JXB Advance Access originally published online on September 12, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2007 58(2):161-168; doi:10.1093/jxb/erl116
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER |
Effect of partial rootzone drying on the concentration of zeatin-type cytokinins in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) xylem sap and leaves
1Institute of Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa Research Centre, Oktyabrya str. 69, 450054, Ufa, Russian Federation
2Department of Biological Sciences, The Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: I.Dodd{at}lancaster.ac.uk
Received 28 November 2005; Accepted 14 July 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Decreased cytokinin (CK) export from roots in drying soil might provide a root-to-shoot signal impacting on shoot physiology. Although several studies show that soil drying decreases the CK concentration of xylem sap collected from the roots, it is not known whether this alters xylem CK concentration ([CKxyl]) in the leaves and bulk leaf CK concentration. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were grown with roots split between two soil columns. During experiments, water was applied to both columns (well-watered; WW) or one (partial rootzone drying; PRD) column. Irrigation of WW plants aimed to replace transpirational losses every day, while PRD plants received half this amount. Xylem sap was collected by pressurizing detached leaves using a Scholander pressure chamber, and zeatin-type CKs were immunoassayed using specific antibodies raised against zeatin riboside after separating their different forms (free zeatin, its riboside, and nucleotide) by thin-layer chromatography. PRD decreased the whole plant transpiration rate by 22% and leaf water potential by 0.08 MPa, and increased xylem abscisic acid (ABA) concentration 2.5-fold. Although PRD caused no detectable change in [CKxyl], it decreased the CK concentration of fully expanded leaves by 46%. That [CKxyl] was maintained and not increased while transpiration decreased suggests that loading of CK into the xylem was also decreased as the soil dried. That leaf CK concentration did not decline proportionally with CK delivery suggests that other mechanisms such as CK metabolism influence leaf CK status of PRD plants. The causes and consequences of decreased shoot CK status are discussed.
Key words: Cytokinins, long-distance signalling, partial rootzone drying, tomato, xylem ABA concentration, zeatin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During soil-drying episodes, roots growing in the dry upper soil layers generate chemical signals, which can alter shoot physiology in the absence of changes in shoot water relations (reviewed in Davies and Zhang, 1991; Dodd, 2005). One way of demonstrating the potency of these root-sourced chemical signals has been to grow plants with roots split between two soil columns (Blackman and Davies, 1985; Gowing et al., 1990; Sobeih et al., 2004). After plant establishment, water is applied to both columns (well-watered control; WW) or one (partial rootzone drying; PRD) column and water is withheld from the other column in the PRD treatment. Such experiments have shown stomatal closure and leaf growth inhibition of PRD plants even though they maintain a similar leaf water potential (
leaf) to control plants. Further evidence that the roots controlled shoot responses in such split-root plants was provided by an experiment showing that excising the roots in drying soil allowed growth recovery and stomatal re-opening of apple (Malusxdomestica) seedlings (Gowing et al., 1990). Root excision cannot make more water available to the plant, but it can remove the supply of root-sourced chemical signals.
Much research has focused on identifying these chemical signals, and many reports implicate increases in xylem abscisic acid (ABA) concentration ([ABAxyl]) in the regulation of shoot processes as the soil dries (reviewed in Dodd, 2005). Although decreased cytokinin (CK) delivery to the shoot has long been considered an important root-to-shoot signal of soil drying (Davies et al., 1986), relatively few reports implicate changes in xylem cytokinin concentration ([CKxyl]) or delivery (the product of [CKxyl] and xylem flow rate) in regulating the physiology of plants grown in drying soil (Itai and Vaadia, 1965; Bano et al., 1993; Shashidar et al., 1996; Hansen and Dörffling, 2003). Reasons for this lack of attention include the multiplicity of CK forms (Incoll and Jewer, 1987), the greater volumes of sap needed for CK analysis than ABA analysis (Bano et al., 1993), and that [ABAxyl] can respond more quickly and sensitively to soil drying. Mild soil drying [soil water potential (
soil) decreased from 0.3 to 0.6 MPa] of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plants increased [ABAxyl] 3-fold but did not change the zeatin riboside (ZR) concentration of root-derived xylem sap, but the decrease in the whole plant transpiration rate (presumably mediated by the increased [ABAxyl]) decreased xylem ZR delivery to the shoot. More severe soil drying (
soil of 1.2 MPa) decreased the xylem ZR concentration by 85% (Shashidhar et al., 1996). However, similar experiments in sunflower suggest that CKs can respond sensitively to soil drying. The xylem ZR concentration decreased exponentially as the hypocotyl water potential (
h) decreased from 0.1 to 0.3 MPa, while ABA was ascertained not to increase until
h decreased below 0.4 MPa (Hansen and Dörffling, 2003). Thus there remains a need to evaluate the relative sensitivities of xylem ABA and CK concentration to soil drying in other species.
