Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/400/1245    most recent
erh107v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graciet, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gontero, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graciet, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gontero, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Graciet, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gontero, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 55, No. 400, pp. 1245-1254, May 1, 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press


Photosynthetic Carbon Fluxes

Emergence of new regulatory mechanisms in the Benson–Calvin pathway via protein–protein interactions: a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase/CP12/phosphoribulokinase complex

Received 11 September 2003; Accepted 16 January 2004

Emmanuelle Graciet*, Sandrine Lebreton and Brigitte Gontero{dagger}

Laboratoire d’ingéniérie des protéines et contrôle métabolique, Département Biologie des génomes, Institut Jacques Monod, UMR 7592 CNRS, Universités Paris VI-VII, 2 place Jussieu, F-75251 Paris cedex 05, France

* Present address: California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology, 147-75, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Abbreviations, GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PRK, phosphoribulokinase; FBPase, fructose 1;6-bisphosphatase; RubisCO, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; SBPase, sedoheptulose 1;7-bisphosphatase; PRI, phosphoribose isomerase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; DTT, dithiothreitol; PGA, 3-phosphoglyceric acid; BPGA, 1;3-biphosphoglyceric acid; RuBP, ribulose 1;5-bisphosphate; Ru5P, ribulose 5-phosphate; IUPs, intrinsically unstructured proteins.
{dagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +33 1 44 27 57 16. E-mail: meunier{at}ijm.jussieu.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Protein–protein interactions are involved in many metabolic pathways. This review will focus on the role of such associations in CO2 assimilation (Benson–Calvin cycle) and especially on the involvement of a GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex which has been identified in many photosynthetic organisms and may have an important role in the regulation of CO2 assimilation. The emergence of new kinetic and regulatory properties as a consequence of protein–protein interactions will be addressed as well as some of the questions raised by the existence of these supramolecular complexes such as composition, function, and assembly pathways. The presence and role of small intrinsically unstructured proteins like the 8.5 kDa protein CP12, involved in the regulation and/or assembly of these complexes will be discussed.

Key words: Benson–Calvin cycle, CP12, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, multienzyme complex assembly, phosphoribulokinase, protein–protein interactions.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
It is now clear that, in vivo, enzymes bind to other proteins in a highly specific manner to form more complex structures and interact with many components of the cell, such as the membrane. These organized structures have been isolated from prokaryotic organisms and from many organelles of eukaryotic cells, and are quite ubiquitous. The evidence supporting the existence of multienzyme complexes in sequential metabolic pathways is more compelling for some pathways (e.g. glycolysis) than for others (Srere, 1987). The term ‘metabolon’ has been introduced to describe supramolecular complexes of sequential metabolic enzymes and structural components (Srere, 1985). Recent experimental data clearly support the existence of metabolons especially for the Krebs tricarboxylic acid cycle (Velot and Srere, 2000). In the cell, proteins are packed together (Goodsell, 1991) and the mean distance between them is lower than the mean diameter of a protein (Srere, 1982). Thus, specific interactions between them, requiring both spatial and electrostatic complementarities, are very likely to occur in vivo. Recently, global studies on protein–protein interactions have been performed on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by using different methods, such as the TAP-tag (Tandem Affinity Purification), protein arrays, two-hybrid, or surface plasmon resonance (Biacore) coupled to the identification of proteins by mass spectrometry. The TAP-tag method used by Gavin et al. (2002) has identified complexes of which 58% had never been observed before and 33% involved proteins of unknown function (Gavin et al., 2002; Ho et al., 2002; Uetz et al., 2000). These studies also indicate that the composition of these complexes in vivo may vary, depending on physiological conditions. Thus, proteins are not isolated but associate into dynamic complexes that may themselves interact to create a network of complexes. Predictions on the role of these higher order structures show that they participate in many cellular functions (Gavin et al., 2002; Kumar and Snyder, 2002). Only recently, has the concept that metabolic pathways consist of multienzymes, been applied to plants.

The frequency and the dynamic behaviour of macromolecular complexes trigger new questions as to their composition, the cellular functions they are involved in and the advantage of such complexes compared with individual proteins. In recent years, the use of very sensitive analytical techniques has also revealed the presence of small proteins in macromolecular complexes. These small proteins are found in a wide variety of macromolecular complexes, such as pufX and the photosynthetic core complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides (Jungas et al., 1999; Francia et al., 2002), complexins and SNARE complexes (Pabst et al., 2000, 2002), and IF1 and ATPase (Cabezon et al., 2000, 2001; Solaini et al., 1997). The presence of such small proteins in higher order structures raises questions about their role in the formation and regulation of these complexes. One may also wonder what signal in the protein triggers the association with specific partners into stable or transitory complexes? Is it possible to predict such signals? Are there conformational changes upon the association of proteins to form higher order structures? These questions have stimulated research in this field and the study of protein–protein interactions now appears as one of the major issues for the years to come. This review focuses on recent advances in this domain and addresses specific aspects of the regulation of the metabolic pathway responsible for carbon dioxide assimilation, the so-called Benson–Calvin cycle, via protein–protein interactions. Recent studies on a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase/CP12/phosphoribulokinase complex involved in CO2 assimilation will be emphasized, as it is considered to be a good model to answer some of the questions mentioned above.


