JXB Advance Access published online on March 1, 2007
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erm032
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER |
Involvement of polyamines in the drought resistance of rice
1Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
2Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jzhang{at}hkbu.edu.hk
Received 19 December 2006; Accepted 31 January 2007
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This study investigated whether and how polyamines (PAs) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants are involved in drought resistance. Six rice cultivars differing in drought resistance were used and subjected to well-watered and water-stressed treatments during their reproductive period. The activities of arginine decarboxylase, S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase, and spermidine (Spd) synthase in the leaves were significantly enhanced by water stress, in good agreement with the increase in putrescine (Put), Spd, and spermine (Spm) contents there. The increased contents of free Spd, free Spm, and insoluble-conjugated Put under water stress were significantly correlated with the yield maintenance ratio (the ratio of grain yield under water-stressed conditions to grain yield under well-watered conditions) of the cultivars. Free Put at an early stage of water stress positively, whereas at a later stage negatively, correlated with the yield maintenance ratio. No significant differences were observed in soluble-conjugated PAs and insoluble-conjugated Spd and Spm among the cultivars. Free PAs showed significant accumulation when leaf water potentials reached –0.51 MPa to –0.62 MPa for the drought-resistant cultivars and –0.70 MPa to –0.84 MPa for the drought-susceptible ones. The results suggest that rice has a large capacity to enhance PA biosynthesis in leaves in response to water stress. The role of PAs in plant defence to water stress varies with PA forms and stress stages. In adapting to drought it would be good for rice to have the physiological traits of higher levels of free Spd/free Spm and insoluble-conjugated Put, as well as early accumulation of free PAs, under water stress.
Key words: Arginine decarboxylase (ADC), drought resistance, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), polyamines, rice, S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase (SAMDC), spermidine synthase, water stress
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Polyamines (PAs), spermidine (Spd), spermine (Spm), and their diamine obligate precursor putrescine (Put), have been frequently described as endogenous plant growth regulators or intracellular messengers mediating physiological responses (Galston, 1983; Davies, 2004). In higher plants, Put can be directly synthesized from ornithine via ornithine decarboxylase (ODC; EC 4.1.1.17 [EC] ) or indirectly from arginine via arginine decarboxylase (ADC; EC 4.1.1.19 [EC] ) (Gemperlová et al., 2006). Spd and Spm are synthesized via Spd synthase (EC 2.5.1.16 [EC] ) and Spm synthase (EC 2.5.1.22 [EC] ), respectively, by sequential addition of aminopropyl groups to Put. This aminopropyl group is provided by decarboxylated S-adenosyl-L-methionine, which is a product of S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase (SAMDC; EC 4.1.1.50 [EC] ) (Maiale et al., 2004). Because of their polycationic nature at physiologically relevant ionic and pH conditions, PAs occur in cells not only in the free form but also in the soluble-conjugated and insoluble-conjugated forms (Martin-Tanguy, 2001; Gemperlová et al., 2006). Soluble-conjugated PAs are mostly linked to hydroxycinnamic acid monomers, and insoluble-conjugated PAs to hydroxycinnamic acid dimers and trimers, and to macromolecules such as proteins (Kasukabe et al., 2004).
PAs are implicated in many physiological processes such as cell division, morphogenesis, secondary metabolism, senescence, and apoptosis (Bouchereau et al., 1999; Davies, 2004; Kuehn and Phillips, 2005). In recent years, attention has been focused on the role of PAs in plant defence against abiotic and biotic stresses (Galston, 2001; Ma et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2006). A general phenomenon observed is that PAs can alter their titres in response to various types of environmental stresses such as low and high temperatures (Song et al., 2002; Hummel et al., 2004; Imai et al., 2004), salinity (Maiale et al., 2004; Roy et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2006), and water stress (Capell et al., 2004; Kasukabe et al., 2004; Ma et al., 2005). As compared with stress-intolerant plants, stress-tolerant plants generally have a large capacity to enhance PA biosynthesis in responses to stress, resulting in a 2- to 3-fold increase of endogenous PA levels over those in unstressed plants (Kasukabe et al., 2004). Treatment with a PA biosynthetic enzyme inhibitor reduces stress tolerance but the concomitant treatment with exogenous PAs restores it (Lee et al., 1997; He et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2004). However, there is a report that Put and Spd levels decrease, rather than increase, in salt-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants, and Spm accumulation induced by treatment with cyclohexylamine shows no reduction in leaf injury associated with the stress (Maiale et al., 2004). Increases in Spd and Spm in wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants under water stress are observed to be associated with a reduction in drought tolerance (Zhang et al., 1996). So far, the physiological role of PAs in tolerance to environmental stress remains uncertain (Bais and Ravishankar, 2002; Capell et al., 2004; Ma et al., 2005).
