Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2007 58(3):627-636; doi:10.1093/jxb/erl234
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/3/627    most recent
erl234v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nejad, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Meeteren, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nejad, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Meeteren, U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nejad, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Meeteren, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

The role of abscisic acid in disturbed stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana during growth at high relative air humidity

Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad1,2,* and Uulke van Meeteren1

1Horticultural Production Chains Group, Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 22, 6709 PG, Wageningen, The Netherlands
2Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, PO Box 465, Korramabad, Iran

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Hossein.Rezaeinejad{at}wur.nl

Received 31 July 2006; Revised 7 October 2006 Accepted 16 October 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, the role of abscisic acid (ABA) in altered stomatal responses of Tradescantia virginiana leaves grown at high relative air humidity (RH) was investigated. A lower ABA concentration was found in leaves grown at high RH compared with leaves grown at moderate RH. As a result of a daily application of 20 µM ABA to leaves for 3 weeks during growth at high RH, the stomata of ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH showed the same behaviour as did the stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH. For example, they closed rapidly when exposed to desiccation. Providing a high RH around a single leaf of a plant during growth at moderate RH changed the stomatal responses of this leaf. The stomata in this leaf grown at high RH did not close completely in response to desiccation in contrast to the stomata of the other leaves from the same plant. The ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis, though not on a dry weight basis, of this leaf was significantly lower than that of the others. Moreover, less closure of stomata was found in the older leaves of plants grown at high RH in response to desiccation compared with younger leaves. This was correlated with a lower ABA concentration in these leaves on a fresh weight basis, though not on a dry weight basis. Stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH closed in response to short-term application of ABA or sodium nitroprusside (SNP), while for leaves grown at high RH there was a clear difference in stomatal responses between the leaf margins and main-vein areas. The stomatal aperture in response to short-term application of ABA or SNP at the leaf margins of leaves grown at high RH remained significantly wider than in the main-vein areas. It was concluded that: (i) a long-term low ABA concentration in well-watered plants during growth at high RH could be a reason for less or no stomatal closure under conditions of drought stress; and (ii) the long-term ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis rather than on a dry weight basis is likely to be responsible for structural or physiological changes in stomata during leaf growth.

Key words: Chlorophyll fluorescence, nitric oxide, PSII efficiency, stomata, vapour pressure deficit


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Stomatal movement (producing changes in stomatal aperture) is a complex result of interactions of physiological factors and environmental conditions (Kearns and Assmann, 1993; Assmann and Wang, 2001; Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). Besides short-term conditions, stomatal movement also depends on the growth conditions in which the stomata developed, of which one of the most important is relative air humidity (RH). For example, a lack of stomatal closure under conditions of water stress has been reported in roses grown at RHs >85% (Torre and Fjeld, 2001; Torre et al., 2003). Similarly, a failure of stomata to close in response to desiccation or abscisic acid (ABA) has been shown in leafy cuttings rooted at high RH (Fordham et al., 2001) and in plants propagated in vitro (Ziv et al., 1987; Santamaria et al., 1993). Recently, it has been shown that Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at high (90%) RH had a higher leaf transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance and aperture than in plants grown at moderate RH (55%) under all treatments expected to cause stomatal closure (Rezaei Nejad and van Meeteren, 2005). The stomata of leaves grown at high RH were less sensitive to decreases in leaf relative water content and water potential (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). The reason why stomata of leaves grown at high RH are less hydrosensitive is not clear. There are several reports about the stomatal responses to short-term local changes in RH around the leaf (Haefner et al., 1997; Mott and Franks, 2001). However, to our knowledge, there has been no report where the effect of long-term local changes in RH around the leaf on stomatal response characteristics has been investigated.

