Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on June 27, 2005
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/eri218
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
56/418/2183    most recent
eri218v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcos, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Zacarías, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcos, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Zacarías, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marcos, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Zacarías, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved.
Received December 21, 2004
Accepted May 4, 2005

RESEARCH PAPER

Involvement of ethylene biosynthesis and perception in the susceptibility of citrus fruits to Penicillium digitatum infection and the accumulation of defence-related mRNAs

Jose F. Marcos 1*, Luis González-Candelas 1, and Lorenzo Zacarías 1

1 Departamento de Ciencia de los Alimentos, Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA), CSIC, Apartado de Correos 73, Burjassot, E-46100 Valencia, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jose F. Marcos, E-mail: jmarcos{at}iata.csic.es


  Abstract

Citrus fruits infected with the fungus Penicillium digitatum substantially increase the production of the plant hormone ethylene. In this study, the regulation of ethylene biosynthesis in Citrus sinensis-infected fruits and its putative involvement in an active defence response against P. digitatum infection is examined. Ethylene production is demonstrated as being the result of the co-ordinated and differential up-regulation of at least three ethylene biosynthetic genes: ACS1, ACS2, and ACO. Blocking ethylene perception by 1-MCP resulted in an increased ethylene production and ACS2 expression during infection and mechanical wounding, suggesting that this gene is negatively regulated by ethylene. ACO expression was induced by ethylene in the absence of wounding or infection, although further results indicate that its induction during the course of infection may not be primarily mediated by ethylene. Treatment with 1-MCP also increased susceptibility to Penicillium decay, showing an involvement of ethylene perception in promoting defence responses in citrus fruits. The changes in the expression of two defence-related genes up-regulated during infection were also studied: the ones coding for phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and an acidic class II chitinase (ACR311). The onset of PAL expression after mechanical wounding or inoculation was not changed in 1-MCP-pretreated fruits, while its later increase during the course of infection was abolished. Chitinase gene induction was more related to mechanical damage and was partially repressed by ethylene. These studies indicate distinct possible regulatory mechanisms of plant fruit defence genes in the context of fungal infection and ethylene perception.

Keywords: Citrus fruits; defence response; ethylene biosynthesis; ethylene perception; Penicillium digitatum; regulation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 jashsHome page
H. Usuda, D. Nei, Y. Ito, N. Nakamura, Y. Ishikawa, H. Umehara, P. Roy, H. Okadome, M. Thammawong, T. Shiina, et al.
Effect of Dropping on Le-ACS2 Accumulation Around the Mechanically Stressed Site of the Tomato Fruit
J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., September 1, 2008; 133(5): 717 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.