Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on February 8, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erj091
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/6/1253    most recent
erj091v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amaducci, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amaducci, M. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Monti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amaducci, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received August 30, 2005
Accepted December 9, 2005

RESEARCH PAPER

The effect of transient and continuous drought on yield, photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

A. Monti 1 *, E. Brugnoli 2, A. Scartazza 2, and M. T. Amaducci 1

1 Department of Agroenvironmental Science and Technologies (DiSTA), Viale G. Fanin 44, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
2 CNR, Institute of Agroenvironmental Biology and Forestry (IBAF), Via Marconi 2, I-05010 Porano (TR), Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
A. Monti, E-mail: amonti{at}agrsci.unibo.it


  Abstract

Stable carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}13C), photosynthetic performance (A), dry matter accumulation (DW), and sucrose yield (Ys) of sugar beet were evaluated in a glasshouse experiment under transient (TS) and permanent (PS) water stress. A was significantly reduced under drought, to an extent depending on stress duration. The reduced A was strictly associated with a low DW and Ys, the later being 42% lower in PS than control plants (C). Restoring water steeply increased A and the associated leaf traits (RWC, leaf water potential etc.), but the increase of Ys was negligible. Therefore, the negative effects of severe water stress in the early growth period, though reversible on gas-exchange and most leaf traits, can drastically reduce Ys of sugar beet. Furthermore, A seems not to be effective in predicting sucrose accumulation, although it was very effective in detecting the occurrence of plant water stress. The A/Ci model was used to assess the photosynthetic adjustments to continuous or transient drought by calculating the photosynthetic parameters Vcmax and Jmax and then compared with {Delta}13C. Mesophyll conductance (gm) was estimated by comparing {Delta}13C measured on soluble sugars and gas-exchange data. This approach confirmed the expectation that gm was limiting A and that there was a significant drop in [CO2] from the substomatal cavities and the chloroplast stroma both in favourable and drought conditions. Therefore, the carbon concentration at the carboxylation site was overestimated by 25-35% by conventional gas-exchange measurements, and Vcmax was consistently underestimated when gm was not taken into account, especially under severe drought. Root {Delta}13C was found to be strictly related to sucrose content (brix%), Ys and root dry weight, and this was especially clear when {Delta}13C was measured on bulk dry matter. By contrast, leaf {Delta}13C measured in soluble sugars ({Delta}s) and bulk dry matter ({Delta}dm) were found to correlate weakly to brix% and yield, and this was not surprising as the integration time-scale of leaf {Delta}s and {Delta}dm were found to be shorter than that of root {Delta}13C in bulk dry matter. The effect of water stress on diffusive and biochemical limitations with different integration times ranged from 1 d (leaf {Delta}s) to more than 1 month (root {Delta}dm).

Keywords: A/Ci curve; drought; gas exchange; mesophyll conductance; mesophyll limitation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. Monti, G. Bezzi, and G. Venturi
Internal conductance under different light conditions along the plant profile of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Brown.)
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2341 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. Galle, I. Florez-Sarasa, M. Tomas, A. Pou, H. Medrano, M. Ribas-Carbo, and J. Flexas
The role of mesophyll conductance during water stress and recovery in tobacco (Nicotiana sylvestris): acclimation or limitation?
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2379 - 2390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
T. L. Pons, J. Flexas, S. von Caemmerer, J. R. Evans, B. Genty, M. Ribas-Carbo, and E. Brugnoli
Estimating mesophyll conductance to CO2: methodology, potential errors, and recommendations
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2217 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2249 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. Perez-Martin, J. Flexas, M. Ribas-Carbo, J. Bota, M. Tomas, J. M. Infante, and A. Diaz-Espejo
Interactive effects of soil water deficit and air vapour pressure deficit on mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Vitis vinifera and Olea europaea
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2391 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.