Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2007 58(3):651-658; doi:10.1093/jxb/erl238
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/3/651    most recent
erl238v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babourina, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babourina, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Babourina, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Nitrate supply affects ammonium transport in canola roots

Olga Babourina1, Konstantin Voltchanskii1, Bart McGann1, Ian Newman2 and Zed Rengel1

1School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, M087, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009
2School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-21, Hobart, Tasmania 7001

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: olgab{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

Received 10 April 2006; Revised 17 October 2006 Accepted 18 October 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plants may suffer from ammonium (NHFormula) toxicity when NHFormula is the sole nitrogen source. Nitrate (NOFormula) is known to alleviate NHFormula toxicity, but the mechanisms are unknown. This study has evaluated possible mechanisms of NOFormula alleviation of NHFormula toxicity in canola (Brassica napus L.). Dynamics of net fluxes of NHFormula, H+, K+ and Ca2+ were assessed, using a non-invasive microelectrode (MIFE) technique, in plants having different NOFormula supplies, after single or several subsequent increases in external NH4Cl concentration. After an increase in external NH4Cl without NOFormula, NHFormula net fluxes demonstrated three distinct stages: release ({tau}1), return to uptake ({tau}2), and a decrease in uptake rate ({tau}3). The presence of NOFormula in the bathing medium prevented the {tau}1 release and also resulted in slower activation of the {tau}3 stage. Net fluxes of Ca2+ were in the opposite direction to NHFormula net fluxes, regardless of NOFormula supply. In contrast, H+ and K+ net fluxes and change in external pH were not correlated with NHFormula net fluxes. It is concluded that (i) NOFormula primarily affects the NHFormula low-affinity influx system; and (ii) NHFormula transport is inversely linked to Ca2+ net flux.

Key words: Ammonium toxicity, Brassica napus, Ca2+, H+, ion fluxes, nitrate


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ammonium affects plant development and growth (Walch-Liu et al., 2001; Britto and Kronzucker, 2002). Plants can experience ammonium toxicity when ammonium is the sole nitrogen source (Zhang and Rengel, 1999, 2000, 2003). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this phenomenon: (i) acidification of soil; (ii) acidification of the cytosol; (iii) NHFormula-induced cation deficiency and cation versus anion imbalance; (iv) deficiency of carbon sources in the root zone; (v) stimulated nitrogen assimilatory capacity; and (vi) disturbed phytohormone and polyamine status (Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1993; Gerendas et al., 1997; Zhang and Rengel, 1999; Britto and Kronzucker, 2002). Britto et al. (2001) suggested that NHFormula toxicity in plants might occur because plants expend a large amount of energy on NHFormula efflux to keep a low NHFormula concentration in the cytoplasm.

The addition of NOFormula to soil or bathing media is known to alleviate NHFormula toxicity (Ikeda and Osawa, 1981; Goyal et al., 1982). Generally, this alleviation could happen through NOFormula interaction with any of the putative mechanisms of NHFormula toxicity mentioned above or through a more complicated feedback system involving growth and development processes.

Preventing a low root surface pH was proposed as a possible mechanism of NOFormula alleviation of NHFormula toxicity, since the NOFormula uptake involves H+ symport, which might alkalinize the root media (Imsande, 1986).

Nitrate can be involved in charge balancing, thus protecting root cells from NHFormula-induced plasma membrane depolarization, as demonstrated in numerous studies (Ayling, 1993; Wang et al., 1993b), and can decrease the internal ratio of cations to anions in plants (Britto and Kronzucker, 2002). No direct effect of NOFormula on nutrient deficiency can be envisaged; however, preventing acidification of the root media might play an important role in maintaining the plasma membrane potential and therefore maintaining physiological patterns of ion uptake, for example, preventing the increased rate of K+ release observed at low pH (Babourina et al., 2001). On the other hand, NHFormula can compete with K+ for entry through some K+ inward channels (those found permeable for NHFormula), and through non-selective cation channels (Howitt and Udvardi, 2000; Kronzucker et al., 2001). Hence, NOFormula might indirectly alleviate some nutrient deficiencies when plants have been grown with NHFormula as the sole nitrogen source.