ABA is a key component of the signal transduction pathway for stomatal closure (reviewed by Leung and Giraudat, 1998). The leaf ABA level is due not only to the synthesis and redistribution of ABA within leaves, but also to synthesis and transport from the roots (Zhang et al., 1997; Popova et al., 2000; Zhang and Outlaw, 2001). The rate at which ABA enters a leaf from the roots is determined by the ABA concentration in the xylem fluid and the transpiration flux of the leaf (Zhang et al., 1997). As the transpiration rate of plants growing at high RH [low vapour pressure deficit (VPD)] is low, it is likely that there is a low concentration of ABA in the leaves of these plants. However, the failure of stomata of excised leaves developed under high RH to close fully in response to ABA application suggests that short-term ABA deficiency was not responsible for the lack of stomatal closure in response to desiccation (Rezaei Nejad and van Meeteren, 2005). Moreover, many studies have suggested that though the short-term effects of elevated ABA concentrations on stomatal functioning are reversible (Ackerson, 1980; Trejo et al., 1995; Tardieu et al., 1996), its long-term effects on developmental changes and functioning of stomata are permanent (Brown et al., 1976; Cutler et al., 1977; Franks and Farquhar, 2001). For example, it has been shown that stomata of plants grown under water stress (which have higher ABA levels) are smaller than those of well-watered plants (Cutler et al., 1977; Spence et al., 1986; Xia, 1994). A daily application of ABA to leaves of well-watered T. virginiana plants during growth resulted in the production of smaller stomata with altered physiological properties (Franks and Farquhar, 2001). If high ABA concentrations during growth can change the stomatal anatomy and increase their responsivity to drought stress signals, it might be expected that when plants are subjected to low ABA concentrations during growth, the effect would be a lessening of stomatal responsivity to lowered hydration state. It is also unknown whether the stomata which do not respond to short-term ABA application are able to close in response to other signalling components of ABA-induced stomatal closure, such as nitric oxide (Neill et al., 2002; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003). Notably stomatal response characteristics of plants grown at high RH are not uniform within a leaf: in Tradescantia, stomata around the main vein remain open in response to desiccation while stomata at the leaf margins close (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). There is, however, not much information about the variability of ABA concentrations or ABA responses within a leaf or within a plant.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material and growth conditions
Young T. virginiana L. plants were grown in plastic pots (15 cm diameter) filled with a commercial potting compost (Potgrond 4, Hortimea, Lent, The Netherlands) in two growth chambers each with different RH (moderate: 55±5% and high: 90±5%) at Wageningen University. The temperature was 21±0.5 °C, resulting in VPDs of 1.12 kPa and 0.25 kPa for moderate and high RH conditions, respectively. The light intensity was 120±10 µmol m–2 s–1 (measured with an LI-250 Light Meter, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) produced by fluorescent tubes (TLD 33 Philips) with a light period of 16 h per day. Though this light intensity is low, T. virginiana is a shade plant, and measurements of its CO2 fixation/irradiance response showed that 120 µmol m–2 s–1 is ~40% saturating for CO2 fixation. The plants were kept well watered and given a nutrient solution weekly (concentration: 2 g l–1; KristalonTM, Yara, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). The CO2 concentration in the growth chambers was 360±30 µmol mol–1 (measured with a CO2 analyser ADC225, MK3, Analytical Development Co. Ltd, Hoddesdon, UK).

Measurements of ABA and water content
The concentrations of ABA in fresh leaves (not desiccated) grown at moderate or high RH were measured. For ABA analysis, leaves were removed from the plants early in the morning, weighed (fresh weight), freeze-dried, reweighed (dry weight), and finely ground. Distilled water was added at ~3 ml per 50 mg dry weight, vortexed to mix the water and sample, and shaken overnight at 4 °C. The extracts were then centrifuged and the supernatant assayed in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for ABA using the MAC252 monoclonal antibody for ABA (Asch, 2000; Bahrun et al., 2002). No cross-reaction of antibody with other compounds was detected when tested (Quarrie et al., 1988; Asch, 2000). Water content was calculated using the following equation:

Formula

Changes in RH around a leaf of a plant during growth
To investigate the long-term local effects of high RH on plants growing at moderate RH (55±5%), one emerging leaf from each plant growing at moderate RH was placed inside a glass tube (one leaf per tube). High RH (90±5%) was maintained inside half of the tubes by passing air through temperature-controlled columns of iron (II)-sulphate heptahydrate (Fluka). Air from the climate room (55±5%) was pumped directly into the remaining tubes with leaves. The CO2 concentration inside the tubes was 360±40 µmol mol–1. After 3 weeks, the leaf grown inside the tube and an adjacent leaf grown outside the tube at moderate RH in each plant were used for either chlorophyll fluorescence measurements or ABA analysis.

Stomatal responses to short-term application of ABA and SNP
The spatial heterogeneity of stomatal responses to short-term exogenous ABA in leaves grown at moderate or high RH was measured using a chlorophyll fluorescence imaging system (described further). Once in steady-state, an image of photosystem II (PSII) efficiency was taken from leaves in water (0 µM ABA as a control). Then 1 mM stock solution of (±)-ABA (Sigma) was added to the water to obtain the final concentration of 100 µM, and images were taken every 30 min for 150 min.

