Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2005
Journal of Experimental Botany 2005 56(412):745-753; doi:10.1093/jxb/eri049
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
56/412/745    most recent
eri049v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingston-Smith, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Minchin, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingston-Smith, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Minchin, F. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kingston-Smith, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Minchin, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 56, No. 412, © Society for Experimental Biology 2005; all rights reserved

RESEARCH PAPER

Stress-induced changes in protease composition are determined by nitrogen supply in non-nodulating white clover

Alison H. Kingston-Smith*, Andrea L. Bollard and Frank R. Minchin

Department of Plant, Animal and Microbial Science, Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 (0)1970 828357. E-mail: alison.kingston-smith{at}bbsrc.ac.uk

Received 6 July 2004; Accepted 8 October 2004


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
An inbreeding line of white clover has been identified which remains non-nodulated under appropriate physiological conditions and so the nitrogen concentration of the plant can be manipulated by altering the nitrate supply to the roots. Non-nodulating plants were used to test the hypothesis that acclimation to nitrogen limitation in white clover involves changes in protease activity and composition. These results indicate that acclimation to nitrogen limitation involves the realignment of constituent proteases without necessarily incurring significant changes in total protease activity. Plants grown at 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 mM nitrate showed a positive correlation between nitrate supply and foliar protein concentration. Protein profiles, revealed by Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE, were unchanged between treatments for a given amount of protein. Serine, aspartate/metalloprotease, and two cysteine proteases were identified in the leaves. Although total protease activity per gram fresh weight was unchanged between treatments, the relative contributions of these four proteases was determined by nitrate supply. When plants were stressed further by withholding nitrate there was an increase in cysteine protease activity, but a senescence-related aspartate/metalloprotease was not visible. Hence, while protease expression in white clover leaves responded to the current and past nitrogen status of the plant, the proteases involved in remobilization during nutrient limitation were distinct from those involved during the main senescence period. It is suggested that nitrogen limitation induced an early, reversible stage of senescence in which perturbations in protease activity facilitated the degradation of non-essential proteins in order to increase the chances of plant survival or seed set.

Key words: Nitrate limitation, protease, proteolysis, white clover


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nutrient limitation, especially insufficient available nitrogen, can have major consequences for plant growth and productivity (Devienne-Barret et al., 2000Go; Andrews et al., 2001Go; Jenkins and Mahmood, 2003Go). In non-leguminous plants, sufficient soil nitrogen results in high foliar protein and this is often reflected by the extent of accumulation of Rubisco in the leaves of C3 plants (Delgado et al., 1994Go; Geiger et al., 1999Go) and PEPc in C4 plants (Sugiharto and Sugiyama, 1992Go). Extra nitrogen reserves can also be accumulated as storage proteins in leaves or seeds (Quick et al., 1992Go; Krishnan et al., 2000Go; Jain et al., 2001Go; Warren et al., 2003Go). Soil nitrogen availability also determines the abundance and activity of enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in leaves, for instance, asparagine synthetase is expressed in response to ammonium (Kawachi et al., 2002Go). Alternatively, an inadequate nitrogen (nitrate) supply to the roots results in decreased foliar protein (Delgado et al., 1994Go) and nitrate reductase activity (Li and Oaks, 1993Go), and less than 1 mM soil nitrate has been shown to affect directly the relative rates of synthesis and degradation of nitrate reductase in shoots and roots (Li and Oaks, 1993Go). Prolonged nitrogen limitation can result in accelerated leaf senescence and extensive loss of leaf protein (Crafts-Brandner et al., 1998Go; Hortensteiner and Feller, 2002Go), accompanied by increased activities of the enzymes of nitrate remobilization (Thomas and Stoddart, 1980Go; Hortensteiner and Feller, 2002Go). Furthermore, nitrogen limitation has been shown to affect adversely the ability of non-leguminous plants to acclimate to periods of environmental stress (Martindale and Leegood, 1997Go; Crafts-Brandner et al., 1998Go; Bielenberg et al., 2001Go). Hence, crop productivity and quality is directly related to the plants response to nitrogen supply.

Legumes are not normally considered to be nitrogen limited because of the presence of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the root nodules. However, nitrogen limitation can occur if the nodule population is partially or totally ineffective in terms of nitrogen fixation. For example, defoliation and drought can lead to premature nodule senescence which will limit the potential assimilation of molecular nitrogen (Gordon et al., 1990Go). In addition, recent evidence that the presence of heavy metals in soil are toxic to the root nodules (Karina et al., 2003Go) suggests that nitrogen limitation may be a consideration for legumes growing in contaminated soils.