Another explanation for NOFormula alleviation of NHFormula toxicity is based on the ability of NOFormula to increase the expression of enzymes that remove NHFormula from the cytoplasm, glutamine synthetase and ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1993; Kronzucker et al., 1999). It is difficult to envisage a direct NOFormula interaction with other proposed causes of NHFormula toxicity, such as carbon skeleton deprivation or polyamine and phytohormone status. There might be a more complicated feedback system generated at the whole plant level (Loque and von Wiren, 2004).

An ammonium efflux system, which would be involved in NHFormula toxicity in plants, was proposed on the basis of the wash-out kinetics of 13NHFormula from seedlings (Britto et al., 2001). However, no specific transporter that functions as an ammonium efflux transporter has been cloned yet. There is a suggestion, still to be confirmed, that plants can transport NHFormula across the plasma membrane in both directions through transporters from the ammonium transporter (AMT) family or through non-selective cation channels (Loque and von Wiren, 2004).

Here direct electrophysiological assessment is provided of three possible mechanisms that have been proposed for the NHFormula toxicity syndrome, and its alleviation by NOFormula, under high external NHFormula concentration: (i) a decrease in external pH caused by H+ efflux; (ii) changes in K+ and Ca2+ transport; and (iii) induction of NHFormula efflux to relieve toxicity. H+, K+, Ca2+, and NHFormula net fluxes were measured non-invasively by the MIFE® technique at the junction of the elongation/root hair zones of canola seedlings in the presence or absence of NOFormula.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material and growing conditions
Seeds of canola (Brassica napus L. cv. Monty) were surface-sterilized and planted in jars on 0.8% (w/v) agar made up in 1 mM KCl, 100 µM CaCl2, and 10 µM H3BO3 solution. Jars were placed in a cultivation room under fluorescent light at 75 µmol m–2 s–1 (14 h day/10 h night) at 25 °C day/20 °C night for 3 d.

The 10–15 cm long taproot of a seedling was fixed with a Parafilm®M strip in a Petri dish containing unbuffered bathing solution of 1 mM KCl, 100 µM CaCl2, and 100 µM NH4Cl for a non-NOFormula treatment. For NOFormula treatment, 1 mM KNO3 was included in this bathing solution. The Petri dish was then placed on the stage of an inverted microscope in the Faraday cage under the microscope light. Measurements started after 10 min (when ion fluxes had stabilized) to reduce possible transition effects of changes in the environmental conditions. During flux measurements, the pH of the bathing solution ranged between 5.5 and 5.8.

Ion flux measurements
Specific details of ion-selective microelectrode fabrication and calibration are given in a previous publication (Babourina et al., 2001). The theory of measurements using the MIFE® system (University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia) has also been given in a review (Newman, 2001). MIFE measurements of ion net fluxes were made in the solution just outside the surface of the plant tissue: positive values indicate ion uptake and negative values indicate ion release (Newman, 2001).

Electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (GC150-10, Harvard Apparatus, Kent, UK), dried at 230 °C for ~5 h, and silanized with tributylchlorosilane (#90765, Fluka). The tips of dried and cooled electrode blanks were broken to a diameter of 5–10 µm and then back-filled. Back-filling solutions were 15 mM NaCl+40 mM KH2PO4 for the hydrogen electrode, 500 mM NH4Cl for the ammonium electrode, 500 mM KCl for the potassium electrode, and 500 mM CaCl2 for the calcium electrode. Immediately after back-filling, the electrode tips were front-filled with commercially available ionophore cocktails for measuring hydrogen (#95297, Fluka), ammonium (# 09882, Fluka; the selectivity coefficient against K+ determined by the fixed interference method is –1.0), potassium (#60031, Fluka; the selectivity coefficient against NHFormula determined by the fixed interference method is –2.0) and calcium (#21048, Fluka).

Net ion fluxes at the junction of the elongation and root hair zones were measured simultaneously (H+, NHFormula, K+ in one group of experiments and H+, NHFormula, Ca2+ in another) for 10–20 min prior to NH4Cl application from 10 mM stock solution to the bathing media indicated above. The actual NHFormula concentration in the media after each application was measured simultaneously with the ion net fluxes. In the first set of experiments, there was a one-step increase in NH4Cl to a designated external concentration. In the second set of experiments, the external NH4Cl concentration was increased in steps at successive 15 min intervals. After each NH4Cl addition, the bathing solution was thoroughly mixed by sucking and expelling it from a pipette 6–10 times during the first 1–2 min.

