Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on May 19, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(10):2203-2210; doi:10.1093/jxb/erj185
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/10/2203    most recent
erj185v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kytridis, V.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Manetas, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kytridis, V.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Manetas, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kytridis, V.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Manetas, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Mesophyll versus epidermal anthocyanins as potential in vivo antioxidants: evidence linking the putative antioxidant role to the proximity of oxy-radical source

Velissarios-Phaedon Kytridis and Yiannis Manetas*

Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, University of Patras, GR-265 00 Patras, Greece

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: y.manetas{at}upatras.gr

Received 11 January 2006; Accepted 3 March 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
The hypothesis that anthocyanins in red leaves may be potential in vivo antioxidants whose efficiency is linked to their proximity with the oxy-radical source was tested. Advantage was taken of intra-individual and intra-species variations in the anthocyanic trait and green and red leaves on the same individuals or leaves of green and red phenotypes were compared for the extent of PSII damage by reactive oxygen species generated by methyl viologen treatment in the light. Two species possessing anthocyanins in the mesophyll (Cistus creticus and Photiniaxfraseri) and two in the epidermis (Rosa sp. and Ricinus communis) were used, while red actinic light (which is not absorbed by anthocyanins) allowed discrimination between an indirect sunscreen and a direct antioxidant function. Red leaves whose anthocyanins were located in the mesophyll were more resistant to methyl viologen treatment than their green counterparts. In one of these species (Cistus creticus), where anthocyanins are induced in some individuals within the natural population after bright cool days in winter, both green and future-red morphs displayed the same sensitivity to methyl viologen before anthocyanin induction. Immediately after reddening, however, resistance to methyl viologen was considerably increased in the red morphs. By contrast, red leaves whose anthocyanins were restricted to epidermal cells were more sensitive to the herbicide. Total leaf phenolic levels in green/red pairs were similar. The results indicate that vacuolar anthocyanins may be an effective in vivo target for oxy-radicals, provided that the oxy-radical source and the anthocyanic detoxifying sink are in close vicinity.

Key words: Methyl viologen, phenolics, photoinhibition, reactive oxygen species, red leaves


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
The green colour of leaves can be transiently masked by the accumulation of red anthocyanins under some circumstances. A developmental and an environmental component for this change can be distinguished. In some plants, young leaves are red and turn to green upon maturation. In other cases, senescing leaves turn red before abscission. Finally, mature leaves may become temporarily red when stressed by UV-B radiation, low nutrients, wounding, or low temperatures accompanied by high light (Gould et al., 2002b; Steyn et al., 2002; Close and Beadle, 2003; Gould, 2004; Manetas, 2006).

However, the adaptive significance of a red leaf is obscure and this is reflected in the many roles ascribed to foliar anthocyanins. Thus, an anti-herbivore role has been championed by ecologists (Dominy et al., 2002; Lev-Yadun et al., 2004). Physiologists seem to prefer a photoprotective function which is apparently strengthened by the fact that the environmental factors inducing anthocyanin accumulation also make leaves more vulnerable to photoinhibition, since they perturb the fine tuning between chlorophyll excitation pressure and electron sink capacity of the reductive pentose phosphate pathway (Long and Humphries, 1994). The same hypothesis can be applied to juvenile and senescing leaves, which seem to have increased photoprotective needs (Ireland et al., 1985; Krause et al., 1995; Matile et al., 1999). Other proposed roles include osmoregulation and protection against UV-B radiation damage (Chalker-Scott, 1999).

Photoprotection by anthocyanins can be afforded by two means. Anthocyanins attenuate visible radiation thus reducing excitation load in the mesophyll, acting simply as sunscreens. Alternatively (or in addition), they may quench oxy-radicals produced under photoinhibitory conditions (Steyn et al., 2002; Gould et al., 2002a, c). Indeed, anthocyanins are powerful in vitro antioxidants (Wang et al., 1997) and this underlies the recent interest in these compounds for the human diet.

Concerning the antioxidant role, it has been shown that anthocyanins constitute a considerable part of the total oxy-radical scavenging capacity of red leaf extracts (Neill et al., 2002a) and they reduce H2O2 formed in vivo by wounding (Gould et al., 2002a). In addition, anthocyanins in the bathing medium of chloroplast suspensions alleviate photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by red light (Neill and Gould, 2003). However, evidence for a direct in vivo antioxidative function in intact leaves with normal compartmentation of anthocyanins is still lacking.

