on the abaxial surface of five young, but fully expanded leaves, per plant using a porometer (Li-1600). Simultaneously, leaf discs were collected from two leaves per plant for measurements of leaf water potential using thermocouple psychrometers.

Root pressurization experiments
Root pressurization was used to determine whether the ability of roots to produce ABA influenced patterns of stomatal closure in response to soil drying when xylem water potentials were maintained at a constant level. Two types of grafts were made having wild-type shoots, but either wild-type or sitiens roots (i.e. wt/wt and wt/sit), and plants were established in pots designed to fit within a pressure chamber (9x19.5 cm). When the plants had 7–8 unfolded leaves pots were placed in a pressure chamber and the stems were sealed according to methods outlined previously (Stirzaker and Passioura, 1996Go). Plants were brought to balancing pressure by removing a leaflet from the most recent fully expanded leaf, and raising the pressure in the chamber until the xylem sap was on the point of bleeding, as judged from moisture appearing at the end of the cut petiolule. No excess bleeding was observed in other parts of the plant. The method followed that described earlier (Stirzaker and Passioura, 1996Go), except that the plants were in walk-in controlled environment chambers, and that the pressure was monitored and adjusted manually.

Experiments were carried out on three replicate control plants (wt/wt) and six replicate mutant grafts (wt/sit). Three different treatments were carried out sequentially on these plants. First, the soil was allowed to dry while the plant was maintained at balancing pressure. Stomatal conductance was measured until the balancing pressure reached 2 MPa. Pots were weighed at the beginning and end of the period, and the rate of water loss calculated. Second, after allowing plants to recover for 3 d, the soil was allowed to dry without balancing pressure, and conductance and pot weights measured. Third, after 9 d the soil was allowed to dry while plants were pressurized, and leaf tissue as well as xylem sap were collected for measurement of ABA.

Stomatal conductance was measured with a porometer (Delta-T) as the soil dried, on each of 6–8 leaves, starting from the youngest leaf whose laminae had expanded sufficiently to measure, and finishing with the oldest that was not starting to senesce. Conductance was measured every hour until the rate of change increased when it was measured every 20–30 min. The soil took about 2 d to dry to the extent that conductance was reduced by 50–70%. Conductance was measured only between the period of 10.00 h and 18.00 h, i.e. not less than 2 h into the photoperiod and 1 h before the end. However, as conductance was maximum between 11.00 h and 17.00 h, and decreased outside this time in well-watered plants, only data between these times are used. When the rate of drying was such that conductance started to fall outside these times, the experiment was repeated.

To measure changes in ABA during the drying period, a leaflet was detached from the most recently fully expanded leaf at the start of the drying period, and sap was collected from its petiolule while balancing pressure was monitored on the next oldest leaf, for periods of 1–2 h, while the soil was wet, (balancing pressures about 0.5 MPa), and at two times while it was drying (balancing pressures about 1.0 and 1.4 MPa). Another leaflet was sampled for ABA at the end of the drying period.

ABA measurements in xylem sap and leaves
Xylem sap was collected from a number of different mutant and grafted plants, growing under normal light levels in pots designed to fit within a pressure bomb, as described above. Plants were pressurized to bring the water potential of the shoots to near atmospheric, so that the most recently fully expanded leaf was on the point of bleeding. One leaflet was then cut from this leaf, and sap was collected from its petiole, while balancing pressure was monitored on the next oldest leaf. Thus the sap was flowing at normal rates, through a virtually-intact plant. This avoids the problems of collecting sap exuding from stumps of plants with shoots removed, when the low flow rate of the sap results in artificially high concentrations of solutes (Sagi et al., 1999Go). Leaf material was collected as described earlier. Sap and leaflets were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C. ABA was assayed by an indirect ELISA method (Walker-Simmons, 1987Go) using a monoclonal antibody (Idetek). All assays were made in triplicate and possible interference with cross-reactive substances was checked by analysing a range of dilutions. In some plants (wild type, sitiens, and sit/wt), some of the sap was digested by alkaline hydrolysis (pH 11 for 1 h at 60 °C) (following the method of Bano et al., 1993Go).

Leaf tissue was analysed for ABA by the ELISA method after extraction with hot water (Loveys and van Dijk, 1988Go) and passage through a C18 SepPak column. As a further check on the specificity of the assay, and possible interference with cross-reactive substances, replicate leaf samples were taken for analysis by GCMS. Leaves were extracted in 80% methanol with deuterated internal standard added, purified by filtration and ether partitioning, then analysed by GCMS (Green et al., 1997Go). This validated the results of the ELISA assay.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
ABA in xylem sap
The ABA concentration of the xylem sap from well-watered sitiens plants was very low, and sometimes it was undetectable (less than 0.1 nM; Table 1Go). Sap was hydrolysed with alkali to see if there were conjugated (esterified) forms of ABA present, but no significant amount of ABA was released (data not shown). The level of ABA increased with soil drying about 10-fold in both wild type and sitiens, but the level in the mutant was still low compared to the unstressed wild type (Table 1Go). These data show that roots of sitiens do not export a significant amount of ABA to the shoot.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.  ABA concentrations in xylem sap collected from intact transpiring plants of wild type and sitiens before and after the soil was allowed to dry for 3 d

Leaf water potentials for the wild-type plants were about -0.2 MPa in wet and -0.8 MPa in dry soil and for sitiens were -0.4 MPa in wet and -1.4 MPa in dry soil. Values are means±SE (n=4).