Drought is the major abiotic stress factor limiting crop productivity worldwide (Saini and Westgate; 2000; Sharp et al., 2004). Rice as a paddy field crop is particularly susceptible to soil water deficit (Inthapan and Fukai, 1988; Cabuslay et al., 2002). Water stress during reproductive development can reduce grain yield by 35–75% in different cultivars of rice, which display wide genotypic differences in susceptibility to water stress during this period (Garrity and O'Toole, 1994; Sheoran and Saini, 1996). Development and adoption of drought-resistant rice cultivars is believed to be important in coping with drought in the future (Fukai and Cooper, 1995; Cabuslay et al., 2002; Condon et al., 2004). In spite of numerous reports on phonological, morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular adaptive mechanisms, drought tolerance remains poorly understood, and the development of drought-resistant rice cultivars is relatively slow (Fukai and Cooper, 1995; Cabuslay et al., 2002; Condon et al., 2004). Recently, it was suggested that enhancement in crop drought resistance would be achieved through the manipulation of PA metabolism (Capell et al., 2004). However, little is known about how PAs perform when rice is subjected to long-term drought stress during the reproductive period and whether such performances are correlated with drought resistance.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in contents of free PAs, soluble-conjugated PAs, and insoluble-conjugated PAs, and the activities of enzymes involved in PA biosynthesis in rice plants subjected to water stress during the reproductive period by using six cultivars differing in drought resistance, and to determine whether and how PAs are involved in drought resistance.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Plant materials and growth conditions
The experiment was conducted on a farm at Yangzhou University, Jiangsu Province, China (32°30'N, 119°25'E) during the rice growing season (May–October). Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars, Han-501, Shanyou 63, Yangdao 4, Han-A03, Yanjing 2, and Wuyujing 7 were used. The first three are indica and last three are japonica. All the cultivars have a similar growth period ranging from 148 to 152 d from sowing to grain maturity but differ in drought resistance as shown in Table 1. The seeds were sown in a paddy field on 11–12 May. Seedlings (30 d old) were then transplanted to porcelain pots. Each porcelain pot (30 cm in height and 25 cm in diameter, 14.72 l in volume) was filled with 20 kg of sandy loam soil [Typic fluvaquents, Entisols (US taxonomy)] that contained organic matter at 2.45% and available N, P, and K at 112, 34.86, and 66.9 mg kg–1, respectively. Each pot was planted with six seedlings. On the day of transplanting (10–11 June), 1 g of N as urea, 0.3 g of P as single superphosphate, and 0.5 g of K as KCl were mixed into the soil in each pot. N as urea was also applied at mid-tillering (0.5 g per pot) and panicle initiation (0.8 g per pot) stages. All the cultivars headed on 23–25 August (50% of plants), flowered on 25–27 August, and were harvested on 10–12 October. The water level in the pot was kept at 1–2 cm until elongation of the flag leaf was complete when water stress treatments were initiated. The total precipitation during the growing season was 501.3 mm, 74.5% of which was in June and July. The mean solar radiation was 17.4 MJ m–2 d–1.
|
|
Water-stress treatments |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Experiment 1
The experiment was a 6x2 (six cultivars and two levels of soil moisture) factorial design with 12 treatments. Each treatment had 30 pots, of which 20 were used for destructive sampling during the experiment and 10 for the final harvest. From the complete elongation of the flag leaf (7–8 d before anthesis) till grain maturity, two levels of soil water potential (
soil) were imposed by controlling water application. For the well-watered (WW) treatment the pot was flooded to a depth of 1–2 cm (soil=0 MPa) by manually applying tap water; for the water-stressed (WS) treatment soil was maintained at –0.05 MPa. The soil in the WS treatment was monitored with tension meters (Soil Science Research Institute, Nanjing, China) buried at a depth of 15–20 cm in the soil. Tension meter readings were recorded every 4 h from 0600 h to 1800 h. When the readings dropped to the desired value, 0.2 l of tap water per pot was added to the WS treatment. The pots were placed in a field and sheltered from rain by a removable polyethylene shelter during rain.
