Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 378, pp. 2261-2269, November 1, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Carbon isotope discrimination and bundle sheath leakiness in three C4 subtypes grown under variable nitrogen, water and atmospheric CO2 supply

Received 6 November 2001; Accepted 4 July 2002

A. Fravolini3,1, D. G. Williams1 and T. L. Thompson2

1 School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2 Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, PO Box 210038, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alefravo{at}u.arizona.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The changes in composition and productivity of semi-arid C4 grassland, anticipated with rising atmospheric CO2, will depend on soil water and nutrient availability. The interactive effects of soil resource limitation and elevated CO2 on these grasses, furthermore, may vary among C4 biochemical subtypes (NADP-ME, NAD-ME, PCK) that differ in bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) responses to drought and nitrogen supply. To address C4 subtype responses to soil resource gradients, the carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}), bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}), leaf gas exchange (A, gs, ci/ca) and above-ground biomass accumulation were measured on three dominant grasses of semi-desert grassland in south-eastern Arizona. Bouteloua curtipendula (PCK), Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME) and the non-native Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) were grown in controlled-environment chambers from seed under a complete, multi-factorial combination of present ambient (370 ppm) and elevated (690 ppm) CO2 concentration and under high and low water and nitrogen supply. E. lehmanniana (NAD-ME) had the highest photosynthetic rate (A) and lowest {Phi} compared to the other two grasses when grown under low nitrogen and water availability. However, favourable water and nitrogen supply and elevated atmospheric CO2 enhanced photosynthetic performance and above-ground biomass production of B. curtipendula (PCK) to a greater extent than in A. glabrata and E. lehmanniana. Contrary to pre vious studies, {Phi} and {Delta} in the NADP-ME subtype (A. glabrata) were most affected by changing environmental conditions compared to the other subtypes; deviations from the classic NADP-ME anatomy in Aristida could have accounted for this result. Overall, response of semi-arid grasslands to rising atmospheric CO2 may depend more on species-specific responses to drought and nitrogen limitation than on general C4 subtype responses.

Key words: Key words: Bundle sheath leakiness, carbon isotope discrimination, CO2 supply, grasses, nitrogen, semi-arid, water.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is often a close relationship between the amount of precipitation and the distribution of grasses representing different C4 biochemical subtypes (Hattersley, 1992; Schulze et al., 1996). The NAD-ME subtype occurs predominantly in environments receiving comparatively lower average rainfall, whereas the NADP-ME and the PCK subtypes are dominant in regions with higher rainfall. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations potentially could alter these distributional hierarchies if the biochemical subtypes responded differently to enhancements of this trace gas. For example, the reduced stomatal conductance observed in C4 grasses grown under elevated atmospheric CO2 (Rogers et al., 1983; Imai and Okamoto-Sato, 1991; Knapp et al., 1993; Owensby et al., 1993; Morgan et al., 1994) could potentially alter water-use efficiency to a different extent among subtypes, either exacerbating or attenuating their differences and their distribution across aridity gradients. Different responses in transpiration could be decisive in terms of competition among or between grasses and other lifeforms, especially in semi-arid ecosystems where water is the most limiting factor to plant growth. The enhancing effect of rising atmospheric CO2 concentration on plant growth will endure as long as nutrients, such as nitrogen, are available to maintain sufficient enzyme production to sustain biomass production.

