Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on May 7, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/400/1167    most recent
erh141v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Long, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Long, S. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Long, S. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 55, No. 400, pp. 1167-1175, May 1, 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press


Limitations to Photosynthetic Performance

The slow reversibility of photosystem II thermal energy dissipation on transfer from high to low light may cause large losses in carbon gain by crop canopies: a theoretical analysis

Received 2 December 2003; Accepted 2 March 2004

Xin-Guang Zhu1, Donald R. Ort1,2, John Whitmarsh2,* and Stephen P. Long1,{dagger}

1 Departments of Plant Biology and Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 190 Plant and Animal Biotechnology Laboratories, 1201 W Gregory Drive, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801-3838, USA
2 USDA-ARS, University of Illinois, 190 Earl R. Madigan Laboratories, 1201 W Gregory Drive, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801-3838, USA

* Present address: Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, NIGMS/National Institute of Health, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, USA.
{dagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed at the Department of Plant Biology. Fax: +1 217 244 7563. E-mail: stevel{at}life.uiuc.edu

Regulated thermal dissipation of absorbed light energy within the photosystem II antenna system helps protect photosystem II from damage in excess light. This reversible photoprotective process decreases the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) and CO2 assimilation ({Phi}CO2), and decreases the convexity of the non-rectangular hyperbola describing the response of leaf CO2 assimilation to photon flux ({theta}). At high light, a decrease in {Phi}CO2 has minimal impact on carbon gain, while high thermal energy dissipation protects PSII against oxidative damage. Light in leaf canopies in the field is continually fluctuating and a finite period of time is required for recovery of {Phi}CO2 and {theta} when light drops below excess levels. Low {Phi}CO2 and {theta} can limit the rate of photosynthetic carbon assimilation on transfer to low light, an effect prolonged by low temperature. What is the cost of this delayed reversal of thermal energy dissipation and {Phi}CO2 recovery to potential CO2 uptake by a canopy in the field? To address this question a reverse ray-tracing algorithm for predicting the light dynamics of 120 randomly selected individual points in a model canopy was used to describe the discontinuity and heterogeneity of light flux within the canopy. Because photoprotection is at the level of the cell, not the leaf, light was simulated for small points of 104 µm rather than as an average for a leaf. The predicted light dynamics were combined with empirical equations simulating the dynamics of the light-dependent decrease and recovery of {Phi}CO2 and {theta} and their effects on the integrated daily canopy carbon uptake (A'c). The simulation was for a model canopy of leaf area index 3 with random inclination and orientation of foliage, on a clear sky day (latitude 44° N, 120th day of the year). The delay in recovery of photoprotection was predicted to decrease A'c by 17% at 30 °C and 32% at 10 °C for a chilling-susceptible species, and by 12.8% at 30 °C and 24% at 10 °C for a chilling-tolerant species. These predictions suggest that the selection, or engineering, of genotypes capable of more rapid recovery from the photoprotected state would substantially increase carbon uptake by crop canopies in the field.

Key words: Leaf canopies, photoprotection, photosynthesis, reverse ray-tracing, yield loss.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Reynolds, M. J. Foulkes, G. A. Slafer, P. Berry, M. A. J. Parry, J. W. Snape, and W. J. Angus
Raising yield potential in wheat
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(7): 1899 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
X.-G. Zhu, E. de Sturler, and S. P. Long
Optimizing the Distribution of Resources between Enzymes of Carbon Metabolism Can Dramatically Increase Photosynthetic Rate: A Numerical Simulation Using an Evolutionary Algorithm
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2007; 145(2): 513 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Hubbart, S. Peng, P. Horton, Y. Chen, and E. H. Murchie
Trends in leaf photosynthesis in historical rice varieties developed in the Philippines since 1966
J. Exp. Bot., September 17, 2007; (2007) erm192v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. D. B. Leakey, J. D. Scholes, and M. C. Press
Physiological and ecological significance of sunflecks for dipterocarp seedlings
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2005; 56(411): 469 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.