Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on July 4, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(11):2837-2846; doi:10.1093/jxb/erl042
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/11/2837    most recent
erl042v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pulido, A.
Right arrow Articles by Olmedilla, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pulido, A.
Right arrow Articles by Olmedilla, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pulido, A.
Right arrow Articles by Olmedilla, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Hordeins are expressed in microspore-derived embryos and also during male gametophytic and very early stages of seed development

Amada Pulido1, Alberto Hernando2, Ferenc Bakos3, Enrique Méndez2, Martine Devic4, Beata Barnabás3 and Adela Olmedilla1,*

1Department of Plant Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, EEZ (CSIC), Profesor Albareda 1, E-18008 Granada, Spain
2Unidad de Gluten, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Cantoblanco, E- 28049 Madrid, Spain
3Agricultural Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Science, H-2462 Martonvasar, Hungary
4Plant Genome and Development Laboratory, UMR (CNRS) 5096, University of Perpignan, France

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: adela.olmedilla{at}eez.csic.es

Received 3 March 2006; Accepted 9 May 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Microspore-derived embryos induced by anther or isolated-microspore culture display certain characteristics of zygotic embryos. Furthermore, the expression of certain endosperm genes has been described in these non-zygotic embryos. The expression of hordein genes encoding the main barley endosperm proteins has been studied using a wide range of methods (RT-PCR, in situ hybridization, ELISA sandwich, western blotting immunocytochemistry, and cytochemistry) to ascertain their presence or absence during the induction and first stages of microspore embryogenesis. Due to the very sensitive techniques used it was possible to detect for the first time hordein expression during microspore embryogenesis. Surprisingly, these hordeins were also detected at different stages of male gametophytic development as well as during the very early stages of seed development, when they have not hitherto been detected. The expression and localization of these storage proteins and their corresponding transcripts provide new information about barley microspore embryogenesis and its relationship to zygotic embryogenesis. Although only small quantities of hordeins are accumulated during microspore embryogenesis they seem to be necessary for the initial development of the microspore-derived embryo. This idea is supported by the changes detected in their concentration throughout this process and is in accordance with previously published data concerning the importance of endosperm proteins for embryo development in both microspore culture and in planta.

Key words: Barley, hordeins, microspore embryogenesis, pollen development, protein bodies, storage proteins


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Microspores programmed to differentiate and give rise to pollen tubes and gametes may be deviated to an alternate developmental pathway leading to the formation of haploid embryos (Reynolds, 1997). This dramatic shift from the gametophytic to the sporophytic pathway is usually induced as a consequence of stress treatment followed by anther or microspore culture under the appropriate conditions. Since this process, known as microspore embryogenesis, could have many advantages for breeding (Kasha et al., 1990) considerable efforts have been made to induce microspore embryogenesis in a wide variety of species and thus obtain higher induction frequencies (Raghavan, 1986; Reynolds, 1997; Touraev et al., 1997). These almost completely empirical approaches have afforded good results for cereals and, in particular, for barley, in which very efficient anther and isolated-microspore culture methods have been reported when using pretreatment with mannitol (Kasha et al., 1990; Hoekstra et al., 1992). Nevertheless, cellular and molecular studies of microspore embryogenesis are scarce and an understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of the induction of this process is still limited. One of the general characteristics of this embryogenic process is that the microspore-derived embryos develop following a pattern similar to that of zygotic embryos (Reynolds, 1997; Touraev et al., 1997; Pulido et al., 2001). The resemblances between the development of zygotic and microspore-derived embryos suggest that both pathways may have a partially common pattern of gene expression. Consequently, one of the strategies to characterize microspore embryogenesis and to find molecular markers is to study, during microspore embryogenesis, the expression of genes that are normally expressed during zygotic embryogenesis (Reynolds, 1997). Among the zygotic genes studied, those encoding the storage proteins of zygotic embryos, napins and cruciferins, have been reported as being expressed during microspore embryogenesis in Brassica (Crouch, 1982; Boutilier et al., 1994). In addition, it appears that endosperm genes (ZmAE1, ZmAE, and ZmESR2) are expressed during the early stages of microspore embryogenesis in maize (Magnard et al., 2000; Massonneau et al., 2005). These authors have suggested that some endosperm products are needed for embryo development in microspore culture and have also pointed out the presence of endosperm-like domains showing a coenocytic organization in maize embryogenic microspores similar to that of endosperm initials. In barley microspore embryogenesis, the presence of two different kinds of multicellular pollen grain has recently been reported: homogeneous grains formed by a single type of cell and heterogeneous grains made up of cells with different cytological characteristics (Pulido et al., 2001, 2002, 2005; Maraschin et al., 2005b).

Cereal prolamins (known as gliadins in wheat, hordeins in barley, secalins in rye, avenins in oats, and zeins in maize) are the main endosperm storage proteins in all cereal grains, with the exception of oats and rice (Shewry and Halford, 2002). Hordeins represent 35–50% of the total protein in barley seeds (Jaradat, 1991). They are classified into four groups, A, B, C, and D, in order of decreasing mobility (Field et al., 1982). The B hordeins are the main protein fraction, differing from C hordeins in their sulphur content (Kreis and Shewry, 1989). B hordeins account for 70–80% of the total and C hordeins for 10–20% (Davies et al., 1993). The A hordeins are not generally considered to be a storage fraction whereas D hordeins are homologous to the high-molecular-weight glutenins. Hordeins, along with the rest of the related cereal prolamins, are not expressed in the zygotic embryo itself, unlike other storage proteins such as napins; they are believed to be expressed exclusively in the starchy endosperm during the middle-to-late stages of seed development (Davies et al., 1993; Shewry and Halford, 2002).