Experiment 2
All plants of the six cultivars were pot-grown as described above. Each cultivar had 40 pots. From the complete elongation of the flag leaf, half the plants were either well watered (soil=0 MPa) by manually applying tap water or water stressed by withholding water. The water-stressed plants were not watered until the flag leaf was seriously wilted [leaf water potential was –1.8 MPa to –1.9 MPa, 8–9 d after withholding water (DAWW)].
Sampling and leaf water potential measurement
In experiment 1, 20 flag leaves on main stems from each treatment were sampled at 8-d intervals from the beginning of withholding water to 32 DAWW. Half the sampled leaves was frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently stored at –70 °C pending PA extraction and quantification. The other half of the sampled leaves was frozen in liquid nitrogen pending measurement of enzymatic activities. Plants in 10 pots of each treatment were harvested at maturity to determine grain yield.
In experiment 2, 10 flag leaves on main stems from each treatment were sampled daily from 1000 h to 1100 h and from 1400 h to 1500 h from the beginning of withholding water to when the flag leaf was seriously wilted. Half the sampled leaves were used for measuring PAs and the other half for measuring leaf water potential (leaf). A pressure chamber (model 3000, Soil Moisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was used for leaf measurement.
Extraction and quantification of PAs
Free PA fractions were estimated following the method of Flores and Galston (1982), while the soluble-conjugated and insoluble-conjugated fractions were analysed following the method described by Liu et al. (2004) with modifications. Briefly, the sampled leaves (1.5 g) were homogenized with a pre-chilled mortar and pestle in 8 ml of 5% (v/v) perchloric acid. The homogenates were incubated at 5 °C for 1 h and then centrifuged at 25 000 g for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant and pellet were collected separately. To extract soluble-conjugated PAs, aliquots (2 ml) of the supernatant were mixed with 2 ml of 12 N HCl and heated at 110 °C for 18 h in flame-sealed glass ampoules. After acid hydrolysis, HCl was evaporated from the tubes by further heating at 80 °C and the residues were resuspended in 0.5 ml of 5% (v/v) perchloric acid. To extract insoluble-conjugated PAs, the pellet was rinsed four times with 5% perchloric acid to remove any trace of soluble PA and then dissolved by vigorous vortexing in 2 ml of 1 N NaOH. The mixture was centrifuged at 25 000 g for 20 min and the supernatant was hydrolysed under the same conditions mentioned above.
PAs in the non-hydrolysed supernatant, hydrolysed supernatant, and hydrolysed pellet were derived with benzoyl chloride and were quantified by HPLC (Waters 2695 Sparations Module; Waters, USA) as described by DiTomaso et al. (1989). Ten microlitres of samples redissolved in methanol (60%, v/v) were injected in to a fixed 20 µl loop for loading onto a 4.6 mmx250 mm, 5 µm particle size reverse-phase (C18) column (Waters). Samples were eluted from the column by a Perkin-Elmer Series 410 pump at 25 °C with a flow rate of 0.6 ml min–1. PA peaks were detected by a Perkin-Elmer LC-95 with absorbance at 254 nm. Soluble-conjugated PA contents were calculated by subtracting the free PAs in the non-hydrolysed supernatant from the PAs in the hydrolysed supernatant. 1,6-Hexanediamine was used as an internal standard. The PA levels were the average of four replicates and expressed as nmol g–1 fresh weight.