    The Benson–Calvin cycle and its regulation
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The photochemical stage of photosynthesis corresponds to the oxidation of a water molecule followed by an electron transfer in the photosynthetic chain of the thylakoid membrane. At the end of the electron transfer chain, NADP is reduced into NADPH. The electron transfer is also coupled with the translocation of protons through the thylakoid membrane, responsible for the formation of a proton gradient used by ATP synthase to synthesize ATP. Both NADPH and ATP are then used during the second stage of photosynthesis that corresponds to the CO2 assimilation or Benson–Calvin cycle. This metabolic pathway is regulated by light and does not operate in the dark (Leegood, 1990).

Phosphoribulokinase (PRK), ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO), two enzymes specific to this cycle, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase) have been considered as key enzymes because their regulation by dark/light transitions is responsible for the regulation of the cycle. Extensive in vivo analyses have been carried out to study the role of these key enzymes in the regulation of the Benson–Calvin cycle. Experiments using antisense rbcS to decrease expression of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase have been reviewed previously (Stitt and Schulze, 1994). The most important findings are that, in fairly low irradiance conditions, antisense plants with 40% less RubisCO than the wild type, are capable of almost the same rate of photosynthesis as the wild type. Nonetheless, at high irradiance, or when plants are grown on limiting inorganic nitrogen, RubisCO exerts more control. It was also shown that, in plants with decreased RubisCO, the amount of starch which is accumulated in the leaf, but not mobilized for plant growth, was decreased, probably by limiting ‘wastage’ of carbohydrate. Water use efficiency also decreased while the rate of transpiration and stomatal conductance remained unchanged (Stitt and Schulze, 1994).

Recent analyses of transgenic plants also indicate that GAPDH, PRK, and FBPase have little control over photosynthetic carbon fixation (Raines, 2003). The antisense studies have revealed the importance of the levels of individual enzymes in controlling primary carbon flux and allocation. However, reductions in the level of some enzymes, for example, PRK and GAPDH, have little effect on carbon flux. The regulatory properties of these enzymes allow reductions in protein levels to be compensated for by increases in their activation state (Paul et al., 1995; Price et al., 1995; Banks et al., 1999). The regulation of PRK and GAPDH is certainly complex.

PRK and GAPDH, respectively, use ATP and NADPH that have been synthesized during the first stage of photosynthesis. PRK catalyses the following reaction:

Ribulose 5-phosphate + ATP->Ribulose 1,5-biphosphate+ADP

Chloroplast GAPDH uses NAD(P)H according to the following equation:

1,3-biphosphoglyceric acid + NAD(P)H->glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate+NAD(P)

It also has the ability to use NAD(H) and thus contributes to glycolysis, whose first steps at least occur in the chloroplast (Plaxton, 1996).

The properties of isolated PRK (Miziorko, 2000) and GAPDH (Baalmann et al., 1995) are well known, but many questions remain as to their regulation and structure in supramolecular complexes.


    Redox regulation of the Benson–Calvin cycle
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The redox state of the key enzymes of the Benson–Calvin cycle is regulated by 12 kDa proteins, thioredoxins. Two isoforms (m and f) of thioredoxins are found in chloroplasts and have a high level of amino acid sequence similarity. Their active sites have a consensus sequence (WC(G/P)PC) (Jacquot et al., 2002). By contrast, no consensus amino acid sequence motif has been found on target proteins.

The redox state of thioredoxins is also regulated by dark/light transitions. Their reduction is mediated by reduced ferredoxin, produced during the first stage of photosynthesis, and a specific enzyme, the ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase. Other reducing agents such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or ß-mercaptoethanol are often used in vitro to simulate the effects of thioredoxins. In vitro studies have shown that the effect of thioredoxins may be further modulated by other metabolites, such as NADPH, ATP, Mg2+, or substrates (Faske et al., 1995; Wolosiuk et al., 1993).

Experiments performed on isolated PRK have demonstrated that this enzyme is inactive in its oxidized form. Its reduction by thioredoxin and DTT leads to its activation. Alkylation and site-directed mutagenesis studies have shown the existence of a regulatory disulphide bridge in this enzyme (Brandes et al., 1996; Porter and Hartman, 1988). Higher plant GAPDH and FBPase have also been shown to be regulated by thioredoxins and redox transitions (Balmer et al., 2001; Jacquot et al., 1997; Li et al., 1994; Qi et al., 2001; Sparla et al., 2002).


    Regulation by other physiological parameters
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Other parameters change in the chloroplast during dark/light transitions and may play a role in the regulation of the Benson–Calvin cycle. The pH of the stroma most probably increases from 7 to 8 upon dark to light transitions (Heldt et al., 1973; Werdan et al., 1975). Accordingly, it has been found that the optimum pH of most enzymes involved in the Benson–Calvin cycle is close to 8 (Heldt et al., 1973). The proton translocation across the membrane also causes the movement of a counter-ion, Mg2+, whose concentration in the stroma has been shown to increase upon dark to light transitions. CO2 assimilation seems to be regulated by the concentration of this cation (Portis and Heldt, 1976).

