JXB Advance Access published online on March 12, 2004
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erh100
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biochemistry and Interdisciplinary Plant Group, 117 Schweitzer Hall, University ofMissouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: polaccoj{at}missouri.edu.
The ability of two soybean (Glycine max L. [Merrill]) cultivars, ‘Williams 82’ and ‘Maple Arrow’, which were reported to use different ureide degradation pathways, to degrade the ureides allantoin and allantoate was investigated. Protein fractions and total leaf homogenates from the fourth trifoliate leaves of both cultivars were examined for the ability to evolve either 14CO2 or [14C]urea from 14C-labelled ureides in the presence of various inhibitors. 14CO2 evolution from [2,7-14C]allantoate was catalysed by 25-50% saturated ammonium sulphate fractions of both cultivars. This activity was inhibited by acetohydroxamate (AHA), which has been used to inhibit plant ureases, but not by phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD), a more specific urease inhibitor. Thus, in both cultivars, allantoate may be metabolized by allantoate amidohydrolase. This activity was sensitive to EDTA, consistent with previous reports demonstrating that allantoate amidohydrolase requires manganese for full activity. Total leaf homogenates of both cultivars evolved both 14CO2 and [14C]urea from [2,7-14C] (ureido carbon labelled) allantoin, not previously reported in either ‘Williams 82’ or in ‘Maple Arrow’. In situ leaf degradation of 14C-labelled allantoin confirmed that both urea and CO2/NH3 are direct products of ureide degradation. Growth of plants in the presence of PPD under fixing and non-fixing conditions caused urea accumulation in both cultivars, but did not have a significant impact on total seed nitrogen. Urea levels were higher in N-fixing plants of both cultivars. Contrary to previous reports, no significant biochemical difference was found in the ability of these two cultivars to degrade ureides under the conditions used.
© 2004 Society for Experimental Biology
RESEARCH PAPER
Soybean cultivars ‘Williams 82’ and ‘Maple Arrow’ produce both urea and ammonia during ureide degradation
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. K. Werner, I. A. Sparkes, T. Romeis, and C.-P. Witte Identification, Biochemical Characterization, and Subcellular Localization of Allantoate Amidohydrolases from Arabidopsis and Soybean Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 418 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Ladrera, D. Marino, E. Larrainzar, E. M. Gonzalez, and C. Arrese-Igor Reduced Carbon Availability to Bacteroids and Elevated Ureides in Nodules, But Not in Shoots, Are Involved in the Nitrogen Fixation Response to Early Drought in Soybean Plant Physiology, October 1, 2007; 145(2): 539 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. D. Todd, P. A. Tipton, D. G. Blevins, P. Piedras, M. Pineda, and J. C. Polacco Update on ureide degradation in legumes J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 5 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-P. Witte, M. G. Rosso, and T. Romeis Identification of Three Urease Accessory Proteins That Are Required for Urease Activation in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1155 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. IZAGUIRRE-MAYORAL and T. R. SINCLAIR Soybean Genotypic Difference in Growth, Nutrient Accumulation and Ultrastructure in Response to Manganese and Iron Supply in Solution Culture Ann. Bot., July 1, 2005; 96(1): 149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. King and L. C. Purcell Inhibition of N2 Fixation in Soybean Is Associated with Elevated Ureides and Amino Acids Plant Physiology, April 1, 2005; 137(4): 1389 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|