Six to eight seedlings were measured for each different treatment. In some figures, only representative examples are shown to illustrate the character of the ion flux responses. Statistical information on the time for activation of the NHFormula efflux system is presented in Fig. 5. Significance of difference between means was based on Student's t-test.


Figure 5
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Time required by plants to reach peak NHFormula net flux ({tau}1+{tau}2) after the first (or single) NH4Cl application or after subsequent applications, combining all concentrations (a). Time required to reach peak NHFormula net flux ({tau}1+{tau}2) in relation to the external concentration in multiple application experiments (b). Means ±SE (n=6–7). The asterisk indicates that means are significantly different at P <0.005 (unpaired t-test).

 
Membrane potential measurements
Membrane potentials of epidermal cells at the junction of the elongation and root hair zones of canola roots were measured with glass microelectrodes (GC 150-10F, Clark Electromedical Instruments, Pangbourne, Berks, UK) before and during NHFormula application, using the MIFE electrometer. Electrodes had a tip diameter <1 µm and were back-filled with 0.5 M KCl.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Changes in NHFormula transport after a single increase of external NH4Cl from 0.1 mM to 1 mM are shown in Fig. 1. In plants without KNO3, NHFormula release (negative net flux) was observed almost immediately ({tau}1 stage), demonstrating an active state of the efflux system in plants without NOFormula supply and the plant's ability to maintain cytoplasmic NHFormula at a certain level. Plants with a 1 mM NOFormula supply did not show NHFormula release; however, they had a lag phase, also designated {tau}1, before exhibiting a rise in NHFormula net flux. This initial release or lag stage was followed by a return to NHFormula uptake (positive slope of net flux graph, {tau}2), which peaked ~12 min after the NH4Cl addition ({tau}1+{tau}2). Thereafter, the NHFormula uptake rate decreased ({tau}3). This decrease in NHFormula uptake rate indicates a decrease in the activity of an NHFormula influx system or an increase in the activity of an NHFormula efflux system. The threshold points for the three stages of NHFormula flux dynamics ({tau}1, {tau}2, and {tau}3) are indicated in Fig. 1 and their values for each plant were used for further calculations of peak net fluxes (at the start of {tau}3) and time intervals.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Changes in canola root NHFormula net fluxes (inwards positive; averaged over 60 s) after the addition of 1 mM NH4Cl to the bathing solution with or without 1 mM KNO3. Two typical net flux responses are shown for each condition. NH4Cl was added at the vertical arrows. {tau}1 indicates the time required for the plant to reach minimum NHFormula net flux or to start uptake of NHFormula. {tau}2 indicates the duration of rising NHFormula net flux. {tau}3 indicates the duration of decreasing NHFormula net flux.

 
Since the resins used in the microelectrodes are not completely selective, data are presented for K+ and NHFormula net fluxes measured simultaneously in one experiment (Fig. 2). K+ net fluxes did not show any change in response to the addition of 1 mM NH4Cl to the media.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Evidence that NHFormula net fluxes are not confounded by K+ net fluxes, despite poor NHFormula electrode selectivity against K+. Large NHFormula net flux changes are accompanied by undetectable K+ net flux changes after the addition of 1 mM NH4Cl (the bathing solution did not contain 1 mM KNO3). Points are averages over 1 min.

 
In another set of experiments, NHFormula external concentration was increased incrementally every 15 min. Final concentrations after each application are indicated in Fig. 3. The multiple subsequent applications of NH4Cl led to a gradual increase of the peak net flux at the start of {tau}3 (Fig. 3). Generally, flux dynamics looked similar to those observed for the single application experiments (Fig. 1) with well-pronounced {tau}2 and {tau}3 stages.


Figure 3
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Typical examples of changes in canola root NHFormula net fluxes after the addition of 1 mM NH4Cl to the bathing solution with or without 1 mM KNO3 (n=6 for each treatment). Arrows indicate the time when NH4Cl was added to the bathing solution from a concentrated stock to achieve the indicated concentrations. Fluxes at the start of {tau}3, when the NHFormula net flux reaches its peak, are averaged and plotted in Fig. 4 against the corresponding measured NHFormula concentration.