It has been suggested that, in wheat, low exogenous nitrogen supply causes the onset of senescence because a decrease in the cytoplasmic amino acid concentration acts as a signal for increased proteolysis, mediated by aspartic proteases (Barneix and Causin, 1996Go). In this study, non-nodulating clover plants were grown at four different nitrate supplies to test the hypothesis that perturbations in protease activity occur in legumes during acclimation to periods of nitrogen limitation. By exploiting the self-fertile allele of the self-incompatibility system, inbred lines of white clover have been developed (Abberton et al., 1998Go; Michaelson-Yeates et al., 1998Go). These are important tools because the resulting plants can exhibit characteristics governed by recessive genes. One such trait is the non-nodulating phenotype of some clover lines. Under physiological conditions of an acid rooting medium and an external nitrogen supply these plants remain non-nodulated and are entirely dependent on nitrogen supply from the soil to support plant growth and development (Abberton et al., 1998Go). Non-nodulating soybean has been used previously to demonstrate that the nitrogen supply at the roots determines the extent of nitrogen accumulation in the seed during grain-filling in legumes (Ohtake et al., 1996Go; Lhuillier-Soundele et al., 1999Go).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material
Inbred non-nodulating white clover plants with a range of protein concentrations were grown by varying mineral N application to rhizobia-free plants. White clover plants were grown in a controlled environment glasshouse at IGER. Supplementary lighting was provided by a bank of 18 Phillips SONT Agro 400 W bulbs which were computer-controlled to supply a minimum photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 200 µmol m–2 s–1 for a 16 h photoperiod starting at dawn. Temperature was regulated to 20/15 °C during the light and dark periods, respectively.

Seeds of non-nodulating white clover (Abberton et al., 1998Go; Michaelson-Yeates et al., 1998Go) were produced at IGER and sown in Fison's Levingtons compost at a density of 50 seeds to a 15 cm pot and watered daily. After 3 weeks, 20 selected seedlings were transferred to 15 cm pots of Agsorb (8–16 mm diameter baked clay granules, pH 5.2) and watered. The plants were maintained free of rhizobia and, after 4 d, selected pots were fed on one of four nitrogen-containing nutrient solutions (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mM ) prepared by adding KNO3 to a nitrogen-free nutrient stock solution (Ryle et al., 1978Go). These concentrations were selected because earlier trials had confirmed that these treatments gave a range of herbage nitrogen concentrations from low to physiological levels. It was not possible to grow non-nodulating clover in the complete absence of KNO3. Seedlings were grown for 6–8 weeks before experimental use. For characterization experiments, samples were taken from duplicate plants at each nitrate supply and the entire experiment was repeated on three occasions. Excised clover leaves were induced to senesce by placing them in the dark on dampened filter paper for 7 d at room temperature (Morris et al., 1996Go). In nitrogen-depletion experiments five plants were grown on each of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10 mM nitrate for 6 weeks, after which time they were watered with minus-N nutrient solution for a further 6 weeks.

Biochemical measurements
Protein was extracted from leaves and petioles which were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. Buffer (0.1 M TRIS/HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1% Triton X-100) was added at 5 ml g–1 fresh weight (FW). Aliquots of the homogenate were removed for chlorophyll determination and the remainder centrifuged for 10 min at 10 000 g at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and used in subsequent determinations of protein concentration and protease activity. Chlorophyll was extracted from leaf homogenates in acetone and determined according to Arnon (1949)Go. Protein was determined by the dye-binding assay of Bradford (1976)Go. Nitrogen and nitrate were determined according to the methods in Jackson et al. (1986)Go. Protease activity was determined by either a clearing assay in which gelatin/agarose gels (pH 5.6) were incubated at 30 °C as described in Zaveleta-Mancera et al. (1999)Go, in which case 1 unit of activity was assumed to be equivalent to a 1 mm diameter cleared region, or by digestion of azocasein as described by Morris et al. (1996)Go, in which case 1 unit of activity was equivalent to 1 absorbance unit at 405 nm. Soluble sugars were extracted from leaves and petioles in 80% ethanol, and sugar concentration was quantified by HPLC (Cairns et al., 2002Go). Starch was extracted from the residue and analysed as descibed in Gallagher et al. (1997)Go.

Electophoresis
Denaturing protein electrophoresis was performed according to Laemmli (1970)Go. Semi-denaturing electrophoresis and staining of protease activity isoforms was performed as described previously (Kingston-Smith et al., 2003Go). Protease inhibition was achieved by pre-incubation of extracts with 10 µM E-64, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µM pepstatin A or 4 mM EDTA (final concentrations). These inhibitors were also included, as appropriate, in the development solution at the concentrations given above. Polypeptide and protease bands were quantified by densitometry (BioRad GS710 scanning densitometer equipped with Quantity One software; BioRad UK Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK).