In leaves, the major source of oxy-radical production is the photosynthesizing chloroplast (Asada and Takahashi, 1987), which also contains all the known mechanisms for protection against excess excitation energy. Thus, the xanthophyll cycle (Demmig-Adams et al., 1996), the water–water cycle (Asada, 2000), and the C2 cycle (Tolbert, 1997) function within the chloroplast or in close vicinity. It is argued that anthocyanins, in order to be competitive as potential oxy-radical scavengers in vivo (or to supplement the already existing mechanisms in case their capacity is surpassed), they should be located near the source of photosynthetic oxy-radical production. Existing evidence indicates no variation in their intracellular localization, with anthocyanins being exclusively in the vacuoles (Hrazdina et al., 1978). Yet, high inter-tissue and inter-species differences abound. Thus, anthocyanins may be found in the upper epidermis, lower epidermis, palisade mesophyll, spongy mesophyll, and trichomes, either in one cell type or in almost any combination of them (Lee and Collins, 2001). The argument for an antioxidant role has been redefined by hypothesizing that the putative antioxidant function could be enhanced in the case of anthocyanins residing in the photosynthetic cells, and in vivo experiments have been designed for that purpose. Crucial determinants in the experimental design were the following: (i) plants possessing anthocyanins either in the epidermis or mesophyll were used; (ii) in addition to this variant, plants showing intra-species or intra-individual variation in the expression of the anthocyanic character were used, i.e. leaves of either green or red phenotypes were compared, or red young and mature green leaves from the same individuals were compared; (iii) oxy-radicals were induced by a combination of light and methyl viologen (MV). MV mediates the transfer of electrons from PSI to molecular O2, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) within chloroplasts (Iturbe-Ormaexte et al., 1998); and (iv) red light was used in order to by-pass anthocyanin absorbance and to discriminate between the antioxidant and light-screening alternatives. Under this scheme, the sensitivity of green and red leaves to ROS production was assessed by measuring PSII photochemical efficiency, through in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Plant material
In preliminary trials, free-hand cross-sections of leaves were viewed under the microscope (Axioplan, Zeiss, Operkochen, Germany) both under bright field and with an epifluorescence attachment. Bright field observations were used for anthocyanin localization and epifluorescence for the possible co-occurrence of chlorophylls in the anthocyanic cells. On the basis of these trials and the prerequisites detailed in the Introduction, four species were selected for further experimentation.

(i) Cistus creticus L. Mediterranean drought semi-deciduous shrub. Leaves of some individuals turn red during winter, while neighbouring individuals under the same conditions remain green. All shrubs resume a green colour after the shedding of old leaves in late spring (personal observations). Leaves of both morphs were sampled in the field.
(ii) Rosa sp. Common rose. Varieties producing either red or green young leaves during spring were used. All mature leaves are green. The plants were purchased from a local nursery.
(iii) Photiniaxfraseri Dress. Ornamental shrub cultivated for its bright red young leaves, produced during spring and autumn under Mediterranean conditions. Mature leaves are green. The plants were purchased from a local nursery.
(iv) Ricinus communis L. Herbaceous ornamental naturalized in the Mediterranean. Red young leaves produced during spring and autumn turn green upon maturation. Leaves were sampled in the field.
All individual plants used in this study were fully exposed to solar radiation. South-facing (i.e. exposed) green and red leaves from each species were compared on the same experimental dates. In P.xfraseri and R. communis this was possible due to the extended period of leaf development, during which both young and mature leaves co-occur on the plants. The species used, the location of anthocyanins, and the comparisons performed are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Characteristics of species used in the experiments

 
Experimental design
Leaves were sampled in the afternoon, put in air-tight plastic bags lined with moistured filter paper, and kept in the dark overnight at room temperature. During the next morning, discs from red or green leaves were cut under dim laboratory light (less than 1 µmol m–2 s–1 PAR) and infiltrated in water or water containing 1 mM MV for 10 min. This protocol was selected on the basis of preliminary trials aiming at a modest, yet measurable MV effect and without extensive damage to the tissues. For example, no chlorophyll loss was observed during the course of this experiment. There was no need to buffer the MV solution. Dark-adapted maximum PSII efficiencies were measured on the upper disc side both before and after infiltration. The discs were then illuminated on the same side in Petri dishes, the bottom of which was covered by three layers of filter paper moistened with the infiltration liquid. Red light was provided by a quartz–halogen lamp filtered through a red film. The spectral transmittance of the film has been given elsewhere (Manetas et al., 2003) and this was selected because it matches the spectral transmittance of leaf anthocyanins. In all cases, PAR was kept at 400 µmol m–2 s–1. The light-adapted PSII photochemical efficiency was followed during illumination as well as in the subsequent dark recovery period. For each species the experiment was replicated 4–8 times with 5–10 discs per replication.