One of the difficulties with demonstrating a role for xylem CKs in influencing shoot physiology is that changes in [CK] in xylem sap emanating from the roots need not necessarily influence [CK] of the leaves. For example, the ramosus (rms) pea (Pisum sativum L.) branching mutants have increased (rms2) and decreased (rms4) xylem [CK] (relative to wild-type plants), yet all lines maintained a similar leaf [CK] (Dodd et al., 2004). Similarly, root hypoxia substantially decreased xylem ZR concentration in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpaxdeltoides), yet had no effect on leaf CK concentration (Neuman et al., 1990). The lack of correlation between the changes in [CKxyl] and bulk leaf [CK] indicates a complex interaction between transport and metabolism along the transport pathway (Burkle et al., 2003).
Several studies measured [CK] in sap exiting the root system of plants grown in drying soil without parallel measurements of leaf [CK] (Itai and Vaadia, 1965; Bano et al., 1993; Shashidar et al., 1996; Hansen and Dörffling, 2003). Our objective was to measure [CK] in both leaf tissues and xylem sap collected from the leaves of plants exposed to drying soil, using a species (tomato) in which sufficient sap could be collected from leaves detached and pressurized in a Scholander-type pressure chamber. This sap collection method is commonly used in experiments on root-to-shoot signalling (Sobeih et al., 2004), is suitable for field use (Dodd et al., 1996), and provides a reasonable estimate of the concentration of xylem sap constituents within the transpiration stream (Borel and Simmoneau, 2002). Zeatin (Z; and its derivatives) was chosen for study since it represents the major xylem-transported CK in tomato (Davey and van Staden, 1976). A partial rootzone drying treatment was implemented to minimize leaf water deficit experienced by plants grown in drying soil.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plant material and culture
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Ailsa Craig) plants were raised in a single walk-in controlled environment room (3 mx4 m) at the Lancaster Environment Centre under a 12 h photoperiod (09.00 h to 21.00 h) and 1626 °C temperatures. Atmospheric evaporative demand varied between 0.2 and 1.2 kPa. Metal halide lamps (HQI-T 400N, Osram, St Helens, UK) were 1.2 m above bench height and provided 220 mmol m2 s1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) at bench height. Seeds were sown in a well-watered peat-based compost (Levingtons M3, Levington Horticulture Ltd., Ipswich, UK) in seedling trays, with a single seed in each separate compartment (30 mm deepx20 mmx20 mm). After 14 d, when the first true leaf had emerged, seedlings were transferred to net pots (TekuTM, Pöppelmann Plastiques, Pöppelmann, France) of 50 mm diameterx50 mm deep with 5 mmx7 mm pores in the sides. After 1 week, plants in the net pots were transplanted into custom-made split pots comprising two plastic columns (335 mm deepx70 mmx70 mm) that were taped together. Where the two individual columns adjoined, part of the plastic wall of the columns (50 mm deepx50 mm wide) had been removed to allow each net pot to be inserted into the potting compost, minimizing seedling disturbance. Both net pots and split pots were filled with a commercial potting compost (John Innes No. 2, J Arthur Bowers, Lincoln, UK) and watered daily until each experiment commenced.
Thirty-nine days after germination, two different watering regimes were imposed in four replicated experiments (experiments 14). Control (WW) plants received 100% of the previous day's mean evapotranspiration (determined gravimetrically) applied equally between both soil columns, while PRD plants received 50% of the previous day's evapotranspiration applied to one soil column. Water was withheld from the other column in the PRD treatment to expose some of the root system to drying soil. Water was replenished either daily (at the beginning of the photoperiod) or twice daily (at 09.00 h and 17.30 h) according to the transpirational needs of the plant. Treatments were randomly arranged in the controlled environment room.