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by using the ANOVA function of the GENSTAT program (Baird et al., 2002Go).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of non-nodulated white clover under different N supplies
Non-nodulated clover plants showed an obvious phenotypic effect when grown at different nitrogen concentrations. Above-ground dry matter (DM), total leaf nitrogen, and chlorophyll concentration increased significantly between treatments as nitrate supply increased from 2.5 mM to 10 mM (Table 1). There were no significant differences in total nitrogen of the petioles (data not shown). Leaves accumulated significantly more nitrate at 10 mM nitrate supply than at lower nutrient levels (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Above-ground dry matter production (DM) and composition of leaves of non-nodulating clover grown at a range of nitrate supplies

 
The amount of extractable leaf protein increased progressively as nitrate supply increased, such that there was a doubling of protein concentration between plants grown at 2.5 mM and 10 mM nitrate (Table 1). Protein was extracted from leaves of plants grown at the various nitrate supplies and polypeptides were separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis. When loaded on an equal protein basis, the tracks were remarkably similar in composition and intensity of staining of particular bands (Fig. 1). Carbohydrate partitioning was affected by nitrate supply. Leaf starch showed a significant decrease with increasing nitrate supply, whereas there were no significant differences in water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) between treatments (Table 1).



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of nitrate supply on leaf protein composition when non-nodulating clover plants were grown at 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mM nitrate. SDS-PAGE was loaded at 10 µg protein per track, together with molecular weight standards (M) as indicated. Two typical examples are shown for each nitrate supply.

 
On a fresh weight basis, total foliar protease activity was similar between nitrate supply treatments, although a trend towards decreasing activity with increasing nitrate supply was detected when data were expressed on a protein basis (Fig. 2A). Further examination by semi-denaturing electrophoresis revealed three protease isoforms in mature leaves (identified here as a, c, and d) with Mrs of 72, 42, and 37 kDa (Fig. 2B). Isoform d at 37 kDa was most abundant (47% of total protease by densitometry), in leaves of plants grown at 2.5 mM N compared with other N supplies (17% of total protease by densitometry), but was observed in all extracts made from senescent leaves. By contrast, isoform a at 72 kDa was most obvious in mature leaves of plants grown with 7.5 or 10 mM nitrate (>35% of total protease by densitometry compared with 6% in leaves of plants supplied with 2.5 mM nitrate). The 50 kDa isoform b was not detectable in mature leaves, although it increased with increasing nitrate supply in senescent leaves (Fig. 2B). Isoform c was more visible in senescent than mature clover leaves regardless of nitrate supply. In addition, isoform c was unaffected by nitrate supply in mature leaves, although there was a slight decrease in activity with nitrate supply in senescent leaves (Fig. 2B). By the inclusion of protease inhibitors during electrophoresis and staining, it was possible to deduce the protease activity class from the disappearance of specific bands in replica gels (Fig. 3). Isoform a was inhibited by PMSF and showed increased activity with EDTA, consistent with it being a serine protease (Fig. 3A, B). Isoform b was inhibited by both pepstatin and increasing concentrations of EDTA, suggesting either an aspartate or metalloprotease (Fig. 3C, D). Both isoforms c and d appeared to be cysteine proteases as they were inhibited by E-64 and activated by EDTA (Fig. 3E–H). For each protease isoform, where data are not presented for a particular inhibitor there was no detectable change in band density.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of nitrate supply on (A) foliar protease activities (SED 0.317 and 25.26 for activity based on FW (hatched bars; P <0.001) and protein (cross-hatched bars; P <0.094) respectively), (B) protease activities revealed by zymograms developed at pH 5.0. (10 µg protein loaded per track together with molecular weight standards as indicated (M).

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Inhibition of protease isoforms by 1 mM PMSF, 10 µM E-64, 1 µM pepstatin and 0, 4, or 10 mM EDTA. Effect of (A) PMSF and (B) EDTA on protease a; (C) pepstatin and (D) EDTA on protease b; (E) E-64 and (F) EDTA on protease c; (G) E64 and (H) EDTA on protease d. Representative images are presented where inhibition of activity was detected by comparative densitometry of images in negative: solid lines, untreated controls; dashed lines, inhibitor treated.

