Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on March 18, 2008

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erm343
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/7/1923    most recent
erm343v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salvucci, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salvucci, M. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Salvucci, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

SPECIAL ISSUE REVIEW PAPER

Association of Rubisco activase with chaperonin-60β: a possible mechanism for protecting photosynthesis during heat stress

Michael E. Salvucci*

USDA-ARS, Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ 85238, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mike.salvucci{at}ars.usda.gov

Received 24 September 2007; Revised 14 November 2007 Accepted 12 December 2007


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous studies have shown that inhibition of photosynthesis by moderate heat stress is a consequence of Rubisco deactivation, caused in part by the thermal instability of Rubisco activase. This involvement of Rubisco activase was confirmed in heat stress and recovery experiments using transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Compared with wild-type plants, photosynthesis, the effective quantum yield of photosystem II, and Rubisco activation were less thermotolerant and recovered more slowly in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with reduced levels of Rubisco activase. Immunoblots showed that 65% of the Rubisco activase was recovered in the insoluble fraction after heat stress in leaf extracts of transgenic but not wild-type plants, evidence that deactivation of Rubisco was a consequence of thermal denaturation of Rubisco activase. The transgenic Arabidopsis plants used in this study contained a modified form of Rubisco activase that facilitated affinity purification of Rubisco activase and proteins that potentially interact with Rubisco activase during heat stress. Sequence analysis and immunoblotting identified the β-subunit of chaperonin-60 (cpn60β), the chloroplast GroEL homologue, as a protein that was bound to Rubisco activase from leaf extracts prepared from heat-stressed, but not control plants. Analysis of the proteins by non-denaturing gel electrophoresis showed that cpn60β was associated with Rubisco activase in a high molecular mass complex. Immunoblot analysis established that the apparent association of cpn60β with Rubisco activase was dynamic, increasing with the duration and intensity of the heat stress and decreasing following recovery. Taken together, these data suggest that cpn60β plays a role in acclimating photosynthesis to heat stress, possibly by protecting Rubisco activase from thermal denaturation.

Key words: Carbon metabolism, heat shock, molecular chaperone, photosynthesis, Rubisco, temperature stress


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Heat stress is a major abiotic factor limiting the growth, development, and distribution of plants (Berry and Björkman, 1980). Over the 17 year period from 1982 to 1998, decreases in agricultural yields were linked to increases in growing season temperatures (Lobel and Asner, 2003), suggesting that the prevalence of heat stress has increased over the last two decades. Among the myriad of physiological processes in plants, photosynthesis is one of the most sensitive to inhibition by elevated temperatures, with inhibition occurring at temperatures only slightly higher than those optimal for growth. While the rate of carboxylation by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) increases with temperature up to at least 50 °C (Salvucci et al., 2001), the solubility of CO2, particularly relative to O2, and the specificity of Rubisco for CO2 decrease. These changes favour oxygenation of RuBP by Rubisco over carboxylation, increasing flux through photorespiration, which, together with increased rates of dark respiration, reduces the potential increase in CO2 fixation at high temperature (Berry and Björkman, 1980; Jordan and Ogren, 1984; Kobza and Edwards, 1987).

In addition to stimulating photorespiratory activity, high temperatures have also been shown to have a direct inhibitory effect on photosynthesis (Kobza and Edwards, 1987). While photosystem II (PSII) has often been regarded as the primary target of heat stress, evidence was presented >20 years ago showing that Rubisco was even more sensitive to inactivation by moderate heat stress (Weis, 1981; Kobza and Edwards, 1987). To be active in vivo, Rubisco requires the continued action of Rubisco activase, an AAA+ protein that converts Rubisco sites from a closed, inactive conformation to an open and potentially active conformation (Andrews et al., 1995; Spreitzer and Salvucci, 2002; Portis, 2003). The closed conformation is stabilized and continually formed by the binding of certain sugar-phosphates that act as inhibitors of the enzyme (Andrews et al., 1995). Conversion from the closed to the open conformation not only frees Rubisco sites of bound inhibitors, but is also required for spontaneous ‘activation’ by carbamylation and Mg2+ binding, prerequisites for productive RuBP binding and subsequent catalysis (Spreitzer and Salvucci, 2002). Thus, by promoting conformational changes that are essential for activity, Rubisco activase regulates the fraction of Rubisco sites that are catalytically competent, i.e. the activation state of Rubisco.

Measurements of the activation state of Rubisco in leaves, determined from the ratio of initial extractable activity to the activity after incubation under conditions that fully carbamylate the enzyme, show that the activation state of Rubisco decreases when net photosynthesis is inhibited by moderate heat stress (Feller et al., 1998; Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2000; Sharkey et al., 2001; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a; Haldimann and Feller, 2004; Kim and Portis, 2005; Yamori et al., 2006). Renewed interest in the mechanistic basis for heat inactivation of Rubisco and its association with inhibition of photosynthesis has occurred recently, spurred by the realization that Rubisco activase is acutely sensitive to inactivation by heat, while processes that inactivate Rubisco, such as catalytic misfire, increase with temperature (Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2000; Salvucci et al., 2001; Portis, 2003; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a). Consistent with this idea is the observation that isolated Rubisco activase exhibits a relatively low temperature optimum of between 22 °C and 35 °C, depending upon the species, with the variation relating to the natural thermal environment of the individual plant species (Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a, b). In an elegant proof-of-concept, Kurek et al. (2007) recently demonstrated that improvements in the thermostability of Rubisco activase using gene shuffling increased photosynthesis, growth rates, and yield in transformed Arabidopsis under moderate heat stress.