 
Xylem sap was collected from reciprocal grafts of wild-type and mutant plants, both sitiens and flacca, grown under well-watered conditions. Self-grafted plants (both mutant and wild type) were examined in case the graft union interfered with the transport of ABA up or down the stem, or produced ABA of its own. Self-grafted sitiens (sit/sit) and flacca (flc/flc) transported very little ABA in xylem sap, and self-grafted wild-type (wt/wt) had ABA levels similar to those found in intact wild-type plants (compare Fig. 2Go with Table 1Go). Reciprocal grafts between wild type and mutant (either sitiens or flacca) had xylem sap ABA concentrations that were several times higher than the self-grafted mutants although much less than self-grafted wild type (Fig. 2Go). The low amount of ABA in the sap of plants with mutant shoots and wild-type roots (sit/wt and flc/wt) had presumably arisen in the roots. However, the low amount of ABA in the sap of plants with wild-type shoots and mutant roots (wt/sit and wt/flc) had presumably originated in the shoots, as the roots of the sit/sit and flc/flc plants exported little ABA (Fig. 2Go). This ABA could have been produced by the stem or leaves below the site of collection, and transferred to the xylem either via the roots, or by direct phloem–xylem transfer in the stem above the graft.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.  ABA in xylem sap of grafted plants in well-watered conditions. Data are the average of triplicate assays for separate plants. Bars show standard errors (number of plants was 8, 8, 5, and 3 for the wt/wt, sit/sit, flc/flc, and sit/wt graft types, respectively). Histograms without bars indicate that only one plant was measured.

 

Reciprocal graft experiments
The stomatal behaviour of reciprocal grafts of sitiens demonstrated that the plants responded to soil drying according to their shoot genotype. In wet soil, there was no statistically significant difference between the plants with wild-type shoots (wt/wt and wt/sit) in transpiration rate (Fig. 3AGo) or stomatal conductance (Fig. 3BGo). Neither was there any difference between the plants with mutant shoots (sit/sit and sit/wt). However, there was the expected difference between shoot genotype. In wet soil, plants with sitiens shoots had almost twice the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of plants with wild-type shoots, regardless of their root genotype (Fig. 3Go). Stomatal closure began at about the same soil moisture level (about 0.07 g cm-3) in all grafted plants (Fig. 3AGo, BGo). At this stage, the plants with sitiens shoots were already severely wilted, almost desiccated (as first noted by Neill and Horgan, 1985Go). Prior to this stage, the conductance actually increased; when the soil water content fell below 0.15 g cm-3, the conductance increase to about 1200 mmol m-2 s-1, and remained elevated as the soil water fell to about 0.06 g cm-3 (Fig. 3BGo). This occurrence was most pronounced in the sit/sit plants.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.  Response of sitiens reciprocal grafts to soil drying. Each point is the mean (±SE) of five plants. (A) Transpiration (mmol m-2 s-1) in relation to soil moisture. Plants began to wilt when the soil moisture content fell below 0.07 g cm-3. (B) Midday stomatal conductance (mmol m-2 s-1) in relation to soil moisture. (C) Foliar ABA concentrations from leaf tissue collected at the beginning and end of the drying period.

 
The ABA concentration in the leaves of all the grafted plants increased to different extents as the soil dried, with the increase being greatest in the self-grafted wild-type plants (Fig. 3CGo). Thus, there was little correlation between bulk ABA in the leaves and stomatal closure. Figure 3CGo also shows that although the ABA concentration in the leaves reflects most strongly the shoot genotype, there was some influence of the roots, as the level of ABA in the wt/wt plants in well-watered soil at the beginning of the experiment was greater than in the wt/sit plants, and the initial level of sit/wt plants was greater than in sit/sit plants. As the soil dried, this pattern became more pronounced. No water relations measurements were made in this experiment.

The stomatal response of reciprocal grafts with flacca produced similar results to those with sitiens. There were no differences in transpiration rates between wt/wt and wt/flc plants, both when the soil was well watered and as the soil dried (Fig. 4AGo). Stomatal conductance was also independent of root genotype (data not shown), and declined in parallel with transpiration rates. There were no differences in leaf water potential between the two types of grafts (Fig. 4BGo), and little decrease as the soil dried (Fig. 4BGo). The 4-fold decrease in transpiration as the soil water content fell from 0.20 to 0.12 g cm-3 was accompanied by a relatively small fall in leaf water potential, about 0.2 MPa (Fig. 4BGo), indicating that the stomatal closure was sufficient to prevent a significant fall in leaf water status. This makes it unlikely that stomates closed because of a leaf water deficit and raises the possibility of regulatory signals coming from the roots.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.  Response of flacca reciprocal grafts to soil drying. Each point is the mean (±SE) of six plants. (A) Transpiration (mmol m-2 s-1) in relation to soil moisture. Plants began to wilt when the soil water content fell below 0.17 g cm-3. (B) Midday leaf water potential (MPa) in relation to soil moisture.