Stomatal aperture in response to exogenous ABA and sodium nitroprusside (SNP as a nitric oxide donor) (Neill et al., 2002) was determined with epidermal strips. Epidermal strips were removed from the margins and main-vein areas of the abaxial surfaces of eight leaves from eight randomly selected plants grown at moderate or high RH and cut into 5 mmx10 mm pieces (Weyers and Meidner, 1990). One leaf per plant and one strip per location per leaf for each treatment were used. The strips were preincubated for 2 h in a stomata-opening medium (10 mM MES-KOH, pH 6.15, 50 mM KCl) in a test room (20 °C and 100 µmol m–2 s–1 irradiance). The strips were then incubated in a bath medium containing 10 mM MES-KOH, pH 6.15, 50 mM KCl and 0 µM ABA (control), 100 µM ABA, 200 µM SNP (Fluka), or 100 µM ABA+200 µM SNP (only for leaves grown at high RH) for 1 h. Stomatal aperture of 10 randomly selected stomata in each strip was measured from digitized video images (x800 magnification) of stomata using a microscope (Leica, Aristoplan) connected to a Nikon digital imaging camera DXM-1200. Image processing was done using the free UTHSCSA ImageTool program (University of Texas Health Science Centre at San Antonio, TX, USA).

Stomatal response characteristics to long-term ABA application during growth
To investigate the effects of long-term ABA application on stomatal response characteristics, both sides of one emerging leaf from half of the plants in each climate room (moderate and high RH) were treated daily with a solution of 20 µM ABA in distilled water and two drops of Triton X-100 per litre. The remaining untreated plants (control) were painted with distilled water/Triton X-100 solution in the same manner as the treated plants. The treatment lasted 3 weeks in total. The treated leaves from seven plants (one leaf per plant) were used for chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. The ABA treatment was stopped 24 h prior to chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Using an AP3 porometer (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK), it was confirmed that the application of ABA induced short-term closure of stomata which lasted only for a few hours. Stomatal conductance completely recovered to the value of the control leaves within 24 h after the ABA treatment.

Mapping of PSII photochemical yield using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging
To study the effects of RH conditions or ABA treatments on stomatal response characteristics, leaves were removed from the plants, re-cut under water, and transferred to the laboratory. From these leaves, chlorophyll fluorescence images were made under an atmosphere of 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2, and the remainder N2 (a non-photorespiratory condition) as described elsewhere (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). Under non-photorespiratory conditions, {Phi}PSII is closely related to stomatal closure (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). To examine whether the steady-state was reached, the leaves were kept side by side inside a gas-tight cuvette under a continuous actinic irradiance of 100 µmol m–2 s–1 for ~20 min. Images of the leaves were then made at 5 min intervals and, when there was no significant difference between consecutive images, the leaves were considered to be at steady-state. After a steady-state was reached, the first image that was taken from the leaves (which were still in water) served as a control. The desiccation process was begun by removing the leaves from water, and images were then taken every 30 min for 150 min. The relative humidity in the air flowing through the cuvette was 40±2% and was produced by passing the air through a temperature-controlled column of iron (II)-sulphate heptahydrate (Fluka). The cuvette temperature was 22±1 °C. The experiments were repeated at least six times.

Statistical analysis
Each experiment was carried out with at least six leaves from six plants (one leaf per plant). Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data in Figs 2, 4, and 6 were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. The Student's t-test was used for mean separation (P=0.05). GraphPad Prism 4 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. PSII efficiency ({Phi}PSII) of the second (squares), fourth (circles), and sixth (triangles) leaf in basipetal sequence from the shoot tip in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 90% RH over time of desiccation measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2. Values are the mean of six leaves ±SEM.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. PSII efficiency ({Phi}PSII) of Tradescantia virginiana leaves over time of desiccation measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2. Triangles represent the {Phi}PSII of the mature leaves from plants of which one of their leaves was grown in a glass tube with high RH (90±5%). Squares represent the {Phi}PSII of the mature leaves from plants of which one of their leaves was grown in a tube with moderate RH (55±5%). From each plant, the leaf grown inside the tube (open symbols) and an adjacent leaf grown outside the tube at moderate RH (closed symbols) were used for the measurements. Values are the mean of eight leaves ±SEM.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. PSII efficiency ({Phi}PSII) of Tradescantia virginiana leaves grown at 55% (squares) or 90% (triangles) RH over time of desiccation measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2. Open and closed symbols represent the {Phi}PSII of the leaves treated daily with 0 µM (control) or 20 µM ABA for 3 weeks, respectively. Values are the mean of seven leaves ±SEM.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The endogenous ABA level of the leaves was affected by the RH during growth (Table 1). The ABA concentration was significantly higher in fresh (not desiccated) leaves grown at moderate RH compared with leaves grown at high RH when expressed both on a dry weight basis (P=0.027) and on a fresh weight basis (P=0.0007). The water content was significantly lower in leaves grown at moderate RH compared with leaves grown at high RH (P <0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. ABA level and water content in fresh (not desiccated) Tradescantia virginiana leaves grown at moderate (55%) or high (90%) RH