Whole plant transpiration was determined gravimetrically, and corrected for evaporation from blank pots (without a plant). Leaf samples comprising the terminal leaflet of leaf 9 (numbering from the base of the plant) were removed, weighed, then placed in liquid nitrogen for subsequent analysis. Following measurement of
leaf using a Scholander-type pressure chamber (Plant Moisture Systems, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), an overpressure of 0.4 MPa was applied to leaves for 60120 s to collect xylem sap. To gain sufficient xylem sap for CK analysis, three leaves per plant (typically leaves 68) were sampled from 56 replicate plants per treatment between 10.00 h and 15.00 h. Xylem sap was pooled from each leaf number and 400 µl was typically used as a sample for CK analysis. For each day of sap collection, four samples (two leaves per plantxtwo treatments) were analysed. Following completion of sap collection, the whole shoot was removed just below the cotyledons, and the area of all leaves was recorded with a Li-3100 Area Meter (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA), allowing transpiration to be calculated on a leaf area basis.
Whole pot gravimetric water content (
) at shoot harvest was estimated after measurement of combined pot and soil weight, and assuming that each pot was of uniform weight and contained a uniform weight of dry soil. Values for the combined weight of pot and dry soil were obtained from a subsample of pots for each experiment, after oven drying the soil at 60 °C until constant mass.
soil at known gravimetric soil water contents (made by adding known volumes of water to known masses of oven-dry soil in a cup, which was sealed with parafilm and allowed to equilibrate overnight) were measured with a soil psychrometer (Model WP4, Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA, USA). A calibration curve plotting
versus
soil was constructed.
Single leaf gas exchange of six plants per treatment was performed between 10.00 and 12.00 h on leaves 5 and 7 (during experiments 2 and 4, respectively) on days 2 and 4 of the experiments. An infra-red gas analyser (CIRAS-2, PP systems, UK) was used, and leaves were allowed to equilibrate at ambient temperature, constant CO2 concentration (37.5 Pa), and PPFD (350 mmol m2 s1) for 3 min before data were recorded. After measurement, the leaf was excised for
leaf determination and collection of xylem sap as described above. An aliquot of each sap sample was retained (prior to pooling sap for CK analysis) to quantify ABA.
Hormone analysis
Sap ABA concentration was measured with a radioimmunoassay (Quarrie et al., 1988), using the monoclonal antibody AFRC MAC 252 (kindly provided by Dr G Butcher, Babraham Bioscience Technologies, Cambridge, UK).
CKs were extracted from leaves by homogenization in 80% ethanol and incubation overnight at 4 °C. After filtration and vacuum evaporation of extracts to remove all traces of ethanol, CKs from the aqueous residue were concentrated on a prewetted C18 column (Bond-Elut, RP-C18) and, after washing, the column was loaded with 20 ml of distilled water and then eluted with 5 ml of 80% ethanol. After solvent evaporation, the dry residue of leaf extract and xylem sap were dissolved in 20 ml of 80% ethanol and applied to precoated Merck 50x200x0.25 mm silica gel 60 F-254 thin-layer chromatography plates which were developed in 2-butanol:14 M NH4OH:H2O (6:1:2 by vol., upper phase). This protocol successfully separated zeatin nucleotide (ZN; RF 00.1), ZR (RF 0.40.5), and Z (RF 0.60.7). More than 90% recovery was obtained for Z, ZR, and ZN standards using the described elution procedure. CK-containing zones (based on the position of standards) were eluted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 for 12 h and added directly to microplate wells in serial dilutions. These were assayed using antibodies raised against ZR having high immunoreactivity towards Z, ZR, and ZN (Vysotskaya et al., 2004). The antibodies showed low cross-reactivity to dihydrozeatin (DHZ) and isopentenyladenine (iP) and their derivatives (8% and 1% cross-reactivity, respectively). Immunoassay reliability was confirmed by dilution tests, chromatographic examination of the distribution of immunoreactivity, and comparison of the results of immunoassay against physicochemical assays [liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (LCMS); Veselov et al., 1999].
