JXB Advance Access published online on April 4, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erj144
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Plant Sciences Division, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Mutant alleles at the suffulta locus of tomato dramatically affect the pattern of plastid division throughout the plant, resulting in few, greatly enlarged chloroplasts in leaf and stem cells. suffulta plants are compromised in growth and have distinctly pale stems. The green developing tomato fruit are generally paler compared with the wild type, but ripe red fruit are much more similar in colour and pigment content. By using plastid-targeted green fluorescent protein, the underlying plastid phenotypes in the ripening suffulta fruit reveal that enlarged chlorophyll-containing chloroplasts degenerate and give rise to a wild type-like population of chromoplasts in ripe fruit by a process of plastid budding and fragmentation, resulting in a heterogeneous population of plastid-derived structures which eventually become chromoplasts. In stomatal guard cells, plastid-derived structures lacking chlorophyll, but containing GFP, are also observed, especially in guard cells which completely lack normal chloroplasts. How this novel replication process in suffulta relates to conventional plastid division and stromule formation is discussed.
Received October 6, 2005
Accepted February 2, 2006
RESEARCH PAPER
The suffulta mutation in tomato reveals a novel method of plastid replication during fruit ripening
Daniel Forth 1
and
Kevin A. Pyke 1 *
Kevin A. Pyke, E-mail: kevin.pyke{at}nottingham.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Schmitz, J. M. Glynn, B. J.S.C. Olson, K. D. Stokes, and K. W. Osteryoung Arabidopsis FtsZ2-1 and FtsZ2-2 Are Functionally Redundant, But FtsZ-Based Plastid Division Is Not Essential for Chloroplast Partitioning or Plant Growth and Development Mol Plant, November 1, 2009; 2(6): 1211 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-S. Yun and Y. Kawagoe Amyloplast Division Progresses Simultaneously at Multiple Sites in the Endosperm of Rice Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1617 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, T. Asano, M. T. Fujiwara, S. Yoshida, Y. Machida, and Y. Yoshioka Plant Cells Without Detectable Plastids are Generated in the crumpled leaf Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana Plant Cell Physiol., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 956 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Yoder, D. Kadirjan-Kalbach, B. J. S. C. Olson, S.-y. Miyagishima, S. L. DeBlasio, R. P. Hangarter, and K. W. Osteryoung Effects of Mutations in Arabidopsis FtsZ1 on Plastid Division, FtsZ Ring Formation and Positioning, and FtsZ Filament Morphology in Vivo Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 775 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