 
Figure 1 shows the images of {Phi}PSII of the second, fourth, and sixth leaf in basipetal sequence from the shoot tip in plants grown at high RH. Before desiccation and under a non-photorespiratory condition, {Phi}PSII was high and homogeneously distributed over the leaves irrespective of leaf age, implying the opening of stomata in all leaves (Fig. 1A). After 150 min of desiccation, {Phi}PSII decreased in all leaves but to different extents (Fig. 1B). The lower {Phi}PSII in the second leaf indicated a greater closure of stomata in younger leaves in response to desiccation. The different stomatal behaviour observed among the leaves from the three different positions (also corresponding to different ages) is shown by the changes in average {Phi}PSII measured under low O2 concentration over time of desiccation (Fig. 2). Before desiccation (time 0), {Phi}PSII in all leaves was high and there was no significant difference among them. With desiccation, {Phi}PSII of younger leaves decreased sooner than it did for older leaves. The interaction between the effects of leaf age and duration of desiccation on {Phi}PSII was significant (P=0.001). There were no significant differences in ABA concentration on a dry weight basis of leaves of the three different ages (Table 2). However, significantly higher ABA concentrations on a fresh weight basis were found in younger leaves compared with older leaves (P=0.0001). The water content was significantly lower in younger leaves compared with older leaves (P <0.0001).


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Images of {Phi}PSII of leaves in water (A) and after 150 min desiccation (B) measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2 in the second (right leaf in each image), fourth (middle leaf in each image), and sixth (left leaf in each image) leaf in basipetal sequence from the shoot tip in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 90% RH.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. ABA level and water content of the second, fourth, and sixth leaf in basipetal sequence from the shoot tip in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 90% RH

 
Figures 3 and 4 show how a high RH maintained around a single leaf of a plant grown at moderate RH can change the trend of {Phi}PSII, and thus stomatal behaviour, in response to desiccation. Following desiccation, leaves grown at high RH had both a greater heterogeneity and a higher average value of {Phi}PSII compared with leaves grown at moderate RH on either the same or another plant. This implies a slower and smaller closure of stomata in these leaves compared with leaves grown at moderate RH. The interaction between the effects of RH conditions and duration of desiccation on {Phi}PSII was significant (P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in ABA concentration on a dry weight basis of leaves grown at either high or moderate RH (Table 3). However, a significantly lower ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis was found in leaves grown in the tubes with high RH compared with leaves grown at moderate RH (P <0.0001). The water content was significantly higher in leaves grown in the tubes with high RH compared with leaves grown at moderate RH (P <0.0001).


Figure 3
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Images of {Phi}PSII of leaves in water (A) and after 150 min desiccation (B) measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2 in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 55% RH. From each plant [plant (1) and plant (2)], there was one leaf inside a glass tube. The RH in this tube was kept at 90±5% [plant (1)] or at 55±5% [plant (2)].

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. ABA level and water content of fresh (not desiccated) leaves in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 55% RH

 
Figure 5 shows the images of {Phi}PSII of leaves treated daily with 0 µM or 20 µM ABA during growth at moderate or high RH. Before desiccation and under a non-photorespiratory condition, {Phi}PSII was high and homogeneously distributed over the leaves irrespective of RH and ABA treatments, implying that stomata were open in all leaves (Fig. 5A). After 150 min of desiccation, although {Phi}PSII decreased in all leaves, it was higher in control leaves grown at high RH (Fig. 5B). The ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH showed the same behaviour as did leaves grown at moderate RH with or without ABA application. The changes in average {Phi}PSII over time of desiccation under low O2 concentration in leaves treated with 0 µM or 20 µM ABA during growth at moderate or high RH is illustrated in Fig. 6. Before desiccation (time 0), the {Phi}PSII in all leaves was high and there was no significant difference among them. With desiccation, the {Phi}PSII of ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH decreased sooner than it did for control leaves grown at high RH, similar to leaves grown at moderate RH. These results show the similarity of stomatal responses to desiccation in leaves grown at high RH treated with ABA to those of leaves grown at moderate RH. In addition, no significant difference was found between {Phi}PSII of control and ABA-treated leaves grown at moderate RH in response to desiccation.