To gain further insight into the possible resemblances and differences between microspore and zygotic embryogenesis, the expression of hordeins was studied during microspore embryogenesis in barley. As a control, these proteins and their corresponding transcripts were also studied in developing seeds. Moreover, hordeins were examined at different pollen developmental stages: before the deviation to the embryogenic pathway and in the late stages of gametogenesis. To this end, very sensitive methods were used for the detection of prolamins (Valdés et al., 2003).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material
Barley seeds of the winter cultivar ‘Igri’ were sown in pots of soil and germinated in a growth chamber with a photoperiod of 16/8 h (day/night) and a daytime temperature of 13 °C and night-time temperature of 11 °C. Germinated seedlings were vernalized at 4 °C for 1 month and grown in a climate chamber until tillering under the conditions described for seed germination.

Tillers containing microspores at the different stages of male gametophytic development were excised and microspores were isolated from the rest of the sporophytic tissues for the mRNA and protein extractions by blending and maltose-gradient centrifugation according to Mordhorst and Lörz (1993). To study zygotic embryogenesis, developing seeds were collected at 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 35 d post-anthesis (DPA) (35 DPA seeds correspond to mature seeds). Finally, 14-d-old zygotic embryos were dissected from the rest of the caryopsis tissues prior to processing for RT-PCR, western blot, and ELISA tests.

Microspore culture
Tillers containing microspores at the late vacuolated stage were surface-sterilized by spraying with 70% ethanol and spikes were removed from the unsheathing leaves. Essentially Olsen's protocol (Olsen, 1991) was followed with minor modifications. Aseptically dissected anthers were pretreated with 0.3 M mannitol in the dark for 3 d at 26 °C. Microspores were isolated by blending; maltose-gradient centrifugation was then applied according to Mordhorst and Lörz (1993). The upper microspore band was collected and cultured in MMS3 medium (Hu and Kasha, 1997) composed of MS medium containing 60 g l–1 maltose.

RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from zygotic-embryogenesis samples (10 DPA complete caryopses and 14 DPA dissected zygotic embryos) and microspore pellets from in vivo pollen development and microspore cultures using the TRI REAGENT® LS (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For RT-PCR, 2.5 µg of DNase I-treated total RNA was used for first-strand synthesis of cDNA by oligo(dT) primer reverse transcription using Moloney Murine Leucemy Virus Reverse Transcriptase as described by the manufacturer's protocol (First Strand RT-PCR kit, ProSTAR; Stratagene). PCR was performed using the following primers, designed on the basis of database sequence information for the B1 Hordein gene (GenBank accession number X87232): B1 Hordein forward primer 5'-AACCATTTCCACAGCAACCACCA-3', and reverse primer 5'-ATTGTCCGACTTGCTCCTCCTGC-3'. The B1 Hordein gene was amplified with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 10 min followed by 40 denaturation amplification cycles (94 °C, 1 min), annealing (60 °C, 1 min), and extension (72 °C, 1 min), and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min for all the stages studied. Saturation for S10 was reached at 36 cycles (data not shown) but 40 cycles were applied to have a positive control. The amplification products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel. Elongation factor 1{alpha} gene (EF1{alpha}) expression was assumed to be constitutive and equivalent in all the samples and was used as a loading control to normalize the amount of cDNA used in the amplification reaction. The primers used were: EF1{alpha} forward primer 5'-GGCTGTCAAGGATCTCAAGC-3' and reverse primer 5'-AACTATCGCCACCACCAAAC-3', and the amount of cDNA used in the amplification reaction was normalized so that the EF1{alpha} amplification product showed a similar intensity in each of the samples assayed. 32 cycles for the EF1{alpha} gene were used because it had previously been established that this number of cycles did not lead to saturation in the amplification of the EF1{alpha} product (data not shown). To detect any possible amplification from contaminating genomic DNA, control PCR reactions were performed in which RNA was not retrotranscribed, but no contamination was found during these experiments. RT-PCR products were cloned in pGEM-T-Easy vector (pGEM-T-Easy Vector System I, Promega) and sequenced. Both strands were sequenced using the dideoxy chain-termination method (Prism Read Reaction DyeDeosy Terminator Cycle Sequence Kit, Applied Biosystems) with an automated DNA sequencer (3100 Genetic Analyser, Applied Biosystems).

Processing for microscopy
Anthers containing microspores at different gametophytic developmental stages, isolated microspores at various stages of the embryogenic process and 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 35 DPA developing seeds were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.25% glutaraldehyde in PBS (PBS: 137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 16 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4 at pH 7.3) for 4 h at 4 °C. The isolated and fixed microspores were then embedded in 1% agarose solution in PBS and after solidification washed in PBS. The anthers and caryopses were not embedded in agarose but washed straight away in PBS after fixation. Isolated microspores as well as anthers and developing seeds were then dehydrated in an ethanol series with a progressive lowering of temperature, embedded in Unicryl (BioCell) at –20 °C, and polymerized under ultraviolet irradiation.