Studies with a variety of plant species have shown that Rubisco activase often repartitions from the soluble to the insoluble fraction when heat stress is imposed on leaves, protoplasts, and chloroplasts (Feller et al., 1998; Rokka et al., 2001; Salvucci et al., 2001; Haldiman and Feller, 2004; Yang et al., 2005; Feng et al., 2007). Rokka et al. (2001) suggested that repartitioning of Rubisco activase involves binding of the protein to the thylakoid membrane, specifically the ribosomal fraction, and speculated that this binding could reflect a dual function of Rubisco activase in regulating expression of chloroplast proteins. However, treatment of ‘thylakoid-bound’ Rubisco activase with detergent, salt, and chaotropic agents failed to solubilize the Rubisco activase (Rokka et al., 2001; Salvucci et al., 2001). Also, experiments with isolated Rubisco activase in the absence of membranes showed that Rubisco activase loses structural integrity and precipitates from solution when exposed to temperatures only slightly above the temperature optimum for activity (Salvucci et al., 2001). Together these results indicated that Rubisco activase was not redistributing to the insoluble fraction by tightly associating with the membrane, but rather was simply denaturing and co-precipitating with the heaviest fraction from the thylakoid membrane (i.e. polysomes).

It is well known that photosynthesis acclimates to moderate heat stress in both the short and long term when plants receive either a prior or gradual exposure to elevated temperature (Berry and Björkman, 1980). The extent of acclimation is variable and the range of temperatures to which a particular plant species can acclimate is generally related to the temperature range found in the natural environment of that species (Berry and Björkman, 1980). The involvement of Rubisco activase in the thermal sensitivity of photosynthesis suggests that stabilization of Rubisco activase could represent one mechanism for photosynthetic acclimation to heat stress. In fact, several studies have shown that acclimation of Rubisco activation to moderate heat stress can occur in response to both long- and short-term pre-exposure (Crafts-Brandner and Law, 2000; Hikosaka et al., 2006; Yamori et al., 2006). Since this acclimation can take place rather quickly, protective machinery either must already be in place or is rapidly induced to prevent thermal denaturation of Rubisco activase during a heat shock episode. In the present study, an affinity capture technique was used with transgenic Arabidopsis plants containing a modified form of Rubisco activase to identify a chloroplast component that associates with and possibly protects Rubisco activase during moderate heat stress.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material
Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a tagged version of the Arabidopsis β-isoform (i.e. {Delta}43 plants) were produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the Rubisco activase-deficient rca mutant as described previously (Salvucci et al., 2006). The Arabidopsis cDNA was engineered to include nucleotides that encoded Trp-Ser-His-Pro-Gln-Phe-Glu-Lys, an eight amino acid peptide with binding affinity for the biotin pocket of streptavidin (Skerra and Schmidt, 2000). This Strep- or S-tag was incorporated as a C-terminal extension to the β-form of Rubisco activase via a Ser–Ala linker. Wild-type and transgenic plants were grown in air at 23 °C under an irradiance of 175–250 µmol photons m–2 s–1 with a 10 h light/14 h dark photoperiod (Salvucci et al., 2006). Plants were grown in soil and watered as necessary with the nutrient solution described previously (Crafts-Brandner and Law, 2000), but at half-strength. Heat stress was imposed on intact plants by increasing the temperature of the growth chamber to the temperatures and for the durations indicated in the text. The relative humidity in the growth chamber was maintained at 80–90% during the treatment. Measurements of leaf temperature with a needle thermocouple verified that leaf temperatures were within 1 °C of air temperatures under these conditions. Immediately following each treatment, plant material was frozen in liquid N2 and stored at –80 °C until extraction.

Gas exchange and fluorescence measurements
The gas exchange of attached leaves was measured at air levels of CO2 (internal CO2 ~280 µbar) and 202 mbar O2 with an irradiance of 1000 µmol photons m–2 s–1 on 4–5-week-old plants using a Li-Cor 6400 as described previously (Salvucci et al., 2006). Control plants were measured after at least 1 h at 23 °C. Leaf temperatures were measured using a thermocouple placed directly on the undersurface of the leaf. Heat stress was imposed by increasing the temperature of the growth chamber and the leaf cuvette rapidly from 23 °C to 37.5 °C over a 5–10 min period. After 30 min at 37.5 °C, the temperature was decreased to 23 °C for 1 h. Gas exchange was measured continuously, before, during, and after the 30 min of heat stress. In parallel experiments, chlorophyll fluorescence was measured at 250 µmol photons m–2 s–1 as described previously (Salvucci et al., 2006). The results of the gas exchange and fluorescence measurements are the means ±SEM of individual measurements of 4–8 separate plants.

Rubisco activation
Rubisco activation was determined at 25 °C as described previously (Salvucci et al., 2006). Leaf discs (0.5 cm2) were excised in the light from intact plants during a time-course of heat stress and recovery as described above, and immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at –80 °C. Duplicate assays were conducted on each sample, each sample consisting of a disc from a separate plant. The results presented are the means ±SEM of 3–5 samples.

Rubisco activase protein determination
The relative amounts of Rubisco activase protein in the soluble and insoluble fractions from leaf extracts of transgenic and wild-type Arabidopsis plants were determined by image analysis of immunoblots. Serial dilutions of extracts prepared from discs sampled under control conditions were used as standards. Leaf discs (0.5 cm2) were sampled as described above and the frozen discs were extracted in the same buffer used for Rubisco assays, but supplemented with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100. Extracts were centrifuged for 10 min at 10 000 g to separate soluble and insoluble proteins. Insoluble (i.e. pellet) material was suspended in the same volume of buffer used for extraction and the solution was supplemented with SDS and dithiothreitol to solubilize the proteins. Polypeptides in both the soluble and insoluble fractions were separated and analysed by SDS–PAGE and immunoblotting (Salvucci et al., 2001).

Affinity purification of Rubisco activase from leaf extracts
All procedures except electrophoresis and immunoblotting were performed at 4 °C. Frozen leaf tissue (~0.9 g fresh weight) from heat-stressed and control plants was extracted in 8 ml of 0.1 M TRIS-HCl, pH 8, and 75 mM NaCl (S-75 buffer) in a Ten Broeck glass homogenizer. For some experiments, the buffer was supplemented with 85 µg of purified, recombinant S-tagged Rubisco activase prior to extraction. Extracts were centrifuged for 5 min at 23 500 g and the supernatant loaded on a 0.15–0.8 ml column of Strep-Tactin-Sepharose (IBA GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). After three passes of the extract through the column, the column was rinsed with 8 ml of S-75 buffer. Rubisco activase was eluted by incubation of the column for 30 min with one column volume of 5 mM desthiobiotin in S-75 buffer followed by two additional column volumes of this buffer. The eluted material was concentrated by ultrafiltration on a Centricon YM-30 membrane and the polypeptides were separated and analysed by SDS–PAGE and immunoblotting (Salvucci et al., 2001). For some experiments, blots were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, and the stained proteins were submitted to the Protein Analysis and Synthesis Laboratory at Arizona State University for N-terminal sequencing by Edman degradation analysis.