Measurements
PSII photochemical efficiency [as {Delta}F/F'm = (F'mF)/F'm according to Genty et al., 1989] was measured with a Pulse Amplitude Modulated Fluorimeter (MINI-PAM, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). Since measurements had to be done without changing the incident PAR during application of the saturated beam, the optical fibre was attached to the so-called distance clip which was directly applied on the discs inside the Petri dish. Thus, the fibre received fluorescence signals at an angle of 30°, without appreciably impeding the incident actinic light.

PAR was measured with a LI-190 quantum sensor (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA).

Anthocyanins and total phenolics were extracted in a mortar and pestle with methanol/water/HCl (90:1:1 by vol.) and a small amount of washed sea sand. After clearing by centrifugation, spectral absorbance was read from 250–700 nm. The relative amount of anthocyanins was assessed from their peak absorbance (527–535 nm, depending on species), after correction for the contribution of pheophytins at this wavelength (Mancinelli et al., 1975). The relative amount of total phenolics was assessed from their mean absorbance between 250 and 400 nm. It has been shown that the absorbance at this band is linearly correlated with the actual amount of phenolics measured chemically with the Folin–Ciocalteu method (Levizou and Manetas, 2002).

Statistics
When needed, significance of differences between treatments, leaf types, etc. was computed by one-way ANOVA (SPSS 9.0 for Windows).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Conventional (bright field) microscopy of leaf cross-sections indicated that anthocyanins reside in both the upper and lower epidermises of Rosa sp. and in the upper (exposed) epidermis of R. communis. Epidermises of C. creticus and P.xfraseri were devoid of anthocyanins, which were abundant in the palisade mesophyll of C. creticus and the whole mesophyll of P.xfraseri. Epifluorescence microscopy indicated the presence of chlorophyll in the anthocyanic mesophyll cells of these two species (Fig. 1). Thus, the test plants could be distinguished between those containing chlorophyll and anthocyanins in separate cells and those containing both pigments in the same cells. Table 2 presents the area-based levels of anthocyanins of the test plants and leaves. A trend for higher levels in leaves with epidermal anthocyanins may be noted.


Figure 1
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Freehand cross-sections of leaves, indicating the location of anthocyanins in the epidermis of Rosa sp. (A) and R. communis (B) and in the mesophyll of P.xfraseri (C) and C. creticus (D). The bar corresponds to 250 µm.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Anthocyanin contents of green and red leaves of the indicated species

 
Maximum, dark-adapted PSII photochemical efficiency of red leaves was slightly (i.e. 2–4%), yet significantly lower in red leaves when compared with green in Rosa sp. and P.xfraseri (Table 3). The same, yet not significant trend was evident in the other two species. Note that the comparison in R. communis and P.xfraseri refers to young red versus mature green leaves. In the other two species, the compared leaves had the same age. MV had no effect on Fv/Fm in the dark up to 2 h after application. It may be concluded that the initial green and red leaf material was equally healthy with respect to PSII yield and was appropriate for the photoinhibitory experiments described below.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Dark-adapted PSII photochemical efficiency of green and red leaves in the indicated species

 
Under constant illumination with red light at 400 µmol m–2 s–1 PAR, the PSII effective yields of red leaves were lower in P.xfraseri and Rosa sp., while the same was evident in C. creticus during the first 60 min of exposure. In R. communis, the red leaves displayed higher PSII effective yields only after 3 h illumination (Fig. 2a). The extent of inhibition of PSII efficiency by MV in the light was species-specific, with C. creticus displaying slightly higher resistance to the herbicide, probably due to lower or slower uptake (Fig. 2b). Concerning differences between the two leaf kinds, red leaves suffered from significantly higher inhibition than green leaves in Rosa sp. (with the exception of the 2 h sampling) and R. communis (with the exception of the 1 h sampling). In P.xfraseri the extent of inhibition by MV was the same in both leaf kinds (Fig. 2b). In C. creticus, however, green leaves displayed higher values of inhibition at all sampling times.