 
Effect of nutrient stress on clover proteases
In order to investigate the effect of nitrogen deprivation on the protein–protease relationship, plants were grown for 6 weeks with nitrate supplied as described above, after which time plants were given nutrient solution without nitrate (minus-N treatment) for 6 weeks. As the duration of the minus-N treatment progressed, leaf protein and chlorophyll values decreased towards those of the 2.5 mM nitrate pretreatment plants (Table 2). A significant timexnitrogen interaction was identified for chlorophyll and protein concentrations as a result of nitrogen deprivation, indicating that net protein concentration was a result of both prior nitrogen nutrition and duration of the minus-N treatment. Changes in leaf protein were accompanied by a gradual increase in protease activity regardless of the initial nitrate feeding regime (Table 2). This pattern began to reverse by the sixth week of treatment, possibly due to the very low levels of protein which were achieved prior to this sample time. Isoforms a, c, and d were present in leaves before the start of the minus-N treatment (Fig. 4). The gels were loaded on an equal fresh weight basis, so that intensity of staining reflects changes in net leaf protein between sample times (Table 2) as well as protease isoform abundance within samples. Hence, low staining of protease bands in plants initially grown at 10 mM nitrate reveals that protease proteins were a minor component of the protein pool, whereas they were relatively more abundant in leaves of plants grown at 2.5 mM nitrate before the start of the minus-N treatment. Isoform b was not observed to be a contributor to the protease activity during acclimation to lack of nitrate (Fig. 4). The band density of isoform c was relatively stable during minus-N treatment, and the relative abundance of isoform c was not affected by prior nitrate supply (mean percentage relative abundances were approximately 35%). The relative abundance of isoform d increased with time from 25% to 40%, regardless of the feeding regime before the onset of the minus-N treatment (Fig. 4). However, the time when isoform d was at maximum relative abundance depended on the previous nitate supply; between weeks 3 and 4 for plants grown with 2.5 mM nitrate, but between weeks 4 and 5 for plants grown with 10 mM nitrate before the minus-N treatment (Fig. 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of withholding nitrate on the chlorophyll, protein, and protease content of destructively sampled leaves of non-nodulating white clover previously grown at different nitrate supplements

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of 6 weeks of nitrogen starvation on protease activity in leaves from plants previously grown at (A) 2.5, (B) 5.0, (C) 7.5, or (D) 10.0 mM nitrate. Molecular weight standards are shown in (A). Each track was loaded with the protein contained in 0.5 mg FW.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Soil nitrogen supply is a key determinant of plant growth and productivity and it can directly influence the activity of enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in leaves of non-leguminous plants (Li and Oaks, 1993Go; Hortensteiner and Feller, 2002Go; Kawachi et al., 2002Go). By contrast with most legumes, the lack of nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacteria in the root nodules of the white clover plants used here meant that these plants were entirely dependent on the uptake of nitrate by the roots to provide the nitrogen required for growth. As in non-leguminous plants, the non-nodulating clover showed a clear growth response to nitrate supplied at between 2.5 mM and 10 mM with an incremental rise in both total leaf nitrogen and extractable protein (Table 1). Murage et al. (1996)Go found that in Solanum nigrum, increasing the supply of nitrogen increased both protein and nitrate concentration of the leaves. However, in this study, a slight increase in the nitrate concentration of white clover leaves was observed only at the highest level of nitrate nutrition (Table 1).

An exogenous nitrate supply has been shown to be essential for the accumulation of the storage protein ß-conglycinin by non-nodulating soybean and pea (Ohtake et al., 1996Go; Krishnan et al., 2000Go). It was possible that, in non-nodulating white clover, the observed increase in leaf protein at higher nitrate supplies was due to the accumulation of either storage Rubisco (Dalling, 1985Go) or a vegetative storage protein. However, the results from protein measurement and gel electrophoresis indicate that the increase in leaf protein observed here was due to an overall increase in protein synthesis and was not because of an increase in specific proteins. The proportion of the protein pool accounted for by Rubisco was remarkably consistent between nitrate treatments (Fig. 1). Likewise, if the observed 2-fold increase in leaf protein between the highest and the lowest nitrate treatments was due to a storage protein, the corresponding peptide band would have been highly visible, but no suitable candidates were observed.