Miscellaneous
The recombinant β-isoform of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase containing a C-terminal S-tag, but without a chloroplast transit peptide was expressed in Escherichia coli cells from a cDNA as described previously (Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2000; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a). Monoclonal antibodies directed against human hsp60 were purchased from StressGen Bioreagents (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada). Electrophoresis under non-denaturing conditions was performed at 4 °C as described by Barraclough and Ellis (1980) using 5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels. Rubisco was purified from spinach leaves as described previously (Salvucci, 1992).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, Rubisco activation, and Rubisco activase distribution during heat stress and recovery
The inhibition and recovery of net photosynthesis after moderate heat stress were compared for wild-type and transgenic {Delta}43 Arabidopsis plants. Compared with the wild type, {Delta}43 plants contained ~12% of the amount of Rubisco activase (Salvucci et al., 2006). At the control temperature and a saturating irradiance of 1000 µmol m–2 s–1, the {Delta}43 plants exhibited photosynthetic rates that were 44% of wild-type rates (Fig. 1A). These rates of net photosynthesis in air were similar to rates measured previously by us (Salvucci et al., 2006) and others (Eckardt et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 2002) for Arabidopsis plants grown under relatively high irradiance and with supplemental nutrients. When plants were exposed for 30 min to a moderate heat stress of 37.5 °C, net photosynthesis decreased for both wild-type and {Delta}43 plants. Net photosynthesis in the {Delta}43 plants was completely inhibited by the moderate heat stress, whereas net photosynthesis in wild-type plants was only inhibited by ~20%. For wild-type plants, recovery of net photosynthesis was complete within 30 min of transfer back to the control temperature of 23 °C, whereas marked inhibition of net photosynthesis persisted in the {Delta}43 plants, even after 60 min at 23 °C. Differences between wild-type and {Delta}43 plants were also apparent in the response of the effective quantum yield of PSII ({Phi}PSII) to heat stress (Fig. 1B). When measured at 250 µmol m–2 s–1, the same irradiance used for growth, {Phi}PSII increased slightly in wild-type plants in response to a 30 min heat stress, but then decreased over the 60 min recovery period. In contrast, {Phi}PSII in the {Delta}43 plants decreased in response to heat stress and continued to decrease markedly over the 60 min recovery period.


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Impairment of photosynthesis, the effective quantum yield of PSII ({Phi}PSII), and Rubisco activation in wild-type and {Delta}43 transgenic Arabidopsis plants during a time-course of heat stress and recovery. Net photosynthesis (A), {Phi}PSII (B), and the activation state of Rubisco (C) were measured in wild-type (filled circles) and {Delta}43 (open circles) plants at the control temperature of 23 °C (zero time), during exposure for 30 min to a moderate heat stress of 37.5 °C (grey bars) and at various times after return to the control temperature of 23 °C. Net photosynthesis was measured at an irradiance of 1000 µmol m–2 s–1, while {Phi}PSII and Rubisco activation were measured at the growth irradiance of 250 µmol m–2 s–1. The results presented are the means ±SEM for measurements on 3–8 separate plants.

 
The activation state of Rubisco was also measured before and after heat stress and during recovery at the growth irradiance of 250 µmol m–2 s–1 (Fig. 1C). Compared with the wild type, Rubisco activation was lower in the {Delta}43 plants under control temperatures and decreased to a greater extent in response to heat stress, that is 36% for {Delta}43 plants compared with 18% for wild-type plants (see also Salvucci et al., 2006). After 60 min of recovery at the control temperature, the activation state of Rubisco in wild-type plants fully recovered to the level at the control temperature prior to imposition of the heat stress, whereas Rubisco activation in the {Delta}43 plants was 18% lower than the level at the control temperature.

The amounts and distribution of Rubisco activase protein were examined in wild-type and {Delta}43 plants at three stages of the time-course in Fig. 1; while at the control temperature of 23 °C prior to heat stress, after 30 min at 37.5 °C, and after 60 min of recovery at the control temperature. Immunoblots of Rubisco activase in soluble and insoluble fractions from extracts of wild-type plants showed that neither the total amount of Rubisco activase nor its distribution changed in response to moderate heat stress (Fig. 2). The leaves of wild-type plants contained both isoforms of Rubisco activase, and both remained soluble after heat stress, with <8% of the total Rubisco activase associating with the insoluble fraction. In contrast, leaves of the {Delta}43 plants contained only the β-isoform of Rubisco activase, and the amount and, particularly, the distribution of this Rubisco activase changed markedly in response to moderate heat stress. At the control temperature prior to imposition of heat stress, >93% of the Rubisco activase was soluble, similar to the distribution in wild-type leaves. However, after 30 min of moderate heat stress, most of the Rubisco activase (i.e. 65%) was recovered in the pellet fraction and a large percentage (i.e. 35%) of the Rubisco activase from the {Delta}43 plants was still associated with insoluble material after 60 min of recovery at the control temperature. The total amount of Rubisco activase in the {Delta}43 plants decreased by ~10% after 30 min of heat stress and by ~15% after an additional 60 min of recovery.


Figure 2
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of heat stress on the solubility of Rubisco activase in wild-type and {Delta}43 transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Leaf extracts were prepared from wild-type (top panel) and transgenic {Delta}43 (bottom panel) Arabidopsis plants that were exposed to 23 °C, i.e. control conditions (C), 30 min of moderate heat stress at 37.5 °C (HS), and 60 min of recovery (R) at the control temperature as in the time-course shown in Fig. 1. An equal amount of leaf tissue was extracted in buffer, and the polypeptides in the soluble (s) and pellet (p) fractions were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Blots were probed with antibody to tobacco Rubisco activase and visualized using alkaline phosphatase conjugated to a secondary antibody.

