JXB Advance Access originally published online on December 12, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 55, No. 395, pp. 205-212, January 1, 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press
Signalling in Abiotic Stress |
ABA, hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide signalling in stomatal guard cells
Received 14 July 2003; Accepted 7 October 2003
Centre for Research in Plant Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 (0)117 3282904. E-mail: radhika.desikan{at}uwe.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased synthesis and redistribution of the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) in response to water deficit stress initiates an intricate network of signalling pathways in guard cells leading to stomatal closure. Despite the large number of ABA signalling intermediates that are known in guard cells, new discoveries are still being made. Recently, the reactive oxygen species hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the reactive nitrogen species nitric oxide (NO) have been identified as key molecules regulating ABA-induced stomatal closure in various species. As with many other physiological responses in which H2O2 and NO are involved, stomatal closure in response to ABA also appears to require the tandem synthesis and action of both these signalling molecules. Recent pharmacological and genetic data have identified NADPH oxidase as a source of H2O2, whilst nitrate reductase has been identified as a source of NO in Arabidopsis guard cells. Some signalling components positioned downstream of H2O2 and NO are calcium, protein kinases and cyclic GMP. However, the exact interaction between the various signalling components in response to H2O2 and NO in guard cells remains to be established.
Key words: Abscisic acid, guard cells, hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide, signalling.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plant growth and development are largely affected by the availability of water. Hence adaptation to water deficit stress is common to all terrestrial plants. Abscisic acid (ABA) is an endogenous anti-transpirant that reduces water loss through stomatal pores on the leaf surface. Enhanced biosynthesis of ABA occurs in response to water deficit stress, resulting in the redistribution and accumulation of ABA in guard cells surrounding the stomata. This results in the release of water, efflux and influx of ions, and loss of turgor of guard cells, causing closure of stomata (Bray, 1997).
Perception of ABA by, as yet unidentified, receptors in guard cells activates a complex web of signalling pathways leading to stomatal closure. These include the activation of ion channels and the synthesis of calcium mobilizing molecules such as cyclic ADP ribose and inositol trisphosphate, thereby elevating cytosolic calcium levels. Reversible protein phosphorylation, activation of other signalling components such as G proteins, and modulation of RNA metabolism are also placed downstream of ABA, leading to stomatal closure (Schroeder et al., 2001). Despite the large number of ABA signalling intermediates in guard cells, new discoveries are still being made. Recent additions include the phospholipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (SIP), phospholipase C, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the reactive nitrogen species nitric oxide (NO) (Hetherington, 2001; Neill et al., 2003a, b). In this article, the role of H2O2 and NO as signalling molecules in plants, particularly in guard cells, is discussed, highlighting their involvement in the ABA signalling pathway, and some future perspectives which might enhance the current understanding of guard cell signalling are considered.
| H2O2 and NO as signalling molecules in plants |
|---|
|
|
|---|
H2O2 and NO are forms of reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species, respectively, having wide-ranging effects in many biological systems (Durner et al., 1999; Finkel and Holbrook, 2000). Although the effects of both H2O2 and NO on plant physiology and development have been the subject of investigation for several years, it is only relatively recently that their roles as signalling molecules have been characterized more fully. Exposure of plants to various abiotic and biotic stresses induces the generation of both H2O2 and NO. Such stresses and stimuli include atmospheric pollutants such as ozone and UV radiations, extremes of temperature, wounding and pathogen challenge, dehydration, and plant hormones such as ABA, auxin, cytokinin, and ethylene (Fig. 1).
|
The roles of H2O2 and NO in plant defence responses to pathogens have been studied in some detail. Exposure of plant cells to avirulent (non-disease inducing) pathogens or pathogen-derived elicitors induces both a rapid and a more prolonged burst of H2O2. Generation of NO occurs within the same time frame as H2O2 release, and a critical balance between the two reactive species regulates cellular outcomes such as programmed cell death (Delledonne et al., 2001).
In addition to their role in stress responses, the involvement of H2O2 and NO in developmental processes such as seed germination, gravitropism and root development indicate that these signalling molecules are key regulators of plant responses to a range of endogenous signals and stimuli such as auxin and ABA (Neill et al., 2002b, 2003b).
Common physiological and cellular responses observed in response to these stimuli also suggest that both H2O2 and NO are synthesized in parallel and act in tandem in various situations. The cellular effects of increased synthesis of these molecules are thus likely to be mediated via their actions, either individually or in concert. H2O2 and NO have been shown to regulate the expression of a number of genes whose products are involved in limiting pathogen growth, in cellular protection or in other signalling responses (Desikan et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2002). H2O2 and NO also activate common cellular responses such as elevation of cytosolic calcium levels, protein kinases and phosphatases (see below). The chemical nature of H2O2 and NO suggests that they are also likely to have direct effects on common molecular targets such as protein thiol groups that are susceptible to oxidation or nitrosylation (Cooper et al., 2002). Identification of downstream targets of H2O2 and NO acting in parallel, together or synergistically, in various plant cells, particularly in guard cells, is clearly an important research priority.