Determination of polyamine biosynthetic enzyme activity
Sampled leaves (about 0.8 g fresh weight) were ground to a fine powder and homogenized with 3 ml of extraction buffer (pH 8.0) containing 25 mM potassium phosphate, 50 µM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 100 µM phenylmethylsulfonyfluoride, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 25 mM ascorbic acid. After centrifugation at 25 000 g at 4 °C for 20 min, the supernatant was dialysed overnight against the extraction buffer. The activities of ADC, ODC, and SAMDC were determined by measuring CO2 evolution as described by Lee et al. (1997). Spd synthase activity was assayed according to Kasukabe et al. (2004). An aliquot of the supernatant was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in a reaction mixture consisting of 0.1 M TRIS-HCl (pH 8.0), 30 µM Put, 25 µM decarboxylated S-adenosyl-L-methionine, and 20 µM adenine. The reaction product (5'-deoxy-5'-methyl-thioadenosine) was quantified via HPLC (Waters 2695 Sparations Module) equipped with a fluorescence detector (Waters 2475 Multi 
, USA) and a reverse phase (C18) column (Waters). 1,7-Heptanediamine was used as the internal standard. Proteins in the extract were quantified as described by Bradford (1976).
Statistical analysis
The results were analysed for variance using the SAS/STAT statistical analysis package (version 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data from each sampling date were analysed separately. Means were tested by least significant difference at the P=0.05 level (LSD0.05). Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between PA contents in the flag leaf and drought resistance of the rice cultivars.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Grain yield and drought resistance
The grain yield of all the cultivars was significantly reduced when the plants were subjected to long-term water stress (Table 1). The reduction was mainly attributed to the decrease in grain set and filling-grain percentage (data not shown). However, the effect of water stress on grain yield varied greatly with cultivars when they were compared with their respective controls (WW plants). Among the six cultivars, the two drought-resistant cultivars, Han-501 and Han-A03, were the least affected and therefore showed the highest YMR [(WS grain yield)/(WW grain yield) higher than 0.8], whereas both drought-susceptible cultivars, Yanjing 2 and Wuyujing 7, were the most affected and exhibited the lowest YMR (lower than 0.5), and the two cultivars with medium resistance to drought, Shanyou 63 and Yangdao 4, were intermediate and their YMR was higher than 0.6 (Table 1).
Changes in enzymatic activities
Figure 1 illustrates the changes in activities of ADC, ODC, SAMDC, and Spd synthase in the flag leaf during the water-stress treatment. When plants were well watered, activities of all the enzymes decreased gradually with the ageing of the leaves, and showed no significant differences among the six cultivars (Fig. 1). Water stress significantly enhanced the activities of SAMDC and Spd synthase. The enhancement was greatest for drought-resistant cultivars, lowest for drought-susceptible ones, and intermediate for cultivars with medium resistance to drought (Fig. 1m–x). ADC activity was also enhanced by water stress (Fig. 1a–f). It was enhanced much more in drought-resistant cultivars than in drought-susceptible ones during the first 16 DAWW, whereas the latter showed higher ADC activity than the former at 24 DAWW and 32 DAWW. ODC activity in the flag leaves was much lower when compared with any of the other three enzymes. There were no significant differences in the enzyme activity between WW and WS plants (Fig. 1g–l).
|
Changes in polyamine contents
Very similar to the changes in activities of the enzymes, contents of free PAs (free Put, free Spd, and free Spm) slowly decreased with the ageing of the flag leaves and showed no significant differences among the cultivars when plants were well watered (Fig. 2). The content of free PAs in WS leaves increased and exhibited one peak for each cultivar. The peak values and time of appearance varied greatly with cultivar. At an early water stress stage (8 DAWW), drought-resistant cultivars showed the highest peak of free Put accumulation, drought-susceptible ones had the smallest peak, and the cultivars with medium resistance to drought were intermediate. However, drought-susceptible cultivars exhibited the highest peak of free Put at a later water stress stage (24–32 DAWW) (Fig. 2a–f). During the whole period of withholding water, drought-resistant cultivars had more free Spd and free Spm in the leaves than drought-susceptible ones (Fig. 2g–r). Changes in free PAs were consistent with those in activities of ADC, SAMDC, and Spd synthase under water stress (Fig. 1).
|
Changes in soluble-conjugated PA contents in the flag leaf were similar to those in free PAs (Fig. 3). The WS treatment significantly increased soluble-conjugated PA levels. However, there were no significant differences among the cultivars in either Put, Spd, or Spm in the soluble-conjugated form when
soil was the same (Fig. 3), indicating that soluble-conjugated PAs in rice plants may play a minor role defending against drought.
