Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 366, pp. 13-25,
January 1, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Review Article |
Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance
Pioneer Hi-Bernational, Inc., 7300 NW 62nd Ave., Johnston, IA 50131–1004, USA
Average maize yields have increased steadily over the years in the USA and yet the variations in harvestable yield have also markedly increased. Much of the increase in yield variability can be attributed to (1) varying environmental stress conditions; (2) improved nitrogen inputs and better weed control; and (3) continuing sensitivity of different maize lines to the variation in input supply, especially rainfall. Drought stress alone can account for a significant percentage of average yield losses. Yet despite variable environments, new commercially available maize hybrids continue to be produced each year with ever-increasing harvestable yield. Since many factors contribute to high plant performance under water deficits, efforts are being made to elucidate the nature of water-stress tolerance in an attempt to improve maize hybrids further. Such factors include better partitioning of biomass to the developing ear resulting in faster spikelet growth and improved reproductive success. An emphasis on faster spikelet growth rate may result in a reduction in the number of spikelets formed on the ear that facilitates overall seed set by reducing water and carbon constraints per spikelet. To understand the molecular mechanisms for drought tolerance in improved maize lines better, a variety of genomic tools are being used. Newer molecular markers and comprehensive gene expression profiling methods provide opportunities to direct the continued breeding of genotypes that provide stable grain yield under widely varied environmental conditions.
Key words: Maize, harvestable yield, drought stress, spikelet growth.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Cabrera-Bosquet, C. Sanchez, and J. L. Araus How yield relates to ash content, {Delta}13C and {Delta}18O in maize grown under different water regimes Ann. Bot., November 1, 2009; 104(6): 1207 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Liu and M. Tollenaar Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Heterosis for Shade Tolerance in Maize Crop Sci., September 1, 2009; 49(5): 1817 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Wan, R. Griffiths, J. Ying, P. McCourt, and Y. Huang Development of Drought-Tolerant Canola (Brassica napus L.) through Genetic Modulation of ABA-mediated Stomatal Responses Crop Sci., August 7, 2009; 49(5): 1539 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Guo, M. Baum, S. Grando, S. Ceccarelli, G. Bai, R. Li, M. von Korff, R. K. Varshney, A. Graner, and J. Valkoun Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2009; 60(12): 3531 - 3544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. C. Collins, F. Tardieu, and R. Tuberosa Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand? Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 469 - 486. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Reynolds, C. S. Pierre, A. S.I. Saad, M. Vargas, and A. G. Condon Evaluating Potential Genetic Gains in Wheat Associated with Stress-Adaptive Trait Expression in Elite Genetic Resources under Drought and Heat Stress Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-172 - S-189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. E. Nelson, P. P. Repetti, T. R. Adams, R. A. Creelman, J. Wu, D. C. Warner, D. C. Anstrom, R. J. Bensen, P. P. Castiglioni, M. G. Donnarummo, et al. Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres PNAS, October 16, 2007; 104(42): 16450 - 16455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Welcker, B Boussuge, C Bencivenni, J-M Ribaut, and F Tardieu Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 339 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Xiong, R.-G. Wang, G. Mao, and J. M. Koczan Identification of Drought Tolerance Determinants by Genetic Analysis of Root Response to Drought Stress and Abscisic Acid Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1065 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. N. Fitz Gerald, M. D. Lehti-Shiu, P. A. Ingram, K. I. Deak, T. Biesiada, and J. E. Malamy Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci That Regulate Arabidopsis Root System Size and Plasticity Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 485 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Monneveux, C. Sanchez, D. Beck, and G. O. Edmeades Drought Tolerance Improvement in Tropical Maize Source Populations: Evidence of Progress Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 180 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Monneveux, P. H. Zaidi, and C. Sanchez Population Density and Low Nitrogen Affects Yield-Associated Traits in Tropical Maize Crop Sci., January 31, 2005; 45(2): 535 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Abraham, B. Huang, S. A. Bonos, and W. A. Meyer Evaluation of Drought Resistance for Texas Bluegrass, Kentucky Bluegrass, and Their Hybrids Crop Sci., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1746 - 1753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. TUBEROSA, S. SALVI, M. C. SANGUINETI, P. LANDI, M. MACCAFERRI, and S. CONTI Mapping QTLs Regulating Morpho-physiological Traits and Yield: Case Studies, Shortcomings and Perspectives in Drought-stressed Maize Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 941 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|