 
Identification of a protein that potentially interacts with Rubisco activase during heat stress
A C-terminal S-tag was engineered into the sequence of Rubisco activase to facilitate affinity purification of Rubisco activase and any proteins bound to it from leaf extracts of the {Delta}43 plants. Separation of polypeptides by SDS–PAGE after elution under gentle conditions with desthiobiotin showed that a 43 kDa polypeptide was the major protein retained on the Strep-Tactin resin from leaf extracts of the {Delta}43 (Fig. 3), but not wild-type plants (data not shown, but see below). The identity of this protein as Rubisco activase was confirmed immunologically (see below), as well as by N-terminal sequencing (data not shown). In addition to the 43 kDa Rubisco activase polypeptide, two other polypeptides of ~52 kDa and 33 kDa bound to the affinity resin and co-eluted with Rubisco activase. These polypeptides were also present in the bound fraction from columns treated with extracts of wild-type plants (data not shown), indicating that their presence in this fraction was not related to the presence of Rubisco activase.


Figure 3
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Affinity purification of Rubisco activase and associated proteins from leaf extracts prepared from transgenic {Delta}43 Arabidopsis plants exposed to various temperatures. Intact plants were exposed for 1 h to the temperatures indicated in the figure before freezing in liquid N2. Frozen plant material was extracted, centrifuged, and the clarified supernatant passed through 0.3 ml of Strep-Tactin Sepharose (23–39 °C). After extensive washing, bound proteins were eluted with 5 mM desthiobiotin, concentrated by ultrafiltration, separated by SDS–PAGE, and visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. For the sample labelled 40 °C, three times as much plant material was extracted and the clarified extract was chromatographed through a 0.8 ml column. Bound polypeptides were eluted and then separated as described above, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. The arrows labelled A refer to the position of the 43 kDa Rubisco activase polypeptide on the gel. The arrows labelled X refer to the position of the 60 kDa polypeptide that increased in abundance with heat stress and was submitted for N-terminal sequencing. The numbers to the right of the blot refer to the position of the other polypeptides described in the text.

 
A 60 kDa polypeptide co-eluted with Rubisco activase in extracts prepared from heat-stressed {Delta}43 plants (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the amount of the 60 kDa polypeptide eluting in the bound fraction increased with increasing leaf temperature, although the amount of Rubisco activase decreased at the highest temperatures and the amounts of the 33 kDa and 52 kDa polypeptides were relatively unaffected. The 60 kDa polypeptide was not present in the bound fraction from affinity chromatography of wild-type extracts, suggesting that its presence in this fraction was related to the presence of Rubisco activase (see below). The N-terminal sequence of this polypeptide, NH2-AAKELHFNKDGTTI, corresponded to the sequence of the β-subunit of chaperonin 60 (cpn60β), the chloroplast homologue of GroEL (Hendrick and Hartl, 1993; Hill and Hemmingsen, 2001).

Verification that binding of cpn60β is specific for Rubisco activase from heat-stressed leaves
Immunoblots probed with antibodies to Rubisco activase and human hsp60 were used to verify that binding of cpn60β to the affinity columns was dependent on Rubisco activase and that its amount in the Rubisco activase fraction from the affinity column increased when plants were exposed to heat stress (Fig. 4). Wild-type plants provided a useful control for these experiments since their unmodified Rubisco activase has no affinity for Strep-Tactin (see above). Immunoblots of the polypeptides that eluted with desthiobiotin showed that the modified Rubisco activase from the {Delta}43 plants bound to the Strep-Tactin affinity column in extracts from both control and heat-stressed plants, but that the unmodified Rubisco activase in wild-type plants exhibited no affinity for the column. Immunoblots probed with anti-hsp60 antibody revealed that cpn60β bound to and then eluted from the affinity column with the modified Rubisco activase, but primarily in extracts prepared from plants that had been subjected to heat stress. Immunoblots of proteins in the pellet and soluble fractions from control and heat-stressed wild-type and {Delta}43 plants, treated as in Fig. 1, showed that cpn60β was not associated with the insoluble fraction even after heat stress and did not increase in total abundance during the 30 min exposure to a moderate heat stress of 37.5 °C (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Dependence on Step-Tactin-bound Rubisco activase from heat-stressed plants for affinity capture of cpn60β. Wild-type (wt) and transgenic {Delta}43 ({Delta}43) Arabidopsis plants were exposed for 1 h to control (C) or heat stress (HS) temperatures of 23 °C or 40 °C, respectively, before freezing in liquid N2. Rubisco activase and associated proteins were affinity purified from leaf extracts as described in Fig. 3. Polypeptides were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Blots were probed with antibody to tobacco Rubisco activase (left panel) or human hsp60 (right panel), and visualized using alkaline phosphatase conjugated to a secondary antibody. The arrow indicates the position of cpn60β on the blot.

 
Evidence for association of Rubisco activase and cpn60β in a high molecular mass complex
Electrophoresis on non-denaturing gels was used to determine if the Rubisco activase and cpn60β that eluted from the affinity column were associated in a complex (Fig. 5). Staining of the native gels with Coomassie Brilliant Blue showed that the desthiobiotin fraction from affinity chromatography of extracts from heat-stressed {Delta}43 plants contained a very high molecular mass protein band that was extremely faint in this same fraction from non-heat-stressed {Delta}43 plants. Antibodies to hsp60 recognized this band on immunoblots of replicate lanes of the gel. Replicate lanes probed with anti-Rubisco activase antibodies showed that affinity-purified Rubisco activase from both control and heat-stressed {Delta}43 plants migrated as a very diffuse band on the top portion of the native gels. Close analysis of the lanes revealed a distinct band of decoration from antibody recognition in the lane corresponding to the heat-stressed but not the control plants. This band corresponded to a concentration of Rubisco activase protein and migrated through the gel to precisely the same position as cpn60β. An even more prominent Rubisco activase band was evident in extracts from {Delta}43 plants that had received a more intense heat shock (Fig. 5B). This band also migrated to the same position as cpn60β, suggesting that an even greater portion of the affinity-purified Rubisco activase in this extract was associated with cpn60β.


