Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on January 30, 2004
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erh057
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/397/743    most recent
erh057v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warembourg, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lafont, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warembourg, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lafont, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Warembourg, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lafont, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received July 10, 2003; accepted November 4, 2003
© 2004 Society for Experimental Biology

Research paper

Interspecific control of non-symbiotic carbon partitioning in the rhizosphere of a grass-clover association:Bromus madritensis-Trifolium angustifolium

F. R. Warembourg 1*, C. Roumet 1, and F. Lafont 1

1 Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CNRS, UPR 9056), 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: warembourg{at}cefe.cnrs-mop.fr.


  Abstract

Grass-legume interaction in the rhizosphere was investigated in a greenhouse experiment with two annual species, bromegrass Bromus madritensis (L.) and clover Trifolium angustifolium (L.) grown in mono and mixed cultures. Partitioning of below-ground carbon between roots, respiration, and soil was measured after separate 2 h-labelling of each species with 14CO2 followed by a 9 d chase period. At the time of labelling, clover nodules were not yet fixing N2. Bromegrass grew much faster than clover. Shoot biomass of bromegrass was greater in the presence of clover than in monoculture. By contrast, both shoot and root biomass of clover was less in the presence of bromegrass than in monoculture. Carbon assimilation during the period of labelling was proportional to shoot biomass and partitioning above and below-ground did not differ among treatments. Absolute amounts of labelled C allocated to rhizosphere respiration was more in bromegrass than in clover (respectively 1.38 mg C against 0.75 mg C in monoculture and 1.79 mg C and 0.63 mg C in mixed culture). However, when expressed as a percentage of below-ground C allocation, rhizosphere respiration was lower in bromegrass than in clover, respectively, 38% and 45% in monoculture. In mixed culture, this percentage increased by 7.3% for clover, and 3.5% for bromegrass, thus indicating that the interspecific effect of grass was higher than that of clover. The percentage of below-ground C in a soil solution of clover in mixed culture was more than 2-fold that measured in monoculture. It was also significantly correlated with the percentage of below-ground C in respiration. These results provided evidence that the grass-legume mixture has the potential to influence the rhizosphere processes of each species in more than an additive way and that the effect of the interaction was stronger on clover than on bromegrass. The possible implications of this in grass-legume competition are discussed.

Key words: Bromus madritensis, 14CO2 plant labelling, grass-legume interaction, rhizosphere respiration, root exudation, Trifolium angustifolium.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.