 

Split-root experiments
In the split-root experiment using the sitiens mutant, water use per plant increased over the 6 d during which each treatment was applied, as a result of the increase in leaf area that occurred during the same interval. Total plant water use increased to a lesser degree when water was withheld from one portion of the root system, compared with when the entire root system remained well watered, but there was no difference if the sitiens roots or the wild-type roots were not watered (Fig. 5AGo). Stomatal conductance declined to about 80% of their initial values, again regardless of whether water was withheld from the sitiens or the wild-type roots (Fig. 5BGo). There was no significant difference in leaf water content when water was withheld from the wild-type or the sitiens root system. Average leaf relative water content (±SE) for the three treatments (wild type dried, sitiens dried, and both sides watered) were 91.6±0.6, 91.4±0.4, and 92.7±0.1, respectively. After 4 d of drying, there was little water uptake from the dry side (Fig. 5CGo), so water was taken up almost exclusively from the wet side.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.  Water use by sitiens split-root plants in response to water being withheld from one side of the root system. (A) Mean change in transpiration rate (% of initial rate) in relation to whether water was withheld from the wild-type roots (wt dried), the sitiens roots (sit dried), or neither (watered). Data are the mean±SE of six plants, averaged over the course of the four experimental runs. (B) Stomatal conductance in relation to whether water was withheld from the wild-type roots (closed symbols) or sitiens (open symbols) roots. Data are the mean±SE of three plants measured during the first experiment. (C) Soil moisture content of the dried pots. Data are the mean±SE for plants over the course of the four experimental runs (n=8).

 
The sitiens roots were not able to extract water at the same rate as the wild-type roots (Fig. 5CGo), nor to the same final extent. For example, the amount of water used by the wild-type root system during the first day after cessation of watering was always about 40% greater than that used by the sitiens root system. After 4–5 d, the soil water content of the wild-type side reached 0.053 g cm-3, while the sitiens side reached a minimum of only 0.063 g cm-3 (Fig. 5CGo). Yet the sitiens root systems were much bigger than the wild-type root systems; the ratio of wild type to sitiens being 0.4:0.6 (Table 2Go). This meant that the rate of water uptake per mass of root was much greater for the wild-type than the sitiens roots. For example, during the first day after cessation of watering, the amount of water taken up by wild-type root systems was about double that from the sitiens root systems.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.  Biomass and leaf area of split-root grafted plants, with wild-type shoots grafted onto two root systems of wild type and sitiens

Plants were harvested at end of the series of experimental treatments shown in Fig. 5Go, in which either one or both systems were watered. Values are means±SE (n=6).

 
The split-root experiment performed with flacca gave qualitatively similar results. Partial drying of the root system resulted in a decrease in stomatal conductance that was independent of the genotype of the roots in the drying soil (Fig. 6Go). There was no difference in the response of stomatal conductance when water was withheld from the sitiens roots or the wild-type roots (Fig. 6AGo). There were no differences in midday leaf water potential between plants (average 0.70±0.04 MPa) and no decreases when water was withheld from one side of the split-root system (data not shown). As with the sitiens split-root plants, wild-type roots were better able to extract water from the soil compared with the flacca roots. In the plants with different roots, the minimum soil water content in the side with the wild-type roots was 0.13 g cm-3, compared with 0.17 g cm-3 in the side with flacca roots (Fig. 6AGo). However, without competition with wild-type roots, flacca roots were able to extract more water; in the plants with all roots of the same genotype, the minimum soil water content resulting from uptake by flacca roots was 0.13 g cm-3, almost as low as that from wild-type roots (Fig. 6BGo).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.  Stomatal conductance of flacca split-root plants in response to water being withheld from one side of the root system. (A) Split-root plants with different root systems; water was withheld from wild-type roots (closed symbols) or flacca roots (open symbols). (B) Split-root plants with the same root system, either wild type (closed symbols) or flacca (open symbols). Each point represents the mean±SE of all leaves measured on a single plant.

 

Root pressurization experiments
Root pressurization, which was used to maintain a high shoot water status during soil drying, did not alter stomatal apertures when the soil was moist. When well-watered plants were first brought to balancing pressure (i.e. the pressure was increased such that xylem sap was visible at the end of a recently cut petiolule) there was no measurable change in stomatal aperture. Stomatal closure in response to soil drying occurred in all plants, irrespective of root genotype or application of pressure to the roots. In wt/wt plants, stomata began to close when the soil water content dropped below 0.095 g cm-3, and the balancing pressure was 0.8–1.0 MPa (Fig. 7AGo). Stomatal closure of 50% occurred at 1.8 MPa, at which point the experiment was terminated as the pressure was approaching the pressure limit of the chamber (2 MPa). The plant was re-watered, and some days later was allowed to dry again, this time without the application of balancing pressure. The relationship between conductance and soil moisture was similar to when it was pressurized, i.e. closure started when the soil moisture fell to the same level (Fig. 7AGo). Two other replicate plants had the same response (data not shown).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.  Soil drying of grafted plants having wild-type roots (wt/wt). (A) Stomatal conductance (closed circles) with balancing pressure (open circles) to maintain leaf water status as the soil dried. (B) Stomatal conductance of the same plant without balancing pressure. Each point represents the mean±SE of all leaves measured on a single plant.