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Effects of MV on green and red leaves of the indicated species. (a) PSII photochemical efficiency versus time under constant red illumination (400 µmol m–2 s–1 PAR). (b). Percentage inhibition by MV. Values are means ±SE from four (R. communis, Rosa sp.), eight (C. creticus), and six (P.xfraseri) independent experiments with 5–10 leaf discs per experiment. Different letters within each data set indicate statistically significant differences (P <0.05). A data set consists of the values in the measured parameters obtained at the indicated time for red and green leaves of each species in the presence or absence of MV.

 
In the dark period following illumination, PSII yield of control leaves gradually recovered, approaching the initial, dark-adapted values. The percentage recovery within the first 5 h of darkness ranged from 66% in P.xfraseri to 96% in Rosa sp., with no differences between green and red leaves (results not shown). However, recovery in MV-treated leaves was less complete in most of the cases, indicating a permanent PSII damage. MV-induced inhibition of PSII dark recovery was the same between green and red leaves of three species, i.e. Rosa sp., R. communis, and C. creticus (not shown). In P.xfraseri, however, MV-treated red leaves recovered to the same extent as control leaves, while green leaves suffered permanent PSII damage by MV (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 PSII photochemical efficiency (as Fv/Fm) following recovery in the dark of pre-illuminated (3 h under red light of 400 µmol m–2 s–1 PAR) green and red leaves of P.xfraseri. (–) denotes control and (+) denotes MV treated leaves

 
In a separate experiment, the effect of MV on PSII effective yield was followed in green and red individuals of C. creticus just before and after anthocyanin induction during winter. As shown in Fig. 3, percentage inhibition of PSII effective yield in both phenotypes was the same in the period between 13/01 to 18/01, i.e. before the future-red phenotypes turn red. Reddening was completed within a few days and in the following period ‘greens’ maintained roughly the same MV sensitivity, while percentage inhibition in ‘reds’ was considerably reduced (Fig. 3). Accordingly, the enhanced resistance of red leaves may be linked to the presence of anthocyanins.


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Percentage inhibition of PSII effective yield in the light (1 h, red light, 400 µmol m–2 s–1 PAR) by MV in green and red leaves of C. creticus sampled just before (13/01 to 18/01) and after (24/01 to 16/03) reddening of the corresponding phenotype in the field. The arrow indicates the first optical sign of colour change. Levels of anthocyanins in the corresponding leaves are shown in Table 2. Values are means ±SE from eight leaves per experiment and phenotype. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between phenotypes (P <0.05).

 
In all tested species, high levels of anthocyanins were not accompanied by increased total phenolic concentrations (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
It is evident from the results of this investigation that MV-treated leaves of all plants tested suffered a reduction in light-adapted PSII photochemical efficiency, which persisted in the subsequent dark recovery period. MV is known to accept electrons from the reducing side of PSI (Fujii et al., 1990), acting competitively to NADP reduction. Accordingly, CO2 fixation is inhibited (Preston, 1994), leading to a transient activation of the xanthophyll cycle and down-regulation of PSII efficiency (Thiele and Krause, 1994). Under short exposure to the herbicide, this dynamic photoinhibition is reversible within minutes in the dark. After longer exposure, however, permanent damage to PSII may occur, resulting in chronic photoinhibition. Hence, it was accepted that, under the conditions of these experiments, the transfer of electrons from MV to molecular O2 and the concomitant production of the superoxide radical (Formula) and other highly reactive oxidative species resulted in a partial photo-oxidative damage of PSII (Iturbe-Ormaexte et al., 1998). Apparently, the intrinsic capacity of the chloroplast antioxidative enzyme complement to scavenge Formula(Asada and Takahashi, 1987) was surpassed in MV-treated leaf discs.

