JXB Advance Access published online on October 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erl172
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzenbiochemie (IPB), Weinberg 3, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Extracellular invertases are suggested to play a crucial role in the arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) symbiosis to fulfil the increased sink function of the mycorrhizal root and the supply of the obligate biotrophic AM fungus with hexoses. In tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), LIN6 represents an apoplastic invertase which is described as a key enzyme in establishing and maintaining sink metabolism. In this study, transcript levels of LIN6 were analysed in tomato roots colonized with the AM fungus Glomus intraradices. Using real-time RT-PCR, a nearly 3-fold increase in LIN6 mRNA levels was detected at late stages of mycorrhization (11 weeks after inoculation). A 1.8-fold induction could already be achieved at earlier stages (5 weeks after inoculation) using higher inoculum concentrations, whereas wounding of non-mycorrhizal roots resulted in up to 12-fold enhanced LIN6 transcripts. As revealed by in situ hybridization, the expression of LIN6 upon mycorrhization was specifically restricted to colonized cells and to the central cylinder. Such a strongly localized pattern due to mycorrhizal cells and to the central core could also be shown for promoter activity using transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants expressing the gene coding for
Received June 16, 2006
Accepted August 29, 2006
RESEARCH PAPER
Arbuscular mycorrhiza induces gene expression of the apoplastic invertase LIN6 in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots
Sara Schaarschmidt 1, Thomas Roitsch 2, and Bettina Hause 1 *
2 Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 2, D-97082 Würzburg, Germany
Bettina Hause, E-mail: bhause{at}ipb-halle.de
![]()
Abstract
-glucuronidase under the control of the LIN6 promoter. The moderate induction of LIN6 expression in mycorrhizal tomato roots compared with stress-stimulated induction suggested a fine-tuning in the activation of sink metabolism in the mutualistic interaction, avoiding stress-induced defence reactions.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. I. Zanor, S. Osorio, A. Nunes-Nesi, F. Carrari, M. Lohse, B. Usadel, C. Kuhn, W. Bleiss, P. Giavalisco, L. Willmitzer, et al. RNA Interference of LIN5 in Tomato Confirms Its Role in Controlling Brix Content, Uncovers the Influence of Sugars on the Levels of Fruit Hormones, and Demonstrates the Importance of Sucrose Cleavage for Normal Fruit Development and Fertility Plant Physiology, July 1, 2009; 150(3): 1204 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Guether, B. Neuhauser, R. Balestrini, M. Dynowski, U. Ludewig, and P. Bonfante A Mycorrhizal-Specific Ammonium Transporter from Lotus japonicus Acquires Nitrogen Released by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Plant Physiology, May 1, 2009; 150(1): 73 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Proels and T. Roitsch Extracellular invertase LIN6 of tomato: a pivotal enzyme for integration of metabolic, hormonal, and stress signals is regulated by a diurnal rhythm J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2009; 60(6): 1555 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Nehls Mastering ectomycorrhizal symbiosis: the impact of carbohydrates J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(5): 1097 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Berger, A. K. Sinha, and T. Roitsch Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant pathogen interactions J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2007; 58(15-16): 4019 - 4026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schaarschmidt, M.-C. Gonzalez, T. Roitsch, D. Strack, U. Sonnewald, and B. Hause Regulation of Arbuscular Mycorrhization by Carbon. The Symbiotic Interaction Cannot Be Improved by Increased Carbon Availability Accomplished by Root-Specifically Enhanced Invertase Activity Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1827 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

