Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on April 23, 2004

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erh128
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/400/1157    most recent
erh128v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Caemmerer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Raines, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Caemmerer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Raines, C. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by von Caemmerer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Raines, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received November 5, 2003; accepted February 10, 2004
© 2004 Society for Experimental Biology

Understanding Photosynthetic Performance Special Issue Article

Stomatal conductance does not correlate with photosynthetic capacity in transgenic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco

Susanne von Caemmerer 1*, Tracy Lawson 2, Kevin Oxborough 2, Neil R. Baker 2, T. John Andrews 1, and Christine A. Raines 2

1 Molecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
2 Department of Biological Sciences University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Susanne.Caemmerer{at}anu.edu.au.


   Abstract

High-resolution imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence from intact tobacco leaves was used to compare the quantum yield of PSII electron transport in the chloroplasts of guard cells with that in the underlying mesophyll cells. Transgenic tobacco plants with reduced amounts of Rubisco (anti-Rubisco plants) were compared with wild-type tobacco plants. The quantum yield of PSII in both guard cells and underlying mesophyll cells was less in anti-Rubisco plants than in wild-type plants, but closely matched between the two cell types regardless of genotype. CO2 assimilation rates of anti-Rubisco plants were 4.4 µmol m-2 s-1 compared with 17.3 µmol m-2 s-1 for the wild type, when measured at a photon irradiance of 1000 µmol m-2 s-1 and ambient CO2 of 380 µmol mol-1. Despite the large difference in photosynthetic capacity between the anti-Rubisco and wild-type plants, there was no discernible difference in the rate of stomatal opening, steady-state stomatal conductance or response of stomatal conductance to ambient CO2 concentration. These data demonstrate clearly that the commonly observed correlation between photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance can be disrupted in the long term by manipulation of photosynthetic capacity via antisense RNA technology. It was concluded that stomatal conductance is not directly determined by the photosynthetic capacity of guard cells or the leaf mesophyll.

Key words: Chlorophyll fluorescence, guard cell, Rubisco, stomatal conductance, tobacco.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. Lawson, S. Lefebvre, N. R. Baker, J. I. L. Morison, and C. A. Raines
Reductions in mesophyll and guard cell photosynthesis impact on the control of stomatal responses to light and CO2
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(13): 3609 - 3619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Z. Xu and G. Zhou
Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2008; 59(12): 3317 - 3325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Doi and K.-i. Shimazaki
The Stomata of the Fern Adiantum capillus-veneris Do Not Respond to CO2 in the Dark and Open by Photosynthesis in Guard Cells
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 922 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
I. Baroli, G. D. Price, M. R. Badger, and S. von Caemmerer
The Contribution of Photosynthesis to the Red Light Response of Stomatal Conductance
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 737 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. B. Cousins, I. Baroli, M. R. Badger, A. Ivakov, P. J. Lea, R. C. Leegood, and S. von Caemmerer
The Role of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase during C4 Photosynthetic Isotope Exchange and Stomatal Conductance
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2007; 145(3): 1006 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Tholen, T. L. Pons, L. A.C.J. Voesenek, and H. Poorter
Ethylene Insensitivity Results in Down-Regulation of Rubisco Expression and Photosynthetic Capacity in Tobacco
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2007; 144(3): 1305 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Marten, K. R. Konrad, P. Dietrich, M. R. G. Roelfsema, and R. Hedrich
Ca2+-Dependent and -Independent Abscisic Acid Activation of Plasma Membrane Anion Channels in Guard Cells of Nicotiana tabacum
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 28 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. M. Messinger, T. N. Buckley, and K. A. Mott
Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2006; 140(2): 771 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. A. Coupe, B. G. Palmer, J. A. Lake, S. A. Overy, K. Oxborough, F. I. Woodward, J. E. Gray, and W. P. Quick
Systemic signalling of environmental cues in Arabidopsis leaves
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.