The long-term discrimination against 13CO2 ({Delta}) that occurs in leaves during CO2 assimilation can be measured to assess variation in photosynthetic metabolism in C4 plants. This parameter depends on both the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (ci/ca) and bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) (Farquhar, 1983). Calculations of {Delta} and {Phi} based on stable isotope ratio analysis have been used to characterize C4 photosynthetic responses to changing environmental conditions (Ranjith et al., 1995; Saliendra et al., 1996; Schulze et al., 1996; Buchmann et al., 1996; Meinzer and Zhu, 1998; Williams et al., 2001). However, few studies have focused on how environmental factors such as water and nitrogen availability influence {Phi} and {Delta} in diverse C4 subtypes under elevated atmospheric CO2 (Williams et al., 2001). Grasses of the NADP-ME subtype are affected less by changing environmental variables because they maintain a more stable and lower {Phi} compared to the PCK and the NAD-ME subtypes (Hattersley, 1982; Buchmann et al., 1996). However, it is still poorly understood how and if these patterns would continue under higher atmospheric CO2. In C4 plants, the efficiency of the CO2 concentrating mechanism in the bundle sheath depends on biochemical and anatomical features, which vary among biochemical subtypes. These differences influence the efficiency of carbon assimilation by varying the synchronization between PEP carboxylase in the mesophyll and Rubisco in the bundle sheath, respectively. At the community level, the success of one species over another may depend on its superiority in co-ordinating these enzyme systems under fluctuating environmental conditions.

Bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}), the fraction of CO2 released by the decarboxylation of C4 compounds in the bundle sheath, which subsequently leaks out to the mesophyll, can be used to measure the extent to which the carboxylation of PEP exceeds RuBP (Henderson et al., 1992). Bundle sheath conductance to CO2 and the CO2 gradient between bundle sheath and mesophyll are two major factors that determine {Phi}. In the NADP-ME and PCK subtypes, where the presence of a suberized lamella surrounding the bundle sheath limits CO2 diffusion back to the mesophyll, {Phi} is usually lower than in the NAD-ME subtype (Hatch et al., 1995; Hattersley et al., 1982). Lacking a suberized lamella, the NAD-ME subtype could be more sensitive to increasing CO2 concentrations because of increasing CO2 bundle sheath leakiness (LeCain and Morgan, 1998). However, the relationship between bundle sheath anatomy, and {Phi} is not always so clear. Henderson et al. (1992) found that C4 grass subtypes with and without a suberized lamella can have high {Phi} values.

Under nitrogen-limiting conditions Rubisco activity can decrease to a greater extent than PEP carboxylase activity (Ranjith et al., 1995). Therefore, if nitrogen is limiting, CO2 fixation in the bundle sheath may diminish, resulting in a greater portion of the unfixed CO2 leaking back into the mesophyll. Although several studies reported differences in photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE; photosynthesis per unit leaf nitrogen) between C3 and C4 plants (Brown, 1978; Bolton and Brown, 1980; Sage and Pearcy, 1987), the relationship between nitrogen and C4 grasses within different subtypes is still unclear. Partitioning of nitrogen into Rubisco and PEP carboxylase may vary among species and subtypes (Evans and Seemann, 1984; Makino et al., 1987; Evans and Austin, 1986; Makino and Osmond, 1991). It has been assumed that the higher enzymatic complexity of the NAD-ME pathway may require more nitrogen for enzyme synthesis compared to the other two subtypes, resulting in lower nitrogen-use efficiency (Bowman, 1991). However, recent studies have not found a clear pattern between subtypes (Taub and Lerdau, 2000), suggesting that adaptation to low nitrogen availability may depend more on differences at the species level rather than in biochemical subtypes.

Can C4 grasses be lumped into a few functional groupings based on biochemical subtypes, based upon growth and photosynthetic responses to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations under conditions of soil resource limitation? Alternatively, do responses depend entirely on unique species traits? carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}), bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}), and their relationship with photosynthetic gas exchange and above-ground biomass production were measured in Bouteloua curtipendula (PEP-CK), Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME) and Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) under ample and limited soil resource supply and ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. These species share similar life histories and co-occur in the semi-arid grasslands of south-eastern Arizona. B. curtipendula and A. glabrata are native to southern Arizona, but E. lehmanniana was introduced from South Africa to this region in the 1940s.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
C4 grasses representing the three decarboxylation subtypes were used in the experiment: Aristida glabrata Vasey (NADP-malic enzyme), Bouteloua curtipendula Michx. (PEP-carboxykinase), and Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees. (NAD-malic enzyme). Caryopses of each species (source: Wildlands Restoration, Tucson, Arizona) were sown in 6.0 l pots constructed from PVC and filled with a sandy loam soil collected from the Santa Rita Experimental Range south of Tucson. Soils were packed to a uniform bulk density of 1.60 g cm–3. Seedlings were allowed to develop and grow in a growth chamber for 20 d under ample water supply. After 20 d, plants were thinned and clipped to a 4 cm height and four replicates of each species were randomly assigned to a complete factorial combination of ambient and elevated CO2 concentration, ample and limited nitrogen supply and dry and wet irrigation treatments.