|
The WS treatment significantly enhanced insoluble-conjugated PA levels in the flag leaf (Fig. 4). Drought-resistant cultivars accumulated more insoluble-conjugated Put than drought-susceptible cultivars (Fig. 4a–f), but the differences in either insoluble-conjugated Spd or insoluble-conjugated Spm were insignificant among the cultivars when
soil was the same (Fig. 4g–r).
|
Regression analysis demonstrated that the relative content [(PAs under WS)/(PAs under WW)] of free Put at 8 DAWW and free Spd, free Spm, and insoluble-conjugated Put during the whole period of withholding water were significantly or very significantly correlated with the YMR of cultivars (r=0.84* to 0.99**, P <0.05 and 0.01, respectively). A negative correlation was observed between the YMR and the relative content of free Put at 24 DAWW and 32 DAWW (r= –0.85* to –0.96**, P <0.05 and 0.01, respectively). The correlation coefficients of the YMR with soluble-conjugated PAs (Put, Spd, and Spm) and higher insoluble-conjugated PAs (Spd and Spm) were insignificant (Table 2).
|
As shown in Figs 2–4
, the leaf contained 1- to 2-fold more free PAs than insoluble-conjugated PAs or soluble-conjugated PAs when the comparison was made within the same cultivar and within the same soil moisture treatment, indicating that most PAs in rice leaves are in the free form.
Leaf water potentials for free PA accumulation
In experiment 2, the leaf thresholds for significant accumulation of free PAs were measured to determine further the relationship between PAs in response to water stress and drought resistance. As shown in Fig. 5, the leaf thresholds were very different among the cultivars. The thresholds for the accumulation of free Put, free Spd, and free Spm were –0.51 to 0.53, –0.59 to –0.61, and –0.60 to –0.62 MPa, respectively, for the drought-resistant cultivars, and –0.70 to –0.72, –0.79 to –0.81, and –0.81 to –0.84 MPa, respectively, for drought-susceptible cultivars. The cultivars with medium resistance to drought had thresholds between the above two types of cultivars (Fig. 5), indicating that drought-resistant cultivars accumulate free PAs earlier than drought-susceptible ones under water stress.
|
Figure 5 also shows that drought-resistant cultivars had a greater ratio of free Put to free Spd or to free Spm (Put/Spd and Put/Spm) than drought-susceptible ones when
leaf was greater than –1.0 MPa, whereas the result was reversed when the leaf was less than that value (Fig. 5). These results were very similar to those obtained from experiment 1 although the treatment conditions were different between the experiments. |
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The results of the present study showed that rice has a large capacity to enhance PA biosynthesis in leaves in response to water stress during the reproductive period. The increase in Put or Spd/Spm titres, especially in the free form, was in agreement with the enhancement in activities of ADC or SAMDC and Spd synthase in the stressed leaves, whereas the ODC activity remained essentially unchanged (Fig. 1). These results suggest that Put synthesis is primarily the result of increased ADC activity, rather than ODC activity, in the water-stressed rice plant. The rise of ADC activity in concert with the enhanced activity of SAMDC and Spd synthase may have contributed to the significant increase in the free and conjugated Spd and Spm contents under water stress.
It was observed that the increase in PA biosynthesis was closely associated with drought resistance in rice (Table 1; Figs 1, 2, 4, and 5). Drought-resistant cultivars had higher SAMDC and Spd synthase activities and accumulated more free Spd and free Spm in the leaves than drought-susceptible ones under water stress (Figs 1, 2, and 5). The relative contents of free Spd and free Spm [(contents under the WS)/(contents under the WW)] were significantly correlated with the YMR of the cultivars (Table 2), implying that both free Spd and free Spm are involved in rice tolerance to drought.