Figure 5
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Images of {Phi}PSII of leaves in water (A) and after 150 min desiccation (B) measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2 in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 55% or 90% RH. One emerging leaf in each plant was treated daily with 0 (control) or 20 µM ABA for 3 weeks. The measurements of {Phi}PSII were done 24 h after the last application of ABA.

 
In a previous study, it was shown that stomatal aperture around the main veins of leaves grown at high RH remained wider after 150 min of desiccation compared with leaf margins (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). Therefore, the endogenous ABA concentrations of these regions and also the response of stomata to short-term ABA application were investigated. There was no significant difference in ABA concentration on a dry weight basis between the margins and main-vein areas of the leaves grown at high RH (Table 4). However, significantly higher ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis was found in the margins compared with the main-vein areas (P=0.04). The water content was significantly lower in the margins compared with the main-vein areas (P=0.0006).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. ABA level and water content in the margin and main-vein areas of fresh (not desiccated) Tradescantia virginiana leaves grown at 90% RH

 
Figure 7 shows the images of {Phi}PSII of leaves grown at moderate or high RH in response to short-term ABA application. Before applying ABA, when the bases of the leaves were in water and under a non-photorespiratory condition, {Phi}PSII was high and homogeneously distributed over the leaves irrespective of growth conditions (Fig. 7A). At 150 min after ABA application, {Phi}PSII decreased in almost all parts of the leaf grown at moderate RH. In the leaf grown at high RH, however, {Phi}PSII decreased only in the main-vein area and it remained high in the margins and in the tip of the leaf (Fig. 7B). Measurements on several leaves showed the same results, and the difference of stomatal closure in response to ABA between leaf margins and main-vein areas were still conspicuous when measurements ended 4 h after the start of the experiment. This implies that stomata in the margins of leaves grown at high RH do not close in response to the short-term ABA application. To ensure that there were no problems with ABA uptake, epidermal strips were bathed in ABA and SNP solutions. The application of ABA or SNP (Fig. 8) decreased stomatal aperture of the margins and main-vein areas of leaves grown at moderate or high RH (P <0.0001). There was no significant difference between average stomatal aperture at the margins and main-vein areas of leaves grown at moderate RH in control, ABA, or SNP treatments (Fig. 8A). There was a significant interaction (P=0.01) between the location of stomata and the effect of treatments in leaves grown at high RH (Fig. 8B). The average stomatal aperture at the margins of the leaves grown at high RH before application of ABA or SNP (control) was higher than around the main veins (P=0.03). Stomatal aperture decreased with the application of ABA or ABA+SNP in both parts of the leaf (P <0.0001), but the average stomatal aperture was significantly wider in the margins (P <0.0001). Moreover, although application of SNP alone caused closure of stomata at the main-vein areas, it did not affect stomatal aperture at the leaf margins.


Figure 7
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. Images of {Phi}PSII of leaves in water (A) and after 150 min in 100 µM ABA (B) measured under 20 mmol mol–1 O2, 350 µmol mol–1 CO2 in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown at 55% (left leaf in each image) or 90% (right leaf in each image) RH.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. Stomatal aperture at the margins (closed bars) and main-vein areas (open bars) of Tradescantia virginiana leaves grown at 55% (A) or 90% (B) RH in response to ABA and sodium nitroprusside (SNP as a nitric oxide donor). The concentrations of ABA and SNP solutions were 100 µM and 200 µM, respectively. Values are the mean of eight leaves ±SEM. The measurements of stomatal aperture were made on 10 stomata at one location for each area type on each of eight leaves. The average stomatal aperture was then calculated per leaf and the averages from eight leaves were further averaged and the SEM of the mean was calculated.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The smaller amount of ABA in fresh leaves grown at high RH (Table 1) was due to (i) the higher water content found in leaves grown at high RH compared with leaves grown at moderate RH, and (ii) the lower amount of ABA expressed on a dry weight basis. It has been shown that in well-watered Acer rubrum, an increase in VPD within a few hours resulted in higher accumulation of ABA in leaves (Bauerle et al., 2004). ABA can be synthesized by water-stressed roots and transferred to leaves via the transpiration stream (Davies and Zhang, 1991; Jackson, 1997; Zhang and Outlaw, 2001). However, ABA can be produced by the roots of even unstressed well-watered plants (Wilkinson and Davies, 2002, and references therein). The amount of ABA entering the leaves of plants grown at high RH via transpiration flux would be lower due to the lower transpiration rate of these plants than of plants grown at moderate RH. Another possible explanation would be the effect of VPD around the leaf on the ABA production by the leaf itself.