 
Similar patterns of stomatal closure in response to soil drying were observed with wt/sit plants. Stomatal closure started at balancing pressures of 0.8–1.0 MPa and a soil moisture content of about 0.08 g cm-3, with closure of about 50% occurring at 1.8 MPa (Fig. 8AGo). When the plant was allowed to dry without balancing pressure, stomatal closure began when soil moisture content fell to the same extent (Fig. 8BGo). The same result was found with three other replicate (wt/sit) plants (data not shown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.  Soil drying of grafted plants having sitiens roots (wt/sit). (A) Stomatal conductance (closed circles) with balancing pressure (open circles) to maintain leaf water status as the soil dried. (B) Stomatal conductance of the same plant without balancing pressure. Each point represents the mean±SE of all leaves measured on a single plant.

 
ABA content of xylem sap could only be determined for plants maintained at balancing pressure as positive xylem pressures are needed to produce exudation from transpiring plants. At the start of the drying period, xylem sap ABA concentration in wt/sit plants was a little lower than that of wt/wt plants (Fig. 9Go). With soil drying, there was a large increase in the ABA concentration of xylem sap of the wt/wt plants, but very little increase in the wt/sit plants (Fig. 9Go). ABA content of leaf tissues was also lower in the wt/sit than the wt/wt plants at the start of the drying period, being 3.20±0.24 nmol g-1 FW for the wt/wt plants and 2.32±0.08 nmol g-1 FW for the wt/sit plants. However, the ABA concentration in the leaves increased as the soil dried in both types of plants to a similar extent, the increase being 0.52±0.30 and 0.60±0.06 nmol g-1 FW respectively (n=3).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.  Xylem ABA concentrations during soil drying of grafted plants having wild-type roots (wt/wt) or sitiens roots (wt/sit). Plants were maintained under balancing pressure as the soil dried to maintain leaf water status and thus to allow sap to be collected. Curves are quadratic regressions. Data are for three wt/wt and six wt/sit plants.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Stomatal closure in drying soil does not require root-sourced ABA
The experiments with reciprocal grafts between ABA-deficient and wild-type shoots and roots showed that the stomatal behaviour depended on the genotype of shoot, not the root. Stomatal conductance was higher when the shoot genotype was either sitiens or flacca, regardless of the root genotype, and decreased as the soil dried regardless of the root genotype. These results are similar to those of Fambrini et al. with reciprocal grafts from a wild-type sunflower and a wilty ABA-deficient mutant (Fambrini et al., 1995Go); they reported that the stomatal conductance during water stress was determined by the shoot rather than the root genotype. They are not inconsistent with those of Jones et al. with reciprocal grafts of wild-type tomato and sitiens or flacca, measured in well-watered conditions (Jones et al., 1987Go), who concluded that there was only a small and generally insignificant effect of the root genotype after grafting either wild-type or mutant shoots onto alternate rootstocks. They are different from those of Borel et al. with tobacco (Borel et al., 2001Go), who reported similar stomatal responses of ABA-deficient and wild-type shoots on a common wild-type rootstock, but in that case there may have been ABA circulating from the wild-type shoot to the mutant shoot, causing a reversion of the phenotype. Phenotype reversion of ABA-deficient shoots on wild-type roots was reported with grafts of tomato (Cornish and Zeevaart, 1988Go) and of sunflower (Fambrini et al., 1995Go).

Leaf ABA was not closely linked to stomatal behaviour. Although leaf ABA was lower when the shoot genotype was sitiens rather than wild type, and thus correlated with stomatal conductance in unstressed plants, it increased much more with soil drying in the wt/wt than the wt/sit plants, yet stomates of these plants closed to the same extent (Fig. 3Go). As the roots of the mutants did not export significant amounts of ABA in the xylem, something other than root-produced ABA was causing stomatal closure. In the experiments with reciprocal grafts, shoot water potential was not controlled, so it was possible that reduced leaf water status influenced stomatal conductance, either directly, or by inducing ABA accumulation. The succeeding two types of experiments, split-root and root pressurization, were designed to examine the effects of soil drying without changes in shoot water status. In both types of experiment, the plants had wild-type shoots and varied only in root genotype. This avoided the morphological abnormalities in leaf and stomatal architecture due to a mutant shoot phenotype (as well as the problem of reversion of shoot morphology of sit/wt grafts).

In the split-root experiments, patterns of stomatal conductance (sitiens and flacca experiments) or transpiration (sitiens experiment) were the same when the ABA-deficient or the wild-type root system was allowed to dry, that is, there was a small degree of stomatal closure, independent of the root genotype. Compared to some other split-root experiments (Jones et al., 1987Go; Gowing et al., 1990Go; Khalil and Grace, 1993Go; Stoll et al., 2000Go), this closure was small, but it was discernible, unlike the split-root experiment of Saab and Sharp with maize, which showed no closure at all, just a reduction in leaf expansion (Saab and Sharp, 1989Go). In the present study, while the soil dried around one root system, there was increasing uptake from the watered roots until, by the end of the experiment, all of the water transpired was withdrawn from the watered root system. To maintain the watered pot at its target soil water content, water was added three times per day. Perhaps the different degrees of stomatal closure in the various split-root experiments reported in the literature reflect the frequency with which the wet pot was watered.