The mechanism by which free Spd and free Spm enhance plant drought tolerance is not clear. It is generally believed that higher PAs (Spd and Spm) can bind strongly to the negative charges in cellular components such as nucleic acids, proteins, and phospholipids, and thereby stabilize the membranes under stress conditions (Smith, 1985; Szegletes et al., 2000; Kasukabe et al., 2004; Ma et al., 2005). PAs have been observed to be correlated with activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase, and to act as free-radical scavengers and control many aspects of RNA and protein turnover (Tiburcio et al., 1993; Bouchereau et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004). Recently it was observed that overexpression of Spd synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (Kasukabe et al., 2004). Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance of drought stress (Capell et al., 2004). Thus it is conceivable that the reactive oxygen species-scavenging, membrane-protecting, and gene expression-promoting properties of Spd and Spm account, at least in part, for water stress tolerance in rice.
Although the phenomenon that Put accumulates in plants under abiotic stress has been observed for more than 50 years, the physiological role of Put in abiotic stress responses remains a matter of controversy (Bouchereau et al., 1999; Chen and Zhang, 2000; Capell et al., 2004; Kuehn and Phillips, 2005). The results presented here demonstrate that the changes in ADC activity and Put levels under drought stress and their relationship with drought resistance of rice cultivars varied greatly with the duration or severity of the stress (Figs 1, 2, and 5). At an early stage in water stress or under a situation of moderate stress (leaf >1.0 MPa), the drought-resistant cultivars accumulated more free Put in leaves than the drought-susceptible ones, whereas the latter showed a higher peak value than the former when plants were subjected to long-term drought stress or to serious stress (leaf <1.0 MPa). The YMR of the cultivars was significantly correlated with free Put content at an early stage of water stress (8 DAWW) but negatively correlated with free Put contents at a later stage (24 DAWW and 32 DAWW) (Table 2). The results suggest that, under drought conditions, drought-resistant rice cultivars are able to accumulate free Put earlier in the leaves, with faster declines and smaller peak values.
Little is known about how the temporal profile of early accumulation, a fast decline, and a smaller peak of free Put in rice leaves performs the compatibility activity during drought stress. Capell et al. (2004) observed, by using transgenic rice plants expressing the Datura stramonium adc gene, that transgenic plants produced much higher levels of Put (free form) under stress, promoting Spd and Spm synthesis and, ultimately, protecting the plants from drought. In contrast, an increase in Put in wild-type plants in response to the onset of drought was insufficient to trigger the conversion of Put to Spd and Spm. Their results suggest that a high level of Put at an early stage of drought is necessary for plants to adapt to stress by triggering the conversion of Put to the higher PAs. On the other hand, mass accumulation of Put, which extends beyond its involvement as a single precursor for the higher PAs along the pathway, can be toxic to plants by catalysing the formation of oxidation products (DiTomaso et al., 1989; Watson and Malmberg, 1996; Richard and Alexandra, 1997).
It was observed that the drought resistance of rice cultivars was not only associated with PA (Put, Spd, and Spm) levels, but was also associated with the response time at which PAs are significantly elevated under water stress (Fig. 5). The drought-resistant cultivars had a higher leaf threshold for obvious free PA accumulation than the drought-susceptible ones, suggesting that drought-resistant cultivars have the ability to respond early to water stress through increases in PA levels. It is proposed that an early response to stress signals would help plants to adapt to stress and prevent them from being seriously damaged (Nilsen and Orcutt, 1996; Chen and Zhang, 2000). It can therefore be speculated that early accumulation of PAs or a higher leaf threshold of PA elevation may be useful physiological traits of rice in adaptation to water stress.
The results presented in Fig. 4 also showed that water stress obviously induced the increases of three insoluble-conjugated PAs in the flag leaf. However, only the insoluble-conjugated Put levels in WS leaves exhibited significant differences among the cultivars and significantly correlated with the YMR (Table 2), suggesting that insoluble-conjugated Put, but neither insoluble-conjugated Spd nor insoluble-conjugated Spm, would be involved in drought tolerance. An explanation for the mechanism by which insoluble-conjugated Put plays a role in drought resistance may be that the conversion of free Put to insoluble-conjugated Put could alleviate the wounding effect of free Put on membranes of plant cells (DiTomaso et al., 1989) and stabilize the configuration and function of proteins by preventing the proteins from denaturing under stress (Serafini-Fracassini, 1995).