Figure 5
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Evidence for an association of Rubisco activase with cpn60β in a high molecular mass complex from heat-stressed plants. (A) Transgenic {Delta}43 Arabidopsis plants were exposed for 1 h to control (C) or heat stress (HS) temperatures of 23 °C or 37.5 °C, respectively, before freezing in liquid N2. Rubisco activase and associated proteins were affinity purified from leaf extracts as described in Fig. 3. Proteins were separated by electrophoresis under non-denaturing conditions and visualized directly either by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (left panel) or by immunoblotting with anti-hsp60 (middle panel) or anti-Rubisco activase (right panel) antibodies after transfer to a PVDF membrane as described in Fig. 4. The band labelled R on the stained gel marks the position of the 520 kDa spinach Rubisco holenzyme. (B) Immunoblots of affinity-purified proteins from transgenic {Delta}43 Arabidopsis plants that were exposed for 1 h to 40 °C. Proteins were separated by non-denaturing electrophoresis and visualized by immunoblotting with anti-hsp60 (left panel) or anti-Rubisco activase (right panel) antibodies. The arrows in the panels indicate the position of Rubisco activase accumulation on the blots, which coincided with the position of cpn60β.

 
The dynamics of the association between Rubisco activase and cpn60β
Thus far, the data suggest that cpn60β was associated with Rubisco activase in extracts from heat-stressed plants. However, to eliminate the possibility that a heat-activated form of cpn60β was associating with undamaged Rubisco activase after Rubisco activase had already bound to the column, Strep-Tactin columns were pre-loaded with saturating amounts of purified recombinant S-tagged Rubisco activase prior to chromatography of leaf extracts from control and heat-stressed {Delta}43 plants (Fig. 6A). Immunoblots of the desthiobiotin elutions showed that cpn60β did not bind to the purified Rubisco activase that was pre-loaded on the column, but was bound to Rubisco activase when leaf extracts alone were chromatographed through untreated columns (see Fig. 4) or when extracts were supplemented with purified Rubisco activase prior to passage through untreated columns (Fig. 6B). For extracts supplemented with purified Rubisco activase, the amount of cpn60β recovered with Rubisco activase was greater in extracts from heat-stressed leaves, suggesting that cpn60β was associated with the endogenous and possibly heat-damaged Rubisco activase from the plant rather than binding to the exogenously added protein.


Figure 6
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Association of cpn60β with Rubisco activase does not occur with purified and undenatured Rubisco activase already bound to the column. Transgenic {Delta}43 Arabidopsis plants were exposed for 1 h to control (C) or heat stress (HS) temperatures of 23 °C or 37.5 °C, respectively, before freezing in liquid N2. Rubisco activase and associated proteins were affinity purified from leaf extracts as described in Fig. 3, except that the column volumes were only 0.15 ml. In (A), purified S-tagged Rubisco activase was pre-bound to the column prior to addition of leaf extracts, while in (B) the same amount of purified S-tagged Rubisco activase as used in (A) was added to the buffer prior to leaf extraction. Polypeptides were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Blots were probed with antibody to human hsp60 antibody and visualized using alkaline phosphatase conjugated to a secondary antibody.

 
Recovery experiments were conducted to characterize the dynamics of the apparent association of cpn60β with Rubisco activase during heat stress (Fig. 7). Immunoblots showed that the amount of cpn60β that was recovered with Rubisco activase from heat-stressed plants decreased progressively with the duration of recovery. Imposition of a second 1 h episode of heat stress after 2 h of recovery from the initial heat stress increased the amount of cpn60β that was associated with Rubisco activase compared with just 1 h of heat stress followed by 1–4 h of recovery.


Figure 7
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. Dependence of Rubisco activase–cpn60β association and dissociation on the timing and duration of heat stress and recovery. Transgenic {Delta}43 Arabidopsis plants were exposed for 1 h to 23 °C (lane 1) or 40 °C (lanes 2–6), followed by recovery at 23 °C for the indicated times (lanes 2–5) or recovery followed by a second 1 h exposure to 40 °C (lane 6). Rubisco activase and associated proteins were affinity purified from leaf extracts as described in Fig. 3. Polypeptides were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Blots were probed with antibody to human hsp60 antibody and visualized using alkaline phosphatase conjugated to a secondary antibody.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Heat stress and recovery experiments with the {Delta}43 plants provide new insights into the involvement of Rubisco activase in photosynthetic thermotolerance
The activation state of Rubisco in leaves reflects the balance between the rates of deactivation, caused by catalytic misfire and/or decarbamylation, and reactivation of inactive Rubisco sites by Rubisco activase (Andrews et al., 1995; Spreitzer and Salvucci, 2002; Portis, 2003). The relatively low temperature optimum of Rubisco activase activity coupled with the high temperature optimum for deactivation drive the equilibrium towards deactivation as temperatures approach and then exceed the thermal optimum of Rubisco activase (Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2000; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a, b). Deactivation reduces the kcat of Rubisco by decreasing the number of sites that are competent for carboxylation. Thus, when photosynthesis is limited by Rubisco, a decrease in the activation state of Rubisco should reduce the rate of net photosynthesis when other conditions are equivalent. Transgenic plants with lower amounts of Rubisco activase, including the {Delta}43 plants (Salvucci et al., 2006), support this conclusion since their reduced rates of net photosynthesis correlate with a lower activation state of Rubisco (cf. Mate et al., 1993; Eckardt et al., 1997).

Under moderate heat stress, Rubisco activation was inhibited to a greater extent in transgenic plants with lower amounts of Rubisco activase than in wild-type plants (Fig. 1; see also Salvucci et al., 2006). In the present study, immunoblots of leaf extracts revealed that a large portion of the Rubisco activase in the {Delta}43 plants became insoluble during a brief exposure to moderate heat stress, whereas almost all of the Rubisco activase remained soluble in wild-type plants under these same conditions. These results provide additional evidence for a cause and effect relationship between Rubisco activation and Rubisco activase thermal stability (Salvucci et al., 2001; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a, b).