| H2O2 as a signal in guard cells |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of H2O2 on guard cells were first reported by McAinsh et al. (1996). Exposure of Vicia faba guard cells to exogenous H2O2 induced elevations of cytosolic calcium and stomatal closure. At low levels (<105 M) H2O2 had no effect on membrane damage, whereas at higher concentrations this was apparent. The ability of guard cells to generate H2O2 has been demonstrated in tobacco, tomato and Commelina sp. (Allan and Fluhr, 1997; Lee et al., 1999). H2O2 synthesis in plant cells can easily be visualized using the cell-permeable fluorescent dye, dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA). Treatment of tobacco epidermal cells with the fungal elicitor cryptogein, induced H2O2 generation in guard cells and surrounding epidermal cells (Allan and Fluhr, 1997). In tomato and Commelina, Lee et al. (1999) observed H2O2 generation in response to an oligogalacturonide elicitor or chitosan, leading to stomatal closure. Treatment with catalase, a H2O2 scavenger, reduced both stomatal closure and H2O2 synthesis, confirming that the H2O2 was required to initiate stomatal closure. The discovery that ABA induces H2O2 synthesis in Arabidopsis guard cells was a significant finding that highlighted further complexities in ABA signalling. Pei et al. (2000) demonstrated that treatment of Arabidopsis guard cells with ABA induced a rapid burst of H2O2 production that resulted in stomatal closure. These findings have subsequently been reported in guard cells of Vicia faba (Zhang et al., 2001c), and observed in pea (R Desikan et al., unpublished data). Therefore, it appears that synthesis of H2O2 is essential for ABA-induced stomatal closure in various species.
H2O2 can be synthesized via several routes in plant cells (Neill et al., 2002b). Electron transport processes such as photosynthesis and respiration generate basal levels of H2O2, which increase in response to stress. Enzymatic sources of H2O2 include NADPH oxidase, cell wall peroxidases, amine oxidases, and other flavin containing enzymes (Neill et al., 2002b, c; Desikan et al., 2003). More than one source of H2O2 has also been proposed for guard cells. Allan and Fluhr (1997) suggested that, in guard cells and epidermal cells of tobacco responding to elicitor challenge, H2O2 was generated via intracellular flavin-containing enzymes, apoplastic peroxidases, and amine oxidase-type enzymes. In Arabidopsis, ABA-induced stomatal closure was inhibited by the flavin analogue diphenylene iodonium (DPI), used widely as an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase (Cross and Jones, 1986). Together with NADPH-dependence of H2O2-induced calcium channel activation, this implies a role for a NADPH oxidase-like enzyme mediating H2O2 synthesis in response to ABA in Arabidopsis guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001). Zhang et al. (2001c) proposed two different sources of H2O2 in Vicia faba guard cells in response to ABA, one chloroplastic and another via a plasma membrane-located enzyme (potentially NADPH oxidase). In this laboratory, it has been shown that exposure of pea guard cells to catalase or DPI reduced ABA-induced H2O2 synthesis and stomatal closure (R Desikan et al., unpublished data), also suggesting NADPH oxidase as a potential source of H2O2.
Until recently, there has been little molecular evidence to support the pharmacological data indicating a role for NADPH oxidase in guard cell functioning. Genes encoding the large subunit of the NADPH oxidase (respiratory burst oxidase homologue, rboh) have been cloned from different species (Desikan et al., 1998; Keller et al., 1998; Torres et al., 1998, 2002; Amicucci et al., 1999; Yoshioka et al., 2001). Reverse genetic approaches have been used to establish a functional role for NADPH oxidase in plant responses to pathogens (Simon-Plas et al., 2002; Torres et al., 2002; Yoshioka et al., 2003). In exciting new developments, the rboh transposon-insertion mutants of Arabidopsis have been used to provide unequivocal evidence that NADPH oxidase-mediated H2O2 synthesis is required for ABA-induced stomatal closure (Kwak et al., 2003). Two homologues of the rboh gene family (AtrbohD and AtrbohF) were found to be expressed in guard cells, and treatment with ABA increased the expression of AtrbohD in guard cells. atrbohD/F double mutants were impaired in stomatal closure and activation of calcium channels in response to ABA, and H2O2 application rescued these responses. These data provide direct molecular genetic evidence that NADPH oxidase homologues function in guard cell ABA signal transduction. These mutants will no doubt be an important research tool to dissect downstream responses to ABA, ROS and other signalling molecules likely to interact with ROS.
| Nitric oxide as a signal in guard cells |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The above findings linking ABA and H2O2 in guard cells were soon followed by the discovery that NO is also an essential signal mediating ABA-induced stomatal closure (Neill et al., 2002a). Exogenous NO (applied as NO donors) induced stomatal closure and reduced transpiration in Vicia faba, Salpichroa organifolia and Tradescantia sp. (Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2001). In this laboratory, it has been shown that different NO donors induce stomatal closure in pea, Arabidopsis, tomato, barley, and wheat (Desikan et al., 2002; Neill et al., 2002a; SJ Neill, unpublished data), a process that is time- and dose-dependent, and fully reversible (Neill et al., 2002a).
