Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ray, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ray, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 49, 1381-1386, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress

J Ray and T Sinclair
USDA-ARS, Agronomy Physiology Laboratory, University of Florida, PO Box 110965, Gainesville, FL 32611-0965, USA; Corresponding author

Many experiments are conducted in greenhouses or growth chambers in which plants are grown in pots. Considerable research has shown that pots can have a limiting effect on overall plant growth. This research was undertaken to examine the effects of pot size specifically on transpiration response of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) plants undergoing water-deficit stress. Maize and soybean experiments were conducted similarly, but as separate experiments. Maize plants were grown in 2.3, 4.1, 9.1, and 16.2 l pots sealed to prevent water loss except by transpiration. For each pot size, plants were divided into two watering regimes, a well-watered control and a water-deficit regime. Water deficits were imposed by simply not rewatering the pots. Soybean was examined in a similar manner, but only the three larger pot sizes were used in the experiment. For both maize and soybean, and in both watering regimes, there was a significant reduction of shoot dry weight and total transpiration with decreasing pot size. However, there were no significant differences among pot sizes in the fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW) point at which transpiration began to decline (FTSW0.31 for maize and 0.35 for soybean) or in the overall relationship of transpiration rate to soil water content in response to water deficits. These results indicated that, regardless of pot size or plant size, the overriding factor determining transpirational response to drought stress was soil water content.Keywords: Drought, maize, pot size, transpiration
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Kholova, C. T. Hash, A. Kakkera, M. Kocova, and V. Vadez
Constitutive water-conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]
J. Exp. Bot., October 27, 2009; (2009) erp314v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. P. Manavalan, S. K. Guttikonda, L.-S. Phan Tran, and H. T. Nguyen
Physiological and Molecular Approaches to Improve Drought Resistance in Soybean
Plant Cell Physiol., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1260 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. A. Fish and H. J. Earl
Water-Use Efficiency Is Negatively Correlated with Leaf Epidermal Conductance in Cotton (Gossypium spp.)
Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1409 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. A. King, L. C. Purcell, and K. R. Brye
Differential Wilting among Soybean Genotypes in Response to Water Deficit
Crop Sci., January 28, 2009; 49(1): 290 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jashsHome page
K. S. Nemali and M. W van Iersel
Physiological Responses to Different Substrate Water Contents: Screening for High Water-use Efficiency in Bedding Plants
J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., May 1, 2008; 133(3): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
K. Metselaar and Q. de Jong van Lier
The Shape of the Transpiration Reduction Function under Plant Water Stress
Vadose Zone J., January 24, 2007; 6(1): 124 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E. V. Hufstetler, H. R. Boerma, T. E. Carter Jr., and H. J. Earl
Genotypic Variation for Three Physiological Traits Affecting Drought Tolerance in Soybean
Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 25 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. LEBON, A. PELLEGRINO, G. LOUARN, and J. LECOEUR
Branch Development Controls Leaf Area Dynamics in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Growing in Drying Soil
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2006; 98(1): 175 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
L. C. Purcell, T. R. Sinclair, and R. W. McNew
Drought Avoidance Assessment for Summer Annual Crops Using Long-Term Weather Data
Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1566 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. J. Earl
A PRECISE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD FOR SIMULATING DROUGHT STRESS IN POT EXPERIMENTS
Crop Sci., September 1, 2003; 43(5): 1868 - 1873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.