 
When net fluxes at the start of {tau}3 were averaged and plotted against the external NHFormula concentrations, the relationship between concentrations and net fluxes was similar for both types of media, regardless of the presence of NOFormula (Fig. 4). Hence, NOFormula did not change the kinetic traits of the NHFormula transporters: external NHFormula concentrations required for reaching the same peak net flux were similar for both NOFormula and non-NOFormula media, as were the limitations on NHFormula uptake rate (by inactivating NHFormula influx systems or activating NHFormula efflux systems). However, the concentrations needed to cause a given net flux were higher in plants when NHFormula was applied once or for the first time in the multiple experiments, compared with net fluxes following incremental concentration increases (Fig. 4). The presence of NOFormula did not alter this behaviour, but there is evidence for saturation of the NHFormula net flux peak at the first application in the presence of NOFormula (Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between peak (start of {tau}3) NHFormula net flux and external NHFormula concentration for canola plants without NOFormula in the bathing solution (a) or exposed to 1 mM KNO3 (b). Points are grouped as follows: after the first application in the multiple application experiments and after the single application (open symbols), and after the second and subsequent applications in the multiple application experiments (filled symbols).

 
The time required for NHFormula uptake to stop rising ({tau}1+{tau}2) in experiments with the multiple NHFormula applications was significantly shorter in NOFormula-free plants than in plants supplied with NOFormula (Fig. 5a). For the first or single NHFormula application, the time for stopping NHFormula uptake (12 min, Fig. 5a) was independent of the presence of NOFormula in the media. On the other hand, absence of NOFormula from the media caused a significant acceleration in reaching {tau}3 in experiments with multiple NHFormula applications at NHFormula concentrations ≤1 mM (1–2 mM, Fig. 5b).

Simultaneous measurement of other ion net fluxes in NOFormula-free media elucidated an interaction between NHFormula and other cations (H+, K+, and Ca2+). There was no effect on K+ and H+ net fluxes either of application of NHFormula in the range 150–250 µM (Fig. 6a) or of a single application of 1–2 mM NH4Cl (data not shown). Ca2+ was different. In experiments with a single NHFormula application, the abrupt increase in external NHFormula concentration led to high negative correlation between NHFormula and Ca2+ net fluxes (Table 1). This opposite direction of NHFormula and Ca2+ net fluxes was also observed in experiments with multiple NHFormula applications without NOFormula (Fig. 6b). The relationships (or lack of them) between net fluxes of H+, K+, and Ca2+ were independent of plants’ exposure to NOFormula (data not shown).


Figure 6
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Typical examples of H+, K+, and Ca2+ net fluxes for plants without nitrate in the media. Arrows indicate the time when NH4Cl was added to the bathing solution from a concentrated stock.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Correlation between NHFormula and Ca2+ net fluxes before the NHFormula application, during {tau}2 (NHFormula uptake phase), and during {tau}3 (activation of NHFormula efflux) in plants with a single NHFormula application

 
Although there was a shift towards acidic pH in long running experiments (up to 3 h), a difference in the medium pH between treatments, without or with NOFormula supply, was not observed (Table 2). Similarly, plasma membrane potential measurements demonstrated that changes in Em from pre-treatment to the end of {tau}2 were not significantly dependent on NOFormula (26±15 mV depolarization for non-NOFormula plants and 22±17 mV depolarization for plants exposed to 1 mM KNO3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Change in pH of the bathing solution, the H+ net fluxes, and Em({tau}2), following a single application of NHFormula or following multiple sequential increases in external NHFormula

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Influx and efflux ammonium transport systems
The activation of AMT systems and their relationship to other cation transport was assessed in two types of experiments in the present study: a single application of NHFormula and multiple applications to observe the dynamics of NHFormula uptake. It has previously been shown that the measurement of ion net fluxes under a sequence of short-time increases of external concentrations of the ion allowed evaluation of the kinetic parameters for chloride in oat (Babourina et al., 1998) and for high-affinity NOFormula and NHFormula transport systems in eucalyptus (Garnett et al., 2003). Garnett et al. (2003) noticed that at concentrations >100 µM NH4Cl, NHFormula net fluxes did not follow Michaelis–Menten kinetics for uptake. Those authors suggested that the reduction in NHFormula net fluxes at high external concentrations was due to an increase in unidirectional NHFormula efflux. This suggestion is in agreement with the earlier results by Britto et al. (2001) demonstrating that plants activate NHFormula efflux to cope with high NHFormula influx under high external concentrations of NHFormula.