In conclusion, the present results demonstrate that increased PA levels are closely associated with the enhanced activities of ADC, SAMDC, and Spd synthase in water-stressed rice leaves. Contents of free Spd and free Spm in the leaves are correlated with the drought resistance of the cultivars. A high level of free Put at an early stress stage and insoluble-conjugated Put during the whole stress period helps the plant to adapt to stress. Both soluble-conjugated PAs (Put, Spd, and Spm) and higher insoluble-conjugated PAs (Spd and Spm) play a minor role in the defence against drought. Higher levels of free Spd/free Spm and insoluble-conjugated Put and early accumulation of PAs under water stress are useful physiological traits of rice in adaptation to drought.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
We are grateful for grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 30671225), the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (HKBU 2149/04M, HKBU 2165/05M), and the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (AOE/B-07/99).
|
Abbreviations |
|---|
ADC, arginine decarboxylase; DAWW, days after withholding water; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase;
leaf, leaf water potential; soil, soil water potential; PA, polyamine; Put, putrescine; SAMDC, S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase; Spd, spermidine; Spm, spermine; WS, water-stressed; WW, well-watered; YMR, yield maintenance ratio. |
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsWater-stress treatmentsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Bais HP and Ravishankar GA. (2002) Role of polyamines in the ontogeny of plants and their biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 69 1–34.
Bouchereau A, Aziz A, Larther F, Martin-Tanguy J. (1999) Polyamines and environmental challenges: recent development. Plant Science 140 103–125.
Bradford MM. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microquantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72 248–254.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cabuslay GS, Ito O, Alejar AA. (2002) Physiological evaluation of responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to water deficit. Plant Science 163 815–827.
Capell T, Bassie L, Christou P. (2004) Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance to drought stress. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA 101 9909–9914.
Chen KM and Zhang CL. (2000) Polyamine contents in the spring wheat leaves and their relations to drought-resistance. Acta Phytophysiologia Sinica 26 381–386.
Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD. (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 2447–2460.
Davies PJ. (2004) The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence and function. In Davies PJ (Ed.). Plant hormones, biosynthesis, signal transduction, action!Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers pp. 1–15.
DiTomaso JM, Shaff JE, Kochian LV. (1989) Putrescine-induced wounding and its effects on membrane integrity and ion transport processes in roots of intact corn seedlings. Plant Physiology 90 988–995.
Flores HE and Galston AW. (1982) Analysis of polyamines in higher plants by high performance liquid chromatography. Plant Physiology 69 701–706.
Fukai S and Cooper M. (1995) Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physio-morphological traits in rice. Field Crops Research 40 67–86.
Galston AW. (1983) Polyamines as modulators of plant development. Bioscience 33 382–388.
Galston AW. (2001) Plant biology: retrospect and prospect. Current Science 80 143–152.
Garrity DP and O'Toole JC. (1994) Screening rice for drought resistance at the reproductive phase. Field Crops Research 39 99–110.
Gemperlová L, Nováková M, Va
ková R, Eder J, Cvikrová M. (2006) Diurnal changes in polyamine content, arginine and ornithine decarboxylase, and diamine oxidase in tobacco leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 57 1413–1421.
He L, Nada K, Kasukabe Y, Tachibana S. (2002) Enhanced susceptibility of photosynthesis to low-temperature photoinhibition due to interruption of chilling-induced increase of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity in leaves of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Plant and Cell Physiology 43 196–206.
Hummel I, Amrani AE, Gouesbet G, Hennion F, Couée I. (2004) Involvement of polyamines in the interacting effects of low temperature and mineral supply on Pringlea antiscorbutica (Kerguelen cabbage) seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 1125–1134.
Imai R, Ali A, Pramanik MHR, Nakaminami K, Sentoku N, Kato H. (2004) A distinctive class of spermidine synthase is involved in chilling response in rice. Journal of Plant Physiology 161 883–886.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Inthapan P and Fukai S. (1988) Growth and yield of rice cultivars under sprinkler irrigation in south-eastern Queensland. 2. Comparison with maize and grain sorghum under wet and dry conditions. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28 243–248.
Kasukabe Y, he L, Nada K, Misawa S, Ihara I, Tachibana S. (2004) Overexpression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stress and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology 45 712–722.
