Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on April 23, 2009

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erp117
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/8/2235    most recent
erp117v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Terashima, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Terashima, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Terashima, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

REVIEW-ARTICLE

Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves

John R. Evans1,*, Ralf Kaldenhoff2, Bernard Genty3 and Ichiro Terashima4

1Environmental Biology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, The Australian National University, GPO Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
2Department of Applied Plant Sciences, Institute of Botany, Darmstadt University of Technology, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
3CEA, CNRS, Université Aix-Marseille, UMR 6191 Biologie Végétale et Microbiologie Environnementale, Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CEA Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France
4Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.evans{at}anu.edu.au

CO2 faces a series of resistances while diffusing between the substomatal cavities and the sites of carboxylation within chloroplasts. The absence of techniques to measure the resistance of individual steps makes it difficult to define their relative importance. Resistance to diffusion through intercellular airspace differs between leaves, but is usually of minor importance. Leaves with high photosynthetic capacity per unit leaf area reduce mesophyll resistance by increasing the surface area of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular airspace per unit leaf area, Sc. Cell walls impose a significant resistance. Assuming an effective porosity of the cell wall of 0.1 or 0.05, then cell walls could account for 25% or 50% of the total mesophyll resistance, respectively. Since the fraction of apoplastic water that is unbound and available for unhindered CO2 diffusion is unknown, it is possible that the effective porosity is <0.05. Effective porosity could also vary in response to changes in pH or cation concentration. Consequently, cell walls could account for >50% of the total resistance and a variable proportion. Most of the remaining resistance is imposed by one or more of the three membranes as mesophyll resistance can be altered by varying the expression of cooporins. The CO2 permeability of vesicles prepared from chloroplast envelopes has been reduced by RNA interference (RNAi) expression of NtAQP1, but not those prepared from the plasma membrane. Carbonic anhydrase activity also influences mesophyll resistance. Mesophyll resistance is relatively insensitive to the manipulation of any step in the pathway because it represents only part of the total and may also be countered by pleiotropic compensatory changes. The parameters in greatest need of additional measurements are Sc, mesophyll cell wall thickness, and the permeabilities of the plasma membrane and chloroplast envelope.

Key words: Aquaporin, cell wall, cooporin, internal conductance, mesophyll conductance

Received 10 December 2008; Revised 12 March 2009 Accepted 17 March 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2271 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2249 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Perez-Martin, J. Flexas, M. Ribas-Carbo, J. Bota, M. Tomas, J. M. Infante, and A. Diaz-Espejo
Interactive effects of soil water deficit and air vapour pressure deficit on mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Vitis vinifera and Olea europaea
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2391 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.