JXB Advance Access published online on April 11, 2008
Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/ern085
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER |
Leaf succulence determines the interplay between carboxylase systems and light use during Crassulacean acid metabolism in Kalanchoë species*
Physiological Ecology Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Downing Street, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hg230{at}cam.ac.uk
The photosynthetic physiology of Crassulacean acid metabolism was investigated in two Kalanchoë species with differing leaf succulence. The magnitude of CAM was higher for the more succulent leaves of K. daigremontiana, compared to the less succulent leaves of K. pinnata. High succulence was related to low mesophyll conductance: K. pinnata was able to maximize diurnal carbon gain by the C3 pathway, whereas increased succulence is associated with a higher commitment to the CAM cycle in K. daigremontiana. The Rubisco specificity factor, 
, determining selectivity for CO2 over O2, was similar for both species (
88), and lower than that of Spinacea (95), but in contrast to C4 plants, the Rubisco KmCO2 (determined independently) was also lower in Kalanchoë spp. than in spinach. Differences in light use were related to the nature of the sink strength in each Phase of CAM, with PEPC activity resulting in low electron transport rates. Decarboxylation was marked by high, non-saturated rates of electron transport, with Rubisco activity and activation state increasing in both species during the course of the light period. The degree of succulence, and extent of CAM activity, was associated with a progressive inhibition of PSII photochemistry and potential Rubisco activity during the night in both species. Rubisco could be ‘woken up’ more rapidly in K. pinnata, whereas 45 min light acclimation was required for full recovery of electron transport and Rubisco activity in K. daigremontiana. Leaf morphology therefore seems to alter the expression of and dependence on CAM, but also the extent of co-regulation of carboxylase networks and light use capacity.
Key words: Chlorophyll fluorescence, mesophyll conductance, PEPC, Rubisco activity and specificity
* This paper is dedicated to Barry Osmond, who encouraged us to investigate the dark side of CAM.
Received 11 February 2008; Revised 26 February 2008 Accepted 28 February 2008
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. M. Borland, H. Griffiths, J. Hartwell, and J. A. C. Smith Exploiting the potential of plants with crassulacean acid metabolism for bioenergy production on marginal lands J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(10): 2879 - 2896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Winter, M. Garcia, and J. A. M. Holtum Canopy CO2 exchange of two neotropical tree species exhibiting constitutive and facultative CAM photosynthesis, Clusia rosea and Clusia cylindrica J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(11): 3167 - 3177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|