Finally, dark/light transitions are also responsible for changes in the concentration of metabolites such as ATP, NADP(H), phosphoglyceric acid (PGA), and NAD(H). However, it is extremely difficult to obtain accurate measurements of the in vivo concentrations of metabolites. In addition, their distribution within the stroma is probably not homogeneous. They may be more concentrated in some parts, while almost absent in other parts of the stroma. One must therefore be extremely cautious when interpreting the regulation of enzymes by metabolites.


    Specific regulatory mechanisms for RubisCO
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Extensive study of the regulation of RubisCO (see the review of Houtz and Portis, 2003) has shown that, under steady-state conditions, its activity is regulated by variations in its activation state rather than by fluctuations in substrate concentration, ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP). In vivo, carbamylation of the residue Lys 101 permits the binding of the catalytically essential divalent metal (Mg2+). Both carbamylation and an increase in activity are required when irradiance increases. The activation of RubisCO is mediated by the stromal protein Rubisco activase (Portis, 1992; Portis et al., 1995) which acts by removing the otherwise inhibitory sugar phosphates, RuBP, and in some plants, 2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphate. Rubisco activase is a member of the ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA+) protein family that constitutes a wide variety of proteins with chaperone-like functions. It is a nuclear-encoded chloroplast protein that usually consists of two isoforms generated by alternative splicing of a pre-mRNA. These two isoforms differ only at the carboxyl terminus. The activity of Rubisco activase is regulated by the ADP/ATP ratio and the larger isoform is regulated through thioredoxin f. The presence of two Cys residues found only in the larger isoform is responsible for this activation (Zhang and Portis, 1999). RubisCO, therefore, can be regulated via the activase in response to light intensity. The major mechanism for compensation of a decrease in the amount of RubisCO in transgenic plants is an increase in the RubisCO activation state, presumably involving Rubisco activase (Stitt and Schulze, 1994).


    Supramolecular complexes of the Benson–Calvin cycle
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The idea that the enzymes involved in this metabolic pathway are not randomly distributed in the chloroplast stroma, but interact to give multienzyme complexes, has been forwarded because some of these proteins, for example, PRK and GAPDH, could not be easily isolated by conventional purification methods, such as ion exchange, gel filtration, and affinity chromatographies and co-purifies with other enzymes of the Benson–Calvin cycle. In addition, different authors have isolated multienzyme complexes from pea and spinach with varying compositions (Giudici-Orticoni et al., 1992; Gontero et al., 1988, 1993, 1994; Müller, 1972; Sainis and Harris, 1986; Sainis and Jawali, 1994; Sainis et al., 1989), which may be linked to their dissociation during the purification procedure. Hence, smaller complexes may be considered as sub-complexes of higher order structures. Strikingly, Clasper et al. (1991) and, more recently, Scheibe et al. (2002) have isolated a PRK/GAPDH complex in spinach leaves, which is also found in green algae such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Avilan et al., 1997b; Wedel and Soll, 1998), Scenedesmus obliquus (Nicholson et al., 1987; O’Brien et al., 1976), and in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 (Wedel and Soll, 1998). This complex may, therefore, correspond to the core complex of a supercomplex involved in CO2 assimilation.

Lately, a small 8.5 kDa protein, named CP12, has also been identified in most of these complexes (spinach, pea, tobacco, C. reinhardtii, and Synechocystis) (Pohlmeyer et al., 1996; Wedel and Soll, 1998; Wedel et al., 1997).


    Organization of the Benson–Calvin cycle in C. reinhardtii
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Immunolocalization studies on C. reinhardtii have shown that phosphoribose isomerase (PRI), PRK, phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), GAPDH, and FBPase co-localize and are located near the thylakoid membrane. Enzymes of the Benson–Calvin cycle in this green alga thus seem to be organized in supramolecular complexes, as the Benson–Calvin cycle of higher plants (Süss et al., 1995).

In the laboratory, Avilan et al. (1997b) have isolated a 460 kDa complex that seemed to be composed of two homodimers of PRK and two homotetramers A4 of GAPDH. Wedel and Soll (1998) have shown that this complex also had a third 8.5 kDa protein, CP12. Attempts by the laboratory to reveal the presence of this protein by immunochemical methods failed, until the complex was studied by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, finally showing that the complex isolated by Avilan et al. (1997b) was the same as that found by Wedel and Soll (1998). In higher plants, chloroplast GAPDH is present as an A2B2 tetramer. The B subunit carries a C-terminal extension responsible for the oligomerization of higher plant chloroplast GAPDH into an A8B8 regulatory form (Baalmann et al., 1996; Li et al., 1994). In green algae such as C. reinhardtii and Scenedesmus obliquus, GAPDH is only present as an A4 homotetramer. Interestingly, CP12 shares sequence homologies with the C terminal extension of the B subunit of GAPDH (Pohlmeyer et al., 1996), that contains two cysteine residues believed to be involved in the redox regulation of this enzyme (Baalmann et al., 1995; Qi et al., 2001; Sparla et al., 2002).


    Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The complex described above is relatively simple compared with most higher plant complexes, as it is made up of only two enzymes and a small protein. This composition facilitates site-directed mutagenesis programmes to identify the residues involved in protein–protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis coupled to in vitro reconstitution experiments enables the characterization of chimeric complexes, since the oxidized partners are able spontaneously to reconstitute a complex in vitro, which is quite similar to the native state (Gontero et al., 2001; Lebreton et al., 1997b).

The GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex is dissociated by reducing agents such as DTT, which enables the purification of isolated PRK and a sub-complex of GAPDH and CP12, also called native GAPDH (Avilan et al., 1997b). The kinetic properties of PRK and GAPDH, both embedded within the complex and as individual enzymes, have been analysed (Lebreton and Gontero, 1999; Lebreton et al., 1997b; Graciet et al., 2003b)

Studies on the complex have shown that PRK within the complex is active. The progress curve of the reaction catalysed by the PRK embedded in the complex displays a lag, which corresponds to the dissociation of the complex. If this complex is first incubated in the reaction mixture lacking the substrates of PRK, then no lag is observed when the reaction is started by adding the substrates (Lebreton et al., 1997b).

Studies on PRK kinetics in this system suggest a model that links the activity of PRK to the dissociation of the complex. The equation that may be derived from the model fits the experimental results best, only if one assumes (as postulated in the model) that both the free PRK released upon dissociation of the complex and the bound PRK of this complex are active. If only the free PRK is assumed to be active, the fit is biased. One may therefore measure the reaction rate catalysed by the bound PRK of the complex by monitoring the reaction rate immediately after mixing this complex with its substrates in a suitable reaction medium. The active oxidized form of PRK that has just been released by the dissociation of the complex in the assay mixture is not stable, for it slowly loses its activity and becomes identical to the stable, almost inactive, form. This recently dissociated PRK is thus considered as a metastable form of the enzyme and its conformation changes have been characterized by fluorescence spectroscopy (Lebreton et al., 1997b). Hence, there are three different forms that have different conformations and activities: the stable enzyme, the enzyme bound to GAPDH/CP12 sub-complex, and the metastable free enzyme. Each of these three forms exists under both oxidized and reduced states which differ in their Km and kcat values (Fig. 1; Table 1) (Lebreton and Gontero, 1999; Lebreton et al., 1997b).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Model explaining the origin of the metastable forms of PRK and native GAPDH. The inserted tables illustrate the different kinetic parameters obtained for different forms of PRK and GAPDH. It was not possible to characterize the kinetic parameters of GAPDH included in the complex as its dissociation was too fast in the presence of its substrates (Graciet et al., 2002). The dissociation of the complex results in the appearance of metastable forms that relapse into stable forms. Some of the kinetic parameters of these metastable forms have been characterized (see Table 1). The standard errors (SE) on all parameters were less than 10%. Kinetic parameters for PRK are from Lebreton and Gontero (1999).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of the metastable forms of PRK and GAPDH The metastable forms were obtained from the complex after dilution. It was shown that the conversion (characterized by a dissociation rate constant, k*) of the PRK embedded into the complex into the dissociated metastable form is 10-fold faster under reducing conditions than under oxidizing conditions (k* is about 0.1 min–1 for the oxidized complex and 1 min–1 for the reduced one) (Lebreton and Gontero, 1999). For GAPDH, this rate constant is too fast and has not been determined. The values of Km for NAD(P)H have also not been characterized for this form. The standard errors (SE) on all parameters were less than 10%. Kinetic parameters for PRK are from Lebreton and Gontero (1999). Kinetic parameters for GAPDH are from Lebreton et al. (2003).
 
Mixing the stable, oxidized, and almost inactive, PRK with GAPDH/CP12 results in the formation of the bi-enzyme complex and in the increase of the catalytic activity of PRK (Avilan et al., 1997b). From these data it seems that GAPDH/CP12 may give an instruction to PRK and, as a consequence of their interaction, an increase of activity of PRK is observed.

Moreover, the metastable PRK which is released just after dissociation of the complex and whose activity and conformation evolve with time is very active compared with the stable isolated PRK (Table 1). This high activity has been linked to an imprinting exerted on PRK by GAPDH/CP12. This imprinting lasts even after dissociation of PRK from the GAPDH/CP12 sub-complex, as if the enzyme kept the memory of the conformation it had in the complex before slowly relapsing into the stable, isolated, inactive form. A possible explanation for the higher activity of metastable PRK compared with the same enzyme associated with GAPDH/CP12 is that the catalytic activity requires an important mobility of the enzyme which is favoured if it is in a free state.

Conversely, PRK may be expected to exert an imprinting effect on the GAPDH/CP12 sub-complex. Such an effect has been demonstrated and it affects the catalysis of GAPDH with NADH or NADPH as cofactors by decreasing the energy barrier of these reactions by 3.8±0.5 and 1.3±0.3 kJ mol–1, respectively. This effect was quantified using the statistical thermodynamic theory mentioned below. With regard to CP12, its association with GAPDH is responsible for changes in the kinetic parameters of GAPDH, probably due to conformation changes (Graciet et al., 2003b).

