Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shackel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shackel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shackel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 49, 1413-1419, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Seed coat cell turgor responds rapidly to air humidity in chickpea and faba bean

K Shackel and N Turner
Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia; CSIRO Plant Industry, Private Bag, PO Wembley, WA 6014, Australia; Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8683, USA; Corresponding author at the University of California

The turgor pressure in cells of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seed coats was measured with a pressure probe. Measurements were made under in situ conditions by removing a section of wall from a pod, which remained attached to the plant, and exposing the intact seed. If the pod wall was removed and the turgor measurements made under ambient laboratory conditions of 50% to 70% relative humidity (RH), cell turgor pressure declined over time, typically reaching 0 MPa. If the pod wall was removed and the turgor measurements made under conditions of 100% RH, however, cell turgor pressure was stable over time, relatively uniform within the seed coat tissue, and was found to be 0.1-0.3 MPa for chickpea, and 0.1-0.2 MPa for faba bean. In both species there was a marked decline in cell turgor, beginning within about 60 s, when humidification was discontinued. The decline in cell turgor occurred regardless of the depth of the cell within the seed coat tissue, and this decline could be stopped, but not entirely reversed, when humidification was restored. An increase in cell turgor could also be caused by wetting of the seed. These responses indicate that a very rapid water exchange can occur within the seed coat tissue in situ. The rapid and, in some cases, relatively permanent loss of seed coat cell turgor in the absence of humidification raises serious concerns regarding desiccation artefacts which may be involved in the empty seed coat technique, often used to study seed carbon and water relations in grain legumes.Keywords: Chickpea, faba bean, air humidity, turgor pressure, seed coat
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. W. Patrick and C. E. Offler
Compartmentation of transport and transfer events in developing seeds
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2001; 52(356): 551 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Q. Ma, M.H. Behboudian, N. C. Turner, and J. A. Palta
Gas exchange by pods and subtending leaves and internal recycling of CO2 by pods of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) subjected to water deficits
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2001; 52(354): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
K. A. Shackel and N. C. Turner
Seed coat cell turgor in chickpea is independent of changes in plant and pod water potential
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2000; 51(346): 895 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.