Maximum nitrogen use efficiency with limited nitrogen supply can be achieved by the remobilization of nitrogen stored as proteins, which is then utilized in reproductive or vegetative organs. Remobilization of stored nitrogen is a key part of grain-fill. Hence, seed yield can be severely restricted if leaf protein concentrations are low as a result of non-nodulation of legumes or low soil nitrogen supply to non-legumes (Tsai et al., 1991Go; Lhuillier-Soundele et al, 1999Go; Miceli et al., 2000Go). It has been shown that protease activities in the roots of a perennial grass change according to the requirements for nitrogen remobilization (Thornton and Bausenwein, 2000Go). It has also been suggested that the decreased abundance of Rubisco polypeptides during growth of maize at low soil nitrogen was a result of enhanced proteolysis (Tsai et al., 1991Go). In the current study, non-nodulating clover plants were used to identify changes in leaf protease activity in relation to growth under limited nitrogen supply. Given that a 2-fold increase in leaf protein was observed between 2.5 mM and 10 mM nitrate supply in the mature leaves of non-nodulating clover, the lack of a corresponding decrease in total protease activity was surprising (Fig. 2A). However, it is possible that fine control of protease activity in white clover leaves was achieved by endogenous inhibitors such as serpins (Roberts et al., 2003Go), rather than by turnover of the protease proteins. Yamauchi et al. (2002)Go have previously found that nitrogen-starved cucumber cotyledons also had lower protease activities than the controls and this could be explained by the specific loss of one protease isoform. Although total protease activity in non-nodulating white clover was little altered by nitrate supply, the protease isoform composition of the leaves was different between 2.5 mM and 10 mM nitrate treatments. By contrast with the results of Yamauchi et al. (2002)Go, one protease activity (isoform d) was present at higher relative abundance in plants grown at 2.5 mM nitrate than in the other treatments. According to its response to incubation with E-64 and EDTA this is a cysteine protease. Asp et al. (2004)Go have recently characterized a 32 kDa cysteine protease from white clover and it is possible that this is the same protease as isoform d.

One explaination for the presence of high protease activity at low leaf protein could involve signalling via cytoplasmic amino acid concentration (Barneix and Causin, 1996Go). Barneix and Causin (1996)Go suggest that exogenous nitrate (and to greater effect, ammonium) supply determines the cytoplasmic free amino acid concentration in leaves. Hence, under high nitrogen supply the maintenance of proteolysis at a low level permits the generation of sufficient amino acids which can be exported to nitrogen-sinks. Under low nitrogen supply the low leaf protein coupled with low rates of proteolysis means a decrease in cytoplasmic amino acid concentration, which results in the increased activity of aspartic proteases and premature senescence (Barneix and Causin, 1996Go). This elegant hypothesis may need further refinement to take into account the observations that regulation of nitrogen uptake also involves the rate of assimilation into amino acids (Devienne-Barret et al., 2000Go) and plant organs often accumulate specific amino acids in response to nitrogen supply (Mack and Schoerring, 2002Go). Nevertheless, it is suggested that the increased relative activity of isoform d at 2.5 mM nitrate compared with higher nitrate supplies reflects an acclimatory increase in a specific stress-responsive protease in white clover leaves to avoid premature senescence under sub-optimal nitrate supplies.

Plants acclimated to restricted nitrate supply were challenged further by the complete withdrawal of nitrate. Plants which had received greater than 2.5 mM nitrate prior to minus-N treatment showed a gradual decrease in leaf protein when supplementary nitrate was withdrawn. Over a period of 6 weeks, protein tended towards that of the 2.5 mM nitrate treatment, which was relatively unaffected by nitrate withdrawal. This suggests that the 2.5 mM nitrate treatment was already seriously limiting for growth. A significant interaction between duration of treatment and nitrate supply before withdrawl was identified for leaf protein concentration (Table 2), reflecting that both the endpoint and the rate of change were influenced by prior nutrition. Although there was no similar effect on total protease activity (Table 2), there did appear to be an effect of time and prior nutrition on isoform profile and abundance (Fig. 4). This is consistant with the proposed role for isoform d in the feedback regulation mechanism of Barneix and Causin (1996)Go; the combination of a high residual protein concentration (e.g. withdrawl of nitrogen from plants grown at 10 mM nitrate) and small changes in protease activity will result in increased amino acid production which will limit further proteolysis. Therefore, changes in protein concentration can be significant while changes in protease activity are not. Once the position is reached where only essential proteins remain and amino acid concentrations fall, it is speculated that this will trigger more extensive proteolysis, which will presumably involve a different range of proteases with different substrate specificities.

The observation that chlorophyll decreased over the 6 week period of nitrogen starvation implies that senescence had been induced by nutrient starvation and that the remobilization processes had been switched on (Thomas and Stoddart, 1980Go; Zaveleta-Mancera et al., 1999Go; Hortensteiner and Feller, 2002Go). Senescence-specific induction of cysteine protease activity has been observed previously (Morris et al., 1996Go; Li et al., 2000Go; Yamada et al., 2001Go; Chen et al., 2002Go; Hayden and Christopher, 2004Go) and during senescence of the non-nodulating white clover leaves there was a strong up-regulation of a cysteine protease at 42 kDa (isoform c) compared with activities in non-senescent leaves (Fig. 2B). Senescing white clover leaves also produced an aspartate or metalloprotease (isoform b) which was not detectable in mature leaves. This agrees with the growing body of evidence supporting senescence-specific expression of examples from most protease classes genes in leaves and petals (Panavas et al., 1999Go; Wagstaff et al., 2002Go; Buchanan-Wollaston et al., 2003Go; Breeze et al., 2004Go). Roberts et al. (2003)Go reported a serine protease activity during senescence of wheat leaves for which Rubisco was a target protein. In this study's experiments, protease a was identified as a putative serine protease, but its activity was less influenced by senescence than the cysteine proteases (isoforms c and d) were. The white clover serine protease (isoform a) does not appear to be the same as that in wheat leaves. Firstly, the Mr of isoform a was much lower than that of the holoenzyme (118 kDa) and greater than the subunits (59 kDa) identified by Roberts et al. (2003)Go. Secondly, the protease identified by Roberts et al. (2003)Go had a neutral pH optimum, whereas staining of protease activity gels at neutral pH (data not shown) did not reveal increased or extra protease activities compared with the data shown here.