From the present results, concentration ranges for both high and low affinity NHFormula transport systems can be estimated. After the first increase in external NHFormula concentration from the 100 µM in the bathing solution (Figs 1, 3), NHFormula net flux demonstrated two well-defined stages: net flux increasing ({tau}2) to a peak and then decreasing ({tau}3). However, when the peaks of NHFormula net fluxes were averaged, grouped, and plotted against the corresponding external NHFormula concentrations, the peak net flux increased linearly with concentration (Fig. 4a). This is similar to what has been demonstrated for low-affinity NHFormula transporters (Wang et al., 1993a; Kronzucker et al., 1996; Rawat et al., 1999).

Generally similar time-courses for NHFormula dynamics have been reported for the two methods used: the electrophysiological MIFE measurements and other workers’ influx measurements using labelled NHFormula. Both approaches used non-steady-state conditions or ‘perturbation’ experiments (Wang et al., 1993a; Kronzucker et al., 1996). During radioisotope studies, Kronzucker et al. (1996) demonstrated that the first 5 min of labelling time gave greater influx values for NHFormula than the next 5 min. In its time-course, this decreased NHFormula influx looked very similar to the {tau}3 stage in the present study (Fig. 1b), since labelling was preceded by a 5 min pre-wash at the same concentration as was used for labelling. Thus the real time of plant exposure to higher NHFormula concentrations in that and other studies on NHFormula influx equals 15 min. This time interval covers the {tau}1 and {tau}2 stages for plants without NOFormula and covers {tau}1, {tau}2, and the start of {tau}3 in plants with 1 mM KNO3, presuming that NHFormula transport in canola seedlings is similar to that found in spruce, rice, and other plants (Wang et al., 1993a; Kronzucker et al., 1996, 1998). However, the MIFE measurements allowed the multiphasic character of NHFormula net flux to be discerned (Fig. 1a), which was hidden in earlier influx experiments with labelled NHFormula (Kronzucker et al., 1996). In more recent elution experiments, Britto and Kronzucker (2001) observed increased NHFormula efflux within the first 10 min after plants were transferred to a 100-fold higher external concentration of NHFormula. This efflux was suggested to have a cytosolic origin (Britto and Kronzucker 2003). This observation led the authors to warn the scientific community about the interpretation of earlier influx experiments based on concentration shifts. However, elution experiments alone, which show the tracer efflux, do not allow estimation of the concurrent unlabelled influx to provide the net flux (in which influx and efflux may dominate in turn), which is provided by the MIFE technique and shown in the present study.

Given that net flux was measured, the observed decrease in NHFormula net flux during {tau}3 in Fig. 1 could result from the inactivation of an NHFormula influx system or the activation of an NHFormula efflux system. However, all plants without NOFormula in the bathing media demonstrated not only a decrease in NHFormula net flux, but also an NHFormula release (negative net flux values) during {tau}3 (Fig. 1). This observation supports the hypothesis that the {tau}3 phase of NHFormula flux dynamics occurs primarily due to the activation of an NHFormula efflux system.

During the first NHFormula application, a given peak of NHFormula uptake into tissue required a higher external concentration than was required under multiple increases in external NHFormula concentration (Fig. 4). A longer time interval to reach peak net flux ({tau}1+{tau}2=12 min) was also required for the first application, compared with 6 min only for subsequent applications (Fig. 5a). The simplest interpretation is that plants take time to suppress activity of a constantly working NHFormula efflux system. In summary, {tau}1+{tau}2 is the suppression of that NHFormula efflux system, with {tau}3 its recovery.

Effect of NOFormula supply on NHFormula dynamics
In the present study, NOFormula affected NHFormula transport in three ways. First, the presence of NOFormula in the bathing media inhibited the release of NHFormula during {tau}1, the first minute after the sudden addition of NHFormula to the external medium (Fig. 1). This NOFormula effect, preventing the initial release, cannot be explained by a direct NOFormula influence on Em because the measurements of Em during the first minutes of NHFormula application demonstrated that depolarization did not differ significantly between treatments. Instead the NOFormula effect could be an action on NH4 transporters involved in cytosolic NHFormula homeostasis or a more complicated feedback response via plant metabolism. This feedback response could be based on the increased activity of NHFormula assimilation enzymes (Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1993). The increased activity of NHFormula transporters, regulated at the post-transcriptional level, could lead to a higher rate of NHFormula uptake into internal compartments (vacuole or plastids) or further transport to the xylem. All these processes would lead to a lower NHFormula concentration in the cytoplasm of root cells.