Statistics
Student's unpaired t-tests were used to determine significant effects between watering regimes on a given measurement occasion. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect significant effects of experiment, measurement occasion, and watering regime, and any interactions. Relationships between variables were determined using correlation analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physiological data obtained from replicate experiments were reasonably consistent. For example, analysis of all leaf water potential data from all four experiments showed no significant (P >0.05) effect of experiment (data not shown). For this reason, experiment 1 is shown as an example (Fig. 1). Evapotranspiration of PRD plants grown with daily application of 50% of evapotranspirational losses was reasonably stable, while that of WW plants (grown with 100% of evapotranspirational losses) almost doubled during the experiment (Fig. 1a). Expressed on a leaf area basis, and averaged over all measurement occasions, the transpiration rate of PRD plants declined by 29% in this experiment (Fig. 1b) and by 22% in experiment 3 (data not shown). Similar averaging of the transpiration rate over three measurement occasions (days 2, 4, and 5) for four replicate experiments showed that PRD decreased the transpiration rate by 22%.
|
The average minimum whole pot soil moisture content experienced by WW plants was 0.37 g g1 (corresponding to a
soil of 0.05 MPa), while that of PRD plants was 0.25 g g1 (corresponding to a
soil of 0.40 MPa) (Fig. 1b). This decrease in soil water content increased the xylem ABA concentration of PRD plants 2.8-fold (Fig. 1c), while
leaf declined by 0.1 MPa (Fig. 1d). When data were averaged over the four replicate experiments, PRD increased the xylem ABA concentration by 2.5-fold and decreased
leaf by 0.08 MPa. After 5 d of PRD, leaf area had declined by 16% (Fig. 3).
|
Although PRD decreased the whole plant transpiration rate in both experiment 1 (Fig. 1b) and all subsequent experiments (data not shown), no significant changes in single leaf stomatal conductance (gs) were detected using infrared gas analysis (Table 1), probably since gs was measured during a small proportion of the photoperiod, immediately after irrigation. Correlation analysis determined possible influences on gs. On day 2, there was no significant correlation between [ABAxyl] and gs (Fig. 2b), yet higher gs was significantly (P=0.002) correlated with lower
leaf (Fig. 2a). The latter relationship was not detected on day 4 (Fig. 2d), yet higher gs was significantly (P=0.002) correlated with lower [ABAxyl] (Fig. 2e). On both days, [ABAxyl] significantly (P <0.05) increased as
leaf declined (Fig. 2c, f).
|
|
PRD increased [ABAxyl] (Table 1; Fig. 1c) and xylem [ZN] (Table 2; Fig. 4a), but no significant changes were detected in the xylem concentrations of Z, ZR, or total Z (Table 2; Figs 3, 4a). Despite this, PRD significantly decreased bulk leaf [CK] by 46%, when data were averaged over days 2, 4, and 5 (Table 2; Figs 3, 4b). No significant and consistent differences of isopentenyladenosine (iPA), iP, and DHZ could be detected between WW and PRD plants (data not shown). The most prominent CKs were zeatin derivatives (Z-type CKs).