Plants grown with ample water supply (‘wet’) were watered to field capacity (500 ml) every 2 d, while plants under the ‘dry’ condition received 500 ml of water every 3 d. Plants were fertilized every three waterings with 500 ml of a complete Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing 15 mmol l–1 N as NH4NO3. Plants grown under low nitrogen conditions (‘–N’) were fertilized with the same nutrient solution, but without NH4NO3. A nitrification inhibitor (Nitrapyrin, N-Serve®) was added to the ‘+N’ solution in order to block the primary ammonium oxidase enzyme action and maintain N in the NH4+ form.

Experiments were conducted in two growth chambers (CONVIRON, PGW 36, Canada). The relative humidity in the chambers was kept near 30% during the day and 60% at night. The photoperiod was 14 h with a midday photosynthetic photon flux density of 600±50 µmol m–2 s–1. The air temperature was 30–35 °C during the day and 23 °C at night. A CO2-injection system maintained a CO2 concentration of 370 ppm in one chamber, and 690 ppm in the other. Plants were randomized with respect to position in the chambers and plants and their respective CO2 levels were switched between chambers weekly to minimize chamber effect.

The CO2 assimilation rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration ci/ca, were monitored weekly following rewetting using a portable gas exchange system (CIRAS-1, PP Systems, Hertz, UK). One young fully expanded leaf blade on each plant was used for gas exchange measurements. Gas exchange was measured under the respective treatment CO2 concentrations (either 370 or 690 ppm) by adjusting the flow rate of a high CO2 source into the leaf chamber. After 45 d the leaves used for gas exchange measurements were cut, immersed in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried, and then ground to a fine powder. A 0.2 mg sample was combusted in a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Fison Isochrome, Manchester, UK) at the Columbia University Biosphere 2 center in Oracle, AZ. The stable carbon isotope composition ({delta}13C) was expressed relative to the Pee Dee belemnite standard. The carbon isotope composition of air ({delta}a) in each chamber was measured by-weekly using 2.0 l glass flasks. The CO2 from the flasks was cryogenically extracted and analysed on a mass spectrometer (Finnigan Mat Delta S, Germany) in the Department of Geosciences at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) was calculated according to Farquhar (1983):

{Delta}=({delta}a{delta}p){delta}a/(1+{delta}p)(1)

where {delta}p is the isotopic composition of the leaf dry matter and {delta}a is the isotopic composition of the air. The average {delta}a measured in each chamber (–10.4±0.6{per thousand} ambient, –7.6±0.3{per thousand} elevated CO2 treatment) over the course of the experiment was used to calculate {Delta}. Bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) was calculated according to Farquhar (1983) and Henderson et al. (1992):

{Phi}=[{Delta}a+(ab4)ci/ca]/[(b3s)(ci/ca)](2)

where a (4.4{per thousand}) is the fractionation during diffusion of CO2 in air, b4 (–5.7{per thousand}) is the isotopic fractionation that occurs during dissolution of HCO3 and fixation by PEP carboxylase, b3 (29{per thousand}) is the fractionation during the carboxylation of Rubisco, and s (1.8{per thousand}) is the fractionation during leakage of CO2 from the bundle sheath to the mesophyll. At the end of the experiment (day 66) above-ground biomass was harvested. All materials was oven-dried at 70 °C for 1 week and then weighed.