These associations also result in the modification of the regulatory properties of the enzymes. When PRK and GAPDH are within the complex, they are regulated by NADP(H), but not when they are in stable isolated states (Graciet et al., 2002). The activities of the metastable PRK and GAPDH, that correspond to the forms released just after dissociation of the complex upon dilution and that slowly evolved into the stable forms, have been measured. The activities of the metastable PRK and GAPDH from the complex preincubated with NADP(H) are different from those of the metastable enzymes released from the untreated complex. NADP increases PRK and NADPH-GAPDH activities and decreases NADH-GAPDH activity; NAD(H) has no effect. NADPH slightly activates PRK and inhibits GAPDH using NADH. As a consequence of NADP(H) binding, the imprinting effects of these two enzymes on each other are modified. Thus, incubation with NADP increases the energy barrier of the NADH-GAPDH dependent reaction by 1.8±0.2 kJ mol–1 and decreases that of the reaction catalysed by PRK by 3±0.2 kJ mol–1 and GAPDH using NADPH by 1.2±0.3 kJ mol–1 (Graciet et al., 2002). These same metabolites have been shown to regulate an oligomeric 600 kDa form of GAPDH in spinach (Baalmann et al., 1996; Wolosiuk and Buchanan, 1976) that is absent from C. reinhardtii.

As the Benson–Calvin cycle is redox-regulated, the activation of oxidized PRK, either free or as part of a complex, by reduced thioredoxin was studied. Reduced thioredoxin may act on PRK either within the complex or in the free states (stable or metastable forms). However, the time required to activate the enzyme as part of the complex is shorter than the one required to activate the free forms. Moreover, this time is similar to the induction time of the Benson–Calvin cycle upon dark–light transitions. With regard to GAPDH, incubation of a crude extract from C. reinhardtii with dithiothreitol increased GAPDH activity 3-fold (Li et al., 1994). Surprisingly, the same increase in NADPH-dependent activity is obtained for GAPDH when it is part of the complex, but not for the individual enzyme. A titration of the thiol groups of GAPDH in the complex reveals 4 SH groups, whatever the redox state of the complex, while each PRK monomer in the oxidized complex has one disulphide bridge that is disrupted upon reduction. These results show that the modulation of GAPDH activity is not linked to disulphide reduction, but to heterologous interactions. The regulation of PRK may thus modulate the activity of GAPDH via a ‘domino-like’ effect (Lebreton et al., 2003).

Protein–protein interactions are responsible for kinetic and conformational changes that may last, even after dissociation of the supramolecular structure. Such changes have also been shown to occur upon association of the proteins. As directly demonstrated by cryo-electron microscopy, GAPDH and PRK undergo important conformational changes upon association, compared with the enzymes in their isolated state (Mouche et al., 2002).


    Protein–protein interactions and information transfer
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
As mentioned above, association between enzymes may result in the change of their properties as enzymes may store some energy upon association. Kinetic studies have led to the development of a thermodynamic theory by J Ricard and coworkers to explain the origin of the energy required to generate these modifications (Ricard et al., 1994, 1998). This theory states that an information transfer between PRK and GAPDH occurs within the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex and it may be quantified. Imprinting effects have emerged from this theory, but they imply the dissociation of the complex and the existence of metastable forms of the enzymes, that have different kinetic properties and probably different conformations compared with the same enzyme in the complex or under an isolated state. The imprinting of GAPDH on PRK has been demonstrated and quantified in the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex from C. reinhardtii (Lebreton and Gontero, 1999; Lebreton et al., 1997a, b). PRK also exerts an imprinting on GAPDH, which is responsible for the decrease of the kinetic barriers of the reactions catalysed by GAPDH. Thus, protein–protein interactions are responsible for kinetic and conformational changes that may last, even after dissociation of the supramolecular structure. Many examples in the literature illustrate the emergence of novel functions as a consequence of protein–protein interactions such as the plasminogen-streptokinase, the Ras-GTPase activating protein, and the prions, to cite but a few (Ricard et al., 1998).


    Nature of protein–protein interactions and supramolecular complex assembly
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The gene coding for PRK of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been isolated, cloned and expressed in E. coli. The recombinant protein may form, with native GAPDH (or GAPDH/CP12 sub-complex), a complex, which is apparently kinetically indistinguishable from that extracted from Chlamydomonas cells. A C. reinhardtii mutant (12-2B) previously isolated and shown to bear a R64C mutation in PRK has been studied (Roesler et al., 1992; Salvucci and Ogren, 1985). Avilan et al. demonstrated that the mutation of this residue impaired the interaction of PRK with GAPDH to form the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex (Avilan et al., 1997a). Whereas the R64A and R64E mutant PRKs are unable to form a complex with GAPDH, the R64K mutant does, although only slightly.