|
|
Soil drying did not induce significant differences in the proportions of different Z-type CKs in both bulk leaves and xylem sap. In sap collected from detached leaves, Z, ZR, and ZN comprised 27, 32, and 41% of the total Z-type CKs respectively, while in bulk leaves these percentages were 33, 21, and 46%, respectively. The percentage of Z-type CKs as ZR was significantly (P <0.05) greater in xylem sap than in the bulk leaf.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although PRD of tomato caused minimal (no more than 0.1 MPa) changes in
leaf (Fig. 1d) and induced no change in xylem CK concentration (Fig. 3), the bulk leaf CK concentration of PRD plants decreased by 46% (Fig. 3). Severe soil drying (
leaf decreased by 1.0 MPa) decreased alfalfa (Medicago sativa) leaf CK concentration by
40% (Goicoechea et al., 1995). Shoot tip and subtending axillary bud CK concentration of PRD-grown grapevine (Vitis vinifera) decreased by 49% and 26%, respectively, when compared with WW plants, although both treatments showed a similar
leaf (Stoll et al., 2000). Sunflower plants exposed to PRD also showed no change in
leaf, and xylem sap ZR and dihydrozeatin riboside (DHZR) concentrations from the roots were similar in control and PRD plants (Masia et al., 1994). Taken together, these observations suggest that relatively mild soil drying (
leaf <0.1 MPa) can exert a major effect on shoot CK status although xylem CK concentration does not change. Recent genetic research has confirmed classical assumptions from physiological research implicating CKs in a wide variety of processes including not only cell division and expansion, but light responses, chloroplast differentiation and functioning, nutrient metabolism and mobilization, leaf senescence, and sinksource relationships (Mok and Mok, 2001; Higuchi et al., 2004; Kiba et al., 2005). Should a 46% decrease in CK concentration occur throughout the plant, profound changes in plant growth and development are likely. Understanding the physiological effects of decreased CK status has been aided by the creation of transgenic plants overexpressing cytokinin oxidase (CKX), which show CK concentrations only 3045% of those of non-transformed plants (Werner et al., 2001, 2003). Such transgenics show retarded shoot development and enhanced root development. Since such developmental changes are also seen in droughted plants, including tomatoes subjected to PRD (Mingo et al., 2004; Sobeih et al., 2004), decreased CK status may be partially responsible for the physiological changes induced by soil drying.
Notwithstanding the physiological implications of decreased bulk leaf CK concentration under PRD, it is important to understand the mechanisms causing this change. Instantaneous leaf CK status will depend on the balance between hormone input (from xylem sap delivery and putative leaf CK synthesis) and output (metabolism and export in the phloem). Assuming that CK delivery to the shoot of PRD-grown plants decreased in proportion to the decrease in transpiration rate (Jackson, 1993), the 22% restriction of the transpiration rate by PRD should have resulted in no more than a 22% decrease in bulk leaf CK concentration. Instead, bulk leaf CK concentration declined by 46%. That leaf CK concentration did not decline proportionally with CK delivery suggests that other mechanisms contribute to regulating leaf CK status of PRD plants, alongside decreased delivery of CKs from roots.
Although the root system has long been considered as the principal source of shoot CKs (Aloni et al., 2005), the expression of ipt genes (for de novo CK synthesis) in the leaves (Takei et al., 2004) suggests that leaves also synthesize CKs. Modelling the xylem and phloem flows of CKs and net metabolic changes of CKs in barley plants also suggested the involvement of leaves in CK biosynthesis (Jiang et al., 2005). However, leaf CK synthesis was probably negligible in leaves in which [CK] was measured since they had ceased to expand (data not shown), while the rate of leaf CK synthesis is high in young developing leaves (Nordstrom et al., 2004). Alternatively, for several reasons, it is suggested that alterations in CK metabolism probably enhanced the decline in leaf CK status. Although CKX activity has not yet been directly assayed in water-stressed plants, transcript abundance of a maize CKX increased in response to both water deficit and ABA treatment (Brugiere et al., 2003). Furthermore, several CKX enzymes have been predicted (based on amino acid sequence analysis, and the construction of CKX green fluorescent fusion proteins) to show extracellular localization (Werner et al., 2003). Since CKX activity has an alkaline pH optimum (pH 6.58.5) (Motyka et al., 1996), alkalization of tomato xylem sap and the leaf apoplast following soil drying (Wilkinson et al., 1998; Sobeih et al., 2004) probably enhanced CK metabolism. Possible CK metabolism in xylem parenchyma cells (since CKX transcript abundance is greater in the vasculature; Brugiere et al., 2003) may contribute to the decreased delivery of CKs from roots, and the decreased leaf CK concentration.
Both Z and ZR are the substrates for CKX (Jones and Schreiber, 1997), while ZNs have been reported to be more resistant to the oxidation process catalysed by the enzyme (Laloue and Fox, 1989). In support of this differential sensitivity of different CK species to oxidation, 2 d of PRD slightly decreased the Z concentration in xylem sap of PRD plants (to 88% of control), while the ZN concentration was increased (to 215% of that of WW plants) (Fig. 4a). However, later in the experiments, no differences in the proportions of different Z-type CKs in xylem sap was observed in PRD compared with WW plants, which might be due to increased activity of enzymes that cleave ZN [e.g. 5'-nucleotidase (EC 3.1.3.5 [EC] ); see Chen, 1997] to make it accessible to the CKX.
