Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holdaway-Clarke, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hepler, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holdaway-Clarke, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hepler, P. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holdaway-Clarke, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hepler, P. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 380, pp. 65-72, January 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Effect of extracellular calcium, pH and borate on growth oscillations in Lilium formosanum pollen tubes

Received 17 June 2002; Accepted 15 July 2002

Terena L. Holdaway-Clarke1,4, Nicole M. Weddle1,4, SaRa Kim1, Amsale Robi2, Colleen Parris3, Joseph G. Kunkel1 and Peter K. Hepler5,1,4

1 Biology Department, Morrill South, University of Massachusetts, 611 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
2 Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
3 Molecular and Cell Biology Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
4 Plant Biology Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

5 To whom correspondence should be sent: Fax: +1 413 545 3243. E-mail: hepler@bio.umass.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Calcium ions (Ca2+), protons (H+), and borate (B(OH)4) are essential ions in the control of tip growth of pollen tubes. All three ions may interact with pectins, a major component of the expanding pollen tube cell wall. Ca2+ is thought to bind acidic residues, and cross-link adjacent pectin chains, thereby strengthening the cell wall. Protons are loosening agents; in pollen tube walls they may act through the enzyme pectin methylesterase (PME), and either reduce demethylation or stimulate hydrolysis of pectin. Finally, borate cross-links monomers of rhamnogalacturonan II (RG-II), and thus stiffens the cell wall. It is demonstrated here that changing the extracellular concentrations of Ca2+, H+ and borate affect not only the average growth rate of lily pollen tubes, but also influence the period of growth rate oscillations. The most dramatic effects are observed with increasing concentrations of Ca2+ and borate, both of which markedly reduce the rate of growth of oscillating pollen tubes. Protons are less active, except at pH 7.0 where growth is inhibited. It is noteworthy, especially with borate, that the faster growing tubes exhibit the shorter periods of oscillation. The results are consistent with the idea that binding of Ca2+ and borate to the cell wall may act at a similar level to alter the mechanical properties of the apical cell wall, with optimal concentrations being high enough to impart sufficient rigidity to the wall so as to prevent bursting in the face of cell turgor, but low enough to allow the wall to stretch quickly during periods of accelerating growth.

Key words: Borate, calcium, cell wall, pectin, oscillations, pH, pollen tube.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is well known that Ca2+, H+, and borate in the extracellular medium are essential for the growth of pollen tubes (Steer and Steer, 1989; Welch, 1995), although their targets for action have not been entirely resolved, particularly since Ca2+ and H+ participate in both intracellular and extracellular processes. More recently, the phenomenon of oscillatory growth in pollen tubes (Pierson et al., 1996) and the measurement of accompanying oscillations in intracellular gradients and extracellular fluxes of Ca2+ and pH (Messerli and Robinson, 1997; Holdaway-Clarke et al., 1997; Feijó et al., 1999) have led to the proposal that the cell wall is a major player in the process of pollen tube elongation (Holdaway-Clarke et al., 1997). It is important to note that the cell wall at the tip consists mainly of pectic polysaccharides, with few or no cellulose microfibrils (Heslop-Harrison, 1987), and that all three ion species, in one way or another, interact with pectin and control its mechanical properties. Therefore changes in the extensibility of pectin, as brought about by extracellular Ca2+, H+, and/or borate, may control oscillatory pollen tube growth.

During pollen tube growth, pectins, which are a mixture of complex polysaccharides characterized by 1,4-linked {alpha}-D-galactosyluronic acid residues (Ridley et al., 2001), are secreted primarily as methylesters (Lennon and Lord, 2000; Li et al., 1997, 2002), and subsequently de-esterified by the enzyme pectin methylesterase (PME) in the cell wall (Li et al., 2002). Although not yet demonstrated in pollen tube cell walls, it is presumed that Ca2+, as in other systems, reacts with acidic residues on homogalacturonan pectin and cross-links adjacent chains forming the ‘egg-box’ configuration, and that this reaction imparts rigidity to the cell wall (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993). H+, on the other hand may promote a more plastic and extensible wall; for example, acidic pH decreases the activity of PME (Moustacas et al., 1986), thus reducing the number of carboxyl residues and the amount of Ca2+ cross-linking. Low pH may also enhance the activity of acidic isoforms of PME (Li et al., 2002), which together with pectin hydrolyases, cause the degradation of pectin gels (Bordenave, 1996). Borate, like Ca2+, most probably imparts rigidity to the cell wall since recent work shows that it forms 1:2 diol ester linkages between apiosyl residues of rhamnogalaturonan II (RG-II) monomers (Fleischer et al., 1998, 1999; Ishii et al., 2001; Matoh and Kobayashi, 1998; Ridley et al., 2001). Here H+ may help to strengthen the wall since lower pH promotes RG-II dimer formation in vitro (O’Neill et al., 1996).