That net photosynthesis was completely inhibited in the {Delta}43 plants during moderate heat stress was consistent with the negative effect of reduced Rubisco activation on photosynthesis (Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2001) combined with the stimulatory effect of higher temperatures on photorespiration and dark respiration (Berry and Björkman, 1980; Sharkey et al., 2001). Less clear is why very low rates of net photosynthesis persisted in the {Delta}43 plants long after heat stress was removed and Rubisco had partially reactivated. Similar slow recovery responses to heat stress have been reported for other plants that contain little or no Rubisco activase (Sharkey et al., 2001; Kim and Portis, 2005), indicating that slow recovery of photosynthesis from heat stress might be a general characteristic of plants with very low amounts of Rubisco activase. The biochemical basis for persistent inhibition of photosynthesis following a heat stress is unknown, but might involve (i) injury to thylakoid membranes caused by the severe level of photosynthetic inhibition suffered during the heat stress; (ii) changes in the nature of the inhibited form of Rubisco upon recovery, specifically to a form with a looser binding inhibitor (Kim and Portis, 2006); or (iii) direct effects of lower amounts and/or activities of Rubisco activase on Rubisco catalysis, independent of changes in the activation state (He et al., 1997; Sharkey et al., 2001).

Another perplexing response observed with the {Delta}43 plants was the acute sensitivity of their Rubisco activase to thermal denaturation. While it is possible that modification with an S-tag decreased the thermal stability of Rubisco activase in these plants, this possibility seems unlikely given that the balanced amino acid composition of the short S-tag generally has little effect on protein stability or activity (Skerra and Schmidt, 2000). In addition, the photosynthetic response of the {Delta}43 plants to heat stress and recovery was similar to the response of rwt46, a transgenic Arabidopsis line that expresses only the {alpha}-isoform of Rubisco activase (Zhang et al., 2002; Kim and Portis, 2005; Salvucci et al., 2006). In both the {Delta}43 and rwt46 plants, the amount of Rubisco activase is reduced compared with the wild type, indicating that the greater thermal instability of their Rubisco activase might be a consequence of the lower amount of Rubisco activase protein in these plants. Rubisco activase has been shown to be a highly self-associating protein whose specific activity and molecular mass increase with increasing concentrations of protein (Salvucci, 1992; Portis, 2003). Consequently, the low levels of Rubisco activase protein in the {Delta}43 and rwt46 plants would favour a more dissociated state in vivo, making the enzyme more prone to thermal denaturation. This idea might also be relevant to the results of Yang et al. (2005) who showed that accumulation of glycine betaine, a compatible solute known to promote self-association reactions (Felitsky et al., 2004), prevented denaturation of Rubisco activase in transgenic tobacco plants that were exposed to heat stress.

Association of Rubisco activase with cpn60β suggests a possible role for this chaperonin as a conventional heat shock protein in chloroplasts
Using an affinity capture procedure, cpn60β was identified as a protein that potentially interacts with Rubisco activase during heat stress. The acute sensitivity of Rubisco activase in the {Delta}43 plants probably improved the specificity of the procedure for cpn60β since a lower temperature could be used to induce thermal denaturation of Rubisco activase in these plants. Key to the approach was the use of very gentle elution conditions that preserved the Rubisco activase–cpn60β complex through isolation by affinity chromatography. That these proteins remained associated after extensive washing of the column with buffer and following electrophoresis through non-denaturing gels suggested that cpn60β forms a very tight complex with Rubisco activase that persists through extraction and subsequent chromatography.

Control experiments with wild-type and unstressed {Delta}43 plants provided considerable evidence that the Rubisco activase–cpn60β complex was formed in vivo during heat stress by the binding of cpn60β to heat-damaged Rubisco activase (Fig. 6). Other experiments indicated that the formation and apparent dissociation of the complex was dynamic, dependent on the duration and intensity of the heat stress and recovery applied to the living plant. Taken together, the results seem to rule out, but not completely exclude, the possibility that cpn60β associated with Rubisco activase in solution during extraction rather than in planta. This possibility seems unlikely given that the propensity for protein–protein interaction would be much greater when Rubisco activase and cpn60β are present together at high concentrations and temperatures in the chloroplast, than at much lower concentrations in diluted leaf extracts at 4 °C.

The term molecular chaperone has been used to describe the ability of cpn60 and other GroEL-type proteins to influence the assembly and disassembly of oligomeric proteins (Hendrick and Hartl, 1993; Horwich et al., 2006). While much attention has been paid to the involvement of cpn60β in aiding the folding and assembly of chloroplast proteins such as Rubisco (Viitanen et al., 1995; Lubben et al., 1989), its role as a conventional heat shock protein has received considerably less attention. In plants, cpn60β does not usually exhibit a rapid increase in abundance in response to heat stress (Schmidt et al., 1996; Holland et al., 1998; Ferreira et al., 2006), suggesting that its function in the chloroplast might differ from that of its counterpart, hsp60, in other organisms. However, Preczewski et al. (2000) reported that cpn60β levels in nine tomato genotypes increased from 1–6.5-fold within 12–24 h of a 4 h heat stress and that the increase was highest in genotypes whose photosynthesis was most thermotolerant. Attempts to elucidate the precise role of cpn60β in plants by reducing or eliminating the amount of cpn60β protein using antisense suppression of cpn60β mRNA in tobacco or T-DNA disruption of the cpn60β gene in Arabidopsis have been inconclusive, producing plants with abnormal phenotypes (Zabeleta et al., 1994; Ishikawa et al., 2003). Curiously, the levels of Rubisco in both tobacco and Arabidopsis were unaffected by a severe reduction in the levels of cpn60β.

