Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on November 22, 2005

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erj002
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/2/355    most recent
erj002v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poorter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Körner, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poorter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Körner, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Poorter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Körner, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received April 29, 2005
Accepted September 6, 2005

PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY AND THE CHANGING ENVIRONMENT SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE

Construction costs, chemical composition and payback time of high- and low-irradiance leaves

Hendrik Poorter 1 *, Steeve Pepin 2, Toon Rijkers 3, Yvonne de Jong 4, John R. Evans 5, and Christian Körner 6

1 Plant Ecophysiology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.84, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institute of Botany, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Environmental Biology, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, GPO Box 475, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
2 Institute of Botany, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Département des Sols et de Génie Agroalimentaire, Université Laval, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada
3 Centre for Ecosystem Studies, Forest Ecology and Forest Management, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
4 Plant Ecophysiology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.84, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
5 Environmental Biology, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, GPO Box 475, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
6 Institute of Botany, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hendrik Poorter, E-mail: H.Poorter{at}bio.uu.nl


   Abstract

The effect of irradiance on leaf construction costs, chemical composition, and on the payback time of leaves was investigated. To enable more generalized conclusions, three different systems were studied: top and the most-shaded leaves of 10 adult tree species in a European mixed forest, top leaves of sub-dominant trees of two evergreen species growing in small gaps or below the canopy in an Amazonian rainforest, and plants of six herbaceous and four woody species grown hydroponically at low or high irradiance in growth cabinets. Daily photon irradiance varied 3-6-fold between low- and high-light leaves. Specific leaf area (SLA) was 30-130% higher at low light. Construction costs, on the other hand, were 1-5% lower for low-irradiance leaves, mainly because low-irradiance leaves had lower concentrations of soluble phenolics. Photosynthetic capacity and respiration, expressed per unit leaf mass, were hardly different for the low- and high-light leaves. Estimates of payback times of the high-irradiance leaves ranged from 2-4 d in the growth cabinets, to 15-20 d for the adult tree species in the European forest. Low-irradiance leaves had payback times that were 2-3 times larger, ranging from 4 d in the growth cabinets to 20-80 d at the most shaded part of the canopy of the mixed forest. In all cases, estimated payback times were less than half the life span of the leaves, suggesting that even at time-integrated irradiances lower than 5% of the total seasonal value, investment in leaves is still fruitful from a carbon-economy point of view. A sensitivity analysis showed that increased SLA of low-irradiance leaves was the main factor constraining payback times. Acclimation in the other five factors determining payback time, namely construction costs, photosynthetic capacity per unit leaf mass, respiration per unit leaf mass, apparent quantum yield, and curvature of the photosynthetic light-response-curve, were unimportant when the observed variation in each factor was examined.

Keywords: Chemical composition; construction costs; payback time; photosynthesis; respiration; shade leaf; soluble phenolics; specific leaf area; sun leaf.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. D. Karagatzides and A. M. Ellison
Construction costs, payback times, and the leaf economics of carnivorous plants
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2009; 96(9): 1612 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tree PhysiolHome page
L. P. Mullin, S. C. Sillett, G. W. Koch, K. P. Tu, and M. E. Antoine
Physiological consequences of height-related morphological variation in Sequoia sempervirens foliage
Tree Physiol, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 999 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
O. O. Osunkoya, S. D. Daud, and F. L. Wimmer
Longevity, Lignin Content and Construction Cost of the Assimilatory Organs of Nepenthes Species
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2008; 102(5): 845 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Ryser, J. Bernardi, and A. Merla
Determination of leaf fresh mass after storage between moist paper towels: constraints and reliability of the method
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2461 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Gayler, T. E. E. Grams, W. Heller, D. Treutter, and E. Priesack
A Dynamical Model of Environmental Effects on Allocation to Carbon-based Secondary Compounds in Juvenile Trees
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1089 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Y. Onoda, F. Schieving, and N. P.R. Anten
Effects of Light and Nutrient Availability on Leaf Mechanical Properties of Plantago major: A Conceptual Approach
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 727 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
U. Niinemets, A. Portsmuth, D. Tena, M. Tobias, S. Matesanz, and F. Valladares
Do we Underestimate the Importance of Leaf Size in Plant Economics? Disproportional Scaling of Support Costs Within the Spectrum of Leaf Physiognomy
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 283 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
O. O. Osunkoya, S. D. Daud, B. Di-Giusto, F. L. Wimmer, and T. M. Holige
Construction Costs and Physico-chemical Properties of the Assimilatory Organs of Nepenthes Species in Northern Borneo
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 895 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Barthod, Z. Cerovic, and D. Epron
Can dual chlorophyll fluorescence excitation be used to assess the variation in the content of UV-absorbing phenolic compounds in leaves of temperate tree species along a light gradient?
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2007; 58(7): 1753 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. F. Sage and A. D. McKown
Is C4 photosynthesis less phenotypically plastic than C3 photosynthesis?
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 303 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.