However, red leaves in two species (C. creticus, P.xfraseri) displayed higher resistance to photo-oxidative PSII damage, when compared with the corresponding green leaves. In these species, anthocyanins reside in the vacuoles of mesophyll cells. The higher resistance of red leaves in C. creticus was evident in the light, while in P.xfraseri it was evident in the dark recovery period. During the dark period in C. creticus and the light period in P.xfraseri, the extent of inhibition in PSII efficiency by MV was the same in both green and red leaves. The results do not allow any speculation concerning the above differences between C. creticus and P.xfraseri. Yet, although the timing for the expression of an assumed protective effect by anthocyanins against MV-induced ROS was different, the final results pointed towards the same direction. At this point it may be noted that ROS-induced PSII damage may extend well into the dark recovery period (Frankart et al., 2003), probably as a result of autocatalytic membrane peroxidation (Halliwell, 1987). Also, the results cannot be explained by a reduction of the light intensity reaching the chloroplasts in red leaves (sunscreen hypothesis), since the red actinic light used is not absorbed by anthocyanins. However, it may be argued that the observed MV-resistance of reds could be associated with anthocyanins residing in mesophyll vacuoles and acting as competitive scavenging targets for reactive oxidative species. The argument is strengthened by the sharp reduction in the sensitivity of the red phenotype of C. creticus to MV, immediately after anthocyanin accumulation in the field (Fig. 3).

An alternative explanation, applied only in illuminated C. creticus, is that the greatest amelioration of the MV effects in red leaves is due to differences in MV uptake. Yet, such an interpretation is weakened by the fact that percentage inhibition in both the green and the red phenotype in the period immediately preceding anthocyanin accumulation was the same (Fig. 3) and there is no reason to assume a sudden decrease in penetration rate upon reddening.

A matter which should be discussed concerning this putative anthocyanin function is the nature of light- and MV-induced oxy-radicals and their capacity to reach the vacuole. Formula is normally reduced in the chloroplast via the action of superoxide dismutase to H2O2, which, in turn, is transformed to H2O plus O2 by ascorbate peroxidase. If in excess or not properly handled, these oxidative agents can further produce hydroxyl radicals (HO·) which attack proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, initiating radical chain reactions. Although anthocyanins can in vitro detoxify all these active oxy-radical species, Formula and HO· cannot penetrate the tonoplast and, accordingly, they have to be scavenged in the chloroplast or the cytoplasm (Takahashi and Asada, 1983). Yet, H2O2 can freely diffuse into the vacuole where anthocyanins abound (Yamazaki et al., 1996). Moreover, it has been reported that the primary target of MV-induced photo-oxidative stress in leaves is ascorbate peroxidase, i.e. the enzyme responsible for H2O2 removal (Mano et al., 2001). Since inactivation of ascorbate peroxidase precedes that of superoxide dismutase (Mano et al., 2001), H2O2 transiently accumulates in the chloroplast stroma under photo-oxidative conditions (Nakano and Asada, 1981) and further diffuses to other cell compartments. Thus an anthocyanin-rich vacuole is a potential sink for excess H2O2 produced in the chloroplast, alleviating the photo-oxidative risk. The results with C. creticus and P.xfraseri are compatible with this possibility. A further argument is that this anthocyanin-based antioxidative potential is enhanced when anthocyanins are located in the vicinity of H2O2 production, as happens in C. creticus and P.xfraseri. Accordingly, one would expect the antioxidative function of anthocyanins to be weakened or absent as the distance between H2O2 source and anthocyanic sink is increased. In fact, in Rosa sp. and R. communis (with anthocyanins located in the epidermal vacuoles), red leaves appeared more sensitive to MV than green leaves. Although this result generally strengthens the initial hypothesis for an enhanced, anthocyanin-based, antioxidative capacity when anthocyanins are near the oxy-radical source, the reasons for the higher MV sensitivity of red leaves possessing anthocyanins in the epidermis cannot be determined from these experiments.