In situ hybridization
RT-PCR product (426 bp) was cloned in pGEM-T-Easy vector and digoxigenin-labelled sense and antisense RNA probes were synthesized using SP6 and T7 RNA polymerases using digoxigenin-UTP (digRNA labelling mix x10, Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2 µm thick sections were attached to 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane-coated slides. The slides were pretreated with 1 µg ml–1 proteinase K in 100 mM TRIS–HCl, 50 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by 100 mM triethanolamine, pH 8.0, for 10 min and 0.25% acetic anhydride in 100 mM triethanolamine, pH, 8.0, for 10 min, both at room temperature. The sections were then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and air-dried. For hybridization each slide was covered with 50 µl of the hybridization solution containing 2 µl of the digoxigenin-labelled RNA probes (2 ng µl–1) in 50% formamide, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM TRIS–HCl, pH 8, EDTA 1 mM, 10% dextran sulphate, 60 mM DTT, 0.02% Ficoll, 0.02% PVP, and 0.02% BSA. Sections were covered with coverslips and incubated in a humid chamber for 15 h at 55 °C. After hybridization the slides were washed in 2x SSC (1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate) for 5 min, incubated in 20 µg ml–1 RNase A in 2x SSC for 20 min, and washed repeatedly in 1 mM DTT in 2x SSC for 30 min, all at room temperature. The slides were immediately washed several times in 1 mM in 0.1x SSC for 60 min at 55 °C. Detection was carried out after blocking with 5% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h by incubating the slides with 1:40 sheep anti-digoxigenin antibody conjugated to colloidal gold particles (BioCell ) in 0.5% BSA, 0.01% Tween 20 in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. Silver enhancement was then carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (BioCell): 1 volume of initiator was mixed with 1 volume of enhancer; the mixture was applied and the reaction monitored under LM for 10–15 min. The reaction was stopped by washing the slides in distilled water, after which the sections were air-dried, stained with safranin and mounted.

Hordein extraction
Hordeins were extracted from 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 35 DPA developing seeds and from microspore pellets from both in vivo pollen development and microspore culture according to Hernando et al. (2003) with minor modifications. First, homogenization was performed in 60% v/v aqueous ethanol by using a pestle vigorously (10 min) and using a rotary shaker at room temperature for 60 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 3220 g and the supernatant collected. The ethanol extracts were used for ELISA and western blot analysis.

Hordein quantification by ELISA
To quantify hordeins during male gametophytic development and zygotic and microspore embryogenesis, a home-made ELISA based on an R5 monoclonal antibody was used according to Valdés et al. (2003). Polystyrene EIA/RIA flat-bottomed plates (Corning Incorporated) were coated overnight at 4 °C with 2.2 µg ml–1 R5 antibody in 50 mM carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6. After washing three times with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS and blocking with 1% BSA, 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h, the plates were incubated for 1 h with 100 µl of sample extract dilutions. Three independent experiments were made for each stage studied and three dilutions of every sample were done in 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS before being added to the ELISA plate wells. Due to the different quantities of hordein present at the various stages studied, different dilutions were made. The European gliadin standard IRMM-480 (Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements of the European Commission in Geel, Belgium) was used in the ELISA system as a gliadin reference, as previously described in Valdés et al. (2003). The calculations in this study were based on a gliadin protein content of 86.4% on the basis of dry matter (van Eckert, 2002). After incubation with the sample extracts the plates were washed and incubated with 100 µl of a peroxidase R5 conjugated antibody (R5-HRP) diluted in 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, after washing the plates six times in 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS, 100 µl of the substrate solution, K-blue 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Neogen), was added and the reaction was stopped 10 min later with 50 µl of 2.5M H2SO4. Absorbances at 450 nm were measured in a microplate reader. Multiple Range Tests was applied for statistical analysis of the results.

Western blot analysis of hordeins
R5 western blotting was performed according to Valdés et al. (2003). Briefly, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was done under the same conditions as those described by Rocher et al. (1996). The proteins were then electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, incubated directly with HRP-R5, a peroxidase R5 conjugated antibody, and developed using the ECL Western Blotting Analysis System for immunodetection (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Spatial localization of hordeins by immunofluorescence
1 µm thick sections were attached to 3-aminopropyl triethoxy-silane-coated slides and incubated in 5% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h. After washing for 5 min the slides were incubated with the R5 monoclonal antibody 1:50 diluted in 0.5% BSA, 0.01% Tween 20 in PBS at 4 °C overnight. They were then washed three times for 15 min in the same buffer and incubated with IgG anti-mouse antibody FITC conjugated 1:40 diluted in 1% BSA in PBS at 4 °C overnight in the dark. After being washed 3 times for 20 min in PBS they were mounted with PBS-glycerol containing p-phenylenediamine (0.1%), an anti-fading agent, and sealed with nail polish before being studied under a Zeiss Axioplan fluorescence microscope equipped with a CCD camera.

Cytochemical detection of proteins by the chloramine T-Schiff reactive method and Coomassie Brilliant Blue
Essentially Burstone's protocol (Burstone, 1955) was followed for the Schiff method: 1 µm semi-thin sections were attached to 3-aminopropyl triethoxy-silane-coated slides and incubated in 2% chloramine T in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, at 40 °C for 4 h. They were then washed with distilled water and 5% sodium thiosulphate for 10 min. The slides were subsequently incubated with Schiff reactive in the dark for 2 h at 40 °C. After being rinsed with distilled water they were washed three times for 5 min with 0.5% sodium metabisulphite and again with distilled water.