In order to dissect the distinct contributions of Ca2+, H+, and borate, the effects of changing the extracellular concentrations of these ions on pollen germination and on growth rate oscillations were examined. It is shown here that varying the extracellular concentrations of these ions have distinct effects on pollen tube germination, average growth rate and the shape of growth rate oscillations. The similarity of effects of extracellular Ca2+ and borate on the relationship between period of oscillation and growth rate supports the idea that cross-linking of the pectins in the cell wall by Ca2+ and borate participates in the regulation of pollen tube growth oscillations.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pollen germination
Fresh Lilium formosanum pollen was obtained from plants grown in a growth chamber. Anthers were removed, placed in 1 ml germination medium in a 1.5 ml tube on a rotary device and allowed to germinate for at least 1.5 h. The control medium consisted of 7% sucrose, 0.1 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1.6 mM H3BO3, and 15 mM MES buffer adjusted to pH 6.0 with KOH. Test media with varying pH, or concentrations of CaCl2 or H3BO3 were constructed with all other parameters of the media the same as for the control. The experimental concentrations were generally as follows; pH: 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.5, 7.0; CaCl2 (in mM): 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 10; H3BO3 (in mM): 0.32, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 8.0, 16.0. All images were acquired using a Princeton Instruments Micromax CCD camera attached to a Nikon Diaphot 300 inverted microscope, controlled by MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging).

Germination experiments
In germination experiments, six anthers from one plant were taken and placed in each of several different media: the control medium and the test media with different experimental concentrations of either CaCl2, H3BO3 or pH. After 1.5 h, pollen was placed on slides and images acquired with a low power (4x) objective on the microscope. Germination frequency was determined by counting the number of germinated and non-germinated grains in the images taken using the count objects feature of MetaMorph. Approximately 100 pollen grains were counted for each treatment. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Bulk growth rate experiments
To determine the effect of altering extracellular concentrations of protons (H+), CaCl2, and H3BO3 on the bulk growth rate of pollen tubes, the pollen from up to six anthers from a single flower were germinated in a single tube containing 1 ml of control medium per anther on a rotary device. After at least 1 h of germination, low power digital images of approximately 100 tubes were acquired for later measurement. The solution with medium and pollen was then divided into smaller aliquots, the pollen allowed to settle to the bottom of each tube, and the germination media suctioned off using a pipette and replaced with media with the experimental pH or concentrations of H3BO3 or CaCl2. The pollen was then germinated for at least another hour, before samples were removed to slides for imaging, and the time between these later samples and the first sample was noted. MetaMorph software was used to measure the lengths of at least 100 pollen tubes in each sample, and the average pollen tube growth rate was calculated for each different solution.

Oscillatory growth measurements
The growth characteristics of pollen tubes displaying oscillating growth rates (those longer than 1000 µm) were investigated in various levels of pH, CaCl2 and H3BO3 by initially germinating pollen in the control medium for at least 1 h before changing the medium to a test solution. Pollen tubes were given at least 1 h in the new solution to adjust to the new condition before being plated onto a slide with a thin layer of 1.2% agarose (Sigma type VII-low gelling point) made from media containing the same experimental conditions. Once the agarose had gelled, the pollen tubes were allowed to recover for at least 30 min. The tubes were observed with a Nikon inverted microscope (Diaphot 300) with a 40x oil immersion objective (NA 1.3), and images acquired every 0.5–2 s. The ‘track objects’ feature of MetaMorph was used to track the growth rate of pollen tube tips and generate data files that could be imported into Microsoft Excel or Microcal Origin for further processing and graphing. The characteristics of the growth rate oscillations, including average rate and period of oscillation, were determined for each pollen tube imaged. An indication of the amplitude of the oscillation was obtained by using the standard deviation of the growth rates measured at each time point in a time-lapse experiment; in a sinusoidal oscillation, the standard deviation of points acquired at regular intervals much shorter than the period of oscillation is related to the amplitude of the oscillation by the following equation: Amplitude=2S2=2(variance).