Whatever the reason for the decreased leaf CK concentration of PRD-grown plants, [CKxyl] was similar in PRD and WW plants (Table 2; Fig. 3). It is not clear which measurement of the CK concentration ([CKxyl] or bulk leaf CK concentration) is more important for regulating CK-dependent processes. Recent research has revealed the succession of events leading from perception of CK signals to the broad spectrum of CK responses (D'Agostino and Kieber, 1999; Kiba et al., 2005). Since CKs bind to a plasmalemma-located histidine kinase homologue (acting as a CK receptor) of which the input domain is exposed outside the cell in the apoplast (D'Agostino and Kieber, 1999), [CKxyl] may be especially important. That [CKxyl] of PRD plants was maintained at a concentration not lower than WW plants might maintain growth and other CK-dependent processes.
Since exogenous CKs can promote stomatal opening in epidermal strips (reviewed in Dodd, 2003), CKs may influence leaf gas exchange. However, changes in
leaf and [ABAxyl] are also probably important. The decreased
leaf of PRD plants (Fig. 1d) raises the issue of whether
leaf itself regulates stomatal conductance (gs) via a feedback signal whereby a sensitive stomatal response to small changes in
leaf decreases the transpiration rate thus maintaining a homeostatic
leaf (Comstock, 2002). It seems unlikely that
leaf controls gs since a high gs is associated with a low
leaf (Fig. 2a), indicating that gs is controlling
leaf and not vice versa. Later in the experiment, this relationship breaks down (Fig. 2d) and instead a high gs is associated with a low [ABAxyl] (Fig. 2e) as seen in many previous studies (Zhang and Davies, 1989; Dodd, 2005), suggesting that [ABAxyl] controls gs. In this context, it may be questioned whether xylem CKs influence gs. Assuming that guard cells detect changes in CK concentration and not delivery, the absence of changes in [CKxyl] during PRD (Table 2; Fig. 3) argues against a role for CKs.
Xylem CK concentration will be influenced by the rate of loading of CKs into the xylem by root and/or stem cells, and will decrease as xylem flow rate increases (as in Dodd et al., 2004). Assuming that these two processes are independent and that CK loading remains constant during the early stages of soil drying, the initial decrease in transpiration rate on day 2 should have increased [CKxyl]. That this may have occurred is suggested by the observation that [CKxyl] of PRD plants on day 2 was 1.4-fold higher than in WW plants (Fig. 4a). The fact that PRD and WW plants maintained a similar [CKxyl] on days 4 and 5 (Fig. 4a; Table 2), despite PRD decreasing the transpiration rate, suggests that xylem loading of CKs has also decreased, indicating that root-to-shoot signalling of CKs during soil drying is regulated by loading from the root system.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
We thank the Royal Society (Joint Project 16013) and DEFRA (Contract HH3609STX) for support of this work, Dr Julian Theobald (Lancaster) for measurement of single leaf gas exchange, and Phil Smith and Maureen Harrison for construction of the split pots and plant care, respectively. Professor Bill Davies (Lancaster) is thanked for his encouragement and helpful advice during the course of this study.
| Abbreviations |
|---|
ABA, abscisic acid; CK, cytokinin; CKX, cytokinin oxidase; [CKxy1], xylem sap cytokinin concentration; DHZ, dihydrozeatin; iP, isopentenyladenine; PRD, partial rootzone drying; WW, well-watered; Z, zeatin; ZN, zeatin nucleotide; ZR, zeatin riboside.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aloni R, Langhans M, Aloni E, Dreieicher E, Ullrich CI. (2005) Root-synthesized cytokinin in Arabidopsis is distributed in the shoot by the transpiration stream. Journal of Experimental Botany 56 15351544.
Bano A, Dörffling K, Bettin D, Hahn H. (1993) Abscisic acid and cytokinins as possible root-to-shoot signals in xylem sap of rice plants in drying soil. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 20 109115.[Web of Science]
Blackman PG and Davies WJ. (1985) Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 36 3948.
Borel C and Simonneau T. (2002) Is the ABA concentration in the sap collected by pressurizing leaves relevant for analysing drought effects on stomata? Evidence from ABA-fed leaves of transgenic plants with modified capacities to synthesize ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 287296.