Statistical analysis
The experiment was a completely randomized factorial design with three treatments (CO2, water, N), two levels per treatment, and four replicates. Because chambers were alternated weekly and pot location was randomized within the chambers, CO2 was regarded as an independent treatment. Multivariate analysis for repeated measures (MANOVA) was conducted for A, gs and ci/ca in each species. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for {Delta} and {Phi}. Species effect was not included in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) because the large number of results would be difficult to interpret. Data are presented and discussed only at the highest level of significance (generally P <=0.05). JMP software for Macintosh (SAS Institute, 1995) was used to perform the analyses.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) was higher under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration in all three species (Fig. 1, Table 1). In A. glabrata, however, the response of {Delta} to the CO2 treatment depended on water supply (significant water by CO2 interaction) (Table 1). Under high water availability A. glabrata had higher {Delta} and {Phi} when grown under elevated compared to ambient CO2 conditions. Likewise, the enhancement of {Delta} under elevated CO2 conditions in E. lehmanniana depended on nitrogen supply; CO2 had a prominent effect on {Delta} only under low nitrogen conditions. Low nitrogen supply enhanced {Delta} in B. curtipendula and A. glabrata while low water supply led to higher {Delta} only in A. glabrata. No significant change in {Delta} was apparent in E. lehmmaniana grown under different water supplies (Table 1).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) and bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) in Bouteloua curtipendula (PCK), Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) and Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME), 37 d after the beginning of water, nitrogen and CO2 treatments. Error bars indicate standard deviation.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Statistical significance of carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) and bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) responses to water, nitrogen and CO2 treatments in Bouteloua curtipendula (PCK), Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) and Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME) at day 37 of the experiment
 
Elevated atmospheric CO2 resulted in higher values of {Phi} in B. curtipendula and A. glabrata, but not in E. lehmanniana where {Phi} remained fairly stable (Fig. 1). Under ambient CO2 conditions bundle sheath leakiness was 0.39–0.58 for all three species. Low water supply increased {Phi} in B. curtipendula and A. glabrata, but not significantly in E. lehmanniana. A. glabrata had the lowest {Phi} values under high water availability compared to the other two species (Fig. 1). In this species bundle sheath leakiness increased 20% from wet to dry treatments under ambient atmospheric CO2, but only 7% under elevated CO2 conditions. Under ambient CO2 conditions E. lehmanniana had intermediate values of {Phi} ranging from 0.43 to 0.50.

Values of {Phi} for grasses grown under elevated CO2 were between 0.43 and 0.62. Bundle sheath leakiness was higher in plants grown with low water and nitrogen availability, among them E. lehmanniana had the lowest values of {Phi}. High values of {Phi} were found in B. curtipendula grown under low nitrogen and water supply.

To determine the extent to which {Delta} was influenced by {Phi} and ci/ca, {Delta} was regressed against these two parameters individually (Fig. 2). This analysis showed that {Phi} was the major factor contributing to variations in {Delta} for B. curtipendula and A. glabrata. Conversely, in E. lehmanniana changes in ci/ca influenced {Delta} more than did {Phi}.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) and the ratio of internal to ambient CO2 partial pressure (ci/ca) and bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) in Bouteloua curtipendula (PCK), Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) and Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME), 37 d after the beginning of water, nitrogen and CO2 treatments. Data from all treatments were pooled from these regression analyses.