Protein–protein association is a process that is harder to simulate than ligand–protein association, as both interacting molecules are large and will, in general, have complex shapes and charge distributions (Sheinerman et al., 2000). In order to study the nature of the protein–protein interactions within the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex, heterologous expression systems have been developed for the two other partners, GAPDH and CP12 (Graciet et al., 2003a, b). The role of CP12 in the assembly pathway of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex has been investigated, as no complex could ever be reconstituted in vitro using isolated native PRK and recombinant GAPDH (devoid of CP12). Reconstitution assays show that oxidized CP12, in addition to modifying GAPDH kinetic properties and, probably, conformation, also acts as a linker in the assembly of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex (Graciet et al., 2003b). The presence of two disulphide bridges in oxidized CP12 seems to be essential for complex reconstitution. The lack of overall organization and the great flexibility of oxidized CP12 observed by nuclear magnetic resonance and circular dichroism are in good agreement with the role of this protein as a linker. Its behaviour resembles that of ‘intrinsically unstructured proteins’ or ‘IUPs’ (Dyson and Wright, 2002; Tompa, 2002; Wright and Dyson, 1999), often involved in protein–protein interactions. The flexibility of these IUPs as well as that of CP12, favours the binding of partners. In many cases, it has been shown that partly disordered conformations provide flexibility and adaptability. Both characteristics explain why these IUPs may be functionally important for the properties of biological macromolecules (Namba, 2001).

Data obtained from surface plasmon resonance binding experiments and in vitro reconstitution assays suggest a model for the assembly process (Fig. 2). The first step in the assembly is the association of CP12 with GAPDH, with a dissociation constant (Kd) close to 0.44 nM. This association is followed by a change of the conformation of GAPDH. This GAPDH/CP12 complex then binds PRK with a Kd close to 60 nM to form half-a-complex, defined as one unit. This unit dimerizes to give the native complex composed of two dimers of PRK, two tetramers of GAPDH and, probably two monomers of CP12 (Fig. 1) (Graciet et al., 2003b).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Model describing the assembly process of GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The dissociation constants (Kd) were obtained using surface plasmon resonance (Graciet et al., 2003a). The inserted table corresponds to kinetic parameters of the stable GAPDH. The standard errors (SE) on all parameters were less than 10%. Kinetic parameters are from Graciet et al. (2003b) and the assembly pathway of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex is from Graciet et al. (2003a).

 
The formation of this complex may be a prerequisite for efficient light activation of the enzymes and subsequent docking of the other enzymes of the Benson–Calvin cycle as the use of immunoelectron cryomicroscopy reveals that, in addition to PRK and GAPDH, phosphoribose isomerase, RubisCO, FBP aldolase, sedoheptulose bisphosphatase, nitrite reductase, ferredoxin NADP oxidoreductase, and ATP synthase are also found (Süss et al., 1995), and also as higher supramolecular complexes have been described (Anderson et al., 1995; Gontero et al., 1988).


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Transitory or stable interactions between proteins play extremely diverse functions in the cell’s life, from signal transduction to an optimal and fine regulation of metabolic pathways. A better understanding of the biological roles of these supramolecular complexes would be facilitated by the study of ‘simple’ models. The work on a CO2-assimilating GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex isolated from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii enables the diverse roles of protein–protein interactions in supramolecular complexes, as mentioned above, to be dealt with. Nonetheless, many questions regarding the existence, composition, and dynamics of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK complex in vivo remain to be answered. Is the composition of this complex the same whatever the physiological conditions? Are there physiological factors that trigger dissociation or association events? Can this complex be considered as the core of a bigger supramolecular complex, other enzymes having the possibility to dock to this core complex? The study of this complex and other complexes, although far from being trivial will clearly help in the understanding of how metabolic pathways are regulated.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Benson-Calvin cycle and...
 Redox regulation of the...
 Regulation by other...
 Specific regulatory mechanisms...
 Supramolecular complexes of the...
 Organization of the Benson...
 Studies of the GAPDH/CP12/PRK...
 Protein-protein interactions and...
 Nature of protein-protein...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Anderson LE, Goldhaber-Gordon IM, Li D, Tang XY, Xiang M, Prakash N. 1995. Enzyme–enzyme interaction in the chloroplast: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, triose phosphate isomerase and aldolase. Planta 196, 245–255.[ISI][Medline]

Avilan L, Gontero B, Lebreton S, Ricard J. 1997a. Information transfer in multienzyme complexes-2. The role of Arg64 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii phosphoribulokinase in the information transfer between glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphoribulokinase. European Journal of Biochemistry 250, 296–302.[ISI][Medline]

Avilan L, Gontero B, Lebreton S, Ricard J. 1997b. Memory and imprinting effects in multienzyme complexes. I. Isolation, dissociation, and reassociation of a phosphoribulokinase-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase complex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts. European Journal of Biochemistry 246, 78–84.[ISI][Medline]

