Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on March 13, 2009

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erp021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/8/2303    most recent
erp021v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hassiotou, F.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hassiotou, F.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hassiotou, F.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Influence of leaf dry mass per area, CO2, and irradiance on mesophyll conductance in sclerophylls

Foteini Hassiotou1,*, Martha Ludwig2, Michael Renton1,3, Erik J. Veneklaas1 and John R. Evans4

1School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
2School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Life and Physical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
3Agricultural Landscapes, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia
4Environmental Biology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed: foteini{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

Leaf photosynthesis (A) is limited by mesophyll conductance (gm), which is influenced by both leaf structure and the environment. Previous studies have indicated that the upper bound for gm declines as leaf dry mass per area (LMA, an indicator of leaf structure) increases, extrapolating to zero at a LMA of about 240 g m–2. No data exist on gm and its response to the environment for species with LMA values higher than 220 g m–2. In this study, laboratory measurements of leaf gas exchange and in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence were used concurrently to derive estimates of gm in seven species of the Australian sclerophyllous genus Banksia covering a wide range of LMA (130–480 g m–2). Irradiance and CO2 were varied during those measurements to gauge the extent of environmental effects on gm. A significant decrease of gm with increasing LMA was found. gm declined by 35–60% in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations at high irradiance, with a more variable response (0–60%) observed at low irradiance, where gm was, on average, 22% lower than at high irradiance at ambient CO2 concentrations. Despite considerable variation in A and LMA between the Banksia species, the CO2 concentrations in the intercellular air spaces (Ci, 262±5 µmol mol–1) and in the chloroplasts (Cc, 127±4 µmol mol–1) were remarkably stable.

Key words: Banksia, CO2, leaf anatomy, leaf internal conductance, light intensity, photosynthesis, sclerophylly

Received 19 November 2008; Revised 14 January 2009 Accepted 16 January 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. L. Pons, J. Flexas, S. von Caemmerer, J. R. Evans, B. Genty, M. Ribas-Carbo, and E. Brugnoli
Estimating mesophyll conductance to CO2: methodology, potential errors, and recommendations
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2217 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. Vrabl, M. Vaskova, M. Hronkova, J. Flexas, and J. Santrucek
Mesophyll conductance to CO2 transport estimated by two independent methods: effect of variable CO2 concentration and abscisic acid
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2315 - 2323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Perez-Martin, J. Flexas, M. Ribas-Carbo, J. Bota, M. Tomas, J. M. Infante, and A. Diaz-Espejo
Interactive effects of soil water deficit and air vapour pressure deficit on mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Vitis vinifera and Olea europaea
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2391 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.