Drought stress during growth at high RH improves the vase life of cut roses due to a better control of water loss during periods of higher evaporative demands (Mortensen and Gislerød, 2005). Conditions that increase endogenous ABA levels of plants cultured in vitro, such as ventilation of the culture vessels or ABA addition to the medium during growth, improve the control of water loss (higher stomatal responsivity) after transferring them to low RH (Pospisilova, 1996; Aguilar et al., 2000; Talavera et al., 2001). Moreover, it has also been reported that the application of ABA during growth in T. virginiana results in the production of smaller stomata with altered physiological properties (Franks and Farquhar, 2001). The results show that the daily application of ABA to leaves during growth at high RH resulted in stomata whose behaviour in response to desiccation was similar to that found in stomata from plants grown at moderate RH (Figs 5, 6). After 3 weeks of ABA application, the endogenous ABA concentration in the ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH was the same as that of leaves grown at moderate RH (data not shown). It can be concluded from our results that a low ABA concentration during growth at high RH is likely to be the cause of less stomatal closure in response to drought stress.

The ABA concentration expressed on a fresh weight basis, although not on a dry weight basis, of older leaves (Table 2) was significantly lower than in younger leaves, which also showed faster closure of stomata (Figs 1, 2). The decrease in the ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis in the older leaves was correlated with a higher water content of these leaves (Table 2). The ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis, although not on a dry weight basis, of the leaf grown at high RH (Table 3) was significantly lower than that of the other leaves from the same plant grown at moderate RH, which also showed faster closure of stomata in response to desiccation (Figs 3, 4). The lower amount of ABA on a fresh weight basis in the leaves grown at high RH was also correlated with a higher water content (Table 3). According to these results, it seems that there is a correlation between ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis of leaves during growth and stomatal response characteristics. It also indicates that besides differences in ABA production or import, changes in water content of a leaf can be responsible for the differences in stomatal responses.

It has been previously shown that stomata at the leaf margins close faster in response to desiccation compared with main-vein areas in plants grown at a high RH (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). This phenomenon has been related to a substantially lower relative water content in these areas of leaves, resulting in a lower turgor of the guard cells rather than a proper functioning of stomata (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). A higher stomatal density and initial stomatal aperture would result in a higher transpiration rate and, consequently, lower water content in leaf margins compared with main-vein areas, as discussed by Rezaei Nejad et al. (2006). The failure of stomata at the margins of leaves grown at high RH to close in response to ABA and SNP treatments (Figs 7, 8) is consistent with this conclusion. However, the lack of stomatal closure in main-vein areas of excised leaves in response to desiccation (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006) could be due to low ABA concentrations in leaves grown at high RH, as the stomata of these areas of leaves could close in response to ABA and SNP treatments (Figs 7, 8). The ABA measurements on the leaf margins and main-vein areas are in contrast to the other findings of this research which showed a correlation between ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis of leaves during growth and stomatal response characteristics. However, the ABA concentration of both parts of leaves grown at high RH are far lower than in leaves grown at moderate RH (Tables 1, 4).

The present results indicate faster responses of stomata to desiccation in younger leaves compared with older leaves (Figs 1, 2). In accordance with these results, it has been reported that the percentage of stomata that closed following exposure of epidermal strips to mannitol, coumarin, and darkness became progressively lower with increasing leaf age in in vitro plum shoots grown at high RH (Zacchini and Morini, 1998). It is also noteworthy that there is a gradient of decreased {Phi}PSII from the tip to the base of the youngest leaf, implying differences in the stomatal responses to desiccation between the younger and older parts of the same leaf (Fig. 1). This indicates that newly developed stomata are functional and need to be exposed to a high RH (or a low ABA level) for some time to become non-functional.