Statistical analysis
The data were analysed by the general approach of linear statistical inference and analysis of variance as set out in Rao (1965). Pollen germination proportions were arcsine transformed to assure homoskedasticity prior to analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of extracellular Ca2+, pH and borate on pollen germination
Figure 1 reveals that variations in extracellular pH across the experimental range had more dramatic effects on pollen germination than either Ca2+ or borate. In Fig. 1a the data indicate that germination rate is optimal when Ca2+ is in the range 0.1–1.0 mM, and that it falls off only moderately either below 0.1 mM or above 1.0 mM. However, even the extremes of 0.01 mM and 10 mM support better than 50% germination. Optimum germination (i.e. 55–65%) is supported by a rather wide range of pH (4.5–6.0), however, above 6.0 the process is increasingly inhibited and at 7.0 is only 12% (Fig. 1b). Extracellular borate appeared to have little effect on germination over the range of concentrations tested (Fig. 1c). Although a cursory inspection suggests that 1.6 mM borate is optimal, these data are not significantly different (P >0.05) from those obtained at higher or lower concentrations.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The effect of extracellular calcium (Ca2+), pH, and borate (H3BO3) on pollen germination. (a) Ca2+ concentration was set at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 10 mM; results are from four replicates. (b) pH was set at 4.5, 5.0. 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0; results are from six replicates. (c) H3BO3 concentration was set at 0.32. 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 8.0, and 16 mM; results are from seven replicates. Replicates above consist of approximately 100 grains each.

 
Effects of extracellular Ca2+, pH and borate effects on growth rates in tubes <1000 µm
During the early phases of elongation following germination, and before they reach approximately 1000 µm, pollen tubes do not exhibit the characteristic oscillatory growth behaviour observed in longer tubes, rather they grow at a steady rate with minor fluctuations about the mean (Pierson et al., 1996). Realizing that there are different phases during the growth of the lily pollen tube, the effects of extracellular Ca2+, pH and borate on tubes less than 1000 µm were tested first. An overall comparison of Figs 2 and 3 immediately reveals that the shorter tubes (Fig. 2) grow much more slowly than the longer, oscillatory tubes (Fig. 3). Focusing on the short pollen tubes, it is evident that increases in both Ca2+ and pH have a marked inhibitory effect on the rate. With Ca2+ the rate drops from 0.05 µm s–1 at 0.5 mM to less than 0.005 µm s–1 at 10 mM (Fig. 2a). The change with elevating pH is equally dramatic showing a decline from 0.083 µm s–1 at pH 6.0 to 0.018 µm s–1 at pH 7.0 (Fig. 2b). With borate, 1.6 mM supports the fastest bulk growth rates in these non-oscillating pollen tubes (Fig. 2c). However, we fail to detect the trends that are apparent in both calcium and pH, and thus the minimum (0.32 mM) and maximum (16.0 mM) levels of borate yield nearly the same bulk growth rates.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The effect of extracellular Ca2+, pH and H3BO3 on bulk growth rates of pollen tubes <1000 µm. (a) Ca2+ concentration was set at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 10 mM; results are from five replicates. (b) pH was set at 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0; results are from four replicates. (c) H3BO3 concentration was set at 0.32, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 8.0, and 16 mM; results are from four replicates. Replicates above consist of approximately 100 pollen tubes each.

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The effect of extracellular Ca2+, pH and H3BO3 on the average growth rates of oscillating pollen tubes (>1000 µm). (a) Ca2+ concentration was set at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 10 mM (n=5). (b) pH was set at 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and 6.5 (n=7). (c) H3BO3 concentration was set at 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 8.0, and 16 mM (n=7).

 
Effects of extracellular Ca2+, pH and borate on growth oscillations in tubes >1000 µm
Longer pollen tubes displaying oscillating growth rates were measured individually. Figure 3a, b, and c shows that changes in the levels of all ions affect growth, with marked inhibitions occurring as the concentration of Ca2+ (Fig. 3a) and borate (Fig. 3c) increased, or that of H+ (Fig. 3b) decreased. For Ca2+ a maximum growth rate of 0.27 µm s–1 was observed at 0.05 mM, which then declined to 0.07 µm s–1 at 10 mM, while for borate the maximum values extend from 0.27 µm s–1 at 3.2 mM to 0.1 µm s–1 at 16 mM. In passing, it was noted that the average growth rate was fastest in the presence of 3.2 mM extracellular borate, which is twice the concentration used in the standard, control medium. With pH there is a modest decline in growth rate from a maximum of 0.26 µm s–1 at pH 5.5 to 0.175 µm s–1 at pH 6.5. However, at pH 7.0 (Fig. 3b) growth drops to nearly zero (data not shown); because of this lack of growth, pH 7.0 has not been included in the subsequent analyses.