Baalmann E, Backhausen JE, Rak C, Vetter S, Scheibe R. 1995. Reductive modification and non-reductive activation of purified spinach chloroplast NADP-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 324, 201–208.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Baalmann E, Scheibe R, Cerff R, Martin W. 1996. Functional studies of chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase subunits A and B expressed in Escherichia coli: formation of highly active A4 and B4 homotetramers and evidence that aggregation of the B4 complex is mediated by the B subunit carboxy terminus. Plant Molecular Biology 32, 505–513.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Balmer Y, Stritt-Etter AL, Hirasawa M, Jacquot JP, Keryer E, Knaff DB, Schurmann P. 2001. Oxidation-reduction and activation properties of chloroplast fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase with mutated regulatory site. Biochemistry 40, 15444–15450.[CrossRef][Medline]

Banks FM, Driscoll SP, Parry MAJ, Lawlor DW, Knight JS, Gray JC, Paul MJ. 1999. Decrease in phosphoribulokinase activity by antisense RNA in transgenic tobacco. relationship between photosynthesis, growth, and allocation at different nitrogen levels. Plant Physiology 119, 1125–1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brandes HK, Larimer FW, Hartman FC. 1996. The molecular pathway for the regulation of phosphoribulokinase by thioredoxin f. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 3333–3335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cabezon E, Arechaga I, Butler PJG, Walker JE. 2000. Dimerization of bovine F1-ATPase by binding the inhibitor protein IF1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 28353–28355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cabezon E, Runswick MJ, W LAG, Walker JE. 2001. The structure of bovine IF1, the regulatory subunit of mitochondrial F-ATPase. EMBO Journal 20, 6990–6996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Clasper S, Easterby JS, Powls R. 1991. Properties of two high-molecular-mass forms of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from spinach leaf, one of which also possesses latent phosphoribulokinase activity. European Journal of Biochemistry 202, 1239–1246.[ISI][Medline]

Dyson HJ, Wright PE. 2002. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 12, 54–60.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Faske M, Holtgrefe S, Ocheretina O, Meister M, Backhausen JE, Scheibe R. 1995. Redox equilibria between the regulatory thiols of light/dark-modulated chloroplast enzymes and dithiothreitol: fine-tuning by metabolites. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1247, 135–142.[CrossRef][Medline]

Francia F, Wang J, Zischka H, Venturoli G, Oesterhelt D. 2002. Role of the N and C-terminal regions of the pufX protein in the structural organization of the photosynthetic core complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. European Journal of Biochemistry 269, 1877–1885.[ISI][Medline]

Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, et al. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141–147.[CrossRef][Medline]

Giudici-Orticoni MT, Gontero B, Rault M, Ricard J. 1992. Organization structurale et fonctionnelle d‘enzymes du cycle de Benson–Calvin à la surface des thylakoïdes des chloroplastes d‘Epinard. Comptes Rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences Paris 314, 477–483.

Gontero B, Cardenas ML, Ricard J. 1988. A functional five-enzyme complex of chloroplasts involved in the Calvin cycle. European Journal of Biochemistry 173, 437–443.[ISI][Medline]

Gontero B, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Ricard J. 1994. The modulation of enzyme reaction rates within multi-enzyme complexes. 2. Information transfer within a chloroplast multi-enzyme complex containing ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase. European Journal of Biochemistry 226, 999–1006.[ISI][Medline]

Gontero B, Lebreton S, Graciet E. 2001. Multienzyme complexes involved in the Benson–Calvin cycle and in fatty acid metabolism. In: McManus MT, Laing WA, Allan AC, eds Protein–protein interactions in plant biology, Vol. 7. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 120–150.

Gontero B, Mulliert G, Rault M, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Ricard J. 1993. Structural and functional properties of a multi-enzyme complex from spinach chloroplasts. 2. Modulation of the kinetic properties of enzymes in the aggregated state. European Journal of Biochemistry 217, 1075–1082.[ISI][Medline]

Goodsell DS. 1991. Inside a living cell. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 16, 203–206.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Graciet E, Gans P, Wedel N, Lebreton S, Camadro JM, Gontero B. 2003a. The small protein CP12: a protein linker for supramolecular assembly. Biochemistry 42, 8163–8170.[CrossRef][Medline]

Graciet E, Lebreton S, Camadro JM, Gontero B. 2002. Thermodynamic analysis of the emergence of new regulatory properties in a phosphoribulokinase-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 12697–12702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Graciet E, Lebreton S, Camadro JM, Gontero B. 2003b. Characterization of native and recombinant A4 glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. European Journal of Biochemistry 270, 129–136.[ISI][Medline]

Heldt WH, Werdan K, Milovancev M, Geller G. 1973. Alkalization of the chloroplast stroma caused by light-dependent proton flux into the thylakoid space. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 314, 224–241.[Medline]

Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, et al. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180–183.[CrossRef][Medline]

Houtz RL, Portis Jr AR. 2003. The life of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase-postranslational facts and mysteries. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 414, 150–158.[ISI][Medline]