For Coomassie Brilliant Blue the method of Cawood et al. (1978) was modified: semi-thin sections attached to slides as described previously were stained for 30 min in a Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 0.25% in absolute methanol–distilled water–glacial acetic acid (9:9:2 by vol.). The slides were then rinsed in the same solution without colourant for 15 min and finally washed in distilled water. The stained sections were studied under a Zeiss Axioplan fluorescence microscope equipped with a CCD camera.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Analysis of B1 Hordein gene expression in microspore embryogenesis and male gamete development
B1 Hordein was chosen to study the expression of hordein genes because it is one of the best characterized of the hordein genes. It was analysed by RT-PCR (Fig. 1) using total RNA extracted from different stages of the microspore embryogenesis process [after mannitol pretreatment (A3) and isolated-microspore culture for 3 d (C3) and 13 d (C13)]. Total RNA extracts from different stages of in vivo pollen development [vacuolated microspores (A0), tricellular pollen (P9), and pollen at anthesis (P12)] as well as RNA from the developing seeds [caryopses 10 DPA (S10) and dissected embryos 14 DPA (E14, zygotic embryogenesis)] were also analysed to be used as controls. Equal loading of the samples was ensured by the comparable intensity of bands resulting from RT-PCR amplification of the EF1{alpha} gene (GenBank accession number L11740) in equivalent samples because EF1{alpha} mRNAs display steady-state levels (Liboz et al., 1990).


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 RT-PCR analysis of B1 Hordein gene expression pattern during male gametophytic development and zygotic and microspore embryogenesis. The stages studied were: A0, vacuolated microspores; A3, isolated microspores after mannitol pretreatment; C3, microspores after 3 d isolated-microspore culture; C13, microspores after 13 d isolated-microspore culture; P9, tricellular pollen 9 d after vacuolated-microspore stage; P12, mature pollen 12 d after vacuolated-microspore stage; E14, zygotic embryos dissected 14 d post-anthesis (DPA); S10, developing seeds 10 DPA. EF1{alpha} mRNA (elongation factor 1{alpha}) of every sample was also amplified as a loading control.

 
The RT-PCR analysis for this gene showed no signal when RNA from dissected zygotic embryos (E14) was used (negative control). A band of 426 bp was observed, however, in 10 DPA complete caryopses (S10) (positive control). With regard to the male gametophytic process, bands of the same size (426 bp) were observed at all the stages studied (A0, P9, and P12). In embryogenic development induced by isolated-microspore culture, bands were detected after mannitol pretreatment (A3) and after 3 d (C3) and 13 d (C13) culture.

In situ spatial expression of the B1 Hordein gene
To study the distribution of the B1 Hordein gene transcripts during in vivo pollen development and at the first stages of microspore embryogenesis, hybridization was carried out in situ with a digoxigenin-labelled riboprobe using semi-thin sections (Fig. 2). Labelling corresponding to gold particles intensified by silver enhancement was evident at every stage of male gametophytic development studied: vacuolated microspore (Fig. 2A), early bicellular (Fig. 2B) and tricellular (Fig. 2C) pollen. No labelling was found in the tapetum at any of these stages however (Fig. 2A). With regard to microspore embryogenesis, after 3 d mannitol pretreatment the microspores also presented labelling (Fig. 2D). The labelling was more abundant and homogeneously distributed later in the homogeneous and heterogeneous multicellular pollen grains obtained after 3, 6, 9, and 13 d culture. In heterogeneous multicellular pollen grains the labelling was distributed in both types of cell (Fig. 2E). Labelling was also observed in microspore-derived embryos released from the microspore wall (Fig. 2F). Labelling was very abundant in the 10 DPA seed endosperm cells (Fig. 2G). No labelling was obtained after hybridization in embryos of 10 DPA seeds (Fig. 2H). No signal was ever detected in the nucleolus, cell wall, vacuoles, or starch granules or when the corresponding B1 Hordein sense riboprobe was applied in parallel sections (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Light microscopy in situ hybridization of antisense B1 Hordein riboprobe in developing seeds and microspores at different developmental stages of male gametophytic development and microspore embryogenesis. The mRNA signal was detected as black dots of different sizes corresponding to the colloidal gold antidig-antibody intensified by silver enhancement (arrows). Sections were stained with safranin. (A, B, C) In vivo pollen development from vacuolated-microspore stage onwards; a faint signal is present in (A) vacuolated microspore, (B) bicellular pollen, and (C) tricellular pollen but not in the tapetum (t) at any of these stages. (D, E, F) Microspore-derived embryogenic development: (D) microspore after mannitol pretreatment showing scarce labelling; (E) heterogeneous multicellular pollen grain obtained after 6 d isolated-microspore culture, more abundant labelling is visible in both types of cell (arrows and double arrows); (F) microspore-derived embryo from 13-d isolated-microspore cultures (signal is also abundant). In situ hybridization controls (G, H). (G) Positive control: 10 DPA seed endosperm, very high labelling is observed except in vacuoles and starch. (H) Negative control: 10 DPA embryo, no signal can be detected. Starch granules (s), vacuoles (v), and cell walls were devoid of labelling. Bars represent 20 µm.

 
Hordeins are present at very early stages of seed development and microspore embryogenesis
In view of the above results, to detect and quantify hordeins during zygotic and early microspore embryogenesis, the ELISA ‘sandwich’ method was used (Fig. 3), which has inter-assay (reproducibility) and intra-assay (repeatability) variabilities of 8.7% and 7.7%, respectively (Valdés et al., 2003). In zygotic embryogenesis (Fig. 3A) it was possible to detect hordeins as early as 3 DPA, although they were very scarce at this moment. This quantity grew progressively from 3 DPA onwards, slowly at first but much faster later on in seed development. In microspore embryogenesis (Fig. 3B), hordeins could already be detected in the vacuolated microspores (A0) before pretreatment with mannitol and they were not affected by this treatment (A3). The quantity of hordeins changed throughout the embryogenic development of microspores, increasing at first after 3 d culture (C3), then decreasing until 9 d isolated-microspore culture, and finally increasing again after 13 d culture.