The Arabidopsis genome contains three paralogues of cpn60β (Hill and Hemmingsen, 2001). The N-terminal sequence of the cpn60β polypeptide that was identified in the present study corresponds to either the cpn60β-2 or -3 gene, which are located on chromosomes III and I, respectively (Hill and Hemmingsen, 2001). Deletion of cpn60β-3 in the len1 T-DNA mutant drastically reduced the amount of cpn60β and produced a severely stunted lesion mimic mutant in plants that were grown under short photoperiods, but had no obvious phenotype under a long photoperiod (Ishikawa et al., 2003). Heat stress accelerated the death of seedlings of the len1 mutant compared with wild-type plants under short days, but experiments with mature plants grown under long photoperiods were not reported. An accumulation of cpn60β in response to NaCl stress was reported in tobacco, but only at the seedling stage, leading to the conclusion that the involvement of cpn60β in stress tolerance in plants only occurs at certain developmental stages (Holland et al., 1998).

The association of cpn60β with Rubisco activase in heat-stressed {Delta}43 plants suggests that cpn60β could function in plants as a mechanism for stress tolerance, not just in seedlings, as with tobacco (Holland et al., 1998), but in mature plants. It has long been recognized that hsp60 improves the thermal tolerance of a large number of organisms by associating with and stabilizing a wide variety of proteins during episodes of heat shock (Parsell and Lindquist, 1991; Hendrick and Hartl, 1993). To my knowledge, the results with Rubisco activase are the first to document an association of cpn60β with another chloroplast protein during heat stress. It seems likely that the association of Rubisco activase with cpn60β during heat stress could function to protect Rubisco activase from thermal denaturation, thus providing a mechanism to protect and acclimate photosynthesis to heat stress. In this way, the function of cpn60β in chloroplasts during heat shock would be analogous to its function in other organisms, but without the requirement for additional accumulation of cpn60β protein. Perhaps the large amount of cpn60β in the chloroplast that is presumably required for assembly of Rubisco and other abundant chloroplast proteins (Barraclough and Ellis, 1980; Viitanen et al., 1995) is sufficient to protect Rubisco activase and other heat-labile proteins during moderate heat stress. It is interesting to note that Rubisco synthesis in cotton leaves was severely inhibited when plants were subjected to moderate heat stress (Law et al., 2001). Although speculative, reduced synthesis of Rubisco and enhanced association of cpn60β with Rubisco activase during episodes of heat stress could be an indication that the function of cpn60β shifts during heat stress from folding and assembly of newly synthesized oligomeric proteins to protection of thermally labile proteins.


    Acknowledgements
 
The author wishes to acknowledge Nancy Parks for technical assistance and Dr Ben DeRidder, Grinnell College, for producing the {Delta}43 transgenic plants. The author would like to thank Dr Elizabeth Vierling, University of Arizona, for initially suggesting the use of an S-tagged Rubisco activase, and Drs Archie R Portis, Jr (USDA-ARS) and Scott Holaday (Texas Tech University) for their critical review of the manuscript. The research was supported by the USDA-ARS and a grant from the United States Department of Energy (97ER20268).


    Abbreviations
 
cpn60, chaperonin-60; hsp60, heat-shock protein-60; PSII, photosystem II; {Phi}PSII, effective quantum yield of photosystem II; PVDF, polyvinylidene fluoride; RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; Rubisco, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; S-tag, Strep-Tactin-binding sequence.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Andrews TJ, Hudson GS, Mate CJ, von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Arvidsson YBC. Rubisco—the consequence of altering its expression and activation in transgenic plants. Journal of Experimental Botany (1995) 46:1293–1300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barraclough R, Ellis RJ. Protein synthesis in chloroplasts. IX. Assembly of newly-synthesized large subunits into ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase in isolated intact pea chloroplasts. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (1980) 608:19–31.[Medline]

Berry J, Björkman O. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology (1980) 31:491–543.[Web of Science]

Crafts-Brandner SJ, Law RD. Effects of heat stress on the inhibition and recovery of the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activation state. Planta (2000) 212:67–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME. Rubisco activase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA (2000) 97:13430–13435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eckardt NA, Snyder GW, Portis AR Jr, Ogren WL. Growth and photosynthesis under high and low irradiance of Arabidopsis thaliana antisense mutants with reduced ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase content. Plant Physiology (1997) 113:575–586.[Abstract]

Felitsky DJ, Cannon JG, Capp MW, Hong J, van Wynsberghe AW, Anderson CF, Record MT Jr. The exclusion of glycine betaine from anionic biopolymer surface: why glycine betaine is an effective osmoprotectant but also a compatible solvent. Biochemistry (2004) 43:14732–14743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Feller U, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME. Moderately high temperatures inhibit ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activase-mediated activation of Rubisco. Plant Physiology (1998) 116:539–546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feng L, Wang K, Li Y, Tan Y, Kong J, Li H, Li Y, Zhu Y. Overexpression of SBPase enhances photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Reports (2007) 26:1635–1646.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ferreira S, Hjernø K, Larsen M, Wingsle G, Larsen P, Fey S, Roepstorff P, Pais MS. Proteome profiling of Populus euphratica Oliv. upon heat stress. Annals of Botany (2006) 98:361–377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haldimann P, Feller U. Inhibition of photosynthesis by high temperature in oak (Quercus pubescens L.) leaves grown under natural conditions closely correlates with a reversible heat-dependent reduction of the activation state of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Plant, Cell and Environment (2004) 27:1169–1183.[CrossRef]

He Z, von Caemmerer S, Hudson GS, Price GD, Badger MR, Andrews TJ. Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase deficiency delays senescence of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase but progressively impairs its catalysis during tobacco leaf development. Plant Physiology (1997) 115:1569–1580.[Abstract]