Jacquot JP, Gelhaye E, Rouhier N, Corbier C, Didierjean C, Aubry A. 2002. Thioredoxins and related proteins in photosynthetic organisms: molecular basis for thiol dependent regulation. Biochemical Pharmacology 64, 1065–1069.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Jacquot JP, Lopez-Jaramillo J, Miginiac-Maslow M, Lemaire S, Cherfils J, Chueca A, Lopez-Gorge J. 1997. Cysteine-153 is required for redox regulation of pea chloroplast fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. FEBS Letters 401, 143–147.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Jungas C, Ranck J-L, Rigaud J-L, Joliot P, Vermeglio A. 1999. Supramolecular organization of the photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. EMBO Journal 18, 534–542.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Kumar A, Snyder M. 2002. Protein complexes take the bait. Nature 415, 123–124.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lebreton S, Gontero B. 1999. Memory and imprinting in multienzyme complexes. Evidence for information transfer from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase to phosphoribulo kinase under reduced state in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 20879–20884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lebreton S, Gontero B, Avilan L, Ricard J. 1997a. Information transfer in multienzyme complexes. I. Thermodynamics of conformational constraints and memory effects in the bienzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase-phosphoribulokinase complex of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts. European Journal of Biochemistry 250, 286–295.[ISI][Medline]

Lebreton S, Gontero B, Avilan L, Ricard J. 1997b. Memory and imprinting effects in multienzyme complexes. II. Kinetics of the bienzyme complex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and hysteretic activation of chloroplast oxidized phosphoribulo kinase. European Journal of Biochemistry 246, 85–91.[ISI][Medline]

Lebreton S, Graciet E, Gontero B. 2003. Modulation, via protein–protein interactions, of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydro genase activity through redox phosphoribulokinase regulation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 12078–12084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leegood RC. 1990. Enzymes in the Calvin cycle. In: Lea PJ, ed. Methods in plant biochemistry, Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 15–37.

Li D, Stevens FJ, Schiffer M, Anderson LE. 1994. Mechanism of light modulation: identification of potential redox-sensitive cysteines distal to catalytic site in light-activated chloroplast enzymes. Biophysical Journal 67, 29–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miziorko HM. 2000. Phosphoribulokinase: current perspectives on the structure/function basis for regulation and catalysis. Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology 74, 95–127.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mouche F, Gontero B, Callebaut I, Mornon JP, Boisset N. 2002. Striking conformational change suspected within the phosphoribulokinase dimer induced by interaction with GAPDH. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 6743–6749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Müller B. 1972. A labile CO2-fixing enzyme complex in spinach chloroplasts. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 27b, 925–932.

Namba K. 2001. Roles of partly unfolded conformations in macromolecular self-assembly. Genes to Cells 6, 1–12.[Abstract]

Nicholson S, Easterby JS, Powls R. 1987. Properties of a multimeric protein complex from chloroplasts possessing potential activities of NADPH-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphoribulokinase. European Journal of Biochemistry 162, 423–431.[ISI][Medline]

O’Brien MJ, Easterby JS, Powls R. 1976. Algal glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases. Conversion of the NADH-linked enzyme of Scenedesmus obliquus into a form which preferentially uses NADPH as coenzyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 449, 209–223.[Medline]

Pabst S, Hazzard JW, Antonin W, Sudhof TC, Jahn R, Rizo J, Fasshauer D. 2000. Selective interaction of complexin with the neuronal SNARE complex. Determination of the binding regions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 19808–19818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pabst S, Margittai M, Vainius D, Langen R, Jahn R, Fasshauer D. 2002. Rapid and selective binding to the synaptic SNARE complex suggests a modulatory role of complexins in neuroexocytosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 7838–7848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paul M.J, Knight JS, Habash D, Parry MAJ, Lawlor DW, Barnes SA, Loynes A, Gray JC. 1995. Reduction in phosphoribulokinase activity by antisense RNA in transgenis tobacco: effect on CO2- assimilation and growth at low irradiance. The Plant Journal 7, 535–542.[CrossRef][ISI]

Plaxton WC. 1996. The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 185–214.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Pohlmeyer K, Paap BK, Soll J, Wedel N. 1996. CP12: a small nuclear-encoded chloroplast protein provides novel insights into higher-plant GAPDH evolution. Plant Molecular Biology 32, 969–978.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Porter MA, Hartman FC. 1988. Catalytic non-essentiality of an active-site cysteinyl residue of phosphoribulokinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263, 14846–14849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Portis Jr AR. 1992. Regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity. Annual Review in Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 43, 415–437.[CrossRef][ISI]

Portis Jr AR, Heldt HW. 1976. Light-dependent changes of the Mg2+ concentration in the stroma in relation to the Mg2+ dependency of CO2 fixation in intact chloroplasts. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 449, 434–446.[Medline]

Portis Jr AR, Lilley R, Andrews TJ. 1995. Subsaturating ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate concentration promotes inactivation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). Studies using continuous substrate addition in the presence and absence of Rubisco activase. Plant Physiology 109, 1441–1451.[Abstract]

Price GD, Evans JR, Caemmerer S von, Yu JW, Badger MR. 1995. Specific reduction of chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity by antisense RNA reduces CO2 assimilation via a reduction in ribulose bisphosphate regeneration in transgenic plants. Planta 195, 369–378.