Growing one leaf from a plant grown at moderate RH under a high RH condition resulted in its stomata having a diminished response to drought stress (Figs 3, 4). The stomata of these leaves reacted more slowly and some remained open in response to desiccation, similar to the stomatal responses of the plants where whole plants were grown in a high RH climate room (Rezaei Nejad et al., 2006). The difference between stomatal behaviour of an individual leaf grown at high RH and the other leaves of the same plant grown at moderate RH shows the importance of the micro-climate around individual leaves and indicates the quantitative effect of RH during growth on stomatal functioning. The effect of a moderate RH on stomatal functioning of the whole plant is not transferred to a single leaf grown under a high RH.

In conclusion, according to the results presented here, (i) it is likely that a long-term low ABA concentration in well-watered plants during growth at high RH is a reason for less or no stomatal closure under conditions of drought stress; (ii) ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis rather than on a dry weight basis correlates with the changes in stomatal response characteristics; and (iii) stomata at the leaf margins of leaves grown at high RH are not able to close in the presence of short-term ABA or nitric oxide, which is involved in the signal transduction pathway linking the perception of ABA to reduced guard cell turgor, while stomata at the main-vein areas can.


    Acknowledgements
 
This research was financed by the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology of Iran.


    Abbreviations
 
ABA, abscisic acid; {Phi}PSII, relative quantum yield or efficiency for electron transport by photosystem II; PSII, photosystem II; RH, relative air humidity; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; VPD, vapour pressure deficit.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ackerson RC. (1980) Stomatal response of cotton to water stress and abscisic acid as affected by water stress history. Plant Physiology 65 455–459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aguilar ML, Espadas FL, Coello J, Maust BE, Trejo C, Robert ML, Santamaria JM. (2000) The role of abscisic acid in controlling leaf water loss, survival and growth of micropropagated Tagetes erecta plants when transferred directly to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 1861–1866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Asch F. (2000) Determination of abscisic acid by indirect enzyme linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA). Technical reportTaastrup, Denmark Laboratory for Agrohydrology and Bioclimatology, Department of Agricultural Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.

Assmann SM and Wang X-Q. (2001) From milliseconds to millions of years: guard cells and environmental responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4 421–428.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bahrun A, Jensen CR, Asch F, Mogensen VO. (2002) Drought-induced changes in xylem pH, ionic composition, and ABA concentration act as early signals in field-grown maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 53 251–263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bauerle WL, Whitlow TH, Setter TL, Vermeylen FM. (2004) Abscisic acid synthesis in Acer rubrum L. leaves—a vapor pressure deficit mediated response. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 129 182–187.

Brown KW, Jordan WR, Thomas JC. (1976) Water stress induced alterations of the stomatal response to decreases in leaf water potential. Physiologia Plantarum 37 1–5.[CrossRef]

Cutler JM, Rains DW, Loomis RS. (1977) The importance of cell size in the water relations of plants. Physiologia Plantarum 40 255–260.[CrossRef]

Davies WJ and Zhang JH. (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42 55–76.[CrossRef][ISI]

Fordham MC, Harrison-Murray RS, Knight L, Evered CE. (2001) Effects of leaf wetting and high humidity on stomatal function in leafy cuttings and intact plants of Corylus maxima. Physiologia Plantarum 113 233–240.[CrossRef][Medline]

Franks PJ and Farquhar GD. (2001) The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana. Plant Physiology 125 935–942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garcia-Mata C, Gay R, Sokolovski S, Hills A, Lamattina L, Blatt MR. (2003) Nitric oxide regulates K+ and Cl channels in guard cells through a subset of abscisic acid-evoked signalling pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100 11116–11121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haefner JW, Buckley TN, Mott KA. (1997) A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 20 1087–1097.[CrossRef]

Hetherington AM and Woodward FI. (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424 901–908.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jackson M. (1997) Hormones from roots as signals for the shoots of stressed plants. Trends in Plant Science 2 22–28.

Kearns EV and Assmann SM. (1993) The guard cell–environment connection. Plant Physiology 102 711–715.[ISI][Medline]

Leung J and Giraudat J. (1998) Abscisic acid signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49 199–222.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mortensen LM and Gislerød HR. (2005) Effect of air humidity variation on powdery mildew and keeping quality of cut roses. Scientia Horticulturae 104 49–55.[CrossRef]

Mott KA and Franks PJ. (2001) The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a local perturbation in humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 24 657–662.[Medline]

Neill SJ, Desikan R, Clarke A, Hancock JT. (2002) Nitric oxide is a novel component of abscisic acid signalling in stomatal guard cells. Plant Physiology 128 13–16.[Free Full Text]

Popova LP, Outlaw WH, Aghoram K, Hite DRC. (2000) Abscisic acid—an intraleaf water-stress signal. Physiologia Plantarum 108 376–381.