Secondly, plants without NOFormula started to release NHFormula in 6 min during multiple incremental applications of NH4Cl, more quickly than the 12 min for a single addition (Fig. 5a). Thirdly, also in the absence of NOFormula, under external NH4Cl concentrations ≥1 mM, plants started to release NHFormula after 5 min, sooner than the 10 min when in the presence of NOFormula (Fig. 5b). These two observations can be considered together: without NOFormula, critical NHFormula uptake values (at the end of {tau}2) to activate the NHFormula efflux system were achieved quicker than if NOFormula was present in the bathing solution, especially when the NHFormula efflux system was already in an ‘active’ mode (i.e. following the second and subsequent NH4Cl applications). Similarly, plants without NOFormula in the bathing media also release NHFormula for a shorter time ({tau}3 is shorter) than plants supplied with NOFormula. The NH4Cl concentration of 0.5 mM is considered to be a threshold above which plants start using low-affinity transporters (Britto et al., 2001). In the present experiments, NOFormula delayed the onset of NHFormula release (Fig. 5b) at concentrations >1 mM. Thus NOFormula appears to affect mostly low-affinity NHFormula transporters.

The present observations are in good agreement with conclusions reached by Kronzucker et al. (1999), where co-provision of NOFormula with NHFormula caused lower NHFormula release, which is also observed in the present study, and enhanced xylem loading of NHFormula. The latter can maintain a low NHFormula concentration in the cytoplasm of root cells, which is also considered to be the most likely mechanism of NOFormula alleviation of NHFormula toxicity.

Interaction between NHFormula fluxes and H+ and Ca2+ fluxes
It has been proposed that for high-affinity NHFormula transport, plants use transporters from the AMT family, whereas low-affinity transport occurs through non-selective cation channels or K+ channels (Howitt and Udvardi, 2000; Kronzucker et al., 2001; Loque and von Wiren, 2004). The AMTs are highly selective for NHFormula and are suggested to be uniporters because NHFormula transport through them was not affected by external pH (Ludewig et al., 2002). This is consistent with 1H-NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) measurements showing hardly any disturbance of the cytoplasmic pH (Bligny et al., 1997). It is supported by the present studies, where H+ net fluxes were found to be unaffected by the addition of NHFormula (Fig. 6).

The results clearly demonstrate a linkage between NHFormula and Ca2+ transport (Fig. 6b; Table 1): canola root cells release Ca2+ when they are taking up NHFormula and vice versa. Earlier, Plieth and co-authors (2000) found a cytoplasmic Ca2+ increase in Arabidopsis in response to a sudden increase in external NH4Cl; however, this phenomenon was observed only at high pH and therefore was linked with NH3 influx. Given that the present experiments were performed in solutions with pH 5.5–5.8, where the NH3 concentration is negligible, the observed link between NHFormula and Ca2+ fluxes is different from the one reported by Plieth et al. (2000). Future pharmacological studies might provide details on the nature of this link.


    Acknowledgements
 
This work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council.


    Abbreviations
 
AMT, ammonium transporter.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ayling SM. (1993) The effect of ammonium ions on membrane potential and anion flux in roots of barley and tomato. Plant, Cell and Environment 16 297–303.

Babourina O, Hawkins BC, Lew RD, Newman IA, Shabala S. (2001) K+ transport by Arabidopsis root hairs at low pH. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28 635–641.

Babourina OK, Knowles A, Newman IA. (1998) Chloride influx by oat coleoptile parenchyma described by combined influx and efflux transport systems. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25 929–936.

Bligny R, Gout E, Kaiser W, Heber U, Walker D, Douce R. (1997) pH regulation in acid-stressed leaves of pea plants grown in the presence of nitrate or ammonium salts, studies involving 31P-NMR spectroscopy and chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1320 142–152.[CrossRef]

Britto DT and Kronzucker HJ. (2001) Can unidirectional influx be measured in higher plants? A mathematical approach using parameters from efflux analysis. New Phytologist 150 37–47.[CrossRef]

Britto DT and Kronzucker HJ. (2002) NHFormula toxicity in higher plants, a critical review. Journal of Plant Physiology 159 567–584.[CrossRef][ISI]

Britto DT and Kronzucker HJ. (2003) Trans-stimulation of 13NHFormula efflux provides evidence for the cytosolic origin of tracer in the compartmental analysis of barley roots. Functional Plant Biology 30 1233–1238.[CrossRef]