The discovery that NO is a key signal mediating ABA responses in pea guard cells (Neill et al., 2002a), has since been confirmed for Vicia faba (Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2002) and Arabidopsis (Desikan et al., 2002). Application of PTIO (or cPTIO), a NO scavenger, inhibited ABA-induced stomatal closure, indicating the involvement of endogenous NO (Desikan et al., 2002; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2002; Neill et al., 2002a). NO synthesis was monitored in guard cells using the NO-fluorescent dye diaminofluorescein diacetate (DAF-2DA), previously used to monitor NO synthesis in guard cells and epidermal cells of tobacco in response to elicitor treatment (Foissner et al., 2000). ABA-induced increases in NO synthesis have been observed in guard cells of Arabidopsis, pea and Vicia faba (Desikan et al., 2002; Neill et al., 2002a, 2003a; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2002). Increased DAF-2DA fluorescence was observed in the cytoplasm, and in some cases around the chloroplasts, of ABA-treated guard cells. This fluorescence was NO-specific, as no increase in fluorescence was observed using the NO-inactive dye 4AF-DA or by co-incubation of ABA with NO scavengers (Desikan et al., 2002; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2002). These studies demonstrate that NO synthesis is essential for ABA-induced stomatal closure in various species.
There are two main candidates for enzymes of NO synthesis in plant cells, nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR), although other routes, both enzymatic and non-enzymatic, may exist (Neill et al., 2003b). In mammalian cells, a family of NOS enzymes catalyses the conversion of L-arginine to citrulline, with the simultaneous release of NO. This NO synthesis can be monitored by measuring the conversion of radiolabelled arginine to citrulline, an assay that has been widely used in plants. Inhibition of NO synthesis, and arginine to citrulline conversion by arginine analogues such as L-NAME (N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester), have provided some evidence for the presence of NOS in plants (Wendehenne et al., 2001; Neill et al., 2003b). In pea guard cells it has been observed that ABA-induced NO synthesis and stomatal closure can be partially inhibited by L-NAME (Neill et al., 2002a), suggesting the involvement of a NOS-type enzyme. Until very recently, there had been no molecular evidence for NOS-like genes in plants. In an exciting new development, the Klessig group has shown that a pathogen-inducible NOS (iNOS) in tobacco and Arabidopsis is actually a variant of the P protein of the glycine decarboxylase complex (Chandok et al., 2003). This protein catalyses the conversion of arginine to citrulline, an activity that was inhibited by NOS inhibitors. Purification and subsequent sequence analysis of this protein revealed only very limited similarity with mammalian NOS enzymes, although the requirements for activation or induction were similar. This is a major discovery that will no doubt lead to further insight into the role of NOS-like proteins in NO signalling.
Nitrate reductase (NR) is an enzyme important for nitrogen assimilation in plants, where its primary function is to convert nitrate to nitrite via a NAD(P)H-dependent electron transfer reaction (Crawford and Forde, 2002). In addition, NR also catalyses the NAD(P)H-dependent reduction of nitrite to NO, originally demonstrated in soybean (Dean and Harper, 1988), but more recently shown both in vitro and in vivo in maize, sunflower and spinach (Yamasaki et al., 1999; Yamasaki and Sakihama, 2000; Kaiser et al., 2002; Rockel et al., 2002). A physiological role for NR-mediated NO synthesis was established in the authors laboratory (Desikan et al., 2002). Treatment of Arabidopsis guard cells with nitrite induced NO synthesis and stomatal closure. Pre-treatment with PTIO inhibited NO accumulation and stomatal closure in response to nitrite (Desikan et al., 2002). Moreover, tungstate, an inhibitor of NR activity (Notton and Hewitt, 1971; J Bright, unpublished data) inhibited ABA and nitrite-induced NO synthesis and stomatal closure in Arabidopsis guard cells (J Bright, R Desikan, unpublished data). In addition, the NOS inhibitor L-NAME did not inhibit ABA-induced NO synthesis or stomatal closure in Arabidopsis epidermal peels (Desikan et al., 2002). Together, these data suggest that NR acts as a source of ABA-induced NO synthesis in Arabidopsis guard cells. To confirm this, the NR-deficient nia1, nia2 mutant of Arabidopsis was used which exhibits less than 5% NR activity of wild-type plants (Wilkinson and Crawford, 1993). In epidermal peels of nia1, nia2, neither ABA nor nitrite induced stomatal closure or NO synthesis (Desikan et al., 2002). Importantly, it was found that guard cells of nia1, nia2 do respond to other closing stimuli such as darkness, H2O2 or a NO donor, implying that they do possess functional guard cells (Desikan et al., 2002). A stomatal closing response to NO also suggests that the deficiencies caused by the nia1, nia2 mutations lie upstream of NO in the signalling pathway. Together, these data provide firm genetic evidence for NR as a source of NO during ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. The significance of the apparently different sources of guard cell NO in pea and Arabidopsis and the potential contribution to NO synthesis by iNOS remain to be determined.
| Stomatal opening responses to ABA, H2O2 and NO |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ABA inhibition of stomatal opening is a process distinct from ABA-induced stomatal closure (Schroeder et al., 2001). Although it is now clear that both H2O2 and NO are essential signals required to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure, there is little information on whether these signalling molecules mediate ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening. In pea guard cells, treatment with catalase inhibited ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening, suggesting the involvement of H2O2 (R Desikan et al., unpublished data). Treatment of pea epidermal peels with exogenous H2O2 alone also inhibits stomatal opening. Preliminary pharmacological data indicate that a MAPK pathway is involved in H2O2-induction of stomatal closure, but not in H2O2 inhibition of stomatal opening (data not shown). Similar divergence of signalling pathways downstream of ABA has been reported by others. Arabidopsis knock-out mutant plants lacking functional G proteins show altered responses to ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening, but not ABA-induced closure (Wang et al., 2001). Interestingly, for NO, the data obtained with the nia1, nia2 double mutant indicate that although guard cells of these mutants do not close in response to ABA, inhibition of stomatal opening in response to ABA is not compromised (Desikan et al., 2002), suggesting that NR-mediated NO synthesis is not required for this response.