Burkle L, Cedzich A, Dopke C, Stransky H, Okumoto S, Gillissen B, Kuhn C, Frommer WB. (2003) Transport of cytokinins mediated by purine transporters of the PUP family expressed in phloem, hydathodes, and pollen of Arabidopsis.. The Plant Journal 34 1326.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Brugiere N, Jiao SP, Hantke S, Zinselmeier C, Roessler JA, Niu XM, Jones RJ, Habben JE. (2003) Cytokinin oxidase gene expression in maize is localized to the vasculature, and is induced by cytokinins, abscisic acid, and abiotic stress. Plant Physiology 132 12281240.
Chen C. (1997) Cytokinin biosynthesis and interconversion. Physiologia Plantarum 101 665673.[CrossRef]
Comstock JP. (2002) Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 195200.
D'Agostino IB and Kieber JJ. (1999) Molecular mechanisms of cytokinin action. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2 359364.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Davey JE and Van Staden J. (1976) Cytokinin translocationchanges in zeatin and zeatin-riboside levels in root exudate of tomato plants during their development. Planta 130 6972.[CrossRef]
Davies WJ, Metcalfe J, Lodge TA, Da Costa AR. (1986) Plant-growth substances and the regulation of growth under drought. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13 105125.
Davies WJ and Zhang J. (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42 5576.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Dodd IC. (2003) Hormonal interactions and stomatal responses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 22 3246.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Dodd IC. (2005) Root-to-shoot signalling: assessing the roles of up in the up and down world of long-distance signalling in planta.. Plant and Soil 274 251270.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Dodd IC, Ngo C, Turnbull CGN, Beveridge CA. (2004) Effects of nitrogen supply on xylem cytokinin delivery, transpiration and leaf expansion of pea genotypes differing in xylem cytokinin concentration. Functional Plant Biology 31 903911.[CrossRef]
Dodd IC, Stikic R, Davies WJ. (1996) Chemical regulation of gas exchange and growth of plants in drying soil in the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 47 14751490.
Goicoechea N, Dolezal K, Antolin MC, Strnad M, Sanchez-Diaz M. (1995) Influence of mycorrhizae and rhizobium on cytokinin content in drought-stressed alfalfa. Journal of Experimental Botany 46 15431549.
Gowing DJG, Davies WJ, Jones HG. (1990) A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malus domestica Borkh. Journal of Experimental Botany 41 15351540.
Hansen H and Dörffling K. (2003) Root-derived trans-zeatin riboside and abscisic acid in drought-stressed and rewatered sunflower plants: interaction in the control of leaf diffusive resistance? Functional Plant Biology 30 365375.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Higuchi M, Pischke MS, Mahohen AP. (2004) In planta functions of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101 88218826.
Incoll LD and Jewer PC. (1987) Cytokinins and the water relations of whole plants. In Horgan R and Jeffcoat B (Eds.). Cytokininsplant hormones in search of a roleBristol British Plant Growth Regulator Group.
Itai C and Vaadia Y. (1965) Kinetin-like activity in root exudate of water-stressed sunflower plants. Physiologia Plantarum 18 941.[CrossRef]
Jackson MB. (1993) Are plant hormones involved in root to shoot communication? Advances in Botanical Research 19 103187.[CrossRef]
Jiang F, Veselova S, Veselov D, Kudoyarova G, Jeschke WD, Hartung W. (2005) Cytokinin flows from Hordeum vulgare to the hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor and the influence of infection on host and parasite cytokinins relations. Functional Plant Biology 32 619629.[CrossRef]
Jones R and Schreiber B. (1997) Role and function of cytokinin oxidase in plants. Plant Growth Regulation 23 123134.[CrossRef]
Kiba T, Naitou T, Koizumi N, Yamashino T, Sakakibara H, Mizuno T. (2005) Combinatorial microarray analysis revealing Arabidopsis genes implicated in cytokinin responses through His
Asp phosphorelay circuitry. Plant and Cell Physiology 46 339355.
Laloue M and Fox JE. (1989) Cytokinin oxidase from wheat: partial purification and general properties. Plant Physiology 90 899906.