Pospisilova J. (1996) Hardening by abscisic acid of tobacco plantlets grown in vitro. Biologia Plantarum 38 605–609.

Quarrie SA, Whitford PN, Appleford NEJ, Wang TL, Cook SK, Henson IE, Loveys BR. (1988) A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: its characterisation and use in a radioimmunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereal and lupin leaves. Planta 173 330–339.[CrossRef]

Rezaei Nejad A, Harbinson J, van Meeteren U. (2006) Dynamics of spatial heterogeneity of stomatal closure in Tradescantia virginiana altered by growth at high relative air humidity. Journal of Experimental Botany 57 3669–3678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rezaei Nejad A and van Meeteren U. (2005) Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity. Physiologia Plantarum 125 324–332.[CrossRef]

Santamaria JM, Davies WJ, Atkinson CJ. (1993) Stomata of micropropagated Delphinium plants respond to ABA, CO2, light and water potential, but fail to close fully. Journal of Experimental Botany 44 99–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spence RD, Wu H, Sharpe PJH, Clark KG. (1986) Water stress effects on guard cell anatomy and the mechanical advantage of the epidermal cells. Plant, Cell and Environment 9 197–202.

Talavera CR, Espadas FL, Aguilar ML, Maust BE, Oropeza CM, Santamaria JM. (2001) The control of leaf water loss by coconut plants cultured in vitro depends on the type of membrane used for ventilation. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 76 569–574.

Tardieu F, Lafarge T, Simonneau TH. (1996) Stomatal control by fed or endogenous xylem ABA in sunflower: interpretation of correlations between leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in anisohydric species. Plant, Cell and Environment 19 75–84.[CrossRef]

Torre S and Fjeld T. (2001) Water loss and postharvest characteristics of cut roses grown at high or moderate relative air humidity. Scientia Horticulturae 89 217–226.[CrossRef]

Torre S, Fjeld T, Gislerød HR, Moe R. (2003) Leaf anatomy and stomatal morphology of greenhouse roses grown at moderate or high air humidity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128 598–602.

Trejo CL, Clephan AL, Davies WJ. (1995) How do stomata read abscisic acid signals? Plant Physiology 109 803–811.[Abstract]

Weyers JDB and Meidner H. (1990) Methods in stomatal researchHarlow, UK Longman Scientific & Technical pp. 129–155.

Wilkinson S and Davies WJ. (2002) ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of response to stress in plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 25 195–210.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xia MZ. (1994) Effects of soil drought during the generative development phase of faba been (Vicia faba) on photosynthetic characters and biomass production. Journal of Agricultural Science 122 67–72.

Zacchini M and Morini S. (1998) Stomatal functioning in relation to leaf age in in-vitro-grown plum shoots. Plant Cell Reports 18 292–296.[CrossRef]

Zhang J, Jia W, Zhang D. (1997) Re-export and metabolism of xylem-delivered ABA in attached maize leaves under different transpirational fluxes and xylem ABA concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 48 1557–1564.[CrossRef][ISI]

Zhang SQ and Outlaw WH. (2001) Abscisic acid introduced into the transpiration stream accumulates in the guard cell apoplast and causes stomatal closure. Plant, Cell and Environment 24 1045–1054.[CrossRef]

Ziv M, Schwartz A, Fleminger D. (1987) Malfunctioning stomata in vitreous leaves of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) plants propagated in vitro; implication for hardening. Plant Science 52 127–134.[CrossRef]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Wilkinson and W. J. Davies
Manipulation of the apoplastic pH of intact plants mimics stomatal and growth responses to water availability and microclimatic variation
J. Exp. Bot., February 13, 2008; (2008) erm338v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Rezaei Nejad and U. van Meeteren
Dynamics of adaptation of stomatal behaviour to moderate or high relative air humidity in Tradescantia virginiana
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2008; 59(2): 289 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/3/627    most recent
erl234v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nejad, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Meeteren, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nejad, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Meeteren, U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nejad, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Meeteren, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?