It was surprising that the root system of sitiens was larger than the wild-type root system in the split-root grafted plants (Table 2Go), as roots of ABA-deficient maize seedlings grow more slowly than those of the wild type under water stress (Saab et al., 1990Go; Sharp et al., 1994Go). Furthermore, addition of ABA can largely restore root and shoot growth in flacca in unstressed conditions (Sharp et al., 2000Go), and presumably would also in stressed conditions. The greater growth of sitiens roots in the grafted plants described here was possibly due to signals coming from the wild-type shoots. However, the hydraulic conductance of the sitiens root system appeared to be impaired, the maximum rate of water transport per unit mass of root being about half that of wild-type roots. The inability to produce ABA was therefore still having an effect on architecture, which is consistent with suggestions that ABA enhances hydraulic conductance in roots (Zhang et al., 1995Go). Nevertheless, despite the greater root system, the actual rate of water uptake from the pot with the sitiens roots was less than from the wild type. The greater mass of the sitiens root system did not compensate for the lower hydraulic conductance.

In the experiments run under balancing pressure, stomatal conductance decreased as the soil dried regardless of the root genotype (stomatal behaviour was the same in wt/sit and wt/wt). This showed there was a signal coming from the roots that influenced stomatal conductance independently of leaf water status and, at least in the case of wt/sit, that this signal was not ABA produced by the roots. What is the signal?

Signals that could be produced by ABA-deficient roots
It is possible that roots of the ABA-deficient mutants are able to export precursors of ABA (such as the ABA-adduct identified by Netting et al., 1997Go) or other precursors that would presumably accumulate in mutants blocked, like sitiens and flacca, at the final step of ABA synthesis (as found in aba3; Schwartz et al., 1997Go). These would not have been detected by the assay system used here for ABA. Other products of the ABA biosynthetic pathway may accumulate in ABA-deficient mutants. For instance, t-xanthoxin accumulates in unstressed sitiens, and increased in water-stressed flacca to a similar extent as ABA in the wild type (Parry et al., 1988Go). Whether t-xanthoxin carries biological activity is unknown.

Other types of hormonal stress signals are also possible. Cytokinin concentrations are often lower in xylem sap from droughted plants (Bano et al., 1993Go, 1994Go; Shashidhar et al., 1996Go; Stoll et al., 2000Go), and can influence stomatal opening (Bradford, 1983Go). Spraying grapevines exposed to partial root water deficit with cytokinin restored stomatal conductance to that of fully irrigated controls (Stoll et al., 2000Go). Other compounds in xylem sap may influence stomatal conductance, for example, an unidentified inhibitor of transpiration was detected in xylem sap of wheat seedlings (Munns et al., 1993Go).

Changes in pH in xylem sap occur in droughted plants, and there is some evidence for these being part of a root signalling system. Changes in pH could be caused by changes in ion transport induced by the lower water status of the roots as the soil dries. A decrease in cell volume or turgor of root cells could activate mechanosensitive Ca2+ channels which could have profound effects on ion transport systems such as K+–H+ symport (Netting, 2000Go). This could affect the ion relations of the apoplast of the root and hence the pH of xylem sap (Gerendas and Schurr, 1999Go). Increases in the pH of the xylem sap were found in sunflower (Gollan et al., 1992Go), tomato (Wilkinson et al., 1998Go) and grapevine (Stoll et al., 2000Go), although decreases were found in Ricinus (Schurr and Schulze, 1996Go). If the xylem flowed unmodified to the guard cells, the pH would affect apoplastic ABA levels in guard cells via carrier-mediated transport, without a change in the bulk leaf ABA (Wilkinson and Davies, 1997Go; Hartung et al., 1998Go).

Regardless of the nature of the signal coming from roots, the fact remains that ABA levels rose in leaves as the soil dried in both wt/wt and wt/sit plants, i.e. in plants whose roots could not produce ABA. It is possible that an increase in xylem pH caused an increase in ABA synthesis in leaves, or reduced its catabolism (Wilkinson and Davies, 1997Go). An increase in pH could release ABA from a precursor pool within the leaf (Netting, 2000Go), or trigger release of ABA from inactive ABA-conjugates via an extracellular ß-glucosidase which can release ABA from glucose esters in barley leaves (Dietz et al., 2000Go).

