Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (75)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gastal, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaire, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gastal, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaire, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gastal, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaire, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 370, pp. 789-799, April 15, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective

F. Gastal1 and G. Lemaire

Unité d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes Fourragères, INRA-UEPF, 86600 Lusignan, France

The rate of N uptake of crops is highly variable during crop development and between years and sites. However, under ample soil N availability, crop N accumulation is highly related to crop growth rate and to biomass accumulation. Critical N concentration has been defined as the minimum N concentration which allows maximum growth rate. Critical N concentration declines during crop growth. The relationship between critical N concentration and biomass accumulation over the growth period of a crop is broadly similar within major C3 and C4 cultivated species. Therefore, the critical N concentration concept is widely used in agronomy as the basis of the diagnosis of crop N status, and allows discrimination between situations of sub-optimal and supra-optimal N supply. The relationship between N and biomass accumulation in crops, relies on the interregulation of multiple crop physiological processes. Among these processes, N uptake, crop C assimilation and thus growth rate, and C and N allocation between organs and between plants, play a particular role. Under sub-optimal N supply, N uptake of the crop depends on soil mineral N availability and distribution, and on root distribution. Under ample N supply, N uptake largely depends on growth rate via internal plant regulation. Carbon assimilation of the crop is related to crop N through the distribution of N between mature leaves with consequences for leaf and canopy photosynthesis. However, although less commonly emphasized, carbon assimilation of the crop also depends on crop N through leaf area development. Therefore, crop growth rate fundamentally relies on the balance of N allocation between growing and mature leaves. Nitrogen uptake and distribution also depends on C allocation between organs and N composition of these organs. Within shoots, allocation of C to stems generally increases in relation to C allocation to the leaves over the crop growth period. Allocation of C and N between shoots and roots also changes to a large extent in relation to soil N and/or crop N. These alterations in C and N allocation between plant organs have implications, together with soil availability and carbon assimilation, on N uptake and distribution in crops. Therefore, N uptake and distribution in plants and crops involves many aspects of growth and development. Regulation of nitrogen assimilation needs to be considered in the context of these interregulatory processes.

Key words: Crop development, crop growth, nitrogen assimilation, nitrogen uptake, plant regulation, photosynthesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. L. Bot, C. Benard, C. Robin, F. Bourgaud, and S. Adamowicz
The 'trade-off' between synthesis of primary and secondary compounds in young tomato leaves is altered by nitrate nutrition: experimental evidence and model consistency
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2009; 60(15): 4301 - 4314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. Sylvester-Bradley and D. R. Kindred
Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(7): 1939 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. K. Rice, L. Aclander, and D. T. Hanson
Do bryophyte shoot systems function like vascular plant leaves or canopies? Functional trait relationships in Sphagnum mosses (Sphagnaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2008; 95(11): 1366 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. Moreau, A.-S. Voisin, C. Salon, and N. Munier-Jolain
The model symbiotic association between Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong and Rhizobium meliloti strain 2011 leads to N-stressed plants when symbiotic N2 fixation is the main N source for plant growth
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(13): 3509 - 3522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Desclos, L. Dubousset, P. Etienne, F. Le Caherec, H. Satoh, J. Bonnefoy, A. Ourry, and J.-C. Avice
A Proteomic Profiling Approach to Reveal a Novel Role of Brassica napus Drought 22 kD/Water-Soluble Chlorophyll-Binding Protein in Young Leaves during Nitrogen Remobilization Induced by Stressful Conditions
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 1830 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Richard-Molard, A. Krapp, F. Brun, B. Ney, F. Daniel-Vedele, and S. Chaillou
Plant response to nitrate starvation is determined by N storage capacity matched by nitrate uptake capacity in two Arabidopsis genotypes
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(4): 779 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A.-S. Voisin, V. Bourion, G. Duc, and C. Salon
Using an Ecophysiological Analysis to Dissect Genetic Variability and to Propose an Ideotype for Nitrogen Nutrition in Pea
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2007; 100(7): 1525 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
K.-P. Gotz, N. Staroske, R. Radchuk, R. J. N. Emery, K.-D. Wutzke, H. Herzog, and H. Weber
Uptake and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in Vicia narbonensis plants with increased seed sink strength achieved by seed-specific expression of an amino acid permease
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2007; 58(12): 3183 - 3195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
B. Hirel, J. Le Gouis, B. Ney, and A. Gallais
The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2007; 58(9): 2369 - 2387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Burstin, P. Marget, M. Huart, A. Moessner, B. Mangin, C. Duchene, B. Desprez, N. Munier-Jolain, and G. Duc
Developmental Genes Have Pleiotropic Effects on Plant Morphology and Source Capacity, Eventually Impacting on Seed Protein Content and Productivity in Pea
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 768 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. E. Miguez and G. A. Bollero
Winter Cover Crops in Illinois: Evaluation of Ecophysiological Characteristics of Corn
Crop Sci., May 18, 2006; 46(4): 1536 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. Keller
Deficit Irrigation and Vine Mineral Nutrition
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2005; 56(3): 267 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Quaggiotti, B. Ruperti, D. Pizzeghello, O. Francioso, V. Tugnoli, and S. Nardi
Effect of low molecular size humic substances on nitrate uptake and expression of genes involved in nitrate transport in maize (Zea mays L.)
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2004; 55(398): 803 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.