 
All three grasses showed a moderate increase (from 3% to 31%) in photosynthetic assimilation rate (A) under enriched CO2 conditions (Fig. 3), however, this trend was significant for A. glabrata and B. curtipendula, but not for E. lehmanniana. With high water and nitrogen supply, A in the PEP-CK subtype, B. curtipendula, was enhanced by elevated CO2 to a greater extent than in the other subtypes. This species was sensitive to both water and nitrogen treatments (Table 2). The waterxnitrogen interaction was significant for B. curtipendula in which nitrogen supply increased A under low water availability. The NAD-ME subtype, E. lehmanniana, had higher A under low nitrogen and water availability compared to the other two subtypes (Fig. 3). Favourable conditions did not appear to enhance A in this species. Likewise A responses in E. lehmanniana to elevated CO2 were not significant. A. glabrata showed the lowest photosynthetic rates under all treatments (Fig. 3). Like E. lehmanniana this species was not stimulated by higher water and nitrogen supply. However, assimilation rates in A. glabrata increased significantly under elevated atmospheric CO2 (Table 2). In all species grown under elevated CO2 conditions, gs decreased while ci/ca showed the opposite trend (Fig. 3).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Photosynthetic assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs), ratio of internal to ambient CO2 partial pressure (ci/ca) and above-ground biomass in Bouteloua curtipendula (PCK), Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) and Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME) grown under different water and nitrogen treatments and under two atmospheric CO2 levels. Each data point represents the average of A along the entire time-course of the experiment (66 d). Error bars indicate standard deviation.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Repeated measures of analysis of variance for water, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide effects on photosynthetic assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (ci/ca) in B. curtipendula (PCK), E. lehmanniana, and A. glabrata (NADP-ME) Parameters were measured weekly through the experiment ‘time’.
 
Both gs and ci/ca changed during the experiment (Table 2). Increases in ci/ca were observed in E. lehmanniana when grown under higher water availability. However, toward the end of the study those differences became less pronounced. In B. curtipendula high nitrogen supply reduced ci/ca. Differences in stomatal conductance (gs) were present among species and treatments. Under ambient CO2, E. lehmanniana had, in general, higher gs compared to the other two species except under high nitrogen and water availability (Fig. 3). Stomatal conductance in B. curtipendula increased significantly with nitrogen availability especially in the presence of water (Fig. 3). A. glabrata had lower gs under dry conditions and elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2. Differences in gs among species were attenuated by elevated CO2 conditions.

Despite the moderate responses in assimilation rates, above-ground biomass of all three subtypes was highly stimulated by elevated CO2 (Fig. 3). At high water and nitrogen availability, above-ground biomass was stimulated more by elevated CO2 in B. curtipendula (50%) than A. glabrata (40%) or E. lehmanniana (10%). As resources became more limiting, especially nitrogen, above-ground biomass became considerably lower in B. curtipendula and A. glabrata, but not in E. lehmanniana. In all three species the above-ground biomass, under low water availability, was enhanced by elevated atmospheric CO2. The differences in above-ground biomass, due to nitrogen treatments within each species, became more pronounced when those plants were grown under elevated atmospheric CO2 conditions.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Carbon isotope discrimination and bundle sheath leakiness of NADP-ME grasses are often less influenced by changes in environmental conditions compared to the other two biochemical subtypes (Buchmann et al., 1996). However, in this study E. lehmanniana (NAD-ME), rather than A. glabrata (NADP-ME), exhibited a stable {Phi} among treatments. Furthermore, despite its lower leakiness under wet conditions, A. glabrata had only moderate enhancements in A and above-ground biomass, contrary to the hypothesis that this subtype would be more responsive to water supply based on the general tendency for this subtype to be dominant in the wetter part of aridity gradients (Hattersley, 1992; Schulze et al., 1996). Deviations from the classical NADP-ME bundle sheath anatomy in the genus Aristida might explain this observation. The genus Aristida forms a morphologically and anatomically distinct group because of its lack of suberized lamellae (Clayton, 1981; Watson and Dallwitz, 1989). To confirm this anomaly Schulze et al. (1996) reported a wide range of {delta}13C values in species of Aristida, that spanned the NAD-ME and the NADP-ME values. The high sensitivity to environmental conditions observed in A. glabrata in this study suggests that, in this species, the atypical bundle sheath anatomy may have overcome and masked the classic characteristics of the NADP-ME subtype.

Carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) of all three subtypes changed substantially in response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (Fig. 1). Plants grown under elevated CO2 had higher {Delta} compared to plants grown in ambient CO2 conditions. In C4 grasses carbon isotope discrimination is influenced by {Phi} and ci/ca (equation 1). The extent to which these two parameters affect {Delta} is still a subject of debate. Previous studies reported that {Delta} is mostly influenced by changes in ci/ca due to variations in stomatal conductance (Madhavan et al., 1991; Henderson et al., 1998). Conversely, ci/ca was fairly stable in sugarcane (Saccharum spp, NADP-ME) under changing environmental conditions, suggesting that variations in {Delta} were associated primarily with changes in {Phi} (Meinzer et al., 1994; Saliendra et al., 1996). In a more recent study on Sorghum bicolor exposed to free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE), both ci/ca and {Phi} contributed to variation in {Delta} under changing water availability (Williams et al., 2001). In the current study, influences on {Delta} by either ci/ca and {Phi} varied among species (Fig. 2), suggesting that influences on {Delta} may be dependent either on the biochemical subtype or unique species responses. In B. curtipendula and in A. glabrata, the sensitivity of carbon isotope discrimination to changes in ci/ca was lower than from variations in {Phi}. In fact, {Delta} was substantially mirrored by changes in {Phi} (Fig. 2).

Bundle sheath leakiness remained fairly stable and ci/ca accounted for most of the variations observed in {Delta} in E. lehmanniana. This species might better co-ordinate the activities of Rubisco and PEPC, thus maintaining a stable Rubisco to PEPC activity ratio under changing environmental conditions. Because of the stability in {Phi}, photosynthetic performance in E. lehmanniana might be more sensitive to stomatal regulation than to biochemical patterns. Decreases in gs and the higher internal CO2 found under elevated atmospheric CO2 may have accounted for changes in {Delta} by increasing the amount of CO2 present in the bundle sheath, thus maintaining a constant gradient between the bundle sheath and the mesophyll.

In this study carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}) and bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) ranged from 4.5{per thousand} to 6.6{per thousand} and 0.38 to 0.63, respectively. Low light conditions in the chambers (600±50 µmol m–2 s–1) may have been responsible for these comparatively high values of {Delta} and {Phi}. In fact, PEP and RuBP regeneration rates tend to decrease under low irradiance limiting CO2 assimilation rates (Peisker and Henderson, 1992). As a result, the release of CO2 in the bundle sheath due to dark respiration and photorespiration prevails on the rates of decarboxylation of CO2 compounds and of RuBP carboxylation increasing {Phi} and {Delta}. Regardless, {Phi} was significantly higher under dry compared to wet conditions in all three grasses. B. curtipendula had the highest {Phi} values followed by A. glabrata and E. lehmanniana. Increases in {Phi} during drought is consistent with previous studies (Saliendra et al., 1996; Williams et al., 2001). The lower bundle sheath leakiness values under dry conditions in E. lehmanniana highlights the superior physiological tolerance to drought in this NAD-ME subtype compared to the other two subtypes (Hattersley, 1992; Schulze et al., 1996). Although high water and nutrient supply resulted in only a moderate stimulation of growth of E. lehmmaniana, high assimilation rates and environmentally stable values of leakiness suggest a greater ability of this species to co-ordinate PEP carboxylase and Rubisco activities under nitrogen and water limitation.

Since the NADP-ME subtype requires fewer enzymes for decarboxylation in the bundle sheath than NAD-ME and PCK subtypes, a higher photosynthetic response in A. glabrata under nitrogen limitation is expected. However, consistent with these results, previous studies have reported that the high nitrogen-use efficiency in the NADP-ME subtype tends to diminish under low nitrogen availability (Bowman, 1991). Some species of Eragrostis show higher N-use efficiencies and photosynthetic rates under low N availability (Taub and Lerdau, 2000). It has been hypothesized that although the NADP-ME subtype has higher nitrogen-use efficiency than the other subtypes, the NAD-ME grasses have greater proportional allocation of nitrogen to photosynthetic organs (Bowman, 1991). This attribute may ensure PEP and Rubisco regeneration and co-ordination under nitrogen stress.