Examination of the effects of these three ions on the period and amplitude of growth oscillations reveals that borate generates dramatic changes (Fig. 4). The two concentrations shown, 3.2 mM and 16 mM, produced, respectively, the maximum and minimum average growth rates (0.29 µm s–1 and 0.1 µm s–1) and shortest and longest periods of oscillation (68±11 s and 24±2 s). The relative amplitude of oscillation in 16 mM borate was approximately twice that observed in 3.2 mM borate. By contrast with borate, changes in Ca2+ and pH appear to have relatively little effect on the period and amplitude of growth oscillation (Fig. 5), although Ca2+, like borate, does produce somewhat shorter periods of oscillation at intermediate concentrations, and longer periods at both higher and lower concentrations (Fig. 5a, c, respectively). The amplitude of the oscillations is most influenced by borate (Fig. 5c).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The effect of two different extracellular concentrations of H3BO3 on the period and amplitude of growth rate oscillations. (a) Three typical examples of growth oscillations in the presence of 3.2 mM H3BO3. (b) Three typical examples of growth oscillations in the presence of 16 mM H3BO3. Comparison of (a) and (b) reveals that rapid growth is accompanied by a short oscillation period and low amplitude, whereas slow growth is accompanied by a long oscillation period and large amplitude.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The effect of extracellular Ca2+, pH and H3BO3 on the average period and amplitude of growth rate oscillations. (a) Ca2+ concentration was set at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 10 mM (n = 5). (b) pH was set at 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and 6.5 (n = 7). (c) H3BO3 concentration was set at 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 8.0, and 16 mM (n = 7).

 
When the results of period versus growth rate for oscillating pollen tubes under changing Ca2+, pH, or borate are pooled, it becomes apparent that there is a relationship between these parameters for Ca2+ and borate, but not pH (Fig. 6). A curve fit of the plot for all Ca2+ data revealed a very highly significant linear relationship between period of oscillation and average growth rate (P <0.00129, Fig. 6a). By contrast, curve fits of pooled results for all extracellular pH levels reveal no significant relationship between period of oscillation and average growth rate (Fig. 6b). The borate data set also revealed a very highly significant linear relationship between period and amplitude of oscillation (P <0.0001); however, a hyperbolic fit is a highly significantly better fit than the linear fit (F = test, P <0.001, Fig. 6c).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Plots showing the relationship between period versus growth rate for oscillating pollen tubes. (a) Ca2+: the dashed line is a linear fit of the pooled data showing a highly significant relationship between the period of oscillation and the average growth rates across all tested concentrations of Ca2+. (b) pH: there is no clear relationship between period of oscillation and growth rate. (c) H3BO3: the dashed line is a hyperbolic fit of the pooled data, whereas the dotted line is a linear fit. The hyperbolic fit is significantly better than the linear fit.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Different phases of pollen growth have different ionic requirements
It is noteworthy that varying the concentrations of Ca2+, H+, and borate in the extracellular medium has distinct effects on pollen tube germination rates, growth rates in shorter (non-oscillating) tubes, growth rates in longer (oscillating) tubes, and on the characteristics of growth rate oscillations (Figs 1, 2, 3). Germination rate and average growth rate of shorter tubes was more sensitive to changes in Ca2+ and pH, than to borate, whereas the longer, oscillating tubes were severely inhibited by higher Ca2+ and borate, while pH had relatively little effect, except at pH 7.0 where it completely stopped growth. These results are consistent with there being three classes of pollen tube growth behaviour as described by Feijó et al. (2001): (1) spiking, which occurs at the onset of tube growth or germination, (2) statistically stable growth in which there are random, small fluctuations about the average, as is observed in Lilium and Hemerocallis tubes that are less than 1000 µm, and (3) oscillatory growth in which there are sustained, quasi-sinusoidal oscillations in the growth rate as is seen in Lilium tubes that are greater than 1000 µm. The shorter, non-oscillating pollen tubes also exhibit substantially slower average growth rates than their longer, oscillating counterparts (compare Figs 2 and 3). Taken together these observations support the notion that the oscillations are a consequence of the pollen tube growing as fast as possible, in which the tube comes close to but narrowly avoids the disaster of extending the wall so far and fast as to cause a breach.