Hendrick JP, Hartl F-U. Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. Annual Review of Biochemistry (1993) 62:349–384.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hikosaka K, Ishikawa K, Borjigidai A, Muller O, Onoda Y. Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis: mechanisms involved in temperature dependence of photosynthetic rate. Journal of Experimental Botany (2006) 57:291–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hill JE, Hemmingsen SE. Arabidopsis thaliana type I and II chaperonins. Cell Stress and Chaperones (2001) 6:190–200.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Holland N, Belkind A, Holand D, Pick U, Edelman M. Stress-responsive accumulation of plastid chaperonin 60 during seedling development. The Plant Journal (1998) 13:311–316.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Horwich AL, Farr GW, Fenton WA. GroEL–GroES-mediated protein folding. Chemical Reviews (2006) 106:1917–1930.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ishikawa A, Tanaka H, Nakai M, Asahi T. Deletion of a chaperonin 60β gene leads to cell death in the Arabidopsis lesion initiation 1 mutant. Plant and Cell Physiology (2003) 44:255–261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jordan DB, Ogren WL. The CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Dependence on ribulosebisphosphate concentration, pH and temperature. Planta (1984) 161:308–313.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Kim K, Portis AR Jr. Temperature dependence of photosynthesis in Arabidopsis plants with modifications in Rubisco activase and membrane fluidity. Plant and Cell Physiology (2005) 46:522–530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim K, Portis AR Jr. Kinetic analysis of the slow inactivation of Rubisco during catalysis: effects of temperature, O2 and Mg++. Photosynthesis Research (2006) 87:195–204.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kobza J, Edwards GE. Influences of leaf temperature on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in wheat. Plant Physiology (1987) 83:69–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kurek I, Chang TK, Bertain SM, Madrigal A, Liu L, Lassner MW, Zhu G. Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. The Plant Cell (2007) 19:3230–3241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Law RD, Crafts-Brandner S, Salvucci ME. Heat stress induces synthesis of a new form of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase in cotton leaves. Planta (2001) 214:117–125.[Web of Science][Medline]

Lobell DB, Asner GP. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science (2003) 229:1032.

Lubben TH, Donaldson GK, Viitanen PV, Gatenby AA. Several proteins imported into chloroplasts form stable complexes with the GroEL-related chloroplast molecular chaperone. The Plant Cell (1989) 1:1223–1230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mate CJ, von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Hudson GS, Andrews TJ. The relationship between CO2-assimilation rate, Rubisco carbamylation and Rubisco activase content in Rubisco activase-deficient transgenic tobacco suggests a simple model of Rubisco activase action. Planta (1996) 198:604–613.[Web of Science]

Parsell DA, Lindquist S. The function of heat-shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Annual Review of Genetics (1993) 27:437–496.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Portis AR Jr. Rubisco activase—Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynthesis Research (2003) 75:11–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Preczewski PJ, Heckathorn SA, Downs CA, Coleman JS. Photosynthetic thermotolerance is quantitatively and positively correlated with production of specific heat-shock proteins among nine genotypes of Lycopersicon (tomato). Photosynthetica (2000) 38:127–134.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Rokka A, Zhang L, Aro E-M. Rubisco activase: an enzyme with a temperature-dependent dual function? The Plant Journal (2001) 25:463–471.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Salvucci ME. Subunit interactions of Rubisco activase: polyethylene glycol promotes self-association, stimulates ATPase and activation activities, and enhances interactions with Rubisco. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (1992) 298:688–696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Salvucci ME, Crafts-Brandner SJ. Mechanism for deactivation of Rubisco under moderate heat stress. Physiologia Plantarum (2004a) 122:513–519.[CrossRef]

Salvucci ME, Crafts-Brandner SJ. Relationship between the heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the thermal stability of Rubisco activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments. Plant Physiology (2004b) 134:1460–1470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salvucci ME, DeRidder BP, Portis AR Jr. Effect of Rubisco activase level and isoform on the thermotolerance of photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany (2006) 57:3793–3799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salvucci ME, Osteryoung KW, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Vierling E. Exceptional sensitivity of Rubisco activase to thermal denaturation in vitro and in vivo. Plant Physiology (2001) 127:1053–1064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmitz G, Schmidt M, Feirabend J. Comparison of the expression of a plastidic chaperonin 60 in different plant tissues and under photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic conditions. Planta (1996) 200:326–334.[Web of Science][Medline]

Sharkey TD, Badger MR, von Caemmerer S, Andrews TJ. Increased heat sensitivity of photosynthesis in tobacco plants with reduced Rubisco activase. Photosynthesis Research (2001) 67:147–156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Skerra A, Schmidt TGM. Use of the Strep-tag and strepavidin for recombinant protein purification and detection. Methods in Enzymology (2000) 326:271–304.[Web of Science][Medline]

Spreitzer RJ, Salvucci ME. Rubisco: interactions, associations and the possibilities of a better enzyme. Annual Review of Plant Biology (2002) 53:449–475.[CrossRef][Medline]

Viitanen PV, Schmidt M, Buchner J, Suzuki T, Vierling E, Dickson R, Lorimer GH, Gatenby A, Soll J. Functional characterization of the higher plant chloroplast chaperonins. Journal of Biological Chemsitry (1995) 270:18158–18164.[CrossRef]

Weis E. Reversible heat-inactivation of the Calvin cycle: a possible mechanism of the temperature regulation of photosynthesis. Planta (1981) 151:33–39.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Yamori W, Suzuki K, Noguchi K, Nakai M, Terashima I. Effects of Rubisco kinetics and Rubisco activation state on the temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate in spinach leaves from contrasting growth temperatures. Plant, Cell and Environment (2006) 29:1659–1670.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yang X, Liang Z, Lu C. Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine enhance photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiology (2005) 138:2299–2309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zabaleta E, Oropeza A, Assad N, Mandel A, Salerno G, Herrera-Estrella L. Antisense expression of chaperonin 60β in transgenic tobacco plants leads to abnormal phenotypes and altered distribution of photoassimilates. The Plant Journal (1994) 6:425–432.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Zhang N, Kallis RP, Ewy RG, Portis AR Jr. Light modulation of Rubisco in Arabidopsis requires a capacity for redox regulation of the larger Rubisco activase isoform. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA (2002) 99:330–3334.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. P. Scafaro, P. A. Haynes, and B. J. Atwell
Physiological and molecular changes in Oryza meridionalis Ng., a heat-tolerant species of wild rice
J. Exp. Bot., October 9, 2009; (2009) erp294v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Depuydt, S. Trenkamp, A. R. Fernie, S. Elftieh, J.-P. Renou, M. Vuylsteke, M. Holsters, and D. Vereecke
An Integrated Genomics Approach to Define Niche Establishment by Rhodococcus fascians
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2009; 149(3): 1366 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/7/1923    most recent
erm343v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salvucci, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salvucci, M. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Salvucci, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?