A recent publication describes the role of NO in promoting stomatal opening in Vicia faba (Sakihama et al., 2003). However, these data contradict those reported by Garcia-Mata and Lamattina (2001) from the same species, where NO was found to induce stomatal closure. These discrepancies could possibly be accounted for by the relative concentrations of the NO donor (SNAP) used. Whilst the Lamattina group used micromolar concentrations, at least 10-fold higher concentrations were used by Sakihama et al. (2003). This concentration dependence has also been observed in the authors laboratory in both pea and Arabidopsis (Neill et al., 2003a). NO (administered via SNP) in the range of 10200 µM causes stomatal closure whilst at higher concentrations of SNP (0.52 mM), stomata remain open. The physiological relevance for this phenomenon is not known, particularly as endogenous NO concentrations in and around guard cells have not yet been determined.
| H2O2 and NO signalling and cross-talk in guard cells |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is clear that both H2O2 and NO regulate stomatal movements. However, there is little information on the cellular processes by which H2O2 and NO act in guard cells. An understanding of the signalling events that occur downstream of H2O2 or NO may determine any convergence/divergence between stomatal closure (or opening) responses.
Pharmacological data from the authors laboratory suggest that MAPK(s) mediate both ABA and H2O2-induced stomatal closure (R Desikan et al., unpublished data; Burnett et al., 2000). In previous work it was shown that H2O2 induces the activation of a MAPK in cell cultures, leaves and protoplasts of Arabidopsis (Neill et al., 2002b). In pea epidermis, H2O2 induces the transient activation of a MAPK-like enzyme (R Desikan et al., unpublished data), possessing properties similar to those of the ABA-activated kinase (Burnett et al., 2000). Interestingly, treatment with the NO donor SNP also induces the transient activation of a similar kinase (data not shown). These data suggest that ABA, H2O2 and NO may converge on MAPK signalling pathways that are involved in regulating stomatal closure. Recent data from Giraudats laboratory identified an ABA-activated protein kinase, OST1, that lies upstream of H2O2 production in guard cells (Mustilli et al., 2002). It remains to be determined whether the ABA-activated kinase in pea also regulates H2O2 or NO production.
Protein dephosphorylation also plays an important role in ABA-induced stomatal movements (Schroeder et al., 2001). The protein phosphatase 2C enzymes ABI1 and ABI2 are negative regulators of ABA signalling (Merlot et al., 2001). Recent data from the Schroeder laboratory indicate that ABI1 lies upstream, and ABI2 downstream, of H2O2 synthesis in Arabidopsis guard cells (Murata et al., 2001). Further complexities in this scheme are likely to become apparent, as in vitro studies have revealed that ABI1 and ABI2 activities can be inhibited by H2O2 (Meinhard and Grill, 2001; Meinhard et al., 2002). Whether or not this occurs in vivo is not yet known. A recent addition to this proposed signalling scheme is NO. It has been shown in the authors laboratory that, in the abi1-1 and abi2-1 mutants that are ABA insensitive in their response to stomatal closure, NO synthesis still occurs in response to ABA. However, treatment with the NO donor SNP did not induce stomatal closure in these mutants, indicating that the action of both the phosphatase enzymes occurs downstream of NO synthesis (Desikan et al., 2002). Whether these enzymes can be modified directly by NO, as with H2O2 (Meinhard et al., 2002; Meinhard and Grill, 2001) is an interesting question.
Stomatal closure in response to ABA typically requires elevated cytosolic calcium (Allen et al., 2000). Synthesis and action of calcium-mobilizing molecules such as inositol trisphosphate and cADPR regulate these elevations in calcium (Leckie et al., 1998). There is some evidence that both H2O2 and NO actions in guard cells require calcium. H2O2 activates calcium channels in Arabidopsis guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Kohler et al., 2003). In conjunction with this, a role for phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in ABA-induced H2O2 generation was recently demonstrated in V. faba guard cells (Park et al., 2003). A requirement for calcium in NO-mediated stomatal closure has also been demonstrated (Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2001; R Desikan et al., unpublished data). In mammalian cells, NO acts via enhanced synthesis of cADPR. Using a pharmacological approach it was shown that ABA and NO-induced stomatal closure can be inhibited with nicotinamide, an antagonist of cADPR synthesis (Neill et al., 2002a), implying that ABA and NO-induced stomatal closure occur via synthesis of cADPR. However, NO-induced increases in cADPR synthesis (leading to elevations of cytosolic calcium) have not been demonstrated in guard cells or any other plant cell; clearly this is an important research priority that needs to be addressed.
In addition to regulating calcium channels, H2O2 also inhibits K+ channel activity and induces cytosolic alkalinsation in guard cells (Zhang et al., 2001a, b; Kohler et al., 2003). However, it is not known whether H2O2 acts directly on such ion channels via conformational changes to protein structure or via an intermediate mechanism. The role of NO in activating ion channels is not yet known, although it is quite likely that this will be a research area gaining much interest in the future.