Masia A, Pitacco A, Braggio L, Giulivo C. (1994) Hormonal responses to partial drying of the root system of Helianthus annuus.. Journal of Experimental Botany 45 6976.
Mingo DM, Theobald JC, Bacon MA, Davies WJ, Dodd IC. (2004) Biomass allocation in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants grown under partial rootzone drying: enhancement of root growth. Functional Plant Biology 31 971978.[CrossRef]
Mok DWS and Mok MC. (2001) Cytokinin metabolism and action. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52 5289.
Motyka V, Faiss M, Strnad M, Kaminek M, Schmülling T. (1996) Changes in cytokinin content and cytokinin oxidase activity in response to derepression of ipt gene transcription in transgenic tobacco calli and plants. Plant Physiology 112 10351043.[Abstract]
Neuman DS, Rood SB, Smit BA. (1990) Does cytokinin transport from root-to-shoot in the xylem sap regulate leaf responses to root hypoxia? Journal of Experimental Botany 41 13251333.
Nordstrom A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Astot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G. (2004) Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxincytokinin-regulated development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101 80398044.
Quarrie SA, Whitford PN, Appleford NEJ, Wang TL, Cook SK, Henson IE, Loveys BR. (1988) A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: its characterisation and use in a radioimmunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereal and lupin leaves. Planta 173 330339.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Shashidhar VR, Prasad TG, Sudharshan L. (1996) Hormone signals from roots to shoots of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L). Moderate soil drying increases delivery of abscisic acid and depresses delivery of cytokinins in xylem sap. Annals of Botany 78 151155.
Sobeih WY, Dodd IC, Bacon MA, Grierson D, Davies WJ. (2004) Long-distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial rootzone drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 23532363.
Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P. (2000) Improving water use efficiency of irrigated horticultural crops. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 16271634.
Takei K, Ueda N, Aoki K, Kuromori T, Hirayama T, Shinozaki K, Yamaya T, Sakakibara H. (2004) AtIPT3 is a key determinant of nitrate-dependent cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 45 10531062.
Veselov SY, Valcke R, Van Onckelen H, Kudoyarova GR. (1999) Cytokinin content and location in the leaves of the wild-type and transgenic tobacco plants. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 46 2631.
Vysotskaya LB, Kudoyarova GR, Veselov S, Jones HG. (2004) Unusual stomatal behaviour on partial root excision in wheat seedlings. Plant, Cell and Environment 27 6977.[CrossRef]
Werner T, Motyka V, Laucou V, Smets R, Van Onckelen H, Schmülling T. (2003) Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity. The Plant Cell 15 25322550.
Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmülling T. (2001) Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98 1048710492.
Wilkinson S, Corlett JE, Oger L, Davies WJ. (1998) Effects of xylem pH on transpiration from wild-type and flacca tomato leaves: a vital role for abscisic acid in preventing excessive water loss even from well-watered plants. Plant Physiology 117 703709.
Zhang J and Davies WJ. (1989) Abscisic acid produced in dehydrating roots may enable the plant to measure the water status of the soil. Plant, Cell and Environment 12 7381.[CrossRef]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Vyroubalova, K. Vaclavikova, V. Tureckova, O. Novak, M. Smehilova, T. Hluska, L. Ohnoutkova, I. Frebort, and P. Galuszka Characterization of New Maize Genes Putatively Involved in Cytokinin Metabolism and Their Expression during Osmotic Stress in Relation to Cytokinin Levels Plant Physiology, September 1, 2009; 151(1): 433 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Dodd Rhizosphere manipulations to maximize 'crop per drop' during deficit irrigation J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(9): 2454 - 2459. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Dodd, G. Egea, and W. J. Davies Accounting for sap flow from different parts of the root system improves the prediction of xylem ABA concentration in plants grown with heterogeneous soil moisture J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2008; 59(15): 4083 - 4093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dong, Y. Niu, W. Li, and D. Zhang Effects of cotton rootstock on endogenous cytokinins and abscisic acid in xylem sap and leaves in relation to leaf senescence J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2008; 59(6): 1295 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hirose, K. Takei, T. Kuroha, T. Kamada-Nobusada, H. Hayashi, and H. Sakakibara Regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis, compartmentalization and translocation J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2008; 59(1): 75 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





