JXB Advance Access published online on February 22, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erj135
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Applied Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Ave, Little Rock, AR 72204-1099, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The relationship between phloem-feeding insects (PFIs) and plants offers an intriguing example of a highly specialized biotic interaction. These insects have evolved to survive on a nutritionally imbalanced diet of phloem sap, and to minimize wound responses in their host plants. As a consequence, plant perception of and responses to PFIs differ from plant interactions with other insect-feeding guilds. Transcriptome-wide analyses of gene expression are currently being applied to characterize plant responses to PFIs in crop plants with race-specific innate resistance, as well as in compatible interactions with susceptible hosts. Recent studies indicate that PFIs induce transcriptional reprogramming in their host plants, and that plant responses to PFIs appear to be quantitatively and qualitatively different from responses to other insects or pathogens. Transcript profiling studies also suggest that PFIs induce cell wall modifications, reduce photosynthetic activity, manipulate source-sink relations, and modify secondary metabolism in their hosts, and many of these responses appear to occur within the phloem tissue. Plant responses to these insects appear to be regulated in part by the salicylate, jasmonate, and ethylene signalling pathways. As additional transcript profiling data become available, forward and reverse genetic approaches will be necessary to determine which changes in gene expression influence resistance or susceptibility to PFIs.
Received August 24, 2005
Accepted January 25, 2006
FOCUS PAPER
Transcriptomics and functional genomics of plant defence induction by phloem-feeding insects
Gary A. Thompson 1 *
and
Fiona L. Goggin 2
2 Department of Entomology, University of Arkansas, 320 Agriculture Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Gary A. Thompson, E-mail: gathompson{at}ualr.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Gosset, N. Harmel, C. Gobel, F. Francis, E. Haubruge, J.-P. Wathelet, P. du Jardin, I. Feussner, and M.-L. Fauconnier Attacks by a piercing-sucking insect (Myzus persicae Sultzer) or a chewing insect (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) on potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) induce differential changes in volatile compound release and oxylipin synthesis J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1231 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Girling, R. Madison, M. Hassall, G. M. Poppy, and J. G. Turner Investigations into plant biochemical wound-response pathways involved in the production of aphid-induced plant volatiles J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 3077 - 3085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Singh, I. K. Singh, and P. K. Verma Differential transcript accumulation in Cicer arietinum L. in response to a chewing insect Helicoverpa armigera and defence regulators correlate with reduced insect performance J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2379 - 2392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Walling Avoiding Effective Defenses: Strategies Employed by Phloem-Feeding Insects Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 859 - 866. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-L. Gao, J. P. Klingler, J. P. Anderson, O. R. Edwards, and K. B. Singh Characterization of Pea Aphid Resistance in Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 996 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Abe, J. Ohnishi, M. Narusaka, S. Seo, Y. Narusaka, S. Tsuda, and M. Kobayashi Function of Jasmonate in Response and Tolerance of Arabidopsis to Thrip Feeding Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 68 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Zarate, L. A. Kempema, and L. L. Walling Silverleaf Whitefly Induces Salicylic Acid Defenses and Suppresses Effectual Jasmonic Acid Defenses Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 866 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Kempema, X. Cui, F. M. Holzer, and L. L. Walling Arabidopsis Transcriptome Changes in Response to Phloem-Feeding Silverleaf Whitefly Nymphs. Similarities and Distinctions in Responses to Aphids Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 849 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Giri, H. Wunsche, S. Mitra, J. A. Zavala, A. Muck, A. Svatos, and I. T. Baldwin Molecular Interactions between the Specialist Herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and Its Natural Host Nicotiana attenuata. VII. Changes in the Plant's Proteome Plant Physiology, December 1, 2006; 142(4): 1621 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