Borate cross-linking of RG-II is possibly a major player in the phenomenon of oscillatory growth
In the oscillatory phase, which is of primary interest because the pollen tube does most of its growing in this manner, both Ca2+ and borate exert strong influences over the average growth rate. Given the ability of Ca2+ and borate, in different cell wall systems, to cross-link pectin chains, and rigidify the cell wall (Ridley et al., 2001) it may be readily understandable that both these ions, when applied to pollen tubes, reduce growth rate at elevated concentrations. Protons, by contrast, can contribute to both the loosening and strengthening of the cell wall. Studies from non-pollen tube systems indicate that acidic pHs inhibit the activity of certain PME isoforms and thus reduce de-esterification and the number of Ca2+-pectate bridges (Moustacas et al., 1986). Low pH also enhances the activity of acidic isoforms of PME which, together with pectin hydrolases, can cause the random degradation of pectin gels and weaken the cell wall (Bordenave, 1996). However, low pH enhances the in vitro formation of RG-II borate ester dimers (O’Neill et al., 1996), which in vivo may lead to a strengthening of the cell wall. When extrapolated to the growing pollen tube it seems plausible that H+ will have a similar dual activity on the apical cell wall. On the one hand, low pH may reduce Ca2+-pectate cross-bridges and stimulate pectin gel degradation, thus weakening the apical cell wall. On the other hand, low pH may enhance the formation of RG-II borate esters and contribute to cell wall stiffening. These opposing responses to low pH may explain why we fail to see a marked effect of proton concentration on pollen tube oscillatory growth. Ca2+, aside from its role in pectate cross-links, can also contribute to maintaining RG-II dimers (Matoh and Kobayashi, 1998).

The correlation of rate and period for pooled Ca2+ (Fig. 6a) and borate data (Fig. 6c), but not for pH (Fig. 6b) further indicate that Ca2+ and borate have a similar mode of action, which, we propose, is cross-linking of pectins. The relationship between period and average growth rate is logical, as a stiffer wall will yield more slowly and thus produce longer periods between growth rate peaks, and an overall slower average growth rate. Further investigations using different combinations of Ca2+, H+, and borate should provide more information on the relationship of these ions in determining cell wall extension.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank our greenhouse staff, Mr Ron Beckwith, Ms Teddi Bloniarz and Ms Monica Johnson, for their assistance in growing Lilium plants. This project was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant No. MCB-0077599 to PKH. CP was supported by a summer REU supplement to the NSF grant noted above, while AR was supported by NSF REU Grant No. DBI-0097225 to the Plant Biology Program at UMass.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bordenave M. 1996. Analysis of pectin methyl esterase. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF, eds. Modern methods of plant analysis: ‘Plant cell wall analysis’ 17. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 165–180.

Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM. 1993. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. The Plant Journal 3, 1–30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Feijó JA, Sainhas J, Hackett GR, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK. 1999. Growing pollen tubes possess a constitutive alkaline band in the clear zone and a growth-dependent acidic tip. Journal of Cell Biology 144, 483–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feijó JA, Sainhas J, Holdaway-Clarke T, Cordeiro MS, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK. 2001. Cellular oscillations and the regulation of growth: the pollen tube paradigm. Bioessays 23, 86–94.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fleischer A, O’Neill MA, Ehwald R. 1999. The pore size of non-graminaceous plant cell walls is rapidly decreased by borate ester cross-linking of the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan II. Plant Physiology 121, 829–838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fleischer A, Titel C, Ehwald R. 1998. The boron requirement and cell wall properties of growing and stationary suspension-cultured Chenopidium album L. cells. Plant Physiology 117, 1401–1410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heslop-Harrison J. 1987. Pollen germination and pollen tube growth. International Review of Cytology 107, 1–78.

Holdaway-Clarke TL, Feijó JA, Hackett GR, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK. 1997. Pollen tube growth and the intracellular cytosolic calcium gradient oscillate in phase while extracellular calcium influx is delayed. The Plant Cell 9, 1999–2010.[Abstract]

Ishii T, Matsunaga T, Hayashi N. 2001. Formation of rhamnogalacturonan II-borate dimer in pectin determines cell wall thickness of pumpkin tissue. Plant Physiology 126, 1698–1705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lennon KA, Lord EM. 2000. In vivo pollen tube cell of Arabidopsis thaliana. I. Tube cell cytoplasm and wall. Protoplasma 214, 45–56.[CrossRef]