The two species that were most affected by low water supply, B. curtipendula and A. glabrata also had lower biomass compared to E. lemanniana under these conditions, suggesting that plant size did not affect the intensity of drought stress. The higher above-ground biomass production and photosynthetic rates in B. curtipendula, compared to the other two grasses at elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and with ample nitrogen and water supply, suggests that when soil resources are available this species can be more responsive to increasing atmospheric CO2 compared to the other two species. However, recent studies reported opposite trends showing no significant above-ground enhancement of two South African PCK subtype grasses exposed to elevated CO2 (Wand et al., 2001). The relative responsiveness of different C4 subtypes to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations is apparently unresolved at present due to the low number of species that have been investigated.

In conclusion, increases in above-ground biomass and photosynthetic response to elevated CO2 in different C4 biochemical subtypes are strongly dependent on water and nitrogen availability. Although responses of C4 plants to increasing atmospheric CO2 are smaller than for C3 plants, their ecological consequences should not be undervalued. Most C4 grasses occupy dry and nutrient-poor environments where even a small improvement in either water or nutrient-use efficiency can result in a dramatic change in competitive ability and plant community structure along temporal and spatial scale. The greater stability of {Phi} and higher above-ground biomass accumulation in E. lemanniana (NAD-ME) under limited water and nitrogen availability could, in part, explain the recent proliferation and dominance of this non-native species in semi-arid grasslands throughout the south-western United States. Conversely, if increasing atmospheric CO2 is accompanied by increases in monsoonal precipitation and/or nitrogen deposition, B. curtipendula (PCK) may be favoured. In any event, the response to changing environmental conditions and nitrogen availability can not be explained exclusively by biochemical differences among subtypes. Indeed, in this study the differences in biomass production at elevated CO2 were not always correlated with {Delta} and {Phi}, suggesting that increases in biomass production could only be partly explained by photosynthetic processes at the leaf level. Other factors based on species-specific allocation traits and interaction between different functional types could influence and may in some cases overcome anatomical and biochemical differences related to C4 subtype.


    Acknowledgement
 
The valuable help of Michael Whitchurch is gratefully acknowledged.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bowman WD. 1991. Effect of nitrogen nutrition on photosynthesis and growth in C4 Panicum species. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 295–301.

Brown RH. 1978. A difference in N use efficiency in C3 and C4 plants and its implication in adaptation and evolution. Crop Science 18, 93–98.

Bolton JK, Brown RH. 1980. Photosynthesis of grass species differing in carbon dioxide fixation pathways. Response of Panicum maximum, Panicum milioides, and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) to nitrogen nutrition. Plant Physiology 66, 97–100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buchmann N, Brooks JR, Rapp KD, Ehleringer JR. 1996. Carbon isotope composition of C4 grasses is influenced by light and water supply. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 392–402.

Clayton WD. 1981. Evolution and distribution of grasses. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68, 5–14.[ISI]

Evans JR, Austin RB. 1986. Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase specific activity in relation to wheat genotype. Planta 167, 344–350.

Evans JR, Seemann JR. 1984. Differences between wheat genotypes in specific activity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and the relationship to photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 74, 759–765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Farquhar GD. 1983. On the nature of carbon isotope discrimination in C4 species. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 10, 205–226.

Hatch MD, Agostino A, Jenkins CLD. 1995. Measurements of leakage of CO2 from bundle sheath cells of leaves during C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 108, 173–181.[Abstract]

Hattersley PW. 1982. {delta}13C values of C4 types in grasses. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 9, 139–154.[ISI]

Hattersley PW. 1992. C4 photosynthetic pathway variation in grasses (Poaceae): its significance for arid and semi-arid lands. In: Chapman GP, ed. Desertified grasslands: their biology and management. London, UK: Academic Press, 181–212.

Henderson SA, von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1992. Short-term measurements of carbon isotope discrimination in several C4 species. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19, 263–85.[ISI]

Henderson SA, von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD, Wade L, Hammer G. 1998. Correlation between carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in lines of the C4 species Sorghum bicolor in the glasshouse and the field. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 111–123.