The use of non-nodulated legumes has demonstrated interesting relationships between protease profiles and rates of proteolysis under nutrient limitation and subsequent response to stress. Leaves of non-nodulating soybean, grown in the absence of nitrogen supplements, were observed to enter senescence earlier and had enhanced proteolytic activity during the initial period of senescence compared with a nodulating soybean line (Miceli et al., 2000Go). However, these authors concluded that as protease activity increased in both nodulating and non-nodulating lines, plant nitrogen status played a minor role in the regulation of proteases. By contrast, this work shows that it is possible to have similar protease activities but for the protease isoform composition to be quite different, suggesting the potential targeting of different substrates under different nutrient or stress regimes. During senescence, the greatest increase in activity was seen in isoform c, but isoform d also showed an increased contribution to the protease pool with senescence (Fig. 2). However, only isoform d increased in activity with the duration of the minus-N treatment. It has previously been demonstrated that protease activity can change in response to the onset and reversion of senescence (Zaveleta-Mancera et al., 1999Go). Despite visible symptoms such as loss of chlorophyll, it appears that the proteases involved in remobilization during nutrient limitation are not the same as those involved during senescence-related nitrogen mobilization. From these data it is suggested that protease activity in white clover also reacts to changes in plant nitrogen status. Thus, isoform d could reflect a reversible protease activation which protects against premature senescence during times of low nitrogen which, if not alleviated, are followed by increased isoform c activity, co-incident with the onset of senescence. It may be that the nitrogen limitation treatments imposed here resulted in only the very early stages of senescence, from which recovery is possible (Zavaleta-Mancera et al., 1999Go).

It is concluded that during acclimation to nutrient limitation, nitrogen remobilization involves the realignment of constituent proteases, presumably to facilitate degradation of storage or non-essential proteins and to promote plant survival or increase the chances of seed set. These results imply that protease expression in mature white clover leaves is responsive to the nitrogen status of the plant and that this response is modulated by nutritional history. These data support the hypothesis that plants acclimate to altered nitrate supply by increasing the relative contribution of specific proteases to the total protease activity. However, subtle changes in protease composition may be overlooked as they are not always accompanied by significant changes in total protease activity.


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Z Davies for technical assistance, J Ashton for HPLC analysis of carbohydrates, the staff of the Analytical Chemistry laboratory who performed chemical analyses for nitrate, and BBSRC and DEFRA for financial support.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abberton MT, Michaelson-Yeates TPT, MacDuff JH. 1998. Characterization of novel inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). I. Dynamics of plant growth and nodule development in flowing solution culture. Euphytica 103, 35–43.

Andrews M, Raven JA, Sprent JI. 2001. Environmental effects on dry matter partitioning between shoot and root of crop plants: relations with growth and shoot protein concentration. Annals of Applied Biology 138, 57–68.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24, 1–15.[Free Full Text]

Asp T, Bowra S, Borg S, Holm PB. 2004. Molecular cloning, functional expression in Escherichia coli and enzymic characterization of a cysteine protease from white clover (Trifolium repens). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1699, 111–122.[Medline]

Baird DB, Harding SA, Lane PW, Murray DA, Payne RW, Soutar DM. 2002. Introduction. Genstat for Windows, 6th edn. Oxford: VSN International.

Barneix AJ, Causin HF. 1996. The central role of amino acids on nitrogen utilization and plant growth. Journal of Plant Physiology 149, 358–362.[Web of Science]

Bielenberg DG, Lynch JR, Pell EJ. 2001. A decline in nitrogen availability affects plant responses to ozone. New Phytologist 151, 413–425.[CrossRef]

Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Breeze E, Wagstaff C, Harrison E, Bramke I, Rogers H, Stead A, Thomas B, Buchanan-Wollaston V. 2004. Gene expression patterns to define stages of post-harvest senescence in Alstromeria petals. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2, 155–168.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Buchanan-Wollaston V, Earl S, Harrison E, Mathas E, Navabpour S, Page T, Pink D. 2003. The molecular analysis of leaf senescence: a genomics approach. Plant Biotechnology Journal 1, 3–22.

