Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on November 1, 2007
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erm245
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/7/1475    most recent
erm245v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER

Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO2 transfer

Charles R. Warren*

School of Biological Sciences, Heydon-Laurence Building A08, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

* E-mail: charles.warren{at}bio.usyd.edu.au

Internal conductance describes the movement of CO2 from substomatal cavities to sites of carboxylation. Internal conductance has now been measured in approximately 50 species, and in all of these species it is a large limitation of photosynthesis. It accounts for somewhat less than half of the decrease in CO2 concentrations from the atmosphere to sites of carboxylation. There have been two major findings in the past decade. First, the limitation due to internal conductance (i.e. Ci–Cc) is not fixed but varies among species and functional groups. Second, internal conductance is affected by some environmental variables and can change rapidly, for example, in response to leaf temperature, drought stress or CO2 concentration. Biochemical factors such as carbonic anhydrase or aquaporins are probably responsible for these rapid changes. The determinants of internal conductance remain elusive, but are probably a combination of leaf anatomy, morphology, and biochemical factors. In most plants, the gas phase component of internal conductance is negligible with the majority of resistance resting in the liquid phase from cell walls to sites of carboxylation. The internal conductance story is far from complete and many exciting challenges remain. Internal conductance ought to be included in models of canopy photosynthesis, but before this is feasible additional data on the variation in internal conductance among and within species are urgently required. Future research should also focus on teasing apart the different steps in the diffusion pathway (intercellular spaces, cell wall, plasmalemma, cytosol, and chloroplast envelope) since it is likely that this will provide clues as to what determines internal conductance.

Key words: Economics, internal conductance, mesophyll conductance, nitrogen, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transfer conductance, transpiration, water

Received 22 June 2007; Revised 13 September 2007 Accepted 17 September 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Tree PhysiolHome page
B. Duan, Y. Li, X. Zhang, H. Korpelainen, and C. Li
Water deficit affects mesophyll limitation of leaves more strongly in sun than in shade in two contrasting Picea asperata populations
Tree Physiol, December 1, 2009; 29(12): 1551 - 1561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tree PhysiolHome page
L. P. Mullin, S. C. Sillett, G. W. Koch, K. P. Tu, and M. E. Antoine
Physiological consequences of height-related morphological variation in Sequoia sempervirens foliage
Tree Physiol, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 999 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
R. B. Heinen, Q. Ye, and F. Chaumont
Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(11): 2971 - 2985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
M. Centritto, M. Lauteri, M. C. Monteverdi, and R. Serraj
Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage
J. Exp. Bot., May 14, 2009; (2009) erp123v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
D. Vrabl, M. Vaskova, M. Hronkova, J. Flexas, and J. Santrucek
Mesophyll conductance to CO2 transport estimated by two independent methods: effect of variable CO2 concentration and abscisic acid
J. Exp. Bot., May 11, 2009; (2009) erp115v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. Monti, G. Bezzi, and G. Venturi
Internal conductance under different light conditions along the plant profile of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Brown.)
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2341 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
Y. Tazoe, S. von Caemmerer, M. R. Badger, and J. R. Evans
Light and CO2 do not affect the mesophyll conductance to CO2 diffusion in wheat leaves
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2291 - 2301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, I. J. Wright, and J. R. Evans
Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2433 - 2449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2271 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. Galle, I. Florez-Sarasa, M. Tomas, A. Pou, H. Medrano, M. Ribas-Carbo, and J. Flexas
The role of mesophyll conductance during water stress and recovery in tobacco (Nicotiana sylvestris): acclimation or limitation?
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2379 - 2390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2249 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
J. R. Evans, R. Kaldenhoff, B. Genty, and I. Terashima
Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2235 - 2248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. Perez-Martin, J. Flexas, M. Ribas-Carbo, J. Bota, M. Tomas, J. M. Infante, and A. Diaz-Espejo
Interactive effects of soil water deficit and air vapour pressure deficit on mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Vitis vinifera and Olea europaea
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2391 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tree PhysiolHome page
D.R. Woodruff, F.C. Meinzer, B. Lachenbruch, and D.M. Johnson
Coordination of leaf structure and gas exchange along a height gradient in a tall conifer
Tree Physiol, February 1, 2009; 29(2): 261 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.