Knapp A, Hamerlynck EP, Owensby CE. 1993. Photosynthetic and water relations responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 in the C4 grass Andropogon gerardii. International Journal of Plant Science 154, 459–466.

Imai K, Okamoto-Sato M. 1991. Effects of temperature on CO2 dependence of gas exchanges in C3 and C4 crop plants. Japanese Jounal of Crop Science 60, 139–145.

LeCain DR, Morgan JA. 1998. Growth, gas exchange, leaf nitrogen, and carbohydrate concentrations in NAD-ME and NADP-ME C4 grasses grown in elevated CO2. Physiologia Plantarum 102, 297–306.

Madhavan S, Treichel I, O’Leary MH. 1991. Effects of relative humidity on carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Botanica Acta 104, 292–294.

Makino A, Osmond B. 1991. Effect of nitrogen nutrition on nitrogen partitioning between chloroplast and mitocondria in pea and wheat. Plant Physiology 96, 335–362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Makino A, Mae T, Ohira K. 1987. Relation between nitrogen and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in rice leaves from emergence through senescence. Plant and Cell Physiology 25, 429–437.

Meinzer FC, Zhu J. 1998. Nitrogen stress reduces the efficiency of C4 CO2 concentrating system, and therefore quantum yield in Saccharum (sugarcane) species. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1227–1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meinzer FC, Plaut Z, Saliendra NZ. 1994. Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange and growth of sugarcane cultivars under salinity. Plant Physiology 104, 521–526.[Abstract]

Morgan JA, Hunt HW, Monz CA, LeCain DR. 1994. Consequences of growth at two carbon dioxide concentrations and two temperatures for leaf gas exchange in Pascopyrum smithii (C3) and Bouteloua gracilis (C4). Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 1023–1033.

Owensby CE, Coyne PI, Auen LM. 1993. Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics of a tallgrass prairie ecosystem exposed to elevated carbon dioxide. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 843–850.

Peisker M, Henderson SA. 1992. Carbon: terrestrial C4 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 987–100.

Ranjith SA, Meinzer FC, Perry MH, Thom M. 1995. Partitioning of carboxylase activity in nitrogen-stressed sugarcane and its relationship to bundle sheath leakiness to CO2, photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination. Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 903–911.

Rogers H, Bingham H, Cure GE, Smith JM, Surano KA. 1983. Responses of selected plant species to elevated carbon dioxide in the field. Journal of Environmental Quality 12, 569–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sage RF, Pearcy RW. 1987. The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiology 84, 959–963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saliendra NZ, Meinzer FC, Perry FC, Thom M. 1996. Association between partitioning of carboxylase activity and bundle sheath leakiness to CO2, carbon isotope discrimination, photosynthesis, and growth in sugarcane. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 907–914.[ISI]

SAS Institute. 1995. Stastistical software. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

Schulze ED, Ellis R, Schulze W, Trimborn P, Ziegler H. 1996. Diversity, metabolic types and {delta}13C carbon isotope ratios in the grass flora of Namibia in relation to growth form, precipitation and habitat conditions. Oecologia 106, 352–369.[ISI]

Taub DR, Lerdau MT. 2000. Relationship between leaf nitrogen and photosynthetic rate for three NAD-me and three NADP-me C4 grasses. American Journal of Botany 87, 412–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wand SJE, Midgley GF, Stock WD. 2001. Growth responses to elevated CO2 in NADP-ME, NAD-ME and PCK C4 grasses and a C3 grass from South Africa. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28, 13–25.[ISI]

Watson L, Dallwitz MJ. 1989. Grass genera of the world. Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra.

Williams DG, Gempko V, Fravolini A, Leavitt SW, Wall GW, Kimball BA, Pinter Jr, LaMorte R, Ottman M. 2001. Carbon isotope discrimination by Sorghum bicolor under CO2 enrichment and drought. New Phytologist 150, 285–293.[ISI]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?