Cairns AJ, Cookson A, Thomas BJ, Turner LB. 2002. Starch metabolism in the fructan-grasses: patterns of starch accumulation in excised leaves of Lolium temulentum L. Journal of Plant Physiology 159, 293–305.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Chen GH, Huang LT, Yap MN, Lee RH, Huang YJ, Cheng MC, Chen SCG. 2002. Molecular characterization of a senescence-associated gene encoding cysteine proteinase and its gene expression during leaf senescence in sweet potato. Plant and Cell Physiology 43, 984–991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crafts-Brandner SJ, Holzer R, Feller U. 1998. Influence of nitrogen deficiency on senescence and the amounts of RNA and proteins in wheat leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 102, 192–200.[CrossRef]

Dalling MJ. 1985. The physiological basis of nitrogen redistribution during grain filling in cereals. In: Harper J, Schrader L, Howell R, eds. Exploitation of physiological and genetic variability to enhance crop productivity. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 55–71.

Delgado E, Mitchell RAC, Parry MAJ, Driscoll SP, Mitchell VJ, Lawlor DW. 1994. Interacting effects of CO2 concentration, temperature and nitrogen supply on the photosynthesis and composition of winter-wheat leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 1205–1213.[CrossRef]

Devienne-Barret F, Justes E, Machet JM, Mary B. 2000. Integrated control of nitrate uptake by crop growth rate and soil nitrate availability under field conditions. Annals of Botany 86, 995–1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gallagher JA, Volenec JJ, Turner LB, Pollock CJ. 1997. Starch hydrolytic enzyme activity following defoliation of white clover. Crop Science 37, 1812–1818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Geiger M, Haake V, Ludewig F, Sonnewalkd U, Stitt M. 1999. The nitrate and ammonium nitrate supply have a major influence on the response of photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, and growth to elevated carbon dioxide in tobacco. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 1177–1199.[CrossRef]

Gordon AJ, Kessler W, Minchin FR. 1990. Defoliation-induced stress in nodules of white clover. I. Changes in physiological parameters and protein synthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1245–1253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayden DM, Christopher DA. 2004. Characterization of senescence-associated gene expression and senescence-dependent and -independent cysteine proteases differing in microsomal processing in Anthurium. Plant Science 166, 779–790.[CrossRef]

Horstensteiner S, Feller U. 2002. Nitrogen metabolism and remobilization during senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 927–937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jackson E, Farrington DS, Henderson K. 1986. Method 51 nitrate nitrogen in herbage. In: The analysis of agricultural materials, 3rd edn. Reference book 427. London, UK: HMSO Publications.

Jain V, Guru SK, Abrol YP. 2001. Responses of the penultimate flag leaves of wheat to different nitrogen supply. Biologia Plantarum 44, 373–378.[CrossRef]

Jenkins PD, Mahmood S. 2003. Dry matter production and partitioning in potato plants subjected to combined deficiencies of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Annals of Applied Biology 143, 215–229.[CrossRef]

Karina BB, Benavides MP, Gallego SM, Tomaro ML. 2003. Effect of cadmium stress on nitrogen metabolism in nodules and roots of soybean plants. Functional Plant Biology 30, 57–64.[CrossRef]

Kawachi T, Sueyoshi K, Nakajima A, Yamagata H, Sugimoto T, Oji Y. 2002. Expression of asparagine synthetase in rice (Oryza sativa) roots in respnse to nitrogen. Physiologia Plantarum 114, 41–46.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kingston-Smith AH, Bollard A, Armstead IP, Thomas BJ, Theodorou MK. 2003. Proteolysis and cell death in clover leaves is induced by grazing. Protoplasma 220, 119–129.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Krishnan HB, Jiang, GQ, Krishnan AH, Wiebold WJ. 2000. Seed storage protein composition of non-nodulating soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and its influence on protein quality. Plant Science 157, 191–199.

Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lhuillier-Soundele A, Munier-Jolian NG, Ney B. 1999. Dependence of seed nitrogen concentration on plant nitrogen availability during seed filling in pea. European Journal of Agronomy 11, 157–166.[CrossRef]

Li XZ, Oaks A. 1993. Induction and turnover of nitrate reductase in Zea mays: influence of NO3. Plant Physiology 102, 1251–1257.[Abstract]

Li Q, Bettany AJE, Donnison I, Griffiths CM, Thomas H, Scott I. 2000. Characterization of a cysteine protease cDNA from Lolium multiflorum leaves and its expression during senescence and cytokinin treatment. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta- Gene Structure and Expression 1492, 233–236.[CrossRef]

Mack G, Schjoerring JK. 2002. Effect of supply on N metabolism of potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) with special focus on the tubers. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 999–1009.[CrossRef]

Martindale W, Leegood RC. 1997. Acclimation of photosynthesis to low temperature in Spinacia oleracea L. 2. Effects of nitrogen supply. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1873–1880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miceli F, Zerbi G, Scalet M. 2000. Non-destructive limits to seed growth and leaf protease activities in nodulating and non-nodulating soybean isolines. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 184, 23–31.[CrossRef]

Michaelson-Yeates TPT, MacDuff JH, Abberton MT, Raistrick N. 1998. Characterization of novel inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). II. Variation in N2 fixation, uptake and their interactions. Euphytica 103, 45–54.

Morris K, Thomas H, Rogers L. 1996. Endopeptidases during the development and senescence of Lolium temulentum leaves. Phytochemistry 41, 377–384.

Murage EN, Chewya JA, Imungi JK. 1996. Changes in leaf yield and nutritive quality of the black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) as influenced by nitrogen application. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 35, 149–157.

Ohtake N, Suzuki M, Takahashi Y, Fujiwara T, Chino M, Ikarashi T, Ohyama T. 1996. Differential expression of ß-conglycinin genes in nodulated and non-nodulated isolines of soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 96, 101–110.[CrossRef]

Panavas T, Pikula A, Reid PD, Rubinstein B, Walker EL. 1999. Identification of senescence-associated genes from daylily petals. Plant Molecular Biology 40, 237–248.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Quick WP, Fichtner K, Schulze ED, Wendler R, Leegood RC, Mooney H, Rodermel SR, Bogorad L, Stitt M. 1992. Decreased ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate carboxylase-oxgenase in transgenic tobacco transformed with antisense RBC. 4. Impact on photosynthesis in conditions of altered nitrogen supply. Planta 188, 522–531.[Web of Science]

Roberts IN, Murray PF, Caputo CP, Passeron S, Barneix AJ. 2003. Purification and characterization of a subtilisin-like serine protease induced during the senescence of wheat leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 118, 483–490.[CrossRef]

Ryle GJA, Powell CE, Gordon AJ. 1978. Effect of source of nitrogen on the growth of Fiskeby soybean: the carbon economy of whole plants. Annals of Botany 42, 637–648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sugiharto B, Sugiyama T. 1992. Effects of nitrate and ammonium on gene expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and nitrogen metabolism in maize leaf tissue during recovery from nitrogen stress. Plant Physiology 98, 1403–1408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thomas H, Stoddart JL. 1980. Leaf senescence. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31, 83–111.[Web of Science]

Thornton B, Bausenwein U. 2000. Seasonal protease activity in storage tissue of the deciduous grass Molinia caerulea. New Phytologist 146, 75–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Tsai CY, Huber DM, Warren HL, Lyznik A. 1991. Nitrogen uptake and redistribution during maturation of maize hybrids. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 175–187.[CrossRef]

Wagstaff C, Leverentz MK, Griffiths G, Thomas B, Chanasut U, Stead AD, Rogers HJ. 2002. Cysteine protease gene expression and proteolytic activity during senescence of Alstromeria petals. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 233–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Warren CR, Dreyer E, Adams MA. 2003. Photosynthesis–Rubisco relationships in foliage of Pinus sylvestris in response to nitrogen supply and the proposed role of Rubisco and amino acids as nitrogen stores. Trees: Structure and Function 17, 359–366.

Yamada K, Matsushima R, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I. 2001. A slow maturation of a cysteine protease with a granulin domain in the vacuoles of senescing arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiology 127, 1626–1634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamauchi Y, Suimoto T, Sueyoshi K, Oji Y, Tanaka K. 2002. Appearance of endopeptidases during the senescence of cucumber leaves. Plant Science 162, 615–619.[CrossRef]

Zaveleta-Mancera HA, Thomas BJ, Thomas H, Scott IM. 1999. Regreening of senescent Nicotiana leaves. II. Redifferentiation of plastids. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1683–1689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. H. Kingston-Smith, T. E. Davies, J. E. Edwards, and M. K. Theodorou
From plants to animals; the role of plant cell death in ruminant herbivores
J. Exp. Bot., February 4, 2008; (2008) erm326v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. E. Martinez, C. G. Bartoli, V. Grbic, and J. J. Guiamet
Vacuolar cysteine proteases of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are common to leaf senescence induced by different factors
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2007; 58(5): 1099 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
56/412/745    most recent
eri049v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingston-Smith, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Minchin, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingston-Smith, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Minchin, F. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kingston-Smith, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Minchin, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?