Li YQ, Mareck A, Faleri C, Moscatelli A, Liu Q, Cresti M. 2002. Detection and localization of pectin methylesterase isoforms in pollen tubes of Nicotiana tabacum L. Planta 214, 734–740.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Li YQ, Moscatelli A, Cai G, Cresti M. 1997. Functional interactions among cytoskeleton, membranes, and cell wall in the pollen tube of flowering plants. International Review of Cytology 176, 133–199.[ISI][Medline]

Matoh T, Kobayashi M. 1998. Boron and calcium, essential inorganic constituents of pectic polysaccharides in higher plant cell walls. Journal of Plant Research 111, 179–190.[CrossRef]

Messerli M, Robinson KR. 1997. Tip localized Ca2+ pulses are coincident with peak pulsatile growth rates in pollen tubes of Lilium longiflorum. Journal of Cell Science 110, 1269–1278.[Abstract]

Moustacas AM, Nari J, Diamantidis G, Noat G, Crasnier M, Borel M, Ricard J. 1986. Electrostatic effects and the dynamics of enzyme reactions at the surface of plant cells. 2. The role of pectin methyl esterase in the modulation of electrostatic effects in soybean cell walls. European Journal of Biochemistry 155, 191–197.[ISI][Medline]

O’Neill MA, Warrenfeltz D, Kates K, Pellerin P, Doco T, Darvill AG, Albersheim P. 1996. Rhamnogalacturonan-II, a pectic polysaccharide in the walls of growing plant cell, forms a dimer that is covalently cross-linked by a borate ester—in vitro conditions for the formation and hydrolysis of the dimer. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 22923–22930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pierson ES, Miller DD, Callaham DA, van Aken J, Hackett G, Hepler PK. 1996. Tip-localized calcium entry fluctuates during pollen tube growth. Developmental Biology 174, 160–173.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rao CR. 1965. Linear statistical inference and its applications. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 522.

Ridley BL, O’Neill MA, Mohnen DA. 2001. Pectins: structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signaling. Phytochemistry 57, 929–967.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Steer MW, Steer JM. 1989. Pollen tube tip growth. New Phytologist 111, 323–358.[CrossRef][ISI]

Welch RM. 1995. Micronutrient nutrition of plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 14, 49–82.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. L. Ge, H. Q. Tian, and S. D. Russell
Calcium function and distribution during fertilization in angiosperms
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2007; 94(6): 1046 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Iwai, A. Hokura, M. Oishi, H. Chida, T. Ishii, S. Sakai, and S. Satoh
The gene responsible for borate cross-linking of pectin Rhamnogalacturonan-II is required for plant reproductive tissue development and fertilization
PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16592 - 16597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Lovy-Wheeler, J. G. Kunkel, E. G. Allwood, P. J. Hussey, and P. K. Hepler
Oscillatory Increases in Alkalinity Anticipate Growth and May Regulate Actin Dynamics in Pollen Tubes of Lily
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2182 - 2193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
X. Wang, Y. Teng, Q. Wang, X. Li, X. Sheng, M. Zheng, J. Samaj, F. Baluska, and J. Lin
Imaging of Dynamic Secretory Vesicles in Living Pollen Tubes of Picea meyeri Using Evanescent Wave Microscopy
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2006; 141(4): 1591 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J.-U. Hwang, Y. Gu, Y.-J. Lee, and Z. Yang
Oscillatory ROP GTPase Activation Leads the Oscillatory Polarized Growth of Pollen Tubes
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2005; 16(11): 5385 - 5399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Bosch, A. Y. Cheung, and P. K. Hepler
Pectin Methylesterase, a Regulator of Pollen Tube Growth
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2005; 138(3): 1334 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
Z.-l. Shang, L.-g. Ma, H.-l. Zhang, R.-r. He, X.-c. Wang, S.-j. Cui, and D.-y. Sun
Ca2+ Influx into Lily Pollen Grains Through a Hyperpolarization-activated Ca2+-permeable Channel Which Can be Regulated by Extracellular CaM
Plant Cell Physiol., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 598 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
R. S. Tegg, L. Melian, C. R. Wilson, and S. Shabala
Plant Cell Growth and Ion Flux Responses to the Streptomycete Phytotoxin Thaxtomin A: Calcium and Hydrogen Flux Patterns Revealed by the Non-invasive MIFE Technique
Plant Cell Physiol., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 638 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holdaway-Clarke, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hepler, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holdaway-Clarke, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hepler, P. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holdaway-Clarke, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hepler, P. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?