Alternatively, it may be argued that an explanation for these results could be sought on age- or morph- (green versus red) specific differences in enzyme and/or phenolic-based antioxidative potential. It has been shown with many plants that activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and catalase increase with leaf age (Polle, 1997). Accordingly, the higher sensitivity of young red versus green mature leaves of R. communis to MV-induced PSII damage could be ascribed to the lower antioxidant enzyme pool of young red leaves. In young, red leaves of P.xfraseri, however, the presence of anthocyanins within photosynthetic cells seems not only to compensate for the assumed lower antioxidant enzyme pools, but to render these leaves more resistant to MV-induced oxy-radical production than green mature leaves. Concerning pool differences in these enzymes between red and green leaves of the same age, Neill et al. (2002a) reported higher activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase in red leaves of the shade species Elatostema rugosum but no differences in the canopy tree Quintinia serrata (Neill et al., 2002b). At this point it may be noted that leaves used in the present study were taken from fully exposed plants. Finally, phenolic-based differences in antioxidant activities between green and red leaves are unlikely, as judged by the similarity of total phenolic levels, although differences in the relative concentrations of individual phenolics can not be excluded. The use of mutants lacking the whole flavonoid biosynthetic pathway or just the final steps leading to anthocyanins may help to assess the relative importance of these compounds to antioxidative defence. It may also be noted here that the anthocyanin most often encountered in red leaves is cyanidin-3-glucoside (Harborne, 1976). Although the structure of anthocyanins in the test plants was not investigated, it can be noted that red anthocyanins have the highest antioxidative capacity which is further enhanced by glucosylation (Wang et al., 1997). Hence, an in vivo antioxidative function for anthocyanins seems plausible. Thse results not only confirm earlier reports indicating a possible antioxidative role for leaf anthocyanins, but extend this confirmation to an in vivo situation where the normal compartmentation of both anthocyanins and oxy-radical source is maintained.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
It is concluded from the above that leaf vacuolar anthocyanins, although not optimally located in relation to the chloroplastic source of oxy-radical production, may afford a detoxifying sink for some reactive oxygen species when the chloroplastic, the first line of antioxidative defence, is surpassed. This putative function is more possible for anthocyanins located in mesophyll than in epidermal vacuoles.


    Acknowledgements
 
This research was funded by the Research Committee of the University of Patras (project K Karatheodori).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Asada K. (2000) The water–water cycle as alternative photon and electron sink. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 355:1419–1430.

Asada K and Takahashi M. (1987) Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. In Kyle DJ, Osmond CB, Arntzen CJ (Eds.). Photoinhibition (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp. 227–287.

Chalker-Scott L. (1999) Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology 70:1–9.

Close C and Beadle CL. (2003) The ecophysiology of foliar anthocyanins. Botanical Review 69:149–161.

Demmig-Adams B, Gilmore AM, Adams WW. (1996) In vivo functions of carotenoids in higher plants. FASEB Journal 10:403–412.[Abstract]

Dominy NJ, Lucas PW, Ramsden LW, Riba-Hernandez P, Stoner KE, Turner IM. (2002) Why are young leaves red? Oikos 98:163–175.[CrossRef]

Frankart C, Eullaffroy P, Vernet G. (2003) Comparative effects of four herbicides on non-photochemical fluorescence quenching in Lemna minor. Environmental and Experimental Botany 49:159–168.[CrossRef]

Fujii T, Yokorama E, Inoue K, Sakurai H. (1990) The sites of electron donation of photosystem I to methyl viologen. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1015:41–48.[CrossRef]

Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR. (1989) The relationship between quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport rate and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990:87–92.

Gould KS. (2004) Nature's swiss army knife: the diverse protective roles of anthocyanins in leaves. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 4:314–320.

Gould KS, McKelvie J, Markham KR. (2002a) Do anthocyanins function as antioxidants in leaves? Imaging of H2O2 in red and green leaves after mechanical injury. Plant, Cell and Environment 25:1261–1269.[CrossRef]

Gould KS, Neill S, Vogelmann TC. (2002b) A unified explanation for anthocyanins in leaves? In Gould KS and Lee DW (Eds.). Anthocyanins in leaves. Advances in Botanical Research (Academic Press, London) Vol. 37: pp. 167–192.

Gould KS, Vogelmann TC, Han T, Clearwater MJ. (2002c) Profiles of photosynthesis within red and green leaves of Quintinia serrata A. Cunn. Physiologia Plantarum 116:127–133.[CrossRef][Medline]

Halliwell B. (1987) Oxidative damage, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in chloroplasts. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 44:327–340.[CrossRef]

Harborne JB. (1976) The anthocyanin pigments. In Harborne JB (Ed.). Comparative biochemistry of the flavonoids (Academic Press, London) pp. 1–36.

Hrazdina G, Wagner GJ, Siegelman HW. (1978) Subcellular localization of enzymes of anthocyanin biosynthesis in protoplasts. Phytochemistry 17:53–56.[CrossRef]

Ireland CR, Baker NR, Long SP. (1985) The role of carbon dioxide and oxygen in determining chlorophyll fluorescence quenching during leaf development. Planta 165:477–485.[CrossRef]

Iturbe-Ormaexte I, Escuredo PR, Arrese-Igor C, Becana M. (1998) Oxidative damage in pea plants exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant Physiology 116:173–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Krause GH, Virgo A, Winter K. (1995) High susceptibility to photoinhibition of young leaves of tropical forest trees. Planta 197:538–591.