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Analysis by ELISA of hordeins in developing seeds and early microspore embryogenesis. (A) Seed development, DPA (days post-anthesis). (B) microspore-derived embryogenic development: the stages studied were: A0, vacuolated microspores; A3, isolated microspores after mannitol pretreatment; C3, C6, C9, and C13, microspores after 3, 6, 9, and 13 d isolated-microspore culture, respectively. Values represent the mean ±SD. n=3. ppm{equiv}µg hordein g–1 of sample. In each graph, asterisks indicate those values which do not show statistically significant differences among themselves at the 95.0% confidence level.

 
Hordein patterns during zygotic embryogenesis and early microspore embryogenesis were analysed by western blotting using HRP-R5 conjugated antibody to identify any differences between the hordein patterns shown in these two different embryogenic pathways (Fig. 4). Due to the considerable difference in the quantities of hordeins present in the samples analysed, the protein samples were loaded in such a way as to be able to visualize the protein patterns for all the samples. Hordeins were first detected in zygotic embryogenesis at 3 DPA (Fig. 4A). Bands ranging from 30 kDa to 70 kDa were obtained at all stages of seed development. The relative abundance of the different hordeins changed, with hordein B proteins increasing throughout seed development. With regard to microspore-derived embryogenic development (Fig. 4B), differences were found in the accumulation of hordeins at the various developmental stages. B hordeins were more abundant than C hordeins before induction, as also occurred in seed development, whilst after 13 d the relative amount of C hordeins was higher than that of B hordeins (Fig. 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Immunoblotting analysis of hordeins. (A) Zygotic embryogenesis: (B, C) hordeins are indicated: 3, 6, 8, 12, and 35 DPA. (B) Pollen embryogenesis: A0, vacuolated microspores; A3, isolated microspores after mannitol pretreatment; C3, C6, C9, and C13, microspores after 3, 6, 9, and 13 d isolated-microspore culture, respectively.

 
Tissue location of hordeins
To study the precise location of hordeins during male gametophytic development and microspore and zygotic embryogenesis, immunocytochemical studies were made at light microscope level at different developmental stages of these processes (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Immunolocalization of hordeins in Unicryl semi-thin sections. (A, B, C, D, E) Immunolocalization of hordeins in developing seeds at 6 DPA. (A) Toluidine-blue-stained, transverse semi-thin section: the endosperm is undergoing cellularization; (CVS) central vacuolar space. (B, C) Localization by immunofluorescence of hordeins with R5 antibody: the labelling is present in the developing endosperm in the protein bodies (arrows), (C) at higher magnification, protein bodies of different sizes, some of them fusing (white arrow heads). (D, E) Detail of endosperm of seeds, protein bodies are visible after staining with chloramine T- Schiff reagent and toluidine blue respectively (black arrows). (F, G, H, I, J, K) In vivo pollen development from vacuolated-microspore stage onwards. (F, G) vacuolated microspore; (H, I) early bicellular pollen; (J, K) tricellular pollen. Labelling is present in a reduced number of spots (F, H, J); the same sections stained with toluidine blue where protein bodies are not visible (G, I, K). Bars represent 20 µm unless otherwise indicated.

 
During endosperm cellularization (Fig. 5A), hordeins were first detected in the endosperm at 6 DPA (Fig. 5B, C). The labelling was concentrated in protein bodies that were also visible with the chloramine T-Schiff reagent and with toluidine blue staining (Fig. 5D, E). These protein bodies fused (Fig. 5C) and grew in size within the endosperm throughout seed development. In mature seeds the immunofluorescent protein matrix formed by the fusion of the protein bodies, together with starch granules, occupied the whole cytoplasm of the endosperm cells (data not shown). No labelling was observed in the zygotic embryo in any of the seed development stages studied (data not shown).

During male gametophytic development immunofluorescence was observed in some spots of the cytoplasm of the vacuolated microspores (Fig. 5F, G) and bicellular (Fig. 5H, I) and tricellular pollen (Fig. 5J, K), although the labelling was concentrated in a very few small spots which were never visible as protein bodies after toluidine blue staining.

As far as microspore-derived embryogenic development was concerned (Fig. 6), scarce labelling was observed after mannitol pretreatment (Fig. 6A, B). After 3 d (Fig. 6C, D), 6 d and 9 d (Fig. 6E, F) culture, immunofluorescence was stronger and concentrated in bigger spots present in homogeneous as well as heterogeneous multicellular pollen grains, the labelling being present in both types of cell in the latter. When dead microspores were present no labelling was found (Fig. 6C, D). After 13 d culture, fluorescent protein bodies were also present in microspore-derived embryos released from the microspore wall (Fig. 6G). Specific techniques for detecting proteins, such as Coomassie Blue staining (Fig. 6H) and chloramine T-Schiff reagent (Fig. 6I), revealed, after 13 d culture, the presence of protein bodies very similar to those observed inside the endosperm. The same occurred after 18 d (Fig. 6J, K), but in these embryo-like structures there were, in addition, some protein bodies that presented no immunofluorescence at all whilst others fluoresced only in certain spots within the protein bodies (insert Fig. 6J).