ABA circulation in grafted plants
Although the roots of the wt/sit plants cannot have produced ABA (sit/sit plants did not export any ABA in the xylem), there was a significant amount of ABA in the xylem sap. The source of this ABA in the xylem of the wt/sit plants must have been the leaves. The ABA could enter the xylem either from the stem below the point of collection and above the graft junction by direct phloem–xylem transfer, or after recirculation via the roots. ABA is readily mobile in phloem sap, and has been found to increase several-fold under water stress (Hoad, 1973Go) or salinity (Wolf et al., 1990Go; Jeschke et al., 1997Go). Evidence that leaf-derived ABA is exported to roots in the phloem and recirculates in the xylem comes from experiments with labelled ABA, showing that ABA synthesized in leaves appeared later in roots and xylem sap (Hoad, 1975Go; Loveys, 1984Go). In lupin, it was calculated that only 70% of the ABA in the xylem had been synthesized by the roots, the remaining part being recirculated from the leaves, and that in salt-treated plants the proportion was even lower at 55% (Wolf et al., 1990Go). Furthermore, defoliation and girdling experiments have indicated that leaves can contribute a substantial proportion of the ABA moving in the xylem (Liang et al., 1997Go; Neales and McLeod, 1991Go). Alternatively, the ABA in the xylem from the wt/sit plants may have not arrived via the roots. The sap was collected from the most recently expanded leaf, inserted into the stem some 5 cm above the graft. The ABA may have been made within the stem above the graft, or made by the older leaves and transferred into the xylem within the stem internodal tissue.

The fate of the ABA in the xylem, whatever its origins, is unclear. Calculations of the amount of ABA in the xylem sap of the wt/wt plants that was delivered to leaves throughout the drying period showed that this exceeded the actual increase in the leaf by about 6-fold (values derived from the data for the last experiment presented above, given in the text and in Fig. 9Go, and assuming a transpiration rate of 6 g g-1 FW of leaves d-1). This indicates that there was considerable metabolism of the incoming ABA. Earlier studies showed that the mesophyll tissue rapidly metabolized ABA fed through the xylem, limiting the supply to the epidermis (Trejo et al., 1993Go). ABA fed through the xylem of detached leaves had a half-life less than 1 h (Gowing et al., 1993Go; Zhang et al., 1997Goa), although in intact leaves the half-life was a little longer, 2.2 h in well-watered maize (Zhang et al., 1997Gob) and increased under water stress to 3.6 h (Jia and Zhang, 1997Go). It is possible that the control of stomatal conductance by ABA is exerted by the metabolic activity in the leaves, not by the amount arriving in the xylem.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Overall, these experiments show that, in tomato, as in other species, root signals operate to control stomatal conductance in drying soil. However, these data show that this closure was not related to xylem ABA concentrations, nor to the ability of roots to produce ABA, and indicate that stomates could be responding to ABA that is made in situ rather than transported from the roots via the xylem. The signal from the roots that causes this increase in ABA, or otherwise influences stomatal conductance, remains unknown, but may be a precursor, or related to pH changes that have been observed in xylem sap.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Andrew Poole for verification of leaf ABA by GCMS, and Andy Netting, Ian Dodd, John Passioura, Rod King, and Brian Loveys for helpful comments on the manuscript.


    Notes
 
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +612 6246 5399. E-mail: rana.munns{at}csiro.au Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Bano A, Dörffling K, Bettin D, Hahn H. 1993. Abscisic acid and cytokinins as possible root-to-shoot signals in xylem sap of rice plants in drying soil. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 20, 109–115.

Bano A, Hansen H, Dörffling K, Hahn H. 1994. Changes in the content of free and conjugated abscisic acid, phaseic acid and cytokinins in xylem sap of drought-stressed sunflower plants. Phytochemistry 37, 345–347.

Borel C, Frey A, Marion-Poll A, Tardieu F, Simmonneau T. 2001. Does engineering abscisic acid biosynthesis in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia modify stomatal response to drought? Plant, Cell and Environment 24, 477–489.

Bradford KJ. 1983. Involvement of plant growth substances in the alteration of leaf gas exchange of flooded tomato plants. Plant Physiology 73, 480–483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cornish K, Zeevaart JAD. 1988. Phenotypic expression of wild-type tomato and three wilty mutants in relation to abscisic acid accumulation in roots and leaflets of reciprocal grafts. Plant Physiology 87, 190–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Correia MJ, Pereira JS. 1994. Abscisic acid in apoplastic sap can account for the restriction in leaf conductance of white lupins during moderate soil drying and after rewatering. Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 845–852.

Correia MJ, Pereira JS. 1995. The control of leaf conductance of white lupin by xylem ABA concentration decreases with the severity of water deficits. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 101–110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davies WJ, Zhang J. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42, 55–76.[Web of Science]

Dietz K-J, Sauter A, Wichert K, Messdaghi D, Hartung W. 2000. Extracellular ß-glucosidase activity in barley involved in the hydrolysis of ABA glucose conjugate in leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 937–944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dunlap JR, Binzel ML. 1996. NaCl reduces indole-3-acetic acid levels in the roots of tomato plants independent of stress-induced abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 112, 379–384.[Abstract]

Fambrini M, Vernieri P, Toncelli ML, Rossi VD, Pugliesi C. 1995. Characterization of a wilty sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) mutant. III. Phenotypic interaction in reciprocal grafts from wilty mutant and wild-type plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 525–530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gerendas J, Schurr U. 1999. Physicochemical aspects of ion relations and pH regulation in plants: a quantitative approach. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1101–1114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gollan T, Passioura JB, Munns R. 1986. Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 459–464.[Web of Science]

Gollan T, Schurr U, Schulze ED. 1992. Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. I. The concentration of cations, anions, amino acid in, and pH of, the xylem sap. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 551–559.

