Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on February 13, 2004

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erh080
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/397/771    most recent
erh080v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received November 25, 2003; accepted November 28, 2003
© 2004 Society for Experimental Biology

Research paper

Mechanisms underlying the amelioration of O3-induced damage by elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO2

João Cardoso-Vilhena 1, Luis Balaguer 2, Derek Eamus 3, John Ollerenshaw 4, and Jeremy Barnes 4*

1 Museu, Laboratório e Jardim Botânico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal
2 Departamento de Biología Vegetal I, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3 Institute for Water and Environmental Resource Management, Dunbar Building, University of Technology, Sydney, CNR. Westbourne Street and Pacific Highway, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
4 Environmental and Molecular Plant Physiology, Institute for Research on the Environment and Sustainability [IRES], School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: J.D.Barnes{at}ncl.ac.uk.


   Abstract

There is growing evidence that rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations will reduce or prevent reductions in the growth and productivity of C3 crops attributable to ozone (O3) pollution. In this study, the role of pollutant exclusion in mediating this response was investigated through growth chamber-based investigations on leaves 4 and 7 of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno). In the core experiments, plants were raised at two atmospheric CO2 concentrations (ambient [350 µl l-1] or elevated CO2 [700 µl l-1] under two O3 regimes (charcoal/Purafil®-filtered air [<5 nl l-1 O3] or ozone-enriched air [75 nl l-1 7 h d-1]). A subsequent experiment used an additional O3 treatment where the goal was to achieve equivalent daily O3 uptake over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7 under ambient and CO2-enriched conditions, through daily adjustment of exposures based on measured shifts in stomatal conductance. Plant growth and net CO2 assimilation were stimulated by CO2-enrichment and reduced by exposure to O3. However, the impacts of O3 decreased with plant age (i.e. leaf 7 was more resistant to O3 injury than leaf 4); a finding consistent with ontogenic shifts in the tolerance of plant tissue and/or acclimation to O3-induced oxidative stress. In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 protected against the adverse effects of O3 and reduced cumulative O3 uptake (calculated from measurements of stomatal conductance) by c. 10% and 35% over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7, respectively. Analysis of the relationship between O3 uptake and the decline in the maximum in vivo rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) revealed the protection afforded by CO2-enrichment to be due, to a large extent, to the exclusion of the pollutant from the leaf interior (as a consequence of the decline in stomatal conductance triggered by CO2-enrichment), but there was evidence (especially from flux-response relationships constructed for leaf 4) that CO2-enrichment resulted in additional effects that alleviated the impacts of ozone-induced oxidative stress on photosynthesis.

Key words: Air pollutant interactions, detoxification, ozone uptake, rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, spring wheat.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. K. Biswas, H. Xu, Y. G. Li, M. Z. Liu, Y. H. Chen, J. Z. Sun, and G. M. Jiang
Assessing the genetic relatedness of higher ozone sensitivity of modern wheat to its wild and cultivated progenitors/relatives
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(4): 951 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. L. Booker, K. O. Burkey, W. A. Pursley, and A. S. Heagle
Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone Effects on Peanut: I. Gas-Exchange, Biomass, and Leaf Chemistry
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1475 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. O. Burkey, F. L. Booker, W. A. Pursley, and A. S. Heagle
Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone Effects on Peanut: II. Seed Yield and Quality
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1488 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. L. Booker and E. L. Fiscus
The role of ozone flux and antioxidants in the suppression of ozone injury by elevated CO2 in soybean
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2139 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. L. Booker, J. E. Miller, E. L. Fiscus, W. A. Pursley, and L. A. Stefanski
Comparative Responses of Container- versus Ground-Grown Soybean to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone
Crop Sci., March 28, 2005; 45(3): 883 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.