Lee DW and Collins TM. (2001) Phylogenetic and ontogenetic influences on the distribution of anthocyanins and betacyanins in leaves of tropical plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162:1141–1153.[CrossRef]

Levizou E and Manetas Y. (2002) Spectrophotometric assessment of leaf UV-B absorbing compounds and chemically determined total phenolic levels are strongly correlated. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:690–694.

Lev-Yadun S, Dafni A, Flaishman A, Inbar M, Izhaki I, Katzir G, Ne'eman G. (2004) Plant coloration undermines herbivorous insect camouflage. BioEssays 26:1126–1130.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Long SP and Humphries S. (1994) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 45:633–662.[CrossRef][ISI]

Mancinelli AL, Yang C-Ph, Lindquist P, Anderson OR, Rabino I. (1975) Photocontrol of anthocyanin synthesis. III. The action of streptomycin on the synthesis of chlorophyll and anthocyanin. Plant Physiology 55:251–257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Manetas Y. (2006) Why some leaves are anthocyanic and why most anthocyanic leaves are red. Flora 201:163–177.

Manetas Y, Petropoulou Y, Psaras GK, Drinia A. (2003) Exposed red (anthocyanic) leaves of Quercus coccifera display shade characteristics. Functional Plant Biology 30:265–270.[CrossRef][ISI]

Mano J, Ohno C, Domae Y, Asada K. (2001) Chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase is the primary target of methylviologen-induced photooxidative stress in spinach leaves: its relevance to monodehydroascorbate radical detected with in vivo ESR. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1504:275–287.[Medline]

Matile P, Hortensteiner S, Thomas H. (1999) Chlorophyll degradation. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50:67–95.[CrossRef][ISI]

Nakano Y and Asada K. (1981) Spinach chloroplasts scavenge hydrogen peroxide on illumination. Plant and Cell Physiology 21:1295–1307.

Neill SO and Gould KS. (2003) Anthocyanins in leaves: light attenuators or antioxidants? Functional Plant Biology 30:865–873.[CrossRef][ISI]

Neill S, Gould KS, Kilmartin PA, Mitchell KA, Markham KR. (2002a) Antioxidant activities of red versus green leaves in Elatostema rugosum. Plant, Cell and Environment 25:539–547.[CrossRef]

Neill S, Gould KS, Kilmartin PA, Mitchell KA, Markham KR. (2002b) Antioxidant capacities of green and cyanic leaves in the sun species Quintinia serrata. Functional Plant Biology 29:1437–1443.[CrossRef]

Polle A. (1997) Defense against photooxidative damage in plants. In Scandalios JD (Ed.). Oxidative stress and the molecular biology of antioxidant defenses (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York) pp. 623–666.

Preston C. (1994) Resistance to photosystem I disrupting herbicides. In Powles SB and Holtum JAM (Eds.). Herbicide resistance in plants. Biology and biochemistry (Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL) pp. 61–82.

Steyn WJ, Wand SJE, Holcroft DM, Jacobs G. (2002) Anthocyanins in vegetative tissues: a proposed unified function in photoprotection. New Phytologist 155:349–361.[CrossRef]

Takahashi MA and Asada K. (1983) Superoxide anion permeability of phospholipid-membranes and chloroplast thylacoids. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 226:558–566.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Thiele A and Krause GH. (1994) Xanthophyll cycle and thermal energy dissipation in photosystem II: relationship between zeaxanthin formation, energy-dependent fluorescence quenching and photoinhibition. Journal of Plant Physiology 144:324–332.

Tolbert NE. (1997) The C-2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48:1–23.[CrossRef][ISI]

Wang H, Cao GH, Prior RL. (1997) Oxygen radical absorbing capacity of anthocyanins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45:304–309.[CrossRef]

Yamasaki H, Uefuji H, Sakihama Y. (1996) Bleaching of the red anthocyanin induced by superoxide radical. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 332:183–186.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/10/2203    most recent
erj185v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kytridis, V.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Manetas, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kytridis, V.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Manetas, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kytridis, V.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Manetas, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?