Britto DT, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Kronzucker HJ. (2001) Futile transmembrane NHFormula cycling: a cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98 4255–4258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garnett TP, Shabala SN, Smethurst PJ, Newman IA. (2003) Kinetics of ammonium and nitrate influx by eucalypt roots and associated proton fluxes measured using ion selective microelectrodes. Functional Plant Biology 30 1165–1176.[CrossRef]

Gerendas J, Zhu Z, Bendixen R, Ratcliffe RG, Sattelmacher B. (1997) Physiological and biochemical processes related to ammonium toxicity in higher plants. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde 160 239–251.

Goyal SS, Huffaker RC, Lorenz OA. (1982) Inhibitory effects of ammoniacal nitrogen on growth of radish plants. 2. Investigation on the possible causes of ammonium toxicity to radish plants and its reversal by nitrate. Journal of The American Society for Horticultural Science 107 130–135.

Howitt SM and Udvardi MK. (2000) Structure, function and regulation of ammonium transporters in plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1465 152–170.[Medline]

Ikeda H and Osawa T. (1981) Nitrate- and ammonium-N absorption by vegetables from nutrient solution containing ammonium nitrate and the resultant change of solution pH. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 50 225–230.

Imsande J. (1986) Nitrate ammonium ratio required for pH homeostasis in hydroponically grown soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany 37 341–347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kronzucker HJ, Britto DT, Davenport RJ, Tester M. (2001) Ammonium toxicity and the real cost of transport. Trends in Plant Science 6 335–337.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Kronzucker HJ, Kirk GJD, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM. (1998) Effects of hypoxia on 13NHFormula fluxes in rice roots. Kinetic and compartmental analysis. Plant Physiology 116 581–587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM. (1996) Kinetics of NHFormula influx in spruce. Plant Physiology 110 773–779.[Abstract]

Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Kirk JD. (1999) Nitrate–ammonium synergism in rice. A subcellular flux analysis. Plant Physiology 119 1041–1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Loque D and von Wiren N. (2004) Regulatory levels for the transport of ammonium in plant root. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 1293–1305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ludewig U, von Wiren N, Frommer WB. (2002) Uniport of NHFormula by root hair plasma membrane ammonium transporter LeAMT1;1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 13548–13555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Newman IA. (2001) Ion transport in roots, measurement of fluxes using ion-selective microelectrodes to characterize transporter function. Plant, Cell and Environment 24 1–14.[Medline]

Plieth C, Sattelmacher B, Knight MR. (2000) Ammonium influx and cellular alkalisation in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana: the involvement of cytoplasmic calcium. Physiologia Plantarum 110 518–523.

Rawat SR, Silim SN, Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM. (1999) AtAMT1 gene expression and NHFormula influx in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana, evidence for regulation by root glutamine levels. The Plant Journal 19 143–152.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Redinbaugh MG and Campbell WH. (1993) Glutamine-synthetase and ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase expression in the maize (Zea mays) root primary response to nitrate. Evidence for an organ-specific response. Plant Physiology 101 1249–1255.[Abstract]

Walch-Liu P, Neumann G, Engels C. (2001) Response of shoot and root growth to supply of different nitrogen form is not related to carbohydrate and nitrogen status of tobacco plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 164 97–103.[CrossRef]

Wang MY, Siddiqi MY, Ruth TJ, Glass ADM. (1993a) Ammonium influx by rice roots. II. Kinetics of 13NHFormula influx across the plasmalemma. Plant Physiology 103 1259–1267.[Abstract]

Wang MY, Glass ADM, Shaff JE, Kochian LV. (1993b) Ammonium influx by rice roots. III. Electrophysiology. Plant Physiology 104 899–906.

Zhang X-K and Rengel Z. (1999) Gradients of pH and ammonium and phosphorus concentration between the banded fertilizer and wheat roots. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50 365–373.[CrossRef]

Zhang X-K and Rengel Z. (2000) Role of soil pH, Ca supply and banded P fertilisers in modulating ammonia toxicity to wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51 691–699.[CrossRef]

Zhang X-K and Rengel Z. (2003) Soil solution composition in association with the toxicity of banded di-ammonium phosphate to wheat and amelioration by CaCO3. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54 183–191.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/3/651    most recent
erl238v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babourina, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babourina, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Babourina, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?