Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on December 23, 2005
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(3):527-536; doi:10.1093/jxb/erj032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/3/527    most recent
erj032v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeLucia, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeLucia, E. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeLucia, E. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

The differential effects of herbivory by first and fourth instars of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana

Jennie Y. Tang1, Raymond E. Zielinski1, Arthur R. Zangerl2, Antony R. Crofts3, May R. Berenbaum2 and Evan H. DeLucia1,*

1Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 265 Morrill Hall, 505 S Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801-3707, USA
2Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801-3707, USA
3Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801-3707, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: delucia{at}life.uiuc.edu

The effect of different feeding behaviours of 1st and 4th instar Trichoplusia ni on photosynthesis of Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia was characterized using spatially resolved measurements of fluorescence and leaf temperature, as well as leaf gas exchange,. First instars made small holes with a large perimeter-to-area ratio and avoided veins, while 4th instars made large holes with a low perimeter-to-area ratio and consumed veins. Herbivory by 1st instars reduced photosynthesis more strongly in the remaining leaf tissue than that by 4th instars. Photosystem II operating efficiency ({Phi}PSII) was correlated with the rate of CO2 exchange, and reductions in {Phi}PSII in areas around the missing tissues contributed to a 15.6% reduction in CO2 assimilation on the first day following removal of 1st instars. The corresponding increases in non-photochemical quenching and greater rates of non-stomatal water loss from these regions, as well as the partial reversal of low {Phi}PSII by increasing the ambient CO2 concentration, suggests that localized water stress and reduced stomatal conductance contributed to the inhibition of photosynthesis. Damage by 1st but not 4th instars reduced the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry (Fv/Fm) by 4–8%. While herbivory by both 1st and 4th instars increased dark respiration rates, the rates were too low to have contributed to the observed reductions in CO2 exchange. The small holes produced by 1st instars may have isolated patches of tissue from the vascular system thereby contributing to localized water stress. Since neither 1st nor 4th instar herbivory had a detectable effect on the expression of the Rubisco small subunit gene, the observed differences cannot be attributed to changes in expression of this gene. The mode of feeding by different instars of T. ni determined the photosynthetic response to herbivory, which appeared to be mediated by the level of water stress associated with herbivore damage.

Key words: Fluorescence imaging, green fluorescent protein, photosynthesis, Rubisco small subunit, Trichoplusia ni


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. D. Nabity, J. A. Zavala, and E. H. DeLucia
Indirect suppression of photosynthesis on individual leaves by arthropod herbivory
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2009; 103(4): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Schwachtje and I. T. Baldwin
Why Does Herbivore Attack Reconfigure Primary Metabolism?
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 845 - 851.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Sack, E. M. Dietrich, C. M. Streeter, D. Sanchez-Gomez, and N. M. Holbrook
Leaf palmate venation and vascular redundancy confer tolerance of hydraulic disruption
PNAS, February 5, 2008; 105(5): 1567 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Chaerle, I. Leinonen, H. G. Jones, and D. Van Der Straeten
Monitoring and screening plant populations with combined thermal and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2007; 58(4): 773 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.