Kuehn GD and Phillips GC. (2005) Roles of polyamines in apoptosis and other recent advances in plant polyamines. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24 123–130.
Lee TM, Lur HS, Chu C. (1997) Role of abscisic acid in chilling tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. 2. Modulation of free polyamine levels. Plant Science 126 1–10.
Liu HP, Dong BH, Zhang YY, Liu ZP, Liu YL. (2004) Relationship between osmotic stress and the levels of free, soluble-conjugated and insoluble-conjugated polyamines in leaves of wheat seedlings. Plant Science 166 1261–1267.
Liu JH, Nada K, Honda C, Kitashiba H, Wen XP, Pang XM, Moriguchi T. (2006) Polyamine biosynthesis of apple callus under salt stress: importance of arginine decarboxylase pathway in stress response. Journal of Experimental Botany 57 2589–2599.
Ma R, Zhang M, Li B, Du G, Wang J, Chen J. (2005) The effects of endogenous Ca2+ on endogenous polyamine levels and drought-resistant traits of spring wheat grown under arid conditions. Journal of Arid Environments 63 177–190.
Maiale S, Sánchez DH, Guirda A, Vidal A, Ruiz O. (2004) Spermine accumulation under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 161 35–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Martin-Tanguy J. (2001) Metabolism and function of polyamines in plants: recent development (new approaches). Plant Growth Regulation 100 675–688.
Nilsen ET and Orcutt DM. (1996) Phytohormone and plant response to stress. In Nilsen ET and Orcutt DM (Eds.). The physiology of plants under stress-abiotic factorsNew York, NY John Wiley & Sons pp. 83–198.
Richard W and Alexandra C. (1997) Polyamine: small molecules triggering pathways in plant growth and development. Plant Physiology 113 241–248.
Roy P, Niyogi K, SenGupta DN, Ghosh B. (2005) Spermidine treatment to rice seedlings recovers salinity stress-induced damage of plasma membrane and PM-bound-H+-ATPase in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice cultivars. Plant Science 168 583–591.
Saini HS and Westgate ME. (2000) Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advances in Agronomy 68 59–96.
Serafini-Fracassini D. (1995) Plant transglutaminase. Phytochemistry 40 355–365.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, Nguyen HT. (2004) Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 2343–2351.
Sheoran IS and Saini HS. (1996) Drought-induced male sterility in rice: changes in carbohydrate levels and enzyme activities associated with the inhibition of starch accumulation in pollen. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9 161–169.
Smith TA. (1985) Polyamines. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 36 117–143.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Song J, Nada K, Tachibana S. (2002) Suppression of s-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activities is a major cause for high-temperature inhibition of pollen germination and tube growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant & Cell Physiology 43 619–627.
Szegletes ZS, Erdei L, Tari I, Cseuz L. (2000) Accumulation of osmoprotectants in wheat cultivars of different drought tolerance. Cereal Research Communications 28 403–410.
Tiburcio AF, Campos JL, Figueras X, Besford RT. (1993) Recent advances in understanding of polyamines functions during plant development. Plant Growth Regulation 12 331–340.
Watson MB and Malmberg RL. (1996) Regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh arginine decarboxylase by potassium deficiency stress. Plant Physiology 111 1077–1083.[Abstract]
Zhang MQ, Chen RK, Yu SL. (1996) Changes of polyamine metabolism in drought-stressed sugarcane leaves and their relation to drought resistance. Acta Phytophysiologia Sinica 22 327–332.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Guo, M. Baum, S. Grando, S. Ceccarelli, G. Bai, R. Li, M. von Korff, R. K. Varshney, A. Graner, and J. Valkoun Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2009; 60(12): 3531 - 3544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Kalamaki, D. Alexandrou, D. Lazari, G. Merkouropoulos, V. Fotopoulos, I. Pateraki, A. Aggelis, A. Carrillo-Lopez, M. J. Rubio-Cabetas, and A. K. Kanellis Over-expression of a tomato N-acetyl-L-glutamate synthase gene (SlNAGS1) in Arabidopsis thaliana results in high ornithine levels and increased tolerance in salt and drought stresses J. Exp. Bot., April 8, 2009; (2009) erp072v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||