Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on October 22, 2004

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/eri012
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/411/461    most recent
eri012v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsubara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Osmond, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsubara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Osmond, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matsubara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Osmond, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 21, 2004
Accepted August 16, 2004

Light Stress in Plants Special Issue Article

Slowly reversible de-epoxidation of lutein-epoxide in deep shade leaves of a tropical tree legume may ‘lock-in’ lutein-based photoprotection during acclimation to strong light

Shizue Matsubara 1, Maria Naumann 2, Robin Martin 3, Caroline Nichol 4, Uwe Rascher 5, Tomas Morosinotto 6, Roberto Bassi 6, and Barry Osmond 7*

1 Photobioenergetics Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Box 475 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA; Present address: Phytosphäre Institut, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
2 Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA; Present address: Institut für Botanik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstrasse 3-5, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
3 Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA; Present address: Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution, 290 Panama St, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
4 Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA; Present address: School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Darwin Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JU, Scotland, UK
5 Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA; Present address: Phytosphäre Institut, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
6 Dipartimento Scientifico e Tecnologico, Università di Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37234 Verona, Italy
7 Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA; Present address and to whom corresponence should be sent: School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Fax: +61 2 6125 0313

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Barry Osmond, E-mail: barry.osmond{at}anu.edu.au


   Abstract

The kinetics of response to strong light have been examined in deeply shaded leaves of the tropical tree legume (Inga sp.) which have extraordinarily high levels of the {alpha}-xanthophyll lutein-epoxide that are co-located in pigment-protein complexes of the photosynthetic apparatus with the {beta}-xanthophyll violaxanthin. As in other species, rapidly reversible photoprotection (measured as non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching) is initiated within the time frame of sun-flecks (minutes), before detectable conversion of violaxanthin to antheraxanthin or zeaxanthin. Photoprotection is stabilized within hours of exposure to strong light by simultaneously engaging the reversible violaxanthin cycle and a slowly reversible conversion of lutein-epoxide to lutein. It is proposed that this lutein ‘locks in’ a primary mechanism of photoprotection during photoacclimation in this species, converting efficient light-harvesting antennae of the shade plant into potential excitation dissipating centres. It is hypothesized that lutein occupies sites L2 and V1 in light-harvesting chlorophyll protein complexes of photosystem II, facilitating enhanced photoprotection through the superior singlet and/or triplet chlorophyll quenching capacity of lutein.

Keywords: Inga sp.; lutein-epoxide; photoacclimation; photoprotection; photosynthesis; xanthophyll cycles.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. Six, R. Sherrard, M. Lionard, S. Roy, and D. A. Campbell
Photosystem II and Pigment Dynamics among Ecotypes of the Green Alga Ostreococcus
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2009; 151(1): 379 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. Forster, C. B. Osmond, and B. J. Pogson
De Novo Synthesis and Degradation of Lx and V Cycle Pigments during Shade and Sun Acclimation in Avocado Leaves
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2009; 149(2): 1179 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Matsubara, T. Morosinotto, C. B. Osmond, and R. Bassi
Short- and Long-Term Operation of the Lutein-Epoxide Cycle in Light-Harvesting Antenna Complexes
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 926 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.