Gowing DJG, Davies WJ, Jones HG. 1990. A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malusxdomestica Borkh. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1535–1540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gowing DJG, Jones HG, Davies WJ. 1993. Xylem-delivered abscisic acid: the relative importance of its mass and its concentration in the control of stomatal aperture. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 453–459.

Green LS, Faergestad EM, Poole A, Chandler PM. 1997. Grain development mutants of barley. Plant Physiology 114, 203–212.[Abstract]

Hartung W, Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 1998. Factors that regulate abscisic acid concentrations at the primary site of action at the guard cell. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 361–367.

Hoad GV. 1973. Effect of moisture stress on abscisic acid levels in Ricinus communis L. with particular reference to phloem exudate. Planta 113, 367–372.

Hoad GV. 1975. Effect of osmotic stress on abscisic acid levels in xylem sap of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Planta 124, 25–29.

Jeschke WD, Peuke AD, Pate JS, Hartung W. 1997. Transport, synthesis and catabolism of abscisic acid (ABA) in intact plants of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) under phosphate deficiency and moderate salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1737–1747.

Jia W, Zhang J. 1997. Comparison of exportation and metabolism of xylem-delivered ABA in maize leaves at different water status and xylem sap pH. Plant Growth Regulation 21, 43–49.

Jones HG, Sharp CS, Higgs KH. 1987. Growth and water relations of wilty mutants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 1848–1856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Khalil AAM, Grace J. 1993. Does xylem sap ABA control the stomatal behaviour of water-stressed sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) seedlings? Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 1127–1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liang J, Zhang J, Wong MH. 1997. How do roots control xylem sap ABA concentrations in response to soil drying? Plant and Cell Physiology 38, 10–16.[Free Full Text]

Loveys BR. 1984. Abscisic acid transport and metabolism in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). New Phytologist 98, 575–582.

Loveys BR, van Dijk HM. 1988. Improved extraction of abscisic acid from plant tissue. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15, 421–427.

Munns R, Cramer GR. 1996. Is coordination of leaf and root growth mediated by abscisic acid? Opinion. Plant and Soil 185, 33–49.

Munns R, Passioura JB, Milborrow BV, James RA, Close TJ. 1993. Stored xylem sap from wheat and barley contains a transpiration inhibitor with a large molecular size. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 867–872.

Neales TF, McLeod AL. 1991. Do leaves contribute to the abscisic acid present in the xylem sap of ‘droughted’ sunflower plants? Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 979–986.

Neill SJ, Horgan R. 1985. Abscisic acid production and water relations in wilty tomato mutants subjected to water deficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 1222–1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Netting AG. 2000. pH, abscisic acid and the integration of metabolism in plants under stressed and non-stressed conditions: cellular responses to stress and their implication for plant water relations. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 147–158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Netting AG, Windsor ML, Milborrow BV. 1997. Endogenous biosynthetic precursors of (+)-abscisic acid. III. Incorporation of 2H2O from 18O2 into precursors. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24, 175–184.

Parry AD, Neill SJ, Horgan R. 1988. Xanthoxin levels and metabolism in the wild-type and wilty mutants of tomato. Planta 173, 397–404.

Saab IM, Sharp RE. 1989. Non-hydraulic signals from maize roots in drying soil: inhibition of leaf elongation but not stomatal conductance. Planta 179, 466–474.

Saab IN, Sharp RE, Pritchard J, Voetberg GS. 1990. Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiology 93, 1329–1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sagi M, Fluhr R, Lips SH. 1999. Aldehyde oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase in a flacca tomato mutant with deficient abscisic acid and wilty phenotype. Plant Physiology 120, 571–577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schurr U, Gollan T, Schulze ED. 1992. Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. II. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid imported from the xylem sap. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 561–567.

Schurr U, Schulze ED. 1996. Effects of drought on nutrient and ABA transport in Ricinus communis. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 665–674.

Schwartz SH, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M, Zeevaart JAD. 1997. Biochemical characterization of the aba2 and aba3 mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 114, 161–166.[Abstract]

Sharp RE, LeNoble ME, Else MA, Thorne ET, Gherardi F. 2000. Endogenous ABA maintains shoot growth in tomato independently of effects on plant water balance: evidence for an interaction with ethylene. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1575–1584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sharp RE, Wu Y, Voetberg GS, Saab I, LeNoble ME. 1994. Confirmation that abscisic acid accumulation is required for maize primary root elongation at low water potentials. Journal of Expermental Botany 45, 1743–1751.[Web of Science]

Shashidhar VR, Prasad TG, Sudharshan L. 1996. Hormone signals from roots to shoots of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Moderate soil drying increases delivery of abscisic acid and depresses delivery of cytokinins in xylem sap. Annals of Botany 78, 151–155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stirzaker RJ, Passioura JB. 1996. The water relations of the root–soil interface. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 201–208.

Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P. 2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1627–1634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tardieu F, Lafarge T, Simonneau T. 1996. Stomatal control by fed or endogenous xylem ABA in sunflower: interpretation of correlations between leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in anisohydric species. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 75–84.