Figure 6
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 Immunolocalization of hordeins during the early stages of the embryogenic process induced by microspore culture. (A, B) Microspore after mannitol pretreatment: (A) faint immunofluorescence present in the cytoplasm, (B) equivalent toluidine-blue-stained image. (C, D) 3 d isolated-microspore culture: (C) labelling is localized in small spots in a homogeneous pollen grain whilst the dead grain (star) does not present any immunofluorescence, (D) equivalent image after toluidine-blue staining. (E, F) Heterogeneous multicellular pollen grain obtained after 9 d isolated-microspore culture in which the cell wall is breaking down: (E) labelling is present in spots localized in both kinds of cell (arrows and double arrows, respectively), (F) equivalent toluidine-blue-stained image. (G, H, I) Embryo-like structure from 13 d isolated-microspore cultures: (G) immunofluorescent protein bodies are abundant. (H, I) Protein specific stainings: with both (H) Coomassie Blue and (I) chloramine T-Schiff reagent protein bodies (black arrows) are visible. (J, K) Microspore-derived embryo from 18 d isolated-microspore cultures: (J) immunofluorescence showing fluorescent protein bodies (arrows), protein bodies which are not fluorescent (arrow heads) and protein bodies where fluorescence is only visible in some areas inside them (Insert in J) and (K) equivalent image after toluidine-blue staining clearly showing these protein bodies. Bars represent 20 µm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To date, cereal prolamin genes have been reported as being expressed exclusively in the starchy endosperm during the middle-to-late developmental stages of seed development (for a review see Shewry and Halford, 2002). The results of this study show, however, that hordeins in barley are expressed in microspore-derived embryos and also during male gametophytic development. These results could be obtained due to the high sensitivity of the techniques employed, especially the ELISA sandwich (Valdés et al., 2003), thus finding them as early as 3 DPA in seed development. The presence of hordeins so early in seed development has not been described before. As far as is known, the earliest detection of hordeins was 5 DPA, made in Sundance barley by Davies et al. (1993) using immunocytochemistry.

In situ hybridization, which allowed the spatial localization of B1 Hordein gene transcripts, was used because, although hordein transcription was evident after RT-PCR, the microspore-derived embryogenic response is non-homogeneous and unsynchronized, as has been demonstrated elsewhere (Pulido et al., 2005).

Although these results show that the quantity of these proteins was very low in both male gametophytic and microspore-derived embryogenic development, the coincidence in the results obtained by the different techniques reinforces their value.

Hordeins in the microspore-derived embryogenic pathway
The presence of either storage proteins or their messengers in microspore-derived embryos of barley or any other monocots has not been described previously. Nevertheless, Crouch (1982) detected the presence of a 12S glycoprotein (cruciferin) during microspore embryogenesis in the dicot Brassica napus, and later Boutilier et al. (1994) described the presence of napin transcripts in embryogenic microspores of the same species. Other storage proteins have also been reported in the somatic embryos of different species (Crouch, 1982; Shoemaker et al., 1987; Joy et al., 1991; Misra et al., 1993; Koltunow et al., 1996; Chatthai and Misra, 1998; Sunderlíková and Wilhelm, 2002). All the storage proteins found in microspore-derived and somatic embryos have been detected previously in the corresponding zygotic embryos. Hordeins, however, are not present in the zygotic embryo of barley but in the endosperm of the corresponding seeds, as has been described elsewhere (for a review see Shewry and Halford, 2002) and has been confirmed in this investigation. During monocot seed development the endosperm acts as a storage tissue, but this tissue is not present in the embryos originated from microspores. These results may suggest that, due to the lack of endosperm, the microspore-derived embryos themselves need to synthesize some of the substances necessary for giving rise to the future plantlet, hordeins among them. Comparing microspore-derived and zygotic embryo development by ELISA it was seen that there were fluctuations in the hordein content throughout microspore-derived embryogenic development, whereas in seed development they increased constantly. Whilst it is known that, during seed development, hordeins are stored for later use in germination and seedling development, these results suggest that in microspore-derived embryogenic development these proteins may be synthesized and consumed according to the requirements of the embryogenic microspores and early embryos.

Other endosperm genes, unrelated to storage proteins, have been described as being expressed in microspore-derived embryos, but not in the corresponding zygotic embryos (Magnard et al., 2000; Massonneau et al., 2005). The expression of hordein genes in microspore-derived embryos is in harmony with the recent suggestion of Maraschin et al. (2005a) and Massonneau et al. (2005) that the development of embryogenic microspores requires endosperm-like functions, which might be needed to establish interactions that probably exist in planta between embryo and endosperm. Massonneau et al. (2005) suggested that certain proteins deriving from non-embryogenic structures are secreted into the medium to stimulate microspore-embryo development. In barley, hordeins are expressed in embryogenic structures, as has been shown, but they are not secreted proteins.

Magnard et al. (2000) showed the existence of endosperm-like domains in multicellular maize pollen grains. From these immunolocalization and in situ hybridization results, however, it is not possible to distinguish any domain which might be considered as being endosperm-like, either in the homogeneous or heterogeneous multicellular pollen grains.

Blumenthal et al. (1990) discovered the presence of several heat-shock elements upstream of the ‘TATA’ box in the nucleotide sequence of gliadin genes. These elements were conserved sequences associated with the switching on of all known heat-shock genes. Within this context it is worth noting that the expression of heat-shock proteins has been widely described during the induction and early stages of microspore embryogenesis induced by different kind of stresses, including starvation (Pechan et al., 1991; Zarsky et al., 1995). Thus it is possible that hordein expression increased in the cultured microspores used here as a consequence of the stress treatment to which they had been subjected. This hypothesis would need to be proved by further research.