NO action requires the synthesis of the cyclic nucleotide cyclic GMP (cGMP). Although the existence of this molecule in plants has been speculated for several years, recent data indicate that cGMP is indeed synthesized in plant cells, and enhanced in response to NO (Newton et al., 1999; Neill et al., 2003b). In guard cells, cGMP was highlighted as a likely target of NO signalling. Treatment of pea guard cells with with ODQ, an inhibitor of cGMP synthesis, attenuated ABA and NO-induced stomatal closure, processes that were reversed by co-incubation with 8Bromo-cGMP (8Br-cGMP, a cell-permeable analogue of cGMP). However, treatment with 8Br-cGMP alone did not induce stomatal closure, implying that cGMP synthesis is required, but not sufficient, for stomatal closure (Neill et al., 2002a). Interestingly, H2O2-induced closure is not inhibited by ODQ (R Desikan, unpublished data), suggesting a branch in the ABA-H2O2/NO signalling pathway (Fig. 2).
|
From the findings described above, it is not yet clear whether signalling pathways unique to either H2O2 or NO exist in guard cells. Given the convergence, divergence and network of signalling pathways that occur in response to ABA in guard cells, it may be that ABA-H2O2 and ABA-NO guard cell signalling are not singular entities and, instead, they are networked so that they function together to effect co-ordinated stomatal responses. It is now imperative to undertake further studies to dissect the complexities underlying H2O2 and NO signalling responses in guard cells.
| Conclusions and future perspectives |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Guard cells are a unique signal transduction research tool that provide an elegant system to dissect an intricate network of signalling pathways. Clearly, both H2O2 and NO play a central role in the guard cell ABA signalling network. Both H2O2 and NO are synthesized in response to ABA, perhaps in parallel, and both control a single responsea reduction in stomatal aperture. NADPH oxidase is a source of H2O2 biosynthesis in guard cells, although other sources could also exist. NO synthesis occurs via NR, and/or possibly other enzymes with NOS-like activity. Lack of either NADPH oxidase or NR activities reduces stomatal responses to ABA, but there is no indication that it results in plants with a wilty phenotype under normal growth conditions. Clearly, further evaluation of the mechanisms of synthesis of H2O2 and NO is required, in order to elucidate the exact function of their biosynthetic enzymes in response to ABA and drought stress in guard cells. Genetic ablation of both NADPH oxidase and NR, for example, will be useful to study the role of both H2O2 and NO in response to drought stress or ABA treatment. In the NR-deficient mutant, although the guard cells do not synthesize NO in response to ABA, they exhibit enhanced synthesis of H2O2 (R Desikan et al., unpublished data), perhaps reflecting a cellular capacity to compensate for the chronic lack of a key enzyme. Would plants lacking both NR and NADPH oxidase be able to retain functional guard cell ABA responses through some compensatory mechanism?
Development of techniques to monitor simultaneously the generation of H2O2 and NO in response to ABA, will be essential to discern the spatial and temporal co-ordination of events leading to stomatal closure. Investigating the position of different signalling components and their relative importance in this signalling scheme will allow this complex system to be understood more clearly. The use of various ABA signalling mutants defective in stomatal responses has already proved useful to position H2O2 and NO in the signalling scheme (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Desikan et al., 2002). Application of recently developed genetic screens to monitor water loss, such as thermo-imaging (Mustilli et al., 2002) may be useful in revealing novel targets of H2O2 and NO in guard cells. Identification of downstream targets of H2O2 and NO should be advanced using proteomics analysis of guard cells from the wild type, and from rboh or nia mutants. This technology should reveal novel targets for both H2O2 and NO in guard cells, for example, thiol-modified proteins, or newly synthesized proteins, and whether they are common or unique to H2O2 or NO. It has already been established that MAPKs, cGMP, cADPR, and protein phosphatases are likely targets downstream of H2O2 or NO. Further work is required here to measure, quantify and determine accurately the concentrations of cGMP and cADPR specifically in guard cells. Functional genomic studies have already proved useful to identify a source of H2O2 synthesis in guard cells (Kwak et al., 2003). This approach could also be utilized to determine the role of other components of guard cell signalling, such as MAPKs or cGMP-synthases, that are activated by H2O2 and/or NO, respectively. Guard cell research in the forthcoming years will no doubt remain exciting, with the prospect of developing plants better able to tolerate water stress, and thus impact on global agriculture.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allan CA, Fluhr R. 1997. Two distinct sources of elicited reactive oxygen species in tobacco epidermal cells. The Plant Cell 9, 15591572.[Abstract]
Allen GJ, Chu SP, Schumacher K, et al. 2000. Alteration of stimulus-specific guard cell calcium oscillations and stomatal closing in Arabidopsis det3 mutant. Science 289, 23382342.
Amicucci E, Gaschler K, Ward JM. 1999. NADPH oxidase genes from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus). Plant Biology 1, 524528.
Bray EA. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Sciences 2, 4854.
Burnett EC, Desikan R, Moser RC, Neill SJ. 2000. ABA-induced MAP kinase activation in Pisum sativum peels correlates with stomatal responses to ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 197205.
Chandok MR, Ytterberg AJ, van Wijk KJ, Klessig DF. 2003. The pathogen-inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in plants is a variant of the P protein of the glycine decarboxylase complex. Cell 113, 469482.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cooper CE, Patel RP, Brookes PS, Darley-Usmar VM. 2002. Nanotransducers in cellular redox signalling: modification of thiols by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 27, 489492.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Crawford NM, Forde BG. 2002. Molecular and developmental biology of inorganic nitrogen nutrition. In: Somerville CR, Meyerowitz EM, eds. The Arabidopsis book. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Biologists. http://www.aspb.org/publications/arabidopsis/.
Cross AR, Jones OTG. 1986. The effect of the inhibitor diphenylene iodonium on the superoxide-generating system of neutrophils. Biochemical Journal 237, 111116.[Web of Science][Medline]
Dean JV, Harper JE. 1988. The conversion of nitrite to nitrogen oxide(s) by the constitutive NAD(P)H-nitrate reductase enzyme from soybean. Plant Physiology 88, 389395.
Delledonne M, Zeier J, Marocco A, Lamb C. 2001. Signal interactions between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 1345413459.
Desikan R, A-H Mackerness S, Hancock JT, Neill SJ. 2001. Regulation of the Arabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress. Plant Physiology 127, 159172.
Desikan R, Burnett E, Hancock JT, Neill SJ. 1998. Harpin and hydrogen peroxide induce the expression of a homologue of gp91-phox in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 17671771.
Desikan R, Griffiths R, Hancock J, Neill S. 2002. A new role for an old enzyme: nitrate reductase-mediated nitric oxide generation is required for abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 1631416318.
Desikan R, Hancock JT, Neill SJ. 2003. Oxidative stress signalling. In: Hirt H, Shinozaki K, eds. Topics in current genetics. UK: Springer-Verlag, 121150.
Durner J, Gow AJ, Stamler JS, Glazebrook J. 1999. Ancient origins of nitric oxide signaling in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 1420614207.
Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. 2000. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408, 239247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Foissner I, Wendehenne D, Langebartels C, Durner J. 2000. In vivo imaging of an elicitor-induced nitric oxide burst in tobacco. The Plant Journal 23, 817824.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Garcia-Mata C, Lamattina L. 2001. Nitric oxide induces stomatal closure and enhances the adaptive plant responses against drought stress. Plant Physiology 126, 11961204.
Garcia-Mata C, Lamattina L. 2002. Nitric oxide and abscisic acid cross talk in guard cells. Plant Physiology 128, 790792.
Hetherington AM. 2001. Guard cell signalling. Cell 107, 711714.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Huang X, Rad Uv, Durner J. 2002. Nitric oxide induces transcriptional activation of the nitric oxide-tolerant alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis suspension cells. Planta 215, 914923.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kaiser WM, Weiner H, Kandlbimder A, Tsai C-B, Rockel P, Sonoda M, Planchet E. 2002. Modulation of nitrate reductase: some new insights, an unusual case and a potentially important side reaction. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 875882.
Keller T, Damude HG, Werner D, Doerner P, Dixon RA, Lamb C. 1998. A plant homolog of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase gp91-phox subunit gene encodes a plasma membrane protein with Ca2+ binding motifs. The Plant Cell 10, 255266.
Kohler B, Hills A, Blatt MR. 2003. Control of guard cell ion channels by hydrogen peroxide and abscisic acid indicates their action through alternate signaling pathways. Plant Physiology 131, 385388.
Kwak JM, Mori IC, Pei Z-M, Leonhardt N, Torres MA, Dangl JL, Bloom RE, Bodde S, Jones JDG, Schroeder JI. 2003. NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO Journal 22, 26232633.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Leckie CP, McAinsh MR, Allen GJ, Sanders D, Hetherington AM. 1998. Abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure mediated by cyclic ADP-ribose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 1583715842.
Lee S, Choi H, Suh S, Doo I-S, Oh K-Y, Choi EJ, Taylor ATS, Low PS, Lee Y. 1999. Oligogalacturonic acid and chitosan reduce stomatal aperture by inducing the evolution of reactive oxygen species from guard cells of tomato and Commelina communis. Plant Physiology 121, 147152.
McAinsh MR, Clayton H, Mansfield TA, Hetherington AM. 1996. Changes in stomatal behaviour and guard cell cytosolic free calcium in response to oxidative stress. Plant Physiology 111, 10311042.[Abstract]
Meinhard M, Grill E. 2001. Hydrogen peroxide is a regulator of ABI1, a protein phosphatase 2C from Arabidopsis. FEBS Letters 508, 443446.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Meinhard M, Rodriguez PL, Grill E. 2002. The sensitivity of ABI2 to hydrogen peroxide links the abscisic acid-response regulator to redox signalling. Planta 214, 775782.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Merlot S, Gosti F, Guerrier D, Vavasseur A, Giraudat J. 2001. The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatase 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway. The Plant Journal 25, 295303.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Murata Y, Pei Z-M, Mori IC, Schroeder J. 2001. Abscisic acid activation of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels in guard cells requires cytosolic NAD(P)H and is differentially disrupted upstream and downstream of reactive oxygen species production in abi1-1 and abi2-1 protein phosphatase 2C mutants. The Plant Cell 13, 25132523.
Mustilli A-C, Merlot S, Vavasseur A, Fenzi F, Giraudat J. 2002. Arabidopsis OST1 protein kinase mediates the regulation of stomatal aperture by abscisic acid and acts upstream of reactive oxygen species production. The Plant Cell 14, 30893099.
Neill SJ, Desikan R, Bright J, Hancock JT. 2003a. Nitric oxide as a mediator of abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. In: Magalhaes JR, Singh RP, Passos LP, eds. Nitric oxide signalling in higher plants. Houston, USA: The Science Tech Publisher, LCC.
Neill SJ, Desikan R, Clarke A, Hancock JT. 2002a. Nitric oxide is a novel component of abscisic acid signalling in stomatal guard cells. Plant Physiology 128, 1316.
Neill SJ, Desikan R, Clarke A, Hurst RD, Hancock JT. 2002b. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signalling molecules in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 12371242.
Neill SJ, Desikan R, Hancock JT. 2002c. Hydrogen peroxide signalling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5, 388395.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Neill SJ, Desikan R, Hancock JT. 2003b. Nitric oxide signalling in plants. New Phytologist 159, 1135.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Newton RP, Roef L, Witters E, Van Onckelen H. 1999. Cyclic nucleotides in higher plants: the enduring paradox. New Phytologist 143, 427455.[CrossRef]
Notton BA, Hewitt EJ. 1971. The role of tungsten in the inhibition of nitrate reductase activity in spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.) leaves. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 44, 702710.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Park K-Y, Jung J-Y, Park J, Hwang J-U, Kim Y-W, Hwang I, Lee Y. 2003. A role for phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in abscisic acid-induced reactive oxygen species generation in guard cells. Plant Physiology 132, 9298.
Pei Z-M, Murata Y, Benning G, Thomine S, Klusener B, Allen GJ, Grill E, Schroeder JI. 2000. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic signalling in guard cells. Nature 406, 731734.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rockel P, Strube F, Rockel A, Wildt J, Kaiser WM. 2002. Regulation of nitric oxide (NO) production by plant nitrate reductase in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 103110.
Sakihama Y, Murakamai S, Yamasaki H. 2003. Involvement of nitric oxide in the mechanism for stomatal opening in Vica faba leaves. Biologia Plantarum 45, 117117.[CrossRef]
Schroeder JI, Allen GJ, Hugouvieux V, Kwak JM, Waner D. 2001. Guard cell signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52, 627658.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Simon-Plas F, Elmayan T, Blein J-P. 2002. The plasma membrane oxidase NtrbohD is responsible for AOS production in elicited tobacco cells. The Plant Journal 31, 137147.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Torres MA, Dangl JL, Jones JDG. 2002. Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 517522.
Torres MA, Onouchi H, Hamada S, Machida C, Hammond-Kossack KE, Jones JDG. 1998. Six Arabidopsis thaliana homologues of the human respiratory burst oxidase (gp91-phox). The Plant Journal 14, 365370.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wang X-Q, Ullah H, Jones AM, Assmann SM. 2001. G protein regulation of ion channels and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells. Science 292, 20702072.
Wendehenne D, Pugin A, Klessig DF, Durner J. 2001. Nitric oxide: comparative synthesis and signalling in animal and plant cells. Trends in Plant Sciences 6, 177183.
Wilkinson JQ, Crawford NM. 1993. Identification and characterization of a chlorate-resistant mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana with mutations in both nitrate reductase structural genes NIA1 and NIA2. Molecular and General Genetics 239, 289297.
Yamasaki H, Sakihama Y. 2000. Simultaneous production of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite by plant nitrate reductase: in vitro evidence for the NR-dependent formation. FEBS Letters 468, 8992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yamasaki H, Sakihama Y, Takahashi S. 1999. An alternative pathway for nitric oxide production in plants: new features of an old enzyme. Trends in Plant Sciences 4, 128129.
Yoshioka H, Numata N, Nakajima K, Katou S, Kawakita K, Rowland O, Jones JDG, Doke N. 2003. Nicotiana benthamiana gp91phox homologs NbrbohA and NbrbohB participate in H2O2 accumulation and resistance to Phytophthora infestans. The Plant Cell 15, 706718.
Yoshioka H, Sugie K, Park HJ, Maeda H, Tsuda N, Kawakita K, Doke N. 2001. Induction of plant gp91phox homologue by fungal cell wall arachidonic acid, and salicylic acid in potato. Molecular PlantMicrobe Interactions 14, 725736.
Zhang X, Dong FC, Cao JF, Song CP. 2001a. Hydrogen peroxide-induced changes in intracellular pH of guard cells precede stomatal closure. Cell Research 11, 3743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zhang X, Miao YC, An GY, Zhou Y, Shangguan ZP, Gao JF, Song CP. 2001b. K+ channels inhibited by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in Vicia guard cells. Cell Research 11, 195202.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zhang X, Zhang L, Dong F, Gao J, Galbraith DW, Song C-P. 2001c. Hydrogen peroxide is involved in abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure in Vicia faba. Plant Physiology 126, 14381448.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Mika, M. J. Boenisch, D. Hopff, and S. Luthje Membrane-bound guaiacol peroxidases from maize (Zea mays L.) roots are regulated by methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and pathogen elicitors J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2010; 61(3): 831 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Corpas, M. Hayashi, S. Mano, M. Nishimura, and J. B. Barroso Peroxisomes Are Required for in Vivo Nitric Oxide Accumulation in the Cytosol following Salinity Stress of Arabidopsis Plants Plant Physiology, December 1, 2009; 151(4): 2083 - 2094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, H. Zhu, Q. Zhang, M. Li, M. Yan, R. Wang, L. Wang, R. Welti, W. Zhang, and X. Wang Phospholipase D{alpha}1 and Phosphatidic Acid Regulate NADPH Oxidase Activity and Production of Reactive Oxygen Species in ABA-Mediated Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, August 1, 2009; 21(8): 2357 - 2377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lin, H. Ding, J. Wang, H. Zhang, A. Zhang, Y. Zhang, M. Tan, W. Dong, and M. Jiang Positive feedback regulation of maize NADPH oxidase by mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in abscisic acid signalling J. Exp. Bot., July 10, 2009; (2009) erp157v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, Q. Fang, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, and X. Zheng The role of respiratory burst oxidase homologues in elicitor-induced stomatal closure and hypersensitive response in Nicotiana benthamiana J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(11): 3109 - 3122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Konopka-Postupolska, G. Clark, G. Goch, J. Debski, K. Floras, A. Cantero, B. Fijolek, S. Roux, and J. Hennig The Role of Annexin 1 in Drought Stress in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, July 1, 2009; 150(3): 1394 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ramirez, E. J. Zabaleta, and L. Lamattina Nitric oxide and frataxin: two players contributing to maintain cellular iron homeostasis Ann. Bot., June 25, 2009; (2009) mcp147v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, Y. Li, D. Xing, and C. Gao Characterization of mitochondrial dynamics and subcellular localization of ROS reveal that HsfA2 alleviates oxidative damage caused by heat stress in Arabidopsis J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(7): 2073 - 2091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Li, Y.-Q. Liu, P. Lu, H.-F. Lin, Y. Bai, X.-C. Wang, and Y.-L. Chen A Signaling Pathway Linking Nitric Oxide Production to Heterotrimeric G Protein and Hydrogen Peroxide Regulates Extracellular Calmodulin Induction of Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, May 1, 2009; 150(1): 114 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pitzschke and H. Hirt Disentangling the Complexity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling Plant Physiology, February 1, 2009; 149(2): 606 - 615. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Seligman, E. E. Saviani, H. C. Oliveira, C. A. F. Pinto-Maglio, and I. Salgado Floral Transition and Nitric Oxide Emission During Flower Development in Arabidopsis thaliana is Affected in Nitrate Reductase-Deficient Plants Plant Cell Physiol., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1112 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Avila, M. Brown, S. Pan, R. Desikan, S. J. Neill, T. Girke, M. Surpin, and N. V. Raikhel Expression analysis of Arabidopsis vacuolar sorting receptor 3 reveals a putative function in guard cells J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2008; 59(6): 1149 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Neill, R. Barros, J. Bright, R. Desikan, J. Hancock, J. Harrison, P. Morris, D. Ribeiro, and I. Wilson Nitric oxide, stomatal closure, and abiotic stress J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2008; 59(2): 165 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wang, X. Xing, and N. Crawford Nitrite Acts as a Transcriptome Signal at Micromolar Concentrations in Arabidopsis Roots Plant Physiology, December 1, 2007; 145(4): 1735 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Foresi, A. M. Laxalt, C. V. Tonon, C. A. Casalongue, and L. Lamattina Extracellular ATP Induces Nitric Oxide Production in Tomato Cell Suspensions Plant Physiology, November 1, 2007; 145(3): 589 - 592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xing, W. Jia, and J. Zhang AtMEK1 mediates stress-induced gene expression of CAT1 catalase by triggering H2O2 production in Arabidopsis J. Exp. Bot., August 28, 2007; (2007) erm144v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kwak, V. Nguyen, and J. I. Schroeder The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Hormonal Responses Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 323 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Torres, J. D.G. Jones, and J. L. Dangl Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling in Response to Pathogens Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 373 - 378. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zhang, M. Jiang, J. Zhang, M. Tan, and X. Hu Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Involved in Abscisic Acid-Induced Antioxidant Defense and Acts Downstream of Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Leaves of Maize Plants Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 475 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Zago, S. Morsa, J. F. Dat, P. Alard, A. Ferrarini, D. Inze, M. Delledonne, and F. Van Breusegem Nitric Oxide- and Hydrogen Peroxide-Responsive Gene Regulation during Cell Death Induction in Tobacco Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 404 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mishra, W. Zhang, F. Deng, J. Zhao, and X. Wang A bifurcating pathway directs abscisic acid effects on stomatal closure and opening in Arabidopsis. Science, April 14, 2006; 312(5771): 264 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Crawford Mechanisms for nitric oxide synthesis in plants J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2006; 57(3): 471 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stohr and S. Stremlau Formation and possible roles of nitric oxide in plant roots J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2006; 57(3): 463 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Perazzolli, M. C. Romero-Puertas, and M. Delledonne Modulation of nitric oxide bioactivity by plant haemoglobins J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2006; 57(3): 479 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhou, Z. Guo, J. Xing, and B. Huang Nitric oxide is involved in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant activities in Stylosanthes guianensis J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2005; 56(422): 3223 - 3228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-Q. Guo and N. M. Crawford Arabidopsis Nitric Oxide Synthase1 Is Targeted to Mitochondria and Protects against Oxidative Damage and Dark-Induced Senescence PLANT CELL, December 1, 2005; 17(12): 3436 - 3450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xin, Y. Zhao, and Z.-L. Zheng Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Specific Modulation of Abscisic Acid Signaling by ROP10 Small GTPase in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1350 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Davletova, L. Rizhsky, H. Liang, Z. Shengqiang, D. J. Oliver, J. Coutu, V. Shulaev, K. Schlauch, and R. Mittler Cytosolic Ascorbate Peroxidase 1 Is a Central Component of the Reactive Oxygen Gene Network of Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, January 1, 2005; 17(1): 268 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Chaves and M. M. Oliveira Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2365 - 2384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