Trejo CL, Davies WJ, Ruiz LMP. 1993. Sensitivity of stomata to abscisic acid. An effect of the mesophyll. Plant Physiology 102, 497–502.[Abstract]

Walker-Simmons M. 1987. ABA levels and sensitivity in developing wheat embryos of sprouting resistant and susceptible cultivars. Plant Physiology 84, 61–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilkinson S, Corlett JE, Oger L, Davies WJ. 1998. Effects of xylem sap on transpiration from wild-type and flacca tomato leaves. Plant Physiology 117, 703–709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 1997. Xylem sap pH increase: a drought signal received at the apoplastic face of the guard cell that involves the suppression of saturable abscisic acid upake by the epidermal symplast. Plant Physiology 113, 559–573.[Abstract]

Wolf O, Jeschke WD, Hartung W. 1990. Long-distance transport of abscisic acid in NaCl-treated intact plants of Lupinus albus. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 593–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang J, Jia W, Zhang DP. 1997a. Effect of leaf water status and xylem pH on metabolism of xylem-transported abscisic acid. Plant Growth Regulation 21, 51–58.

Zhang J, Jia W, Zhang DP. 1997b. Re-export and metabolism of xylem-delivered ABA in attached maize leaves under different transpirational fluxes and xylem ABA concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1557–1564.

Zhang J, Zhang X, Liang J. 1995. Exudation rate and hydraulic conductivity of maize roots are enhanced by soil drying and abscisic acid treatment. New Phytologist 131, 329–336.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
I. C. Dodd, J. C. Theobald, S. K. Richer, and W. J. Davies
Partial phenotypic reversion of ABA-deficient flacca tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) scions by a wild-type rootstock: normalizing shoot ethylene relations promotes leaf area but does not diminish whole plant transpiration rate
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2009; 60(14): 4029 - 4039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Wan, R. Griffiths, J. Ying, P. McCourt, and Y. Huang
Development of Drought-Tolerant Canola (Brassica napus L.) through Genetic Modulation of ABA-mediated Stomatal Responses
Crop Sci., August 7, 2009; 49(5): 1539 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Sirichandra, A. Wasilewska, F. Vlad, C. Valon, and J. Leung
The guard cell as a single-cell model towards understanding drought tolerance and abscisic acid action
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2009; 60(5): 1439 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Okamoto, Y. Tanaka, S. R. Abrams, Y. Kamiya, M. Seki, and E. Nambara
High Humidity Induces Abscisic Acid 8'-Hydroxylase in Stomata and Vasculature to Regulate Local and Systemic Abscisic Acid Responses in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2009; 149(2): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. R. MacGregor, K. I. Deak, P. A. Ingram, and J. E. Malamy
Root System Architecture in Arabidopsis Grown in Culture Is Regulated by Sucrose Uptake in the Aerial Tissues
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2008; 20(10): 2643 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Endo, Y. Sawada, H. Takahashi, M. Okamoto, K. Ikegami, H. Koiwai, M. Seo, T. Toyomasu, W. Mitsuhashi, K. Shinozaki, et al.
Drought Induction of Arabidopsis 9-cis-Epoxycarotenoid Dioxygenase Occurs in Vascular Parenchyma Cells
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 1984 - 1993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. Aroca, P. Vernieri, and J. M. Ruiz-Lozano
Mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Lactuca sativa plants exhibit contrasting responses to exogenous ABA during drought stress and recovery
J. Exp. Bot., May 9, 2008; (2008) ern057v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. M. Neumann
Coping Mechanisms for Crop Plants in Drought-prone Environments
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(7): 901 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Marino, P. Frendo, R. Ladrera, A. Zabalza, A. Puppo, C. Arrese-Igor, and E. M. Gonzalez
Nitrogen Fixation Control under Drought Stress. Localized or Systemic?
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1968 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Boyer and J. E. McLaughlin
Functional reversion to identify controlling genes in multigenic responses: analysis of floral abortion
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 267 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. A. Else, J. M. Taylor, and C. J. Atkinson
Anti-transpirant activity in xylem sap from flooded tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants is not due to pH-mediated redistributions of root- or shoot-sourced ABA
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3349 - 3357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Park, J. Li, J. K. Pittman, G. A. Berkowitz, H. Yang, S. Undurraga, J. Morris, K. D. Hirschi, and R. A. Gaxiola
Up-regulation of a H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) as a strategy to engineer drought-resistant crop plants
PNAS, December 27, 2005; 102(52): 18830 - 18835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Q. D. Goodger, R. E. Sharp, E. L. Marsh, and D. P. Schachtman
Relationships between xylem sap constituents and leaf conductance of well-watered and water-stressed maize across three xylem sap sampling techniques
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2005; 56(419): 2389 - 2400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Christmann, T. Hoffmann, I. Teplova, E. Grill, and A. Muller
Generation of Active Pools of Abscisic Acid Revealed by In Vivo Imaging of Water-Stressed Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 209 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Y. Sobeih, I. C. Dodd, M. A. Bacon, D. Grierson, and W. J. Davies
Long-distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial root-zone drying
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2353 - 2363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. V. Sibole, C. Cabot, C. Poschenrieder, and J. Barcelo
Efficient leaf ion partitioning, an overriding condition for abscisic acid-controlled stomatal and leaf growth responses to NaCl salinization in two legumes
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2003; 54(390): 2111 - 2119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?