The localization of hordeins by immunofluorescence showed that, in seed development, these proteins were included in protein bodies of different sizes that were also visualized by cytochemical techniques. During microspore-derived embryogenic development, protein bodies were not visible in young multicelular pollen grains by cytochemical techniques, but fluorescent spots revealed the presence of hordeins. In microspore cultures from 13 d culture onwards, protein bodies were clearly stained by cytochemical techniques but the distribution of hordeins was not the same in all of them, as was shown by immunofluorescence. These results suggest that either some protein bodies are not made up exclusively of hordeins or that hordein epitopes are only partly accessible to these antibodies. It has been proved that barley endosperm protein bodies are formed entirely of hordeins B and C, which are assembled in the centre of the body and surrounded by an external layer of {gamma}1 and {gamma}2 hordeins (Rechinger et al., 1993). In other cereals such as oats and wheat, however, endosperm protein bodies may be made up of different proteins: in oats, globulins and prolamins are co-located in the same protein bodies (Lending et al., 1989) and in wheat the endosperm protein bodies formed by gliadins may contain inclusions of a globulin known as triticin (Bechtel et al., 1991). Perhaps some of the protein bodies present during the embryogenic development induced in microspores in barley are composed of different storage proteins. Further studies are necessary to discover the exact composition and to unravel the accurate function of all the proteins contained in protein bodies present in embryogenic microspores.

Hordeins in male gametophytic development
Although it has been reported that the storage proteins synthesized during pollen maturation provide building blocks for rapid growth and pollen-tube germination (Mascarenhas, 1989; Herman and Larkins, 1999), storage proteins in pollen have not been extensively studied and, to date, cereal prolamins had not been described during gametophytic development. With regard to these results, napins, which are zygotic-embryo storage proteins in Brassica napus, have been reported as being expressed during male gametophytic development as well as in embryogenic microspores (Boutilier et al., 1994). These results may represent a similar pattern of expression for storage proteins in both a dicot and a monocot species.

Most cereal prolamins and glutelins belong to one class of related seed proteins, which have common evolutionary roots (Shewry and Tatham, 1990), except for rice glutelins and maize {alpha}-zein (Müntz, 1998). In this context, these results concerning hordein expression during both embryogenic and male gametophytic development open new perspectives concerning the possible expression of other prolamins, such as gliadins and secalins, in these developmental pathways in related cereals such as wheat and rye.


    Acknowledgements
 
This study was supported by Spain–Hungary Co-operation Project No. REF98HU0014. A Pulido received a fellowship from the Junta de Andalucía, Spain. Thanks go to J Trout for revising the English text.


    Abbreviations
 
DPA, days post-anthesis.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bechtel DB, Wilson JD, Shewry PR. (1991) Immunocytochemical localization of the wheat storage protein triticin in developing endosperm tissue. Cereal Chemistry 68:573–577.

Blumenthal CS, Batey IL, Bekes F, Wrigley CW, Barlow EWR. (1990) Gliadin genes contain heat-shock elements: possible relevance to heat-induced changes in grain quality. Journal of Cereal Science 11:185–187.

Boutilier KA, Giné MJ, DeMoor JM, Baszczynski CL, Iyer VN, Miki BL. (1994) Expression of the BnmNAP subfamily of napin genes coincides with the induction of Brassica microspore embryogenesis. Plant Molecular Biology 26:1711–1723.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Burstone MS. (1955) An evaluation of histochemical methods for protein groups. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 3:32–49.[Abstract]

Cawood AH, Potter U, Dickinson HG. (1978) An evaluation of Coomassie Blue as a stain for quantitative microdensitometry of protein in section. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 26:645–650.[Abstract]

Chatthai M and Misra S. (1998) Sequence and expression of embryogenesis-specific cDNAs encoding 2S seed storage proteins in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. Planta 206:138–145.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Crouch ML. (1982) Non-zygotic embryos of Brassica napus L. contain embryo-specific storage proteins. Planta 156:520–524.[CrossRef]

Davies JT, Shewry PR, Harris N. (1993) Spatial and temporal patterns of B hordein synthesis in developing barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) caryopses. Cell Biology International Reports 17:195–202.

Field JM, Shewry PR, Mifflin BJ. (1982) The purification and characterization of homologous high molecular weight storage proteins from grain of wheat, rye and barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 62:329–336.

Herman EM and Larkins BA. (1999) Protein storage bodies and vacuoles. The Plant Cell 11:601–613.[Free Full Text]

Hernando A, Valdés I, Méndez E. (2003) New strategy for the determination of gliadins in maize- or rice-based foods by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: fractionation of gliadins from maize or rice prolamins by acidic treatment. Journal of Mass Spectrometry 38:862–871.

Hoekstra S, van Zijderveld MH, Louwerse JD, Heidekamp F, van der Mark F. (1992) Anther and microspore culture of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Igri. Plant Science 86:89–96.[CrossRef]

Hu T and Kasha KJ. (1997) Improvement of isolated microspore culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through ovary co-culture. Plant Cell Reports 16:520–525.[CrossRef]

Jaradat AA. (1991) Grain protein variability among populations of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) from Jordan. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83:164–168.

Joy IVRW, Yeung EC, Kong L, Thorpe TA. (1991) Development of white spruce somatic embryos. I. Storage product deposition. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant 27:32–41.

Kasha KJ, Ziauddin A, Cho UH. (1990) Haploids in cereal improvement: anther and microspore culture. In Gustafson JP (Ed.). Gene manipulation in plant improvement (Plenum Press, New York) Vol. II: pp. 213–235.

Koltunow AM, Hidake T, Robinson SP. (1996) Polyembryony in Citrus. Accumulation of seed storage proteins in seeds and in embryos cultured in vitro. Plant Physiology 110:599–609.[Abstract]

Kreis M and Shewry PR. (1989) Unusual features of cereal seed protein structure and evolution. BioEssays 10:201–207.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lending CR, Chesnut RS, Shaw KL, Larkins BA. (1989) Immunolocalization of avenin and globulin storage proteins in developing endosperm of Avena sativa L. Planta 178:315–324.[CrossRef]

Liboz T, Bardet C, Le Van Thai A, Axelos M, Lescure B. (1990) The four members of the gene family encoding the Arabidopsis thaliana translation elongation factor EF-1 alpha are actively transcribed. Plant Molecular Biology 14:107–110.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Magnard JL, Le Deunff E, Domenech J, Rogowsky PM, Testillano PS, Rougier M, Risueño MC, Vergne P, Dumas C. (2000) Genes normally expressed in the endosperm are expressed at early stages of microspore embryogenesis in maize. Plant Molecular Biology 44:559–574.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wang M. (2005a) Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. Journal of Experimental Botany 56:1711–1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maraschin SF, Gaussand G, Pulido A, Olmedilla A, Lamers GEM, Korthout H, Spaink HP, Wang M. (2005b) Programmed cell death during the transition from multicellular structures to globular embryos in barley androgenesis. Planta 221:459–470.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mascarenhas JP. (1989) The male gametophyte of flowering plants. The Plant Cell 1:657–664.[Free Full Text]

Massonneau A, Coronado MJ, Audran A, Bagniewska A, Mol R, Testillano PS, Goralski G, Dumas C, Risueño MC, Matthys-Rochon E. (2005) Multicellular structures developing during maize microspore culture express endosperm and embryo-specific genes and show different embryogenic potentialities. European Journal of Cell Biology 84:663–675.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Misra S, Attree SM, Leal I, Fowke LC. (1993) Effect of abscisic acid, osmoticum and desiccation on synthesis of storage protein during the development of white spruce somatic embryos. Annals of Botany 71:11–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mordhorst AP and Lörz H. (1993) Embryogenesis and development of isolated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) microspores are influenced by the amount and composition of nitrogen sources in culture media. Journal of Plant Physiology 142:485–492.

Müntz K. (1998) Deposition of storage proteins. Plant Molecular Biology 38:77–99.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Olsen FL. (1991) Isolation and cultivation of embryogenic microspores from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Hereditas 115:255–266.[Web of Science][Medline]

Pechan PM, Bartels D, Brown DCW, Schell J. (1991) Messenger-RNA and protein changes associated with induction of Brassica microspore embryogenesis. Planta 184:161–165.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Pulido A, Bakos F, Castillo A, Vallés MP, Barnabas B, Olmedilla A. (2005) Cytological and ultrastructural changes induced in anther and isolated-microspore cultures in barley: Fe deposits in isolated-microspore cultures. Journal of Structural Biology 149:170–181.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Pulido A, Castillo A, Vallés MP, Olmedilla A. (2001) Early stages of pollen embryogenesis in barley anther cultures induced by pretreatment with mannitol. International Journal of Developmental Biology 45:55–56.

Pulido A, Castillo A, Vallés MP, Olmedilla A. (2002) In search of molecular markers for androgenesis. Biologia 57:29–36.

Raghavan V. (1986) Pollen embryogenesis. In Barlow PW, Green PB, Wylie CC (Eds.). Embryogenesis in Angiosperms: a developmental and experimental study (Cambridge University Press, New York) pp. 152–189.

Rechinger KB, Simpson DJ, Svedsen I, Cameron-Mills V. (1993) A role for {gamma}3-hordein in the transport and targeting of prolamin to the vacuole of developing barley endosperm. The Plant Journal 4:41–853.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Reynolds TL. (1997) Pollen embryogenesis. Plant Molecular Biology 33:1–10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rocher A, Calero M, Soriano F, Méndez E. (1996) Identification of major rye secalins as coeliac immunoreactive proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1295:13–22.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shewry PR and Halford N. (2002) Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:947–958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shewry PR and Tatham AS. (1990) The prolamin storage proteins: structure and evolution. Biochemical Journal 267:1–12.[Web of Science][Medline]

Shoemaker RC, Christofferson SE, Galbraith DW. (1987) Storage protein accumulation patterns in somatic embryos of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Reports 6:12–15.[CrossRef]

Sunderlíková S and Wilhelm E. (2002) High accumulation of legumin and Lea-like mRNAs during maturation is associated with increased conversion frequency of somatic embryos from pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Protoplasma 220:97–103.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Touraev A, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E. (1997) Initiation of microspore embryogenesis by stress. Trends in Plant Science 2:297–302.

Valdés I, García E, Llorente M, Méndez E. (2003) Innovative approach to low-level gluten determination in foods using a novel sandwich ELISA protocol. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 15:465–474.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Van Eckert R. (2002) The PWG gliadin, a new reference material. In Stern M (Ed.). Proceedings of the 16th meeting of the working group on prolamin analysis and toxicity (Verlag Wissenschaftliche Scripten, Zwickau) pp. 25–27.

Zarsky V, Garrido D, Eller N, Tupy J, Vicente O, Schoffl F, Heberle-Bors E. (1995) The expression of a small heat shock gene is activated during induction of tobacco pollen embryogenesis by starvation. Plant, Cell and Environment 18:139–147.[CrossRef]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Hansen, C. Friis, S. Bowra, P. B. Holm, and E. Vincze
A pathway-specific microarray analysis highlights the complex and co-ordinated transcriptional networks of the developing grain of field-grown barley
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2009; 60(1): 153 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/11/2837    most recent
erl042v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pulido, A.
Right arrow Articles by Olmedilla, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pulido, A.
Right arrow Articles by Olmedilla, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pulido